BibTex Citation Data :
@article{NMJN67063, author = {Asmat Burhan and Indah Susanti and Vanessa Silva and Vijay Kumar and Do Kim Chi and Riski Hidayat and Septian Sebayang and Hamka Hamka}, title = {Network Meta-Analysis of Wound Dressings and Their Effectiveness in Promoting Healing}, journal = {Nurse Media Journal of Nursing}, volume = {15}, number = {2}, year = {2025}, keywords = {Dressings; network meta-analysis; wound; wound care; wound healing}, abstract = { Background: Chronic and acute wounds affect millions of individuals worldwide, placing a substantial burden on patients and healthcare systems. Previous evaluations have often focused on limited types of dressings or specific wound conditions. Therefore, a comprehensive network meta-analysis is essential for comparing various interventions, bridging knowledge gaps, improving healing outcomes, and addressing clinical and economic challenges. Purpose: This study assessed the comparative effectiveness and safety of advanced wound dressings in promoting healing. Methods: This network meta-analysis, registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023433268), systematically searched PubMed, ProQuest, Scopus, CINAHL, ScienceDirect, Springer Nature, Wiley, Cochrane Library, and Taylor & Francis from January 2012 to December 2022. Eight reviewers independently assessed and extracted data from randomized controlled trials evaluating different dressings, including placebo, alginate, collagen, gamat, honey, hyaluronic acid, hydrocolloid, hydrogel, mebo, platelet-rich plasma, povidone-iodine, and silver sulfadiazine. Data were synthesized using a random-effects network meta-analysis with SUCRA rankings. Study quality was evaluated using Cochrane RoB2, and certainty of evidence was assessed through CINeMA. Results: This review included 38 RCTs with a total of 4,049 patients. The largest placebo group comprised 1,628 participants, while the smallest group was mebo with 10 participants. Heterogeneity and consistency analysis showed negligible variation (χ² = 1.757, p = 0.78). Alginate dressings were the most effective in reducing wound size compared to placebo (OR 0.64; 95% CI 0.38–1.08; SUCRA probability 0.73), whereas hyaluronic acid dressings were the least effective (OR 0.22; 95% CI 0.06–0.79; SUCRA probability 0.08). Conclusion: Alginate was identified as the most effective primary dressing for wound healing, while hyaluronic acid dressings were the least effective. However, clinical practitioners should carefully weigh the benefits and limitations of each dressing type before selecting the most appropriate treatment for patients. }, issn = {2406-8799}, doi = {10.14710/nmjn.v15i2.67063}, url = {https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/medianers/article/view/67063} }
Refworks Citation Data :
Background: Chronic and acute wounds affect millions of individuals worldwide, placing a substantial burden on patients and healthcare systems. Previous evaluations have often focused on limited types of dressings or specific wound conditions. Therefore, a comprehensive network meta-analysis is essential for comparing various interventions, bridging knowledge gaps, improving healing outcomes, and addressing clinical and economic challenges.
Purpose: This study assessed the comparative effectiveness and safety of advanced wound dressings in promoting healing.
Methods: This network meta-analysis, registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023433268), systematically searched PubMed, ProQuest, Scopus, CINAHL, ScienceDirect, Springer Nature, Wiley, Cochrane Library, and Taylor & Francis from January 2012 to December 2022. Eight reviewers independently assessed and extracted data from randomized controlled trials evaluating different dressings, including placebo, alginate, collagen, gamat, honey, hyaluronic acid, hydrocolloid, hydrogel, mebo, platelet-rich plasma, povidone-iodine, and silver sulfadiazine. Data were synthesized using a random-effects network meta-analysis with SUCRA rankings. Study quality was evaluated using Cochrane RoB2, and certainty of evidence was assessed through CINeMA.
Results: This review included 38 RCTs with a total of 4,049 patients. The largest placebo group comprised 1,628 participants, while the smallest group was mebo with 10 participants. Heterogeneity and consistency analysis showed negligible variation (χ² = 1.757, p = 0.78). Alginate dressings were the most effective in reducing wound size compared to placebo (OR 0.64; 95% CI 0.38–1.08; SUCRA probability 0.73), whereas hyaluronic acid dressings were the least effective (OR 0.22; 95% CI 0.06–0.79; SUCRA probability 0.08).
Conclusion: Alginate was identified as the most effective primary dressing for wound healing, while hyaluronic acid dressings were the least effective. However, clinical practitioners should carefully weigh the benefits and limitations of each dressing type before selecting the most appropriate treatment for patients.
Article Metrics:
Last update:
Last update: 2025-08-31 21:32:06
In order for the Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro to publish and disseminate research articles, we need non-exclusive publishing rights (transferred from the author(s) to the publisher). This is determined by a publishing agreement between the author(s) and the Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro. This agreement involves the transfer or licensing of the copyright for publishing to the publisher, while authors still retain significant rights to use and share their own published articles. The Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro supports the need for authors to share, disseminate, and maximize the impact of their research through these rights in any databases.
As the author(s), you have rights to a wide range of uses of your article, including use by your employing institution or company. These author rights can be exercised without the need to obtain specific permission. Authors publishing in the Nurse Media Journal of Nursing have extensive rights to use their works for teaching and scholarly purposes without needing to seek permission, including (but not limited to):
Authors, readers, and third parties can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, as well as remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, but they must give appropriate credit (including the name of the creator and attribution parties, detailed information about the authors, a copyright notice, an open access license notice, a disclaimer notice, and a link to the material), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. The publisher will indicate any modification of the material (if any) and retain an indication of previous modifications using a CrossMark Policy and information about Erratum-Corrigendum notifications.
Authors, readers, and third parties can read, print, and download, redistribute or republish the article (e.g., display it in a repository), translate the article, download it for text and data mining purposes, reuse portions or extracts from the article in other works, sell or reuse it for commercial purposes, remix, transform, or build upon the material. They must distribute their contributions under the same license as the original Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA).
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, non-exclusive right for publishing (publishing right) of the article shall be assigned/transferred to Publisher of the Nurse Media Journal of Nursing (Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro).
Upon acceptance of an article, authors will be asked to complete a 'Copyright Transfer Agreement for Publishing (CTAP)'. An e-mail will be sent to the Corresponding Author confirming receipt of the manuscript together with a 'Copyright Transfer Agreement for Publishing' form by online version of this agreement.
Nurse Media Journal of Nursing and Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, the Editors and the Editorial Board make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in the Nurse Media Journal of Nursing are sole and exclusive responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.
Please note that even though we ask for a transfer of copyright for publishing (CTAP), our journal Author(s) retain (or are granted back) significant scholarly rights as mentioned before.
The Copyright Transfer Agreement for Publishing (CTAP) Form can be downloaded here: [Copyright Transfer Agreement for Publishing (CTAP) Form NMJN 2024]
The copyright form should be signed electronically and send to the Editorial Office in the form of original e-mail below:
Dr. Sri Padma Sari (Editor-in-Chief)Editorial Office of Nurse Media Journal of Nursing Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro Jl. Prof. Soedarto, Tembalang, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia 50275Telp.: +62-24-76480919; Fax.: +62-24-76486849E-mail: media_ners@live.undip.ac.id
(This policy statements has been updated at 24th January 2024)
