1. Home
  2. Vol 49, No 2 (2020)
  3. Rissy

KETENTUAN DAN PELAKSANAAN BUSINESS JUDGEMENT RULE DI AMERIKA, AUSTRALIA DAN INDONESIA

Yafet Yosafet Wilben Rissy
DOI: 10.14710/mmh.49.2.2020.160-171
Copyright (c) 2020 Masalah-Masalah Hukum License URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

Abstract

Tujuan studi ini ialah membahas ketentuan dan penerapan business judgment rule (BJR) di Amerika Serikat (AS), Australia dan Indonesia dimana secara khusus menganalisis bagaimana dan kapan pengadilan memeriksa BJR dan bagaimana BJR diatur dalam hukum perusahaan. Studi ini menunjukan bahwa di AS dan Australia elemen BJR telah menjadi sebuah statutory obligation. Keputusan bisnis direktur telah diadili pengadilan dalam tradisi common law dan kini diatur secara tegas bahwa keputusan bisnis bisa diadili jika terdapat pelanggaran duty of care dan tugas fidusia direktur. Indonesia juga mengadopsi BJR dalam Undang-Undang Perseroan Terbatas 2007 namun pengadilan jarang menguji BJR. Terkait adopsi BJR, studi ini mengindikasikan bahwa adopsi tersebut masih menyisakan sejumlah persoalan mendasar. Oleh karena itu, direkomendasikan agar pengaturan BJR perlu dilakukan secara lebih sistematis.

Full Text: PDF

Keywords

Aturan Penilaian Bisnis; Direktur; Keputusan Bisnis; Tugas Direktur; Pengadilan

References

The Australia Corporations Act 2011, (2011).

Berger, D. J. (1990). Exporting the Twin Towers: The Development Of Transnational Business Judgment Rule. Saint Louis University Public Law Review, 9(1), 169–189.

Block, D.J.; Barton, N.E. ; Radin, S. E. (1987). The Business Judgment Rule - Fiduciary Duties of Corporate Directors and Officers. Prentice Hall.

Branson, D. M. (2002). The Rule at Isn’t a Rule - e Business Judgment Rule. Alparaiso University Law Review, 36(34), 631–654.

Detik. (2020). MA Lepaskan Eks Dirut Pertamina Karen di Kasus Korupsi Rp 568 M. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-4931904/ma-lepaskan-eks-dirut-pertamina-karen-di-kasus-korupsi-rp-568-m?_ga=2.21407481.332223227.1583567161-84216239.1549435714

Farrar, J. H. (1989). Business Judgment And Defensive Tactics In Hostile Takeover Bids. Canadian Business Law Journal, 15(1), 15–42.

Farrar, J. H. (2001). Corporate Governance Theories, Principles, and Practices (2nd (ed.)). Oxford University Press.

Greenhow, A. (1999). The Statutory Business Judgment Rule: Putting The Wind Into Directors’ Sails. Bond Law Review, 11(1), 33–38. http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/BondLawRw/1999/3.html

High Court Of Australia. (1968). Harlowe’s Nominees Pty Ltd V Woodside (Lakes Entrance) Oil Co NL,[1968] HCA 37; 121 CLR 483. Decided 21 June 1968. Jade.io. https://jade.io/article/66053

Hinsey IV, J. (1984). Business Judgment and the American Law Institute’s Corporate Governance Project: The Rule, The Doctrine and the Reality. George Washington Law Review, 15(4–5), 609–623.

Keay, A. ; Loughrey, J. (2019). The Concept of Business Judgment. Legal Studies, 39(1), 36–55.

McMillan, L. (2013). The Business Judgment Rule As An Immunity Doctrine. William and Mary Business Law Review, 4(2), 521–574.

Supreme Court of Delaware. (1927). Supreme Court of Delaware, Bodell v. General Gas Electric Corporation140 A. 264 (Del. 1927) 159 A. 376 Decided Feb 22, 1927, Cesetext, 6.

Supreme Court of Delaware. (1984). Supreme Court of Delaware Aronson v. Lewis, 473 A.2d 805, 812 (Del. 1984) Decided: March 1, 1984, IV. https://law.justia.com/cases/delaware/supreme-court/1984/473-a-2d-805-4.html

Supreme Court of Delaware. (1985). Supreme Court of Delaware Smith v. Van Gorkom488 A.2d 858 (Del. 1985) Decided Jan 29, 1985. https://law.justia.com/cases/delaware/supreme-court/1985/488-a-2d-858-4.html. .

Supreme Court of Delaware. (1993). Supreme Court of Delaware, Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc. 634 A.2d 345 (1993) Decided: October 22, 1993. https://law.justia.com/cases/delaware/supreme-court/1994/634-a-2d-345-1.html

The American Law Institute. (1994). Principles Of Corporate Governance: Analysis And Recommendations. The ALI.

The Model Business Corporation Act 2016, (2016).

Weinberger, L. . (2010). The Business Judgment Rule And Sphere Sovereignty. Cooley Law Review, 27(2), 279–319.