skip to main content

Integrasi Model DeLone & McLean, UTAUT, dan HOT-Fit untuk Menilai Keberhasilan dan Keberterimaan Aplikasi LPD Mobile di Bali

*Anak Agung Bagus Dharma Putra Dewangga orcid  -  Department of Accounting, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Udayana, Jl. P.B. Sudirman, Denpasar, Indonesia, 80232, Indonesia
Dodik Ariyanto orcid  -  Department of Accounting, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Udayana, Jl. P.B. Sudirman, Denpasar, Indonesia, 80232, Indonesia
Made Gede Wirakusuma  -  Department of Accounting, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Udayana, Jl. P.B. Sudirman, Denpasar, Indonesia, 80232, Indonesia
I Ketut Sujana  -  Department of Accounting, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Udayana, Jl. P.B. Sudirman, Denpasar, Indonesia, 80232, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Sistem Informasi Bisnis

Citation Format:
Abstract

Transparency challenges faced by Village Credit Institutions (LPDs) in Bali pose a significant risk to the future reputation of these institutions. In response to this challenge, LPDs introduced the LPD Mobile application to improve operational transparency. However, not all LPDs in Bali have yet implemented this system, so an in-depth analysis is needed to assess the extent of its success and acceptance from a user perspective. The integrated model used in this study is a combination of the DeLone & McLean, UTAUT, and HOT-Fit models with the addition of one moderating variable, namely education level, with the aim of identifying key factors that influence the success and acceptance of LPD Mobile. Through hypothesis testing using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) method on 384 customers in 106 LPDs, all hypotheses were supported and the study found that education level, as a moderator variable, strengthens the influence of human factors on behavioral intentions. Technological factors emerged as the most influential on user satisfaction, while organizational factors showed a lesser impact on behavioral intentions. This integrated model successfully dissect the elements that influence the success and acceptance of LPD Mobile adoption in Bali. The results of this study can be used by LPDs in Bali to plan the direction of LPD development towards technological aspects, while future studies can explore this conceptual framework in different regions or countries with different microfinance institutions, organizational maturity levels, and cultural contexts, thus providing new insights into the flexibility and generalisability of this model.

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download |  common.other
Hasil Cek Similarity (Turnitin)
Subject
Type Other
  Download (3MB)    Indexing metadata
Keywords: DeLone and McLean; UTAUT; HOT-Fit; LPD Mobile.

Article Metrics:

  1. Agustini, K., Darmawiguna, I.G.M., Artayasa, I.K.D., Mertayasa, I.N.E., 2020. Evaluation of The Teachers’ Acceptance to E-Report Card Applications with The Hot-Fit Model Approach. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 475-490. http://dx.doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13333a
  2. Ajzen, I., 1991. The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision, 50(1), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  3. Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa’deh, R., Sinclair, J., 2020. Evaluating E-Learning Systems Success: an Empirical Study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 67-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004
  4. Al-Mamary, Y.H.S., 2022. Understanding the Use of Learning Management Systems by Undergraduate University Students Using the UTAUT Model: Credible Evidence from Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2022.100092
  5. Alaimo, L.S., Fiore, M., Galati, A., 2020. How the COVID-19 pandemic is changing online food shopping human behaviour in Italy. Sustainability, 12(22), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229594
  6. Apsari, N.W.N., Suaryana, I.G.N.A., Wirajaya, I.G.A., & Sari, M.M.R., 2022. Evaluasi Keberhasilan dan Penerimaan Sistem Keuangan Desa Menggunakan Model Terintegrasi di Kabupaten Tabanan. E-Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Udayana, 11(01), 107-116
  7. Bain, C., Goswami, A., Lloyd, S., Davis, L., 2020. Post-Implementation Evaluation of a Digital Dictation System in a Large Health Service Using Hot-Fit Framework. Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management, 15(4), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.24083/APJHM.V15I4.339
  8. Bali Tribune, 2023. Diakses tanggal 29 September 2023. Mantan Ketua LPD Tulikup Kelod Dilaporkan ke Polda Bali, Diduga Gelapkan Uang Nasabah Rp5,2 Miliar. https://balitribune.co.id/content/mantan-ketua-lpd-tulikup-kelod-dilaporkan-ke-polda-bali-diduga-gelapkan-uang-nasabah-rp52
  9. Barclay, D., Higgings, C., Thompson, R., 1995. The Partial Least Squares (PLS) Approach to Causal Modeling: Personal Computer Adoption and Use as Illustration. Technol Stud Spec Issue Res Methodol, 2(2), 285-309
  10. Chao, C.M., 2019. Factors Determining the Behavioral Intention to Use Mobile Learning: An Application and Extension of the UTAUT Model. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01652
  11. Chen, J.V., Yen, D.C., Pornpriphet, W., Widjaja, A.E., 2015. E-Commerce Web Site Loyalty: A Cross Cultural Comparison. Information Systems Frontiers, 17(6), 1283–1299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10796-014-9499-0
  12. Chin, W.W., 1998. The Partial Least Squares Approach for Structural Equation Modeling. Modern methods for business research, 295-336
  13. Chin, W.W., Thatcher, J.B., Wright, R.T., Steel, D., 2013. Controlling for Common Method Variance in PLS Analysis: The Measured Latent Marker Variable Approach. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics, 56, 231-239. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8283-3
  14. Cidral, W.A., Oliveira, T., Di Felice, M., Aparicio, M., 2018. E-Learning Success Determinants: Brazilian Empirical Study. Computers and Education, 122, 273-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.12.001
  15. DeLone, W.H., McLean, E., 1992. Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60-95. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.60
  16. DeLone, W.H., McLean, E.R., 2003. The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748
  17. Droogenbroeck, E.V., Hove, L.V., 2017. Adoption of Online Grocery Shopping: Personal or Household Characteristics?. Journal of Internet Commerce, 16(3), 255-286. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332861.2017.1317149
  18. Fornell, C., Larcker, F., 1981. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  19. Hagos, Y., Garfield, M., Anteneh, S., 2016. Measurement Factors Model for E-Learning Systems Success. Proceedings - International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science. https://doi.org/10.1109/RCIS.2016.7549361
  20. Hair, J.F., Risher, J.J., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M., 2019. When to Use and How to Report the Results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
  21. Hariyanti, N.K.D., Giriantari, I.A.D., Linawati, L., 2018. Conceptual Model of Evaluation and Acceptance of E-Learning in Vocational Education. Proceedings of the International Conference on Science and Technology (ICST 2018). https://doi.org/10.2991/icst-18.2018.226
  22. Henseler, J., Sarstedt, M., 2013. Goodness-of-Fit Indices for Partial Least Squares Path Modeling. Computational Statistics, 28(2), 565-580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-012-0317-1
  23. Juliastini, N.G.A.P., Dewi, N.A.W.T., 2021. Pengaruh Persepsi Kebermanfaatan, Persepsi Biaya, Kredibilitas dan Kemudahan Penggunaan Terhadap Minat Menggunakan LPD Mobile Pada Nasabah LPD Desa Adat Sibetan. Vokasi Jurnal Riset Akuntansi, 10(2), 178-185. http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/vjra.v10i02.50884
  24. Jung, T., Chung, N., Leue, M.C., 2015. The Determinants of Recommendations to Use Augmented Reality Technologies: the Case of a Korean Theme Park. Tourism Management, 49, 75-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2015.02.013
  25. Khalilzadeh, J., Ozturk, A.B., Bilgihan, A., 2017. Security-Related Factors in Extended UTAUT Model for NFC Based Mobile Payment in The Restaurant Industry. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 460-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.001
  26. Kiranayanti, I.A., Erawati, N.M., 2016. Pengaruh Sumber Daya Manusia, Sistem Pengendalian Intern, Pemahaman Basis Akrual Terhadap Kualitas Laporan Keuangan Daerah. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 16(2), 1290-1318
  27. Kurfalı, M., Arifoğlu, A., Tokdemir, G., Paçin, Y., 2017. Adoption of e-government services in Turkey. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 168-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.041
  28. Lian, J.W., Yen, D.C., Wang, Y.T., 2014. An Exploratory Study to Understand the Critical Factors Affecting the Decision to Adopt Cloud Computing in Taiwan Hospital. International Journal of Information Management, 34(1), 28-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.09.004
  29. Luky, R.D., 2019. Evaluasi Faktor Kesuksesan dan Penerimaan Pengguna Terhadap Aplikasi Info PDAM Jember Menggunakan Model Terintegrasi. Skripsi: Universitas Jember
  30. Meraji, M., Tabesh, H., Jamal, N., Fazaeli, S., Ebnhosini, Z., 2022. An Evaluation of The Pharmacy Information System in Teaching Hospitals Based on The HOT-fit Model. Journal of Health Administration Summer, 25(2), 92-103
  31. Mohamadali, N.A., Zahari, N.A., 2018. The Organization factors as Barrier for Sustainable Health Information Systems (HIS) – A Review. Procedia Computer Science, 124, 354-361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.12.165
  32. Morganosky, M.A., Cude, B.J., 2000. Consumer Response to Online Grocery Shopping. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 28(1), 17-26. https://doi.org/10.1108/09590550010306737
  33. Nurlani, L., Permana, B., 2017. Analisa Kesuksesan Sistem Informasi Akademik Menggunakan Model Terintegrasi. Jurnal Teknologi Rekayasa, 2(2), 105-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.31544/jtera.v2.i2.2017.105-116
  34. Pamugar, H., Winarno, W.W., Najib, W., 2014. Model Evaluasi Kesuksesan dan Penerimaan Sistem Informasi E-Learning pada Lembaga Diklat Pemerintah. Scientific Journal of Informatics, 1(1), 13-27. https://doi.org/10.15294/sji.v1i1.3638
  35. Pamugar, H., 2015. Analisis Kesuksesan dan Penerimaan Terhadap Sistem Informasi E-Learning di Pusdiklat BPK RI. Doctoral dissertation of Universitas Gadjah Mada
  36. Patil, P., Tamilmani, K., Rana, N.P., Raghavan, V., 2020. Understanding Consumer Adoption of Mobile Payment in India: Extending Meta-UTAUT Model with Personal Innovativeness, Anxiety, Trust, and Grievance Redressal. International Journal of Information Management, 54, 102144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102144
  37. Ramayasa, I.P., 2015. Evaluation Model of Success and Acceptance of E-Learning. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 82(3), 462-469
  38. Rana, N.P., Dwivedi, Y.K., Williams, M.D., Weerakkody, V., 2015. Investigating Success of an E-Government Initiative: Validation of an Integrated IS Success Model. Information Systems Frontiers, 17(1), 127-142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10796-014-9504-7
  39. Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M., Mitchell, R., Gudergan, S.P., 2018. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling in HRM Research. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(12), 1617-1643. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1416655
  40. Sarwono, B.A., Rokmawati, R.I., Wardani, N.H., 2019. Evaluasi Kualitas dan Kesuksesan Implementasi E-Learning Fakultas Ilmu Komputer Menggunakan Model Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer, 3(5), 5193-5200
  41. Shehata, S.M., Abdeljawad, A.M., Mazouz, L.A., Aldossary, L.Y.K., Alsaeed, M.Y., Sayed, M.N., 2023. Factors Affecting Customers’ Adoption of Fintech in the Gulf Cooperation Council Countries. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 13(7), 463-477. https://doi.org/10.55493/5002.v13i7.4800
  42. Sugiyono, 2019. Statistika untuk Penelitian. Alfabeta: Bandung
  43. Tam, C., Oliveira, T., 2016. Understanding the Impact of M-Banking on Individual Performance: Delone & Mclean and TTF Perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.016
  44. Thenata, A.P., Suyoto, Santoso, A.J., 2019. Exploring of The Employee Information Management System using HOT-Fit and UTAUT2 Model. Science Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, 4(4), 106-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.25046/aj040412
  45. Veeramootoo, N., Nunkoo, R., Dwivedi, Y.K., 2018. What Determines Success of an E-Government Service? Validation of an Integritive Model of E-Filling Continuance Usage. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 161-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.03.004
  46. Venkatesh, V., James, T., Xu, X., 2012. Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157-178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
  47. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D., 2003. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  48. Verhoef, P.C., Langerak, F., 2001. Possible determinants of consumers’ adoption of electronic grocery shopping in the Netherlands. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 8(1), 275-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-6989(00)00033-3
  49. Wang, S., Wang, J., Li, J., Wang, J., Liang, 2018. Policy Implications for Promoting the Adoption of Electric Vehicles: Do Consumer’s Knowledge, Perceived Risk and Financial Incentive Policy Matter?. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 117, 58-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.014
  50. Yusof, M. M., Paul, R.J., Stergioulas, L.K., 2006. Towards a Framework for Health Information System Evaluation. Proceeding of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2006.491

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-03-11 10:23:32

No citation recorded.