DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/kapal.v20i3.58691

Proposed Quality Plan for Shipbuilding in Indonesia Based on ISO 10005:2018

Putri Virliani  -  National Research and Innovation Agency Republic of Indonesia (BRIN), Indonesia
*Shinta Johar Alif Rahadi orcid scopus  -  National Research and Innovation Agency Republic of Indonesia (BRIN), Indonesia
Rina Rina  -  National Research and Innovation Agency Republic of Indonesia (BRIN), Indonesia
Dian Purnama Sari  -  National Research and Innovation Agency Republic of Indonesia (BRIN), Indonesia
Abdi Ismail  -  National Research and Innovation Agency Republic of Indonesia (BRIN), Indonesia
Buana Maruf  -  National Research and Innovation Agency Republic of Indonesia (BRIN), Indonesia
Ahmad Bisri  -  National Research and Innovation Agency Republic of Indonesia (BRIN), Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2023 Kapal: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi Kelautan
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Ensuring quality is of utmost importance for the shipbuilding sector, as it involves addressing both the quality of processes and the final products to achieve efficient and cost-effective manufacturing. It has become a standard practice for shipyards to adopt certifiable management systems. ISO 9001:2015 sets out the necessary criteria for a Quality Plan, which is influenced by the company's overall quality policy and contractual obligations. In this context, ISO 10005:2018 offers guidance that can be utilized within the framework of quality plans to meet the specific requirements of a project. Several quality plans for Indonesian shipyards, only adopting ISO 9001 and ISO 10005:2018, have yet to be widely implemented. Thus, this paper adopts ISO 10005:2018 to identify the quality plan of three selected shipyards in Indonesia. The gap analysis technique is used to compare the current state of the quality plan with the desired conditions outlined in the ISO 10005:2018 standard. The identified gaps will determine the areas that require immediate attention and improvement in order to meet the requirements of ISO 10005:2018. The primary objective of this study is to facilitate the creation of a quality plan that adheres to the ISO 9001 and 10005 standards. Based on the comparison results of quality plans according to ISO 10005:2018 in shipyards A, B, and C, the recommendation is to integrate distinct clauses (6.4, 6.7.1, 6.7.3, 6.10, 6.13, and 6.15) to improve the quality plans across these specific shipyards.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: ISO 10005 standards, ISO 9001 standards, gap analysis, quality management systems, quality plan improvement

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
Design and Manufacture Ballast Management System Model for Reduce Ship Rolling Motion Selection of Propulsion System for Electric Amphibious Bus to Alleviate Traffic Congestion in the Jabodetabek Area Study of the Motion Performance of Marine Current Power Plant Turbine Floaters Due To Ocean Current Forces under Moored Conditions More recent articles
Most cited articles
ANALISA NUMERIK GERAKAN DAN KEKUATAN KAPAL AKIBAT BEBAN SLAMMING PADA KAPAL PERANG TIPE CORVETTE ANALISA GERAKAN SEAKEEPING KAPAL PADA GELOMBANG REGULER Karakteristik Geometri dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Stabilitas Kapal Ferry Ro-Ro Indonesia OPTIMASI BENTUK DEMIHULL KAPAL KATAMARAN UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KUALITAS SEAKEEPING Estimation of Effective Wave Slope Coefficient of Ships with Large Breadth and Draught Ratio More cited articles
  1. G. Bruce, Garrard dan Ian, The Business of Shipbuilding, London: Informa Law from Routledge, 2013
  2. N. A. Minami, L. L. Soto dan D. H. Rhodes, “Dynamic Lean Management of the Naval Construction Process,” Engineering Management Journal, pp. 36-43, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2010.11431862
  3. D. J. DeFeo, “Toward a model of purposeful participant inclusion: examining deselection as a participant risk,” Qualitative Research Journal, pp. 253-264, 2013, DOI: 10.1108/QRJ-01-2013-0007
  4. J. Defeo, Juran's Quality Handbook: The Complete Guide to Performance Excellence, Seventh Edition, McGraw-Hill Education, 2016
  5. J. M. Juran, Godfrey dan A. Blanton, Juran's Quality Handbook, New York: McGraw Hill, 1999
  6. D. A. Moura dan R. C. Botter, “The coastal transportation in Brazil - potential for the improvement of aiming intermodality logistic flow,” Revista Produção Online, p. 595–617, 2011; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14488/1676-1901.v11i2.897
  7. T. Lamb, Ship Design and Construction, New Jersey: The Society of Naval Architects and Marine, 2003
  8. R. Storch, C. Hammon, H. Bunch dan R. Moore, Ship Production, New Jersey: Second ed The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, 2007
  9. J. R. Thornton, “92. Ship and Boat Building and Repair,” 2011
  10. J. Priede, “Implementation of Quality Management System ISO 9001 in the World and Its Strategic Necessity,” Social and Behavioral Sciences, p. 1466–1475, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1133
  11. O. Combs, “Standardwise: View ISO 9001 as more than a QMS standard to lift business performance to new heights.,” pp. 16-21, 2013
  12. M. Casadesu´s dan S. Karapetrovic, The erosion of ISO 9000 benefits: a temporal study, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2005
  13. W. Zaramdini, An empirical study of the motives and benefits of ISO 9000 certification: The UAE experience, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 2007
  14. B. Rusjan dan M. Alič, “Capitalising on ISO 9001 benefits for strategic result,” International Journal of Quaity & Reability Management, pp. 756-778, 2010, DOI: 10.1108/02656711011062372
  15. L. Caro and J. Gracia, “Does ISO 9000 certification affect consumer perceptions of the service provider?,” Managing Service Quality, Vol.19 No.2, pp. 140-161, 2009, DOI: 10.1108/09604520910943152
  16. E. Dimara, D. Skuras, K. Tsekouras and S. Goutsos, “Strategic orientation and financial performance of firms implementing ISO 9000,” International Journal of Quality & Reability Management, Vol.21 No.1, pp. 72-89, 2004, DOI: 10.1108/02656710410511704
  17. P. Singh, M. Feng dan A. Smith, “ISO 9000 series of standards: comparison of manufacturing and service organisation,” International Journal of Quality & Reability Management, Vol 23 No. 2, pp. 122-142, 2006, DOI: 10.1108/02656710610640916
  18. P. Sampaio, P. Saravia and A. Rodrigues, “ISO 9001 certification forecasting models,” International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 5-26, 2011, DOI 10.1108/02656711111097526
  19. T. Conti, “Quality thinking and system thinking,” The TQM Magazine, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 297-308, 2006, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/09544780610660013
  20. T. Conti, “System thinking in quality management,” The TQM Journal, Vol 22 No.4, pp. 352-368, 2010, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/17542731011053280
  21. J. Tari, “Components of successful total quality management,” The TQM Magazine, pp. 182-194, 2005, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/09544780510583245
  22. L. Koung Rae, “A Study on the Competitive Strategy of a Shipbuilding Nation from Shipowner’s Perspective,” The Journal of Maritime Business, Vol. 37, pp. 149-173, August 2017
  23. T. V. Nunhes, L. C. F. M. Barbosa dan O. J. d. Oliveira, “Identification and analysis of the elements and functions integrable in integrated management systems,” Journal of Cleaner Production, pp. 3225-3235, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.147
  24. K. Hmeshah, Quality Management Approach of Product Data Models for Shipbuilding, University Of Rostock, 2016
  25. Y. Guo, H. Wang, X. Liang dan H. Yi, “ A quantitative evaluation method for the effect of construction process on shipbuilding quality,” Ocean Engineering, pp. 484-491, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.09.046
  26. D. Stamatis, Advanced Quality Planning©: A Commonsense Guide to AQP and APQP, New York: Productivity Press, 2001
  27. International Organization for Standardization, ISO 9001:2015 Quality management systems — Requirements, International Organization for Standardization, 2015
  28. R. Flanagan and C. Jewell, Code of quality management - guide to best practice construction quality management, London: Chartered Institute of Building, 2019, pp. 1-119
  29. International Organization for Standardization, ISO 10001:2007 Quality management — Customer satisfaction — Guidelines for codes of conduct for organizations, International Organization for Standardization, 2007
  30. International Organization for Standardization, ISO 10007:2003 Quality management systems — Guidelines for configuration management, International Organization for Standardization, 2003
  31. M. Kamal, M. Dasuki dan R. Razalli, “The Research Study in Quality Management for a Ship Construction Company,” International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), pp. 995-998, 2013
  32. International Organization for Standardization, ISO 10005:2018 Quality management — Guidelines for quality plans, 2018
  33. Trinidad dan Tobago, “Quality management & ISO 9001 Standard,” 2016

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-05-12 17:24:48

No citation recorded.