BibTex Citation Data :
@article{MMH5787, author = {Shinta Agustina Nani Mulyati}, title = {Persepsi Aparat Penegak Hukum Tentang Implemenasi Asas Lex Specialis Derogat Legi Generali Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana}, journal = {Masalah-Masalah Hukum}, volume = {41}, number = {4}, year = {2012}, keywords = {Lex Specialis Derogat Legi Generali, particular criminal law, and perception of law enforcement officer}, abstract = { Abstract Due to the complexity of regulations on criminal law, one single action could breach directly two or more criminal acts. In such cases, the principle of lex specialis derogat legi generali must be implemented, as stipulated in article 63 (2) of the Criminal Code. This principle required the two acts should regulate the same object or action, otherwise it could not be implemented although the offender seem has breached two acts arised from a single action. In this time being the implementation of this principle often rised an unsatisfaction due to its inconsistency that has rised disparity of sentencing. The different perception of the law enforcement officers on the meaning of particularly criminal law, the cases in which the principle should be implemented, and the model of charging that should be used, are several causes of the inconcistency implementation. Keywords: Lex Specialis Derogat Legi Generali, particular criminal law, and perception of law enforcement officer. Abstra k Tindak pidana yang terjadi dalam masyarakat seringkali melanggar beberapa ketentuan hukum pidana di luar KUHP (hukum pidana khusus) sekaligus. Penegakan hukum terhadap kasus demikian sering tidak memuaskan karena penerapan asas lex specialis derogat legi generali yang inkonsisten, sehingga terjadi disparitas pidana. Pemahaman aparat penegak hukum yang berbeda tentang apa yang dimaksud hukum pdiana khusus, tahapan penerapannya, dan bentuk surat dakwaan yang sesuai bagi penanganan perkara pidana yang demikian menjadi penyebab terjadinya inkonsistensi penegakan hukum tersebut. Kata Kunci: Asas Lex Specialis Derogat Legi Generali, Hukum Pidana Khusus, dan persepsi penegak hukum. }, issn = {2527-4716}, pages = {540--548} doi = {10.14710/mmh.41.4.2012.540-548}, url = {https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/mmh/article/view/5787} }
Refworks Citation Data :
Abstract
Due to the complexity of regulations on criminal law, one single action could breach directly two or more criminal acts. In such cases, the principle of lex specialis derogat legi generali must be implemented, as stipulated in article 63 (2) of the Criminal Code. This principle required the two acts should regulate the same object or action, otherwise it could not be implemented although the offender seem has breached two acts arised from a single action. In this time being the implementation of this principle often rised an unsatisfaction due to its inconsistency that has rised disparity of sentencing. The different perception of the law enforcement officers on the meaning of particularly criminal law, the cases in which the principle should be implemented, and the model of charging that should be used, are several causes of the inconcistency implementation.
Keywords: Lex Specialis Derogat Legi Generali, particular criminal law, and perception of law enforcement officer.
Abstrak
Tindak pidana yang terjadi dalam masyarakat seringkali melanggar beberapa ketentuan hukum pidana di luar KUHP (hukum pidana khusus) sekaligus. Penegakan hukum terhadap kasus demikian sering tidak memuaskan karena penerapan asas lex specialis derogat legi generali yang inkonsisten, sehingga terjadi disparitas pidana. Pemahaman aparat penegak hukum yang berbeda tentang apa yang dimaksud hukum pdiana khusus, tahapan penerapannya, dan bentuk surat dakwaan yang sesuai bagi penanganan perkara pidana yang demikian menjadi penyebab terjadinya inkonsistensi penegakan hukum tersebut.
Kata Kunci: Asas Lex Specialis Derogat Legi Generali, Hukum Pidana Khusus, dan persepsi penegak hukum.
Article Metrics:
Last update:
Last update: 2025-06-17 11:03:06
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Masalah Masalah Hukum journal (MMH) and Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro as publisher of the journal. Copyright encompasses rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.
MMH journal and Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro and the Editors make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in MMH journal are the sole responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.
We strongly encourage that manuscripts be submitted to online journal system in http://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/mmh/index. Authors are required to create an account and submit the manuscripts online. For submission inquiries, please follow the submission instructions in the website. If the author has any problems on the online submission, please contact Editorial Office at the following email: jurnal.mmh@undip.ac.id or jurnal.mmh@gmail.com
Contributors are responsible for obtaining permission to reproduce any materials, including photographs and illustrations, for which they do not hold the copyright and for ensuring that the appropriate acknowledgments are included in the manuscript.