skip to main content

Perancangan Arsitektur Enterprise FMIPA UNTAN Menggunakan Kerangka Kerja TOGAF Berbasis SOA

*Nurul Mutiah orcid  -  Universitas Tanjungpura, Indonesia
Ferdy Febriyanto  -  Universitas Tanjungpura, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2022 JSINBIS (Jurnal Sistem Informasi Bisnis)

Citation Format:
The research aims to develop an Enterprise Architecture from FMIPA UNTAN, this is based on the many individual information systems that have been developed by FMIPA UNTAN which are not integrated in data and technology. This situation results in overlapping data that can affect the effectiveness of decision making within the organization. The designed Enterprise Architecture implements the concept of service-oriented architecture in order to support the integration between the business layer and the organization's technology layer. To support the research, several concepts are used, such as TOGAF as a framework for developing Enterprise Architecture, Service Oriented Architecture as a supporter for integration of architectural layers, and Archimate and Business Process Modeling Notation as a modeling language used to create architectural artifacts. The stages of the research included problem identification, the Enterprise Architecture development process followed the stages of TOGAF ADM namely the preliminary phase, architectural vision, business architecture, information system architecture, technology architecture, and making an architecture implementation roadmap. The results of the development of Enterprise Architecture are architectural artifacts consisting of catalogs, matrices, and diagrams of business, information system, and technology architecture. Based on the design results, it is found that the Enterprise Service Bus concept in Service Oriented Architecture can be used to support application and data integration in organization, as well as the concept of service access can bridge the gap between the business layer and the technology layer.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Enterprise Architecture; TOGAF; SOA; Archimate; TOGAF Modelling

Article Metrics:

  1. Al-Alwani, A., 2014. Information technology integration in higher education: a novel approach for impact assessment. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET) 9(6), 32
  2. Banaeianjahromi, N., & Smolander, K., 2014. The role of enterprise architecture in enterprise integration – A systematic mapping study, Proceedings of the European, Mediterranean and Middle Eastern Conference on Information Systems, EMCIS 2014, (October)
  3. Kotusev, S., 2019. Enterprise Architecture and Enterprise Architecture Artifacts: Questioning the Old Concept in Light of New Findings. Journal of Information Technology 34(2), 102–128
  4. Lam, W., 2007. Information systems integration and enterprise application integration ( EAI ) adoption : a case from financial services. Journal OfInformation Systems Education 18(2), 149–157
  5. Lankhorst, M., 2009. Enterprise Architecture at Work: Modelling, Communication and Analysis (second edi)
  6. Madonsela, N. S., 2020. Integration of Management Information System for Competitive Positioning. Prodecia Manufacturing 43, 375–382
  7. Mutiah, N., Febriyanto, F., 2021. Analisis tingkat kematangan Adopsi Service Oriented Architecture menggunakan ISO / IEC 16680 ( OSIMM ). Jurnal Sistem Informasi Bisnis 11(01), 18–25
  8. Negulescu, O., & Doval, E., 2014. The Quality of Decision Making Process Related to Organizations’ Effectiveness. Procedia Economics and Finance, pp. 858–863
  9. Niknejad, N., Che Hussin, A. R., Prasetyo, Y. A., Ghani, I., Nur Fajrillah, A. A., 2018. Service Oriented architecture adoption: a systematic review. International Journal of Integrated Engineering 10(6)
  10. Rajabi, Z., Minaei, B., Seyyedi, M. A., 2013. Enterprise architecture development based on enterprise ontology. Journal of Theoritical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 8(2), 85–95
  11. Sarta, A., Durand, R., Vergne, J.-P., 2021. Organizational Adaptation. Journal of Management 47(1), 43–75
  12. Setiawan, A., Yulianto, E., 2018. E-Government interoperability and integration architecture modeling using TOGAF framework based on service oriented architecture. The Asian Journal of Technology Management 11(1), 26–45
  13. Shanks, G., Gloet, M., Someh, I. A., Frampton, K., 2018. Achieving benefits with enterprise architecture. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 27(2), 139–156
  14. The Open Group. (2018). The TOGAF® Standard, Version 9.2
  15. Van der Aa, H., van de Weerd, I., Leopold, H., & Reijers, H. A., 2017. Causes and consequences of fragmented process information: insights from a case study, America’s Conference on Information Systems: A Tradition of Innovation, April
  16. Vasconcelos, A., Da Silva, M. M., Fernandes, A., Tribolet, J., 2004. An information system architectural framework for enterprise application integration, Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol 37, 3541–3549

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-06-17 14:15:20

No citation recorded.