DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/kapal.v20i3.53743

Advanced Outfitting Techniques for Shipyard Development: A 2000 GT Shipbuilding Case Study

Triwilaswandio Wuruk Pribadi orcid scopus  -  Department of Naval Architecture, Faculty of Marine Technology, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, 60111 Surabaya, Indonesia, Indonesia
*Sufian Imam Wahidi orcid scopus  -  Department of Naval Architecture, Faculty of Marine Technology, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, 60111 Surabaya, Indonesia, United Kingdom
Muhammad Naufal Aziz  -  Department of Naval Architecture, Faculty of Marine Technology, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, 60111 Surabaya, Indonesia, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2023 Kapal: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi Kelautan
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Cover Image
Abstract

The shipbuilding sector is currently facing issues due to long manufacturing schedules and delays in ship construction completion. These challenges come from national shipyards' conventional onboard outfitting process for equipment installation, which takes a lengthy time to complete. To address this issue, this study proposes implementing the advanced outfitting system (AOS) approach, which combines the zone outfitting system with the hull block construction method, in building a 2000 GT ship at PT. X in Surabaya, Indonesia. Technical analysis is performed to plan the shipbuilding process using the hull block construction method, and the efficiency of man-hours is calculated by implementing the AOS approach. The study also conducts an analysis of shipbuilding costs and the required shipyard development investment. The technical analysis shows that the AOS approach improves efficiency factors by enhancing material handling and testing activities. The AOS method has an efficiency factor of 50% for on-unit outfitting and 62% for on-block outfitting, compared to on-board outfitting. The construction of a 2000 GT ship employing the AOS approach represents a reduction of approximately 9.6% in working days and a cost-saving of approximately 4.3% when compared to the onboard outfitting method, resulting in savings of IDR 1,933,277,000 or about USD 124,175. To implement the AOS approach, an investment of IDR 3,040,776,000 or about USD 195,310 is required for construction facilities and human resources development. The return on investment is obtained after two 2000 GT ships are completed. As a result, the AOS approach can improve shipbuilding productivity by reducing construction time and costs. This study provides insights into the benefits of implementing modern shipbuilding techniques in the industry.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Ship production; advanced outfitting system; productivity; shipyard investment; shipbuilding costs

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
Numerical Analysis of The Effects of Propeller High Thrust Distribution on Propulsion System Performance Cavitation Prevention for Submarine Propeller with Empirical Method Performance Study of a Humpback Whale Fluke Turbine on Foil Shape Variation Based on Double Multiple Streamtube Model More recent articles
Most cited articles
ANALISA KEKUATAN TARIK DAN KEKUATAN LENTUR BALOK LAMINASI KOMBINASI BAMBU PETUNG DAN BAMBU APUS UNTUK KOMPONEN KAPAL KAYU ANALISA PENGARUH BENTUK LAMBUNG AXE BOW PADA KAPAL HIGH SPEED CRAFT TERHADAP HAMBATAN TOTAL PEMANFAATAN TENAGA ANGIN DAN SURYA SEBAGAI ALAT PEMBANGKIT LISTRIK PADA BAGAN PERAHU PENGARUH ANTI-SLAMMING BULBOUS BOW TERHADAP GERAKAN SLAMMING PADA KAPAL PERINTIS 200 DWT ANALISIS KEKUATAN SAMBUNGAN LAS SMAW ( SHIELDED METAL ARC WELDING ) PADA MARINE PLATE ST 42 AKIBAT FAKTOR CACAT POROSITAS DAN INCOMPLETE PENETRATION More cited articles
  1. L. Xue, G. Shi, D. Dai, and Y. Xu, “Two-Stage Efficiency Structure Analysis Model of Shipbuilding Based on Driving Factors: The Case of Chinese Shipyard,” Open J. Soc. Sci., vol. 08, no. 02, pp. 182–200, 2020, doi: 10.4236/jss.2020.82015
  2. L. M. Kujala, M. Nallilkari, H. A. Tokola, and H. Remes, “Influence of block building method on outfitting efficiency at an assembly shipyard,” RINA, R. Inst. Nav. Archit. - Int. Conf. Comput. Appl. Shipbuild. 2015, ICCAS 2015 - Pap., vol. 1, pp. 109–116, 2015, doi: 10.3940/rina.iccas.2015.43
  3. C. Rose, J. Coenen, and H. Hopman, “Definition of Ship Outfitting Scheduling as a Resource Availability Cost Problem and Development of a Heuristic Solution Technique,” J. Sh. Prod. Des., vol. 32, no. 03, pp. 154–165, Aug. 2016, doi: 10.5957/jspd.2016.32.3.154
  4. D. Kolich, S. Sladic, and R. L. Storch, “Lean IHOP Transformation of Shipyard Erection Block Construction,” J. Sh. Prod. Des., vol. 35, no. 03, pp. 273–280, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.5957/JSPD.04180010
  5. Y.-K. Jeong, P. Lee, and J. H. Woo, “Shipyard Block Logistics Simulation Using Process-centric Discrete Event Simulation Method,” J. Sh. Prod. Des., vol. 34, no. 02, pp. 168–179, May 2018, doi: 10.5957/JSPD.170006
  6. I. Salo, T. W. Pribadi, and S. I. Wahidi, “Analysis of Access and Monitoring Systems Implementation on Human Resources to Improve the Shipbuilding Industry Performance,” no. Senta 2018, pp. 79–86, 2020, doi: 10.5220/0008542600790086
  7. I. CIL, F. ARISOY, A. Y. CIL, and H. Kilinc, “a Comparative Analysis of Indoor Positioning Technologies in Shipyard Digitalization Context,” J. Mar. Technol. Environ., vol. 2022, no. 1, pp. 15–25, 2022, doi: 10.53464/jmte.01.2022.03
  8. T. W. Pribadi and T. Shinoda, “Hand Motion Analysis for Recognition of Qualified and Unqualified Welders using 9-DOF IMU Sensors and Support Vector Machine (SVM) Approach,” Int. J. Technol., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 38–47, 2022, doi: 10.14716/ijtech.v13i1.4813
  9. M. S. Arif, H. Supomo, W. U. Alifia, and S. I. Wahidi, “Ship production process monitoring application using QR-code technology,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 972, no. 1, p. 012016, 2022, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/972/1/012016
  10. S. I. Wahidi, T. W. Pribadi, and H. M. Rahman, “Study of QR Code Technology Application for Monitoring Activity of Ship Planned Maintenance System,” Kapal J. Ilmu Pengetah. dan Teknol. Kelaut., vol. 19, no. 2, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.14710/KAPAL.V19I2.45507
  11. P. Fraga-Lamas, D. Noceda-Davila, T. M. Fernández-Caramés, M. A. Díaz-Bouza, and M. Vilar-Montesinos, “Smart Pipe System for a Shipyard 4.0,” Sensors, vol. 16, no. 12, 2016, doi: 10.3390/s16122186
  12. R. Rubeša, N. Fafandjel, and D. Kolić, “Procedure for Estimating the Effectiveness of Ship Modular Outfitting,” Eng. Rev., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 55–62, 2011
  13. R. Rubeša, M. Hadjina, and T. Matulja, “Criteria for Evaluation the Technological Level of Ship Pre-Outfitting in Shipyard,” J. Marit. Transp. Sci., vol. Special ed, no. 4, pp. 201–210, 2022, doi: 10.18048/2022.04.14
  14. F. Zhou, P. Ma, Y. He, S. Pratap, P. Yu, and B. Yang, “Lean production of ship-pipe parts based on lot-sizing optimization and PFB control strategy,” Kybernetes, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 1483–1505, 2020, doi: 10.1108/K-06-2019-0389
  15. M. Semini, C. Patek, P. O. Brett, J. J. G. Agis, J. O. Strandhagen, and J. Vatn, “Some relationships between build strategy and shipbuilding time in European shipbuilding,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part M J. Eng. Marit. Environ., vol. 237, no. 3, pp. 658–676, 2023, doi: 10.1177/14750902221141749
  16. T. W. Pribadi, M. S. Arif, S. I. Wahidi, and I. W. Maditiara, “Modular system construction for laminated wooden fishing vessel industry,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 649, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/649/1/012009
  17. I. Baihaqi, I. Lazakis, and R. E. Kurt, “Development of a novel integrated value engineering and risk assessment (VENRA) framework for shipyard performance measurement: a case study for an Indonesian shipyard,” Ships Offshore Struct., 2023, doi: 10.1080/17445302.2023.2228115
  18. Sukisno and M. L. Singgih, “Location Selection Analysis for New Shipyard Using Integration of DEMATEL and ANP: A Case Study (PT IKI),” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 598, no. 1, pp. 0–6, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/598/1/012109
  19. S. Vakili, A. Schönborn, and A. I. Ölçer, “Application of the transdisciplinary shipyard energy management framework by employing a fuzzy multiple attribute group decision making technique toward a sustainable shipyard: case study for a Bangladeshi shipyard,” J. Shipp. Trade, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 22, 2022, doi: 10.1186/s41072-022-00123-8
  20. R. L. Storch, Ship Production. Cornell Maritime Press, 1995. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=T1N8QgAACAAJ
  21. T. Lamb and A. Arbor, ENGINEERING F0R SHIP PRODUCTION by Prepared for The National Shipbuiiding Research Program bY The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers Ship Production Committee The University of Michigan N / A, no. January. 1986
  22. R. D. Okayama, Y. Ando, K. Tomisawa, M. Honda, K. Chirillo, L. D. Chirillo, Integrated hull construction, outfitting and painting. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Transportation, 1983. doi: LK-https://worldcat.org/title/11146824
  23. S. I. Wahidi, V. M. Virmansyah, and T. W. Pribadi, “Study on Implementation of Activity-Based Costing (ABC) System on Determination of Indirect Costs in Ship Production,” KapalJurnal Ilmu Pengetah. dan Teknol. Kelautan., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.14710/kapal.v18i1.33000
  24. N. Chu, X. Nie, J. Xu, and K. Li, “A systematic approach of lean supply chain management in shipbuilding,” SN Appl. Sci., vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 1–11, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s42452-021-04562-z
  25. S. Chakraborty, “What Is Advanced Outfitting in Shipbuilding?,” Marine Insight, 2019. https://www.marineinsight.com/naval-architecture/advanced-outfitting-in-shipbuilding/ (accessed Oct. 04, 2023)
  26. S. I. Wahidi, T. W. Pribadi, M. I. Firdausi, and B. Santosa, “Technical and Economic Analysis of a Conversion on a Single Pontoon to a Multi Pontoon Floating Dock,” Nase More, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 114–122, 2022, doi: 10.17818/NM/2022/2.5
  27. T. W. Pribadi, R. N. Adam, and S. I. Wahidi, “Technical and Economical Analysis of Shipyard Re-Layout for Product-Oriented Work Breakdown Structure Implementation,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 1052, no. 1, p. 012046, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1757-899x/1052/1/012046
  28. T. J. Eccles and H. S. Marcus, “Integrating design and production: A case study of the naval submarine program,” Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 107–126, 1992, doi: 10.1016/0925-5273(92)90116-O
  29. S. I. Wahidi, T. W. Pribadi, S. R. W. Pribadi, and S. Megawati, “Implementation Study of Activity Based Costing System to Define Indirect Costs on Ship Repair Industries,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 1052, no. 1, p. 012049, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1757-899x/1052/1/012049
  30. S. I. Wahidi, S. R. W. Pribadi, T. W. Pribadi, N. L. A. Wardhana, and M. S. Arif, “Fixed Manpower Reduction Analysis to Reduce Indirect Cost of Ship Production,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 1052, no. 1, p. 012048, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1757-899x/1052/1/012048

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-11-21 22:08:02

No citation recorded.