Determinants of Public Health Behavior Based on the Health Belief Model: A Systematic Review

Ela Salasifah; Diani Fadmi Putri; Fanny Kartika Fajriyani

doi:10.14710/jpki.21.2.180-194

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jpki.21.2.180-194

Determinants of Public Health Behavior Based on the Health Belief Model: A Systematic Review

*Ela Salasifah

- Faculty of Psychology and Health, UIN Walisongo Semarang Jl. Prof. Dr. Hamka, Ngaliyan, Semarang, Central Java 50185, Indonesia, Indonesia

Diani Fadmi Putri - Lecturer at the Faculty of Psychology and Health, Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang, Indonesia. Research interests: public health, health behavior, health promotion, and health policy., Indonesia

Fanny Kartika Fajriyani - Lecturer at the Faculty of Psychology and Health, Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang, Indonesia. Research interests: public health, health behavior, health promotion, and health policy., Indonesia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

BibTex Citation Data :

@article{JPKI85025,
    author = {Ela Salasifah and Diani Putri and Fanny Fajriyani},
    title = {Determinants of Public Health Behavior Based on the Health Belief Model: A Systematic Review},
    journal = {Jurnal Promosi Kesehatan Indonesia},
  volume = {21},
    number = {2},
    year = {2026},
    keywords = {Health belief model ,Health behavior ,Preventive health services ,Health policy ,Systematic review.},
    abstract = {   Background:      Previous systematic reviews of the Health Belief Model have mainly been focused on specific diseases or behavioral intentions. This systematic review was aimed to synthesize the associations between Health Belief Model constructs and actual promotive and preventive health behaviors across public health contexts, and to translate the findings into operational recommendations for health policy and primary healthcare services.       Method:    The PRISMA 2020 guidelines were followed by this systematic review. Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar were searched for English-language, peer-reviewed quantitative studies that were published between 2020 and 2025. Risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Analytical Cross-Sectional Studies    Result:    Of 742 records that were identified, 14 studies that involved 7,403 participants met the inclusion criteria. Across diverse public health behaviors, self-efficacy (10/14 studies, 71.4%) emerged as one of the most recurrent positive determinants, and cues to action were significant in 8 of 12 studies that operationalized the construct (66.7%). An inhibitory or unfavorable association with outcomes was shown by perceived barriers in 7 of 14 studies (50.0%). Perceived susceptibility was significantly associated with behavior or contributed to significant perceived-threat pathways in 9/14 studies (64.3%), while perceived severity was significant in 10/14 studies (71.4%). Positive associations were shown by perceived benefits in 8/14 studies (57.1%). Therefore, effective health policies should move beyond risk communication, so that timely behavioral cues, structural barrier reduction, and self-efficacy enhancement are integrated into primary healthcare services     },
   issn = {2620-4053},   pages = {180--194}  doi = {10.14710/jpki.21.2.180-194},
    url = {https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/jpki/article/view/85025}
}

Citation Format:

Abstract

Background: Previous systematic reviews of the Health Belief Model have mainly been focused on specific diseases or behavioral intentions. This systematic review was aimed to synthesize the associations between Health Belief Model constructs and actual promotive and preventive health behaviors across public health contexts, and to translate the findings into operational recommendations for health policy and primary healthcare services.

Method: The PRISMA 2020 guidelines were followed by this systematic review. Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar were searched for English-language, peer-reviewed quantitative studies that were published between 2020 and 2025. Risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Analytical Cross-Sectional Studies

Result: Of 742 records that were identified, 14 studies that involved 7,403 participants met the inclusion criteria. Across diverse public health behaviors, self-efficacy (10/14 studies, 71.4%) emerged as one of the most recurrent positive determinants, and cues to action were significant in 8 of 12 studies that operationalized the construct (66.7%). An inhibitory or unfavorable association with outcomes was shown by perceived barriers in 7 of 14 studies (50.0%). Perceived susceptibility was significantly associated with behavior or contributed to significant perceived-threat pathways in 9/14 studies (64.3%), while perceived severity was significant in 10/14 studies (71.4%). Positive associations were shown by perceived benefits in 8/14 studies (57.1%). Therefore, effective health policies should move beyond risk communication, so that timely behavioral cues, structural barrier reduction, and self-efficacy enhancement are integrated into primary healthcare services

Fulltext View|Download Email colleagues

Keywords: Health belief model ,Health behavior ,Preventive health services ,Health policy ,Systematic review.

Article Metrics:

Article Info

Section: Research Article

Language : EN

In Vol 21 No 2: April 2026

Most cited articles

Praktik Perawatan Organ Genitalia Eksternal pada Anak Usia 10-11 Tahun yang Mengalami Menarche Dini di Sekolah Dasar Kota Semarang Perilaku Kepatuhan Perawat Melaksanakan SOP Terhadap Kejadian Keselamatan Pasien di Rumah Sakit X Kendari Perilaku Ibu Hamil untuk Tes HIV di Kelurahan Bandarharjo dan Tanjung Mas Kota Semarang Hubungan Peran Suami Dan Orangtua Dengan Perilaku Ibu Hamil Dalam Pelayanan Antenatal Dan Persalinan Di Wilayah Puskesmas Kecamatan Sedan Kabupaten Rembang Non Disclosure Of HIV Positive Status Of Women To Their Partner : Implication For PMTCT More cited articles

Janz NK, Becker MH, Rosenstock IM, Harrison JA, Mullen PD, Green LW. Historical origins of the Health Belief Model. Health Educ Monogr. 1974 Dec 1;2(1):328–35
Carpenter CJ. A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of Health Belief Model variables in predicting behavior. Health Commun; 2010 Nov 30;25(8):661–9
Harrison JA, Mullen PD, Green LW. A meta-analysis of studies of the Health Belief Model with adults. Health Educ Res. 1992;7(1):107–16
Leman MA, Claramita M, Rahayu GR. Predicting factors on modeling health behavior: a systematic review. Am J Health Behav .2021;45(2):268–78
Limbu YB, Gautam RK, Pham L. The Health Belief Model applied to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: a systematic review. Vaccines .2022 Jun 18;10(6):973
Al‐Ani A, Hammouri M, Sultan H, Al‐Huneidy L, Mansour A, Al‐Hussaini M. Factors affecting cervical screening using the Health Belief Model during the last decade: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Psychooncology. 2024 Jan 28;33(1):e6275
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71
Joanna Briggs Institute. Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools. Adelaide: Joanna Briggs Institute; 2020
McKenzie JE, Brennan SE, Ryan RE, Thomson HJ, Johnston RV, Thomas J. Defining the criteria for including studies and how they will be grouped for the synthesis. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al., editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 6. London: Cochrane; 2024
Saghafi-Asl M, Aliasgharzadeh S, Asghari-Jafarabadi M. Factors influencing weight management behavior among college students: an application of the Health Belief Model. PLoS One. 2020 Feb 7;15(2):e0228058
Noghabi AD, Mohammadzadeh F, Yoshany N, Javanbakht S. The prevalence of preventive behaviors and associated factors during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic among Iranian people: application of a Health Belief Model. J Prev Med Hyg. 2021;62(1):E60–6
Mabotja MC, Levin J, Kawonga M. Beliefs and perceptions regarding cervical cancer and screening associated with Pap smear uptake in Johannesburg: a cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2021;16(2):e0246574
Rapheal E, Prithviraj R, Campbell S, Stoddard ST, Paz-Soldan VA. Using the Health Belief Model to predict pre-travel health decisions among U.S.-based travelers. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2023;109(4):937–44
Moucheraud C, Chibaka S, Golub G, Kalande P, Makwaya A, Ochieng E, et al. Factors associated with cervical cancer screening: results from cross-sectional surveys in Kenya and Malawi. BMC Public Health. 2025 May 27;25(1):1956
Habibi S, Tavafian SS, Maghbouli R, Montazeri A. Investigating effective factors on musculoskeletal pain prevention behaviors in the elderly population living in nursing homes, based on the Health Belief Model: structural equation modeling approach. BMC Geriatr. 2025 Sep 3;25(1):685
Eryando T, Sipahutar T, Poddar S. Community preventive behaviour and perception on the severity of COVID-19 disease in Indonesia, 2021-2022: structural equation modelling. F1000Research. 2024 Oct 3;12:966
Mirakzadeh AA, Karamian F, Khosravi E, Parvin F. Analysis of preventive behaviors of rural tourism hosts in the face of COVID-19 pandemic: application of Health Belief Model. Front Public Health. 2021;9:793173
Triharini M, Has EMM, Gita N. Determinant factors of anemia in pregnancy based on Health Belief Model: a correlational study. J Ners. 2023 Apr 1;18(1):40–6
Muthmainnah M, Kurnia GM, Nugrahani A. Determinants of smoking prevention behavior of senior high school students: a short report. Tob Induc Dis. 2025;23:37
Fathian-Dastgerdi Z, Khoshgoftar M, Tavakoli B, Jaleh M. Factors associated with preventive behaviors of COVID-19 among adolescents: applying the Health Belief Model. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Oct;17(10):1786–90
Jadil Y, Ouzir M. Exploring the predictors of health-protective behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multi-country comparison. Environ Res.2021 Aug;199:111376
Li S, Jiang Q, Zhang P. Factors influencing the health behavior during public health emergency: a case study on norovirus outbreak in a university. Data Inf Manag. 2021 Jan;5(1):27–39
Setyaningsih W, Yudianti I, Mansur H. Perceived susceptibility, barriers, and cues to action as determinant factors of reproductive health behavior. Int J Public Health Sci. 2022;11(3):884–92
Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Transformasi layanan primer Kemenkes fokus pada pencegahan di Puskesmas dan Posyandu. Jakarta: Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia; 2025

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-08-20 01:55:35

No citation recorded.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

In order to be accepted and published by Jurnal Promosi Kesehatan Indonesia, author(s) who submit manuscripts should complete the review process. Jurnal Promosi Kesehatan Indonesia articles are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0). Articles can be read, shared, and adapted even for commercial purposes under the following conditions:

Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

The copyright of received articles is assigned to the author (s). The author (s) have the right to the articles that have been published. The Editorial Team of Jurnal Promosi Kesehatan Indonesia and the Author(s) strive to ensure that no errors occur in the articles that have been published, both data errors and statements in the articles. Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
The journal allows the authors to hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions.
Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during submission, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.