DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/mdl.24.1.2024.30-38

ARCHITECTURE AFTER GRAVITY: UNDERSTANDING SPATIAL EXPERIENCE OF WEIGHTLESSNESS AND DISORIENTATION

Ocfia Amirul Elawati  -  Department of Architecture, University of Indonesia, Indonesia
*Kristanti Dewi Paramita orcid scopus  -  Department of Architecture, University of Indonesia, Indonesia
Paramita Atmodiwirjo orcid scopus  -  Department of Architecture, University of Indonesia,, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

This study examine the idea of after gravity as the basis of an architectural design method. After gravity is defined as the condition of weightlessness and disorientation that creates unrestricted body movement. Gravity determines the direction of architectural spatial orientation and gives weight to subject and object in architectural space, creating boundaries of possible body movements. This paper analyzes the development of a design method based on that appropriates gravity through the analytical study of ten gravity-defying body movements such as hanging, flying, or spinning. The study identifies three gravity-based relations; happening between bodies, between body and object, and between body and space. The design method of architecture after gravity highlights the spatial experience of the moving body in receiving stimuli and responding to the context. Understanding architecture after gravity widens the potential of architecture that sees the relations of forces in a context with the body in a dynamically built environment.

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download |  common.other
Untitled
Subject
Type Other
  Download (9MB)    Indexing metadata
Keywords: After gravity; body movement; weightlessness; disorientation; spatial quality

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
KARAKTERISTIK BENTUK ORNAMEN PADA BANGUNAN BERSEJARAH DI KALIMANTAN BARATStudi Kasus: Istana Kadariah Pontianak dan Keraton Alwazikhoebillah Sambas ARCHITECTURE AFTER GRAVITY: UNDERSTANDING SPATIAL EXPERIENCE OF WEIGHTLESSNESS AND DISORIENTATION PERSEPSI MULTIGENERASI TERHADAP ELEMEN PERSISTEN KAWASAN PUSAT KOTA PASURUAN AN EDITORIAL ABOUT BROADER MEANING IN ARCHITECTURE PERAN ARSITEK DALAM FACILITY MANAGEMENT (FM) DI LEVEL BANGUNAN GEDUNG: PERSPEKTIF DAN KONTEKS INDONESIA More recent articles
Most cited articles
EVALUASI SISTEM PROTEKSI KEBAKARAN PADA BANGUNAN RUMAH SUSUN (STUDI KASUS : RUSUNAWA UNDIP) PEMAHAMAN TENTANG LINGKUNGAN BERKELANJUTAN EVALUATION ON SUMBER SENENG NATURAL PARK, REMBANG AS TOURISM OBJECT USING ADO-ODTWA ANALYSIS IMPLEMENTING MIXED LAND USE ROOTING JANE JACOBS’ CONCEPT OF DIVERSITY IN URBAN SUSTAINABILITY Simulasi Intensitas Suara Dari Model Bukaan Jendela Pada Bangunan Kuno Di Semarang More cited articles
  1. Arnheim, R. (1975). The Dynamics Of Architectural Form. Barkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University Of California Press
  2. Atmodiwirjo, P., & Yatmo, Y. A. (2022). Interiority From the Body, Mind, and Culture. Interiority (Vol. 5, No. 1), 1-4. doi: https://doi.org/10.7454/in.v5i1.209
  3. Atmodiwirjo, P., & Yatmo, Y. A. (2021). Animated interior. Interiority, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.7454/in.v4i2.176
  4. Boettger, T. (2014). Threshold Space: Transitions in Architecture, Analysis and Design Tools. Basel: Birkhäuse
  5. Casas, N. (2017). Interactions: Dialogue on Body, Protections and Derivatives. Architectural Design, 34-39. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.2235
  6. Dewindar, K. (1996). The Continuum Of Material, Structure And Space.Anti-gravity Architecture: A New Utopia For AnExperimental Architecture. Transactions on the Built Environment (24), 9. doi: https://doi.org/10.2495/MRS960231
  7. Frank, K. A., & Lepori, R. B. (2000). Architecture inside out. Wiley
  8. Grosz, E. (2001). Architecture from the outside. Cambridge: The MIT Press
  9. Inhabiting Artificial Gravity. AIAA Space Technology Conference. doi:DOI: 10.2514/6.1999-4524
  10. Hall, T. W. (2000). Gravity as an Environmental System. 30th International Conference
  11. Jones, P. B., & Meagher, M. (2017). Architecture and Movement. London and New York: Raoutledge
  12. Kim, S., & Whang, H. (2015). A study on the effects of “Defying gravity” in aesthetic preference of architectural forms. Daehan Geoncug Haghoe Nonmunjib. Gyehoeg’gye/Daehan Geonchuk Hakoe
  13. Nonmunjip. Gyehoekgye, 31(5), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.5659/jaik_pd.2015.31.5.87
  14. Kotnik, T., & Weinstock, M. (2012). Material, Form and Force. Material Computation: Higher Integration in Morphogenetic Design (Vol. 82, Issue. 2), 104-111. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.1386
  15. Mollie, D. (2003). Movement and Dance in the Early Years. London: Paul Chapman Publishing
  16. Morey-Holton, E. R. (2003). The impact of gravity on life. In Elsevier eBooks (pp. 143–159). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-012598655-7/50036-7
  17. Parkes, A., Poupyrev, I., & Ishii, H. (2008). Designing kinetic interactions for organic user interfaces. Communications of the ACM (Vol. 51, No.6), 58-65. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/1349026.1349039
  18. Yatmo, Y. A., Atmodiwirjo, P., & Paramita, K. D. (2016). Topological Reading of Movement Connectivity in Sensory Integration space for Autistic Children. Space and Culture, 20(1), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331216646060
  19. Yatmo, Y. A., & Atmodiwirjo, P. (2013). Sneezing as a Form of Transaction between Active Body and Space. ˜the œSenses and Society, 8(2), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.2752/174589313x13589681980777

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-04-25 11:03:13

No citation recorded.