skip to main content

Analisis Tingkat Kematangan Adopsi Service Oriented Architecture Menggunakan ISO/IEC 16680 (OSIMM)

*Nurul Mutiah orcid  -  Universitas Tanjungpura, Indonesia
Ferdy Febriyanto  -  Universitas Tanjungpura, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

Enterprise application integration makes data sharing easier, efficient and provides flexibility for organizations to seize opportunities and respond to stakeholder needs. Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences (FMIPA) Tanjungpura University is an organization that wants to apply information technology effectively to support its business processes. Currently the application at FMIPA is built with different platforms and databases so that it cannot be integrated to share data between parts of the organization. FMIPA intends to build a service-oriented technology architecture to support the realization of organizational goals. SOA (Service Oriented Architecture) can be used as a framework for enterprise application integration. SOA adoption is often not as expected because organizations do not plan their processes comprehensively. It is necessary to measure the maturity level of the organization's SOA adoption so that the current state of the organization's SOA and future expectations can be found. ISO/IEC 16680 (OSIMM) is a method for measuring the SOA maturity level with 7 levels of maturity and 7 dimensions. To expedite the SOA adoption process in FMIPA, SOA maturity level was measured using ISO/IEC 16680. Based on measurements of the seven dimensions of SOA at ISO/IEC 16680, it was found that the current level of SOA adoption maturity (As-Is) at FMIPA Untan was at the level one (Silo), while the expected maturity level (To-Be) is level four (Service). Gap analysis then carried out related to the gap in maturity levels, and is followed by making recommendations dan roadmap for SOA adoption.

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download |  common.other
Copy Transfer Agreement
Subject Copy Transfer Agreement
Type Other
  Download (71KB)    Indexing metadata
Keywords: Enterprise Application Integration; SOA; Maturity Level; ISO/IEC 16680; OSIMM

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Articles
Language : EN
Statistics:
Share:
  1. Moturi, A.C., Githehu, K.G., Mwaura ,K.A., 2013. A process model for enterprise application integration: case for a customs department. International Journal of Applied Information Systems 6 (2), 1–16
  2. Endrei, M., Ang, J., Arsanjani, Ali, Chua, S., Comte, Philippe, Krogdahl, P., Luo, Min., Newling, T., 2004. Patterns: Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services. IBM
  3. Baghdadi, Y., 2014. SOA maturity models: guidance to realize SOA. International Journal of Computer and Communication Engineering 3 (5), 372–378
  4. Devi, C.P., Venkatesan, V.P., Diwahar, S., Shanmugasundaram, G., 2014. A model for information integration using service oriented architecture. International Journal of Information Engineering and Electronic Business 6 (3), 34–43
  5. Erl, T., 2008. SOA: Principles of Service Design. Boston, Pearson Education, Inc
  6. Fazlollahi, A., Franke, U., Ullberg, J., 2012. Benefits of enterprise integration: review, classification, and suggestions for future research. In: van Sinderen M., Johnson P., Xu X., Doumeingts G. (eds) Enterprise Interoperability. IWEI 2012. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 122. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
  7. Hamdi, M., Hamzah, I., Baharom, F., Mohd, H., Omar, M. H., 2018. Evaluation of service-oriented architecture adoption maturity model for sustainable development. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering 10, 19 - 22
  8. Hevner, A., March, S., Jinsoo, P., Sudha, R., 2004. Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly 28, 75–105
  9. International Standard Organization., 2012. ISO/IEC 16680:2012 The Open Group Service Integration Maturity Model. International Standard Organization, Switzerland
  10. Lankhorst, M., 2009. Enterprise Architecture at Work: Modelling, Communication and Analysis. Springer, Berlin
  11. Li, X., Madnick, S. E., 2015. Understanding the dynamics of service-oriented architecture implementation. Journal of Management Information Systems 32 (2), 104–133
  12. Setiawan, A., Yulianto, E., 2018. E-Government interoperability and integration architecture modeling Using TOGAF framework based on service oriented architecture. The Asian Journal of Technology Management 11 (1), 26–45
  13. Sulong, M., Koronios, A., Gao, J., Abdul-Aziz, A. 2012., Driving the initiative of service-oriented architecture implementation. Journal of Software & Systems Development, 1–10
  14. Welke, R., Hirschheim, R., Schwarz, A., 2011. Service-oriented architecture maturity. Computer 44 (2), 61–67

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.