An Evaluation of Psychometric Properties of Needs Assessment Instruments in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs: A Systematic Review

Kourosh Zarea; Eesa Mohammadi; Johanne Alteren; Neda Sayadi

doi:10.14710/nmjn.v12i2.43808

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/nmjn.v12i2.43808

An Evaluation of Psychometric Properties of Needs Assessment Instruments in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs: A Systematic Review

Kourosh Zarea - Nursing Department, Nursing Care Research Centre in Chronic Disease, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Iran, Islamic Republic of

Eesa Mohammadi - Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Iran, Islamic Republic of

Johanne Alteren - Faculty of Health Sciences and Social Care, Molde University College, Norway

*Neda Sayadi - Nursing Department, Nursing Care Research Centre in Chronic Disease, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Iran, Islamic Republic of

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

BibTex Citation Data :

@article{NMJN43808,
    author = {Kourosh Zarea and Eesa Mohammadi and Johanne Alteren and Neda Sayadi},
    title = {An Evaluation of Psychometric Properties of Needs Assessment Instruments in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs: A Systematic Review},
    journal = {Nurse Media Journal of Nursing},
  volume = {12},
    number = {2},
    year = {2022},
    keywords = {Cardiovascular rehabilitation; coronary artery disease; COSMIN checklist; instrument  needs assessment},
    abstract = {      Background:  Coronary Artery Disease is the foremost reason of illnesses and death in the world. Assessment of the needs is a priority in these patients. However, there is a paucity of tools for the evaluation of needs, with the controversy surrounding their validity.   Purpose:  This review aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of tools used to assess needs of patients with CAD undergoing cardiac rehabilitation (CR) plans.   Methods:  An online literature search combined with manual search was carried out on 11 databases to identify relevant articles. The terms used in the search were: cardiac rehabilitation AND coronary artery disease, cardiac rehabilitation AND acute coronary syndrome, and questionnaires OR need assessment OR tool OR scale. Articles from 1989 to 2021 were selected using some inclusion criteria and no validation studies were excluded. The quality of the questionnaires was evaluated by researchers using consensus-based standards for the selection of health status measurement instruments (COSMIN) list. Data analysis had been done by calculating overall methodological quality scores per study on a measurement property using COSMIN checklist. A methodological quality score per box was obtained by taking the lowest rating of any item in a box (‘worse score counts’).   Results:  Of 653 articles, 15 papers were involved in the study. Six studies reported cross-cultural validity, nine studies for criterion validity, and none reported measurement error, hypothesis testing, and responsiveness. There is no vigorous and valid single scale for the measurement of needs in CAD patients Overall, the CADEQ questionnaire was good and a patient self-assessment tool for cardiac rehabilitation was poor based on psychometric properties.   Conclusions:  The findings of this study disclosed that even though it has been more than 32 years, from 1989 to 2021, of the development in need assessment instruments; each instrument has as a minimum of one “poor” psychometric property according to the COSMIN checklist.  So, it is recommended for the next studies to design and develop instruments with better psychometric validities for clinical environment.     },
   issn = {2406-8799},   pages = {269--287}  doi = {10.14710/nmjn.v12i2.43808},
    url = {https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/medianers/article/view/43808}
}

Citation Format:

Abstract

Background: Coronary Artery Disease is the foremost reason of illnesses and death in the world. Assessment of the needs is a priority in these patients. However, there is a paucity of tools for the evaluation of needs, with the controversy surrounding their validity.

Purpose: This review aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of tools used to assess needs of patients with CAD undergoing cardiac rehabilitation (CR) plans.

Methods: An online literature search combined with manual search was carried out on 11 databases to identify relevant articles. The terms used in the search were: cardiac rehabilitation AND coronary artery disease, cardiac rehabilitation AND acute coronary syndrome, and questionnaires OR need assessment OR tool OR scale. Articles from 1989 to 2021 were selected using some inclusion criteria and no validation studies were excluded. The quality of the questionnaires was evaluated by researchers using consensus-based standards for the selection of health status measurement instruments (COSMIN) list. Data analysis had been done by calculating overall methodological quality scores per study on a measurement property using COSMIN checklist. A methodological quality score per box was obtained by taking the lowest rating of any item in a box (‘worse score counts’).

Results: Of 653 articles, 15 papers were involved in the study. Six studies reported cross-cultural validity, nine studies for criterion validity, and none reported measurement error, hypothesis testing, and responsiveness. There is no vigorous and valid single scale for the measurement of needs in CAD patients Overall, the CADEQ questionnaire was good and a patient self-assessment tool for cardiac rehabilitation was poor based on psychometric properties.

Conclusions: The findings of this study disclosed that even though it has been more than 32 years, from 1989 to 2021, of the development in need assessment instruments; each instrument has as a minimum of one “poor” psychometric property according to the COSMIN checklist. So, it is recommended for the next studies to design and develop instruments with better psychometric validities for clinical environment.

Fulltext View|Download

Keywords: Cardiovascular rehabilitation; coronary artery disease; COSMIN checklist; instrument needs assessment

Article Metrics:

Article Info

Section: Articles

Language : EN

In Vol 12, No 2 (2022): (August 2022)

Recent articles

Patient Safety Competency and its Related Aspects in Professional Education among Nursing Students of Two Nursing Schools in Iran: A Comparative Study Mediation Role of Perceived Organizational Support on Nurses’ Work Engagement and Leadership Styles Quality of Clinical Nursing Education Programme in Ghana: Preceptors’ Perspectives Editorial Front Matter Editorial Back Matter More recent articles

Most cited articles

Review: Anxiety and Quality of life in Patients with Myocardial Infarction Effect of Self-Efficacy Enhancing Education Program on Family Caregivers’ Competencies in Caring for Patients with mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Yogyakarta, Indonesia The Quality of Life of Women with Cervical Cancer in Indonesia: A Cross-Sectional Study PENGARUH LATIHAN FISIK; SENAM AEROBIK TERHADAP PENURUNAN KADAR GULA DARAH PADA PENDERITA DM TIPE 2 DI WILAYAH PUSKESMAS BUKATEJA PURBALINGGA The Competencies, Roles and Scope of Practice of Advanced Psychiatric Nursing in Indonesia More cited articles

Ahyana, A., Kritpracha, C., Thaniwattananon, P. (2013). Cardiac rehabilitation enhancing programs in patients with myocardial infarction: A literature review. Nurse Media Journal of Nursing, 3(1), 541-556. https://doi.org/10.14710/nmjn.v3i1.4468
Anderson, L., Thompson, D. R., Oldridge, N., Zwisler, A. D., Rees, K., Martin, N., & Taylor, R. S. (2016). Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2016(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858
Balady, G. J., Williams, M. A., Ades, P. A., Bittner, V., Comoss, P., Foody, J. M., Franklin, B., Sanderson, B., Southard, D., American Heart Association Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention Committee, the Council on Clinical Cardiology, American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Nursing, American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention, American Heart Association Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism, & American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation (2007). Core components of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention programs: 2007 update: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention Committee, the Council on Clinical Cardiology; the Councils on Cardiovascular Nursing, Epidemiology and Prevention, and Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism; and the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Circulation, 115(20), 2675–2682. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.180945
Chen, Z., Geng, J., Wang, M, Hu, L., De Melo Ghisi, G. L., & Yu, H. (2018). The Chinese version of the coronary artery disease education questionnaire-II (CADEQ-II): Translation and validation. Patient Preference and Adherence, 12, 1587-1596. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S176639
De Bacquer, D., Dallongeville, J., Kotseva, K., Cooney, M. T., Pajak, A., Deckers, J. W., Mayer, O., Vanuzzo, D., Lehto, S., Fras, Z., Ostor, E., Ambrosio, G. B., De Backer, G., Wood, D., Keil, U., Sans, S., Graham, I., & Pyorala, K. (2013). Residual risk of cardiovascular mortality in patients with coronary heart disease: The EUROASPIRE risk categories. International Journal Cardiology, 168(2), 910-914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.10.051
De Melo Ghisi, G. L., Oh, P., Thomas, S., & Benetti, M. (2013). Development and validation of an English version of the Coronary Artery Disease Education Questionnaire (CADE-Q). European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 20(2), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487312437061
De Melo Ghisi, G., Sandison, N., & Oh, P. (2016). Development, pilot testing and psychometric validation of a short version of the coronary artery disease education questionnaire: The CADE-Q SV. Patient Education and Counseling, 99(3), 443–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2015.11.002
De Melo Ghisi, G., & Oh, P. (2021). Validation of the French-Canadian version of a short questionnaire to assess knowledge in cardiac patients (CADE-Q SV). The Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 54(1), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0844562120986001
De Melo Ghisi, G. L., Grace, S. L., Thomas, S., Evans, M. F., & Oh, P. (2013). Development and psychometric validation of a scale to assess information needs in cardiac rehabilitation: The INCR Tool. Patient Education and Counseling, 91(3), 337–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2013.01.007
De Melo Ghisi, G. L., Durieux, A., Manfroi, W. C., Herdy, A. H., Carvalho, T. d., Andrade, A., & Benetti, M. (2010). Construction and validation of the CADE-Q for patient education in cardiac rehabilitation programs. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, 94(6), 813–822. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0066-782x2010005000045
De Melo Ghisi, G., Chaves, G., Loures, J. B., Bonfim, G. M., & Britto, R. (2018). Validation of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of a short questionnaire to assess knowledge in cardiovascular disease patients (CADE-Q SV). Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, 111(6), 841–849. https://doi.org/10.5935/abc.20180169
De Melo Ghisi, G. L., Dos Santos, R. Z., Bonin, C. B., Roussenq, S., Grace, S. L., Oh, P., & Benetti, M. (2014). Validation of a Portuguese version of the Information Needs in Cardiac Rehabilitation (INCR) scale in Brazil. Heart & Lung: The Journal of Critical Care, 43(3), 192–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2014.01.009
Dibben, G., Faulkner, J., Oldridge, N., Rees, K., Thompson, D.R., Zwisler, A. D., & Taylor, R.S. (2021). Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Review, 6(11), CD001800. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/14651858.CD001800.pub4
Fawcett, J., & Desanto-Madeya, S. (2012). Contemporary nursing knowledge: Analysis and evaluation of nursing models and theories. FA Davis
Fayyazi, S., Sayadi, N., & Gheybizadeh, M. (2012). Comparison of quality of life before and after open heart surgery. Zahedan Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 14(9), 98-100
Ghisi, G. L., Grace, S. L., Thomas, S., Evans, M. F., & Oh, P. (2015). Development and psychometric validation of the second version of the Coronary Artery Disease Education Questionnaire (CADE-Q II). Patient Education and Counseling, 98(3), 378–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2014.11.019
Marofi, Z., Bandari, R., Heravi-Karimooi, M., Rejeh, N., & Montazeri, A. (2020). Cultural adoption, and validation of the Persian version of the coronary artery disease education questionnaire (CADE-Q): A second-order confirmatory factor analysis. BMC Cardiovascular Disorder, 20, 345. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-020-01628-5
Menezes Costa, L., Maher, C. G., McAuley, J. H., & Costa, L. O. (2009). Systematic review of cross-cultural adaptations of McGill pain questionnaire reveals a paucity of clinimetric testing. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(9), 934–943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.03.019
Mohammadi, E., Zarea, K., Alteren, J., & Sayadi, N. (2019). Care needs in the Phase I of cardiac rehabilitation: A hybrid concept analysis. Nursing and Midwifery Studies, 8(1), 48-54. http://doi.org/10.4103/nms.nms_76_17
Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Knol, D. L., Stratford, P. W., Alonso, J., Patrick, D. L., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. (2010). The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: A clarification of its content. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(10), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-10-22
Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. (2010). The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(7), 737–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006
Naghdi, S., Ansari, N N., Raji, P., Shamili, A., Amini, M., & Hasson, S. (2016). Cross-cultural validation of the Persian version of the functional independence measure for patients with stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation, 38(3), 289–298. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2015.1036173
Perk, J., De Backer, G., Gohlke, H., Graham, I., Reiner, Z., Verschuren, M., Albus, C., Benlian, P., Boysen, G., Cifkova, R., Deaton, C., Ebrahim, S., Fisher, M., Germano, G., Hobbs, R., Hoes, A., Karadeniz, S., Mezzani, A., Prescott, E., … Zannad, F.(2012). European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012). The fifth joint task force of the European society of cardiology and other societies on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts). European Heart Journal, 33(13), 1635-1701. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehs092
Phelan, C., Finnell, M. D., & Mottla, K. A. (1989). A patient self-assessment tool for cardiac rehabilitation. Rehabilitation Nursing, 14(2), 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2048-7940.1989.tb01425.x
Santos, R., Ghisi, G., Bonin, C., Chaves, G., Haase, C. M., Britto, R. R., & Benetti, M. (2019). Validation of the Brazilian version of CADE-Q II to assess knowledge of coronary artery disease patients. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, 112(1), 78–84. https://doi.org/10.5935/abc.20180244
Sayadi, N., Alteren, J., Mohammadi, E., & Zarea, K. (2021). Development and psychometric properties evaluation of a care needs questionnaire in phase 1 cardiac rehabilitation for patients with coronary artery disease: CNCR-Q. Journal of Caring Cciences, 10(1), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.34172/jcs.2021.006
Smith, J., Garton-Smith, J., Briffa, T., & Maiorana, A. (2015). The development of a new cardiac rehabilitation needs assessment tool (CRNAT) for individualised secondary prevention. Heart, Lung & Circulation, 24(5), 458–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2015.01.001
Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clininical Epidemiology, 60(1), 34-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012
Terwee, C. B., Mokkink, L. B., Knol, D. L., Ostelo, R. W., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. (2012). Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: A scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 21(4), 651–657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9960-1
Van Engen-Verheul, M. M., Kemps, H. M., de Keizer, N. F., Hellemans, I. M., Goud, R., Kraaijenhagen, RA., & Peek, N. (2012). Revision of the Dutch clinical algorithm for assessing patient needs in cardiac rehabilitation based on identified implementation problems. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 19(3), 504-514
Vasan, R.S., Benjamin, E. J. (2016). The future of cardiovascular epidemiology. Circulation, 133(25), 2626-2633. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.023528

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-11-21 19:09:03

No citation recorded.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Journal Author(s) Rights

In order for the Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro to publish and disseminate research articles, we need non-exclusive publishing rights (transferred from the author(s) to the publisher). This is determined by a publishing agreement between the author(s) and the Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro. This agreement involves the transfer or licensing of the copyright for publishing to the publisher, while authors still retain significant rights to use and share their own published articles. The Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro supports the need for authors to share, disseminate, and maximize the impact of their research through these rights in any databases.

As the author(s), you have rights to a wide range of uses of your article, including use by your employing institution or company. These author rights can be exercised without the need to obtain specific permission. Authors publishing in the Nurse Media Journal of Nursing have extensive rights to use their works for teaching and scholarly purposes without needing to seek permission, including:

use for classroom teaching by the author or the author’s institution and presentation at a meeting or conference, including distributing copies to attendees;
use for internal training by the author’s company;
distribution to colleagues for their research use;
use in a subsequent compilation of the author’s works;
inclusion in a thesis or dissertation;
reuse of portions or extracts from the article in other works (with full acknowledgment of the final article);
preparation of derivative works (other than for commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgment of the final article);
voluntary posting on open websites operated by the author or the author’s institution for scholarly purposes;

following the open access license of the Creative Commons CC BY-SA License.

Authors, readers, and third parties can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, as well as remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, but they must give appropriate credit (including the name of the creator and attribution parties, detailed information about the authors, a copyright notice, an open access license notice, a disclaimer notice, and a link to the material), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. The publisher will indicate any modification of the material (if any) and retain an indication of previous modifications using a CrossMark Policy and information about Erratum-Corrigendum notifications.

Authors, readers, and third parties can read, print, and download, redistribute or republish the article (e.g., display it in a repository), translate the article, download it for text and data mining purposes, reuse portions or extracts from the article in other works, sell or reuse it for commercial purposes, remix, transform, or build upon the material. They must distribute their contributions under the same license as the original Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA).

Copyright Transfer Agreement for Publishing (Publishing Right)

The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, non-exclusive right for publishing (publishing right) of the article shall be assigned/transferred to Publisher of the Nurse Media Journal of Nursing (Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro).

Upon acceptance of an article, authors will be asked to complete a 'Copyright Transfer Agreement for Publishing (CTAP)'. An e-mail will be sent to the Corresponding Author confirming receipt of the manuscript together with a 'Copyright Transfer Agreement for Publishing' form by online version of this agreement.

Nurse Media Journal of Nursing and Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, the Editors and the Editorial Board make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in the Nurse Media Journal of Nursing are sole and exclusive responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.

Please note that even though we ask for a transfer of copyright for publishing (CTAP), our journal Author(s) retain (or are granted back) significant scholarly rights as mentioned before.

The Copyright Transfer Agreement for Publishing (CTAP) Form can be downloaded here: [Copyright Transfer Agreement for Publishing (CTAP) Form NMJN 2024]

The copyright form should be signed electronically and send to the Editorial Office in the form of original e-mail below:

Dr. Meira Erawati (Editor-in-Chief)
Editorial Office of Nurse Media Journal of Nursing
Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro
Jl. Prof. Soedarto, Tembalang, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia 50275
Telp.: +62-24-76480919; Fax.: +62-24-76486849
E-mail: media_ners@live.undip.ac.id

(This policy statements has been updated at 24th January 2024)

An Evaluation of Psychometric Properties of Needs Assessment Instruments in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs: A Systematic Review

Journal Author(s) Rights

Copyright Transfer Agreement for Publishing (Publishing Right)

OFFICE INFORMATION