DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/kapal.v23i1.77442

Experimental and Analytical Investigation of Mooring Angle and Tube Mass Effects on the Dynamic Response of a Submerged Floating Tunnel Segment Model under Wave Excitation

*Jamiatul Akmal orcid scopus  -  Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Lampung, Indonesia
Ragil Alvin Dinata  -  Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Lampung, Indonesia
Novri Tanti  -  Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Lampung, Indonesia
Zulhendri Hasymi  -  Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Lampung, Indonesia
Nurcahya Nugraha  -  Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Lampung, Indonesia
Received: 30 Aug 2025; Revised: 11 Feb 2026; Accepted: 4 Mar 2026; Available online: 4 Mar 2026; Published: 9 Mar 2026.
Editor(s): Andi Trimulyono
Open Access Copyright (c) 2026 Kapal: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi Kelautan
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract

The Submerged Floating Tunnel (SFT) is an alternative infrastructure for crossing transportation routes in deep and wide waters, but further studies are still needed on the dynamic response to wave forces. This study aims to evaluate the dynamic response of a wave-excited Tension Leg type SFT segment model, specifically regarding the influence of the mooring cable angle and the influence of the tube mass. This study was conducted using a damped forced vibration theory approach, exploring the relationship among three main elements of structural dynamics: mass (𝑚), damping (𝑐), and stiffness (𝑘). These parameters are important as fundamental elements that determine the overall stiffness of the structure. The SFT segment model, made of a 3-inch (76 mm) diameter tube with a length of 700 mm, was installed at a depth of 1/6 z below the water surface. The parameters tested included the effect of the mooring cable angle (variations: 15°, 30°, and 45°) and the effect of the tube mass (variations: 0.5 kg, 0.75 kg, and 1 kg). The displacement response of the specimens was obtained from video recordings and analyzed using video tracking software. The experimental results show that an increase in the angle of inclination of the mooring cable leads to an increase in stiffness (𝑘) and a smaller structural displacement. In addition, a larger tube mass results in a greater displacement. The experimental data showed good agreement with the theoretical model of single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) damped forced vibration, with deviations below 10%. Therefore, this study recommends the use of the largest feasible mooring angle and smallest practical tube mass for optimal SFT design, while still considering real-world application limitations.

Fulltext View|Download Email colleagues

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Articles
Language : EN
Most cited articles
ANALISA TEKNIS KEKUATAN MEKANIS MATERIAL KOMPOSIT BERPENGUAT SERAT AMPAS TEBU (BAGGASE) DITINJAU DARI KEKUATAN TARIK DAN IMPAK PENGARUH BENTUK LAMBUNG KAPAL TERHADAP POLA ALIRAN DAN POWERING PADA KAPAL PERAIRAN SUNGAI DAN LAUT Estimation of Effective Wave Slope Coefficient of Ships with Large Breadth and Draught Ratio KAJIAN PENGGUNAAN PROGRAM APLIKASI DESAIN KAPAL TRADISIONAL PADA GALANGAN KAPAL KAYU DI KABUPATEN BATANG ANALISA PENGARUH MODIFIKASI BENTUK HALUAN KAPAL TERHADAP HAMBATAN TOTAL DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN CFD More cited articles
  1. G. A. Torres-Alves, C. M. P. ’T Hart, O. Morales-Nápoles, and S. N. Jonkman, “Structural reliability analysis of a submerged floating tunnel under copula-based traffic load simulations,” Engineering Structures, vol. 269, p. 114752, Oct. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114752
  2. M.-C. Tang, “Forms and Aesthetics of Bridges,” Engineering, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 267–276, Apr. 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2017.12.013
  3. N. Fan, J. Jiang, L. Guo, H. Lin, and L. Wang, “Numerical analysis of partial impact forces of offshore submerged floating tunnel encountered submarine slide hazards,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 266, p. 112903, Dec. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112903
  4. Y. Xiang and Y. Yang, “Challenge in Design and Construction of Submerged Floating Tunnel and State-of-art,” Procedia Engineering, vol. 166, pp. 53–60, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.562
  5. Z. Yang et al., “Experimental study on the wave-induced dynamic response and hydrodynamic characteristics of a submerged floating tunnel with elastically truncated boundary condition,” Marine Structures, vol. 88, p. 103339, Mar. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2022.103339
  6. H. Peng, J. Guo, H. Ping, Y. Sun, G. Liu, and G. Liu, “Numerical analysis of the fluid–structure interaction characteristics of a pontoon submerged floating tunnel,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 301, p. 117660, Jun. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.117660
  7. D. Shao, J. Zheng, J. Zhang, Y. Yang, and J. Zhang, “Vibrating behavior of submerged floating tunnel in current field investigated with hybrid vector-autoregressive model,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 256, p. 111359, Jul. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111359
  8. G. Iovane, F. M. Mazzolani, R. Landolfo, E. Begovic, E. Bilotta, and B. Faggiano, “Assessment of experimental tests on SFT small scale specimen,” Applied Ocean Research, vol. 138, p. 103656, Sep. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2023.103656
  9. J. Xie and J. Chen, “Dynamic response analysis of submerged floating tunnel - canyon water system under earthquakes,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 94, pp. 757–779, Jun. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2021.01.031
  10. J. Hou et al., “Analysis of the dynamic response of submerged floating tunnels to wave-induced loads, incorporating joint mechanical properties,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 297, p. 117079, Apr. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.117079
  11. A. Gilmanov, T. B. Le, and F. Sotiropoulos, “A numerical approach for simulating fluid structure interaction of flexible thin shells undergoing arbitrarily large deformations in complex domains,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 300, pp. 814–843, Nov. 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2015.08.008
  12. W. Chul Chung, C. Jin, M. Kim, and J. Hwang, “Comparison Study and Forensic Analysis between Experiment and Coupled Dynamics Simulation for Submerged Floating Tunnel Segment with Free Ends under Wave Excitations,” Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, vol. 137, no. 1, pp. 155–174, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2023.026754
  13. X. Yuan, J. Liu, J. Zhou, and A. Guo, “Effect of cable layout on hydrodynamic response of submerged floating tunnel under wave action,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 280, p. 114257, Jul. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114257
  14. X. Ye, X. Zhou, M. Wang, D. Qiao, X. Zhao, and L. Wang, “Global Responses Analysis of Submerged Floating Tunnel Considering Hydroelasticity Effects,” Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, vol. 12, no. 10, p. 1854, Oct. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12101854
  15. H. Ding et al., “Analysis of the influence of key structural parameters on the dynamic response of oval cross-section SFT under wave-current action,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 336, p. 121738, Sep. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.121738
  16. W. Pan, C. Cui, C. Chen, M. Xie, Q. Gu, and Z. Yang, “Optimization Analysis of the Arrangement of the Submerged Floating Tunnel Subjected to Waves,” Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, vol. 12, no. 5, p. 764, Apr. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12050764
  17. C. Li et al., “Experimental study on dynamic response of submerged floating tunnel moored with different material cables,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 329, p. 121127, Jun. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.121127
  18. M. Sato, S. Kanie, and T. Mikami, “Mathematical analogy of a beam on elastic supports as a beam on elastic foundation,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 688–699, May 2008, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2007.02.002
  19. J. Akmal, N. Nugraha, and A. Lubis, “Direct Integration Mode Superposition: A Simple Method for Dynamic Analysis of Submerged Floating Tunnel (SFT),” Journal of Mechanical Engineering, vol. 22, no. 1, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://search.ebscohost.com/
  20. J. Akmal, “Dynamic response of Tension Leg Platform (TLP): A comparative study between circular and square pontoon usage (in Indonesian),” Machine, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 45–50, Apr. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.33019/jm.v8i1.2928
  21. J. Akmal et al., “Hydrodynamic forces on submerged floating tube: The effect of curvature radius and depth level,” Kapal: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi Kelautan, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–8, Feb. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.14710/kapal.v19i1.44019
  22. H. Ding, B. Huang, L. Cheng, K. Li, and Q. Ren, “Hydrodynamic experiment of submerged floating tunnel under regular wave and current actions during construction period,” Marine Structures, vol. 93, p. 103508, Jan. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103508
  23. L. Flis, G. Szwoch, and P. Krawczyk, “Determining a damping coefficient by using a microelectromechanical systems accelerometer for finite element method simulation purposes on a discrete damper example,” Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 275–290, Jun. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.12913/22998624/202753
  24. R. Kaushik, S. C. Swami, D. Sharma, and P. Ahluwalia, “Object Detection and Tracking in Real Time Video,” International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, pp. 56490–56493, May 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.61841/V24I5/400264
  25. S. Abba, A. M. Bizi, J.-A. Lee, S. Bakouri, and M. L. Crespo, “Real-time object detection, tracking, and monitoring framework for security surveillance systems,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 15, p. e34922, Aug. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34922
  26. Md. M. Alam, “New scaling of critical damping and reduced frequency for mechanically excited systems,” Shock and Vibration, vol. 59, no. 2, p. 2600, Mar. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.59400/sv2600
  27. K. Jeong, S. Min, M. Jang, D. Won, and S. Kim, “Feasibility study of submerged floating tunnels with vertical and inclined combined tethers,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 265, p. 112587, Dec. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112587
  28. X. Ye, X. Zhou, M. Wang, D. Qiao, X. Zhao, and L. Wang, “Global Responses Analysis of Submerged Floating Tunnel Considering Hydroelasticity Effects,” Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, vol. 12, no. 10, p. 1854, Oct. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12101854
  29. D. Won, J. Seo, S. Kim, and W.-S. Park, “Hydrodynamic Behavior of Submerged Floating Tunnels with Suspension Cables and Towers under Irregular Waves,” Applied Sciences, vol. 9, no. 24, p. 5494, Dec. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/app9245494
  30. K. Jeong, J. Kim, S. Min, H. Shin, and S. Kim, “Design strategy for submerged floating tunnels: Structural response analysis and rational mooring-boundary condition combinations under wave loads,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 317, p. 120097, Feb. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.120097
  31. Z. Liu, X. Shi, T. Guo, H. Ren, and M. Zhang, “Investigation on hydrodynamic response and characteristics of a submerged floating tunnel based on hydrodynamic tests,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 300, p. 117187, May 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.117187
  32. W. Pan, M. He, and C. Cui, “Experimental Study on Hydrodynamic Characteristics of a Submerged Floating Tunnel under Freak Waves (I: Time-Domain Study),” Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, vol. 11, no. 5, p. 977, May 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11050977
  33. G. Guo, S. Zhong, Q. Zhang, J. Zhong, and D. Liu, “Effect of Additional Mass on Natural Frequencies of Weight-Sensing Structures,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 17, p. 7585, Sep. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/s23177585
  34. G. A. Amaral, C. P. Pesce, and G. R. Franzini, “Mooring system stiffness: A six-degree-of-freedom closed-form analytical formulation,” Marine Structures, vol. 84, p. 103189, Jul. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2022.103189
  35. F. Foti, L. Martinelli, E. Morleo, and F. Perotti, “Dynamic response of Submerged Floating Tunnels: An enhanced semi-analytical approach,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 294, p. 116648, Feb. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.116648

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-05-15 10:15:35

No citation recorded.