DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/parole.v12i1.69-80

An analysis of International Baccalaureate – English Language Curriculum for Middle Year Program

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia

Received: 13 Dec 2021; Published: 30 Apr 2022.
Open Access Copyright (c) 2022 PAROLE: Journal of Linguistics and Education under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

The IB Curriculum, which was initially founded in Switzerland, is used globally. Many schools in Indonesia also apply this curriculum, and the number keeps growing. This paper will present the results of a study aiming to investigate the ideology, model, and elements of the International Baccalaureate (IB) curriculum, specifically the English (Language Acquisition) curriculum for the Middle Year Program (secondary school). The study has been given shape by the theory of curriculum development. The study employed a case study research design, especially text analysis. The results show that the English IB curriculum applies a learner-cantered ideology with collaborative learning to build students’ communicative skills. It also has been influenced by a deductive model proposed by Tyler. Moreover, the elements also confirm Tyler’s rationale, consisting of objectives, the content, learning activities or learning experiences designed to achieve the objectives various types of assessments and evaluations.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: EFL curriculum; Curriculum analysis; International Baccalaureate Curriculum; Tyler’s rationale

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Article
Language : EN
Recent articles
An analysis of International Baccalaureate – English Language Curriculum for Middle Year Program The Learning of DaF Subject during the Covid-19 Pandemic: The Perspective of the Teachers Integrating Mind-Mapping Collaborated with Think-Pair-Share to Teach Reading Comprehension in Descriptive Text The Digital Game for the Learning of Reading Skill Effective Classroom Management in English as a Foreign Language Classroom Back Matter Parole Volume 12 Number 1 April 2022 Front Matter Parole Volume 12 Number 1 April 2022 More recent articles
Most cited articles
Backmatter Interpersonal Metadiscourse pada Tagline Iklan Poster World Wildlife Fund (WWF) The Effectiveness of TPR (Total Physical Response) Method in English Vocabulary Mastery of Elementary School Children Back Matter Backmatter More cited articles
  1. Alsubaie, M. A. (2015). Hidden curriculum as one of current issue of curriculum. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(33), 125–128. www.iiste.org
  2. Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. Longman
  3. Bobbitt, F. (1918). The curriculum. Houghton Mifflin
  4. Brown, J. D. (1995). The elements of language curriculum: A systematic approach to program design. Heinle & Heinle
  5. Carber, S., & Reis, S. (2004). Commonalities in IB practice and the Schoolwide Enrichment Model. Journal of Research in International Education, 3(3), 339–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475240904047359
  6. Carl, A. (1995). Teacher empowerment through curriculum development: Theory into practice. Juta
  7. Caswell, H. L., & Campbell, D. S. (1935). Curriculum development. American Book
  8. Çelik, S., Aytın, K., & Bayram, E. (2013). Implementing Cooperative Learning in the Language Classroom: Opinions of Turkish Teachers of English. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 1852–1859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.263
  9. Chambers, C. (2003). As Canadian as possible under the circumstances: A view of contemporary curriculum discourses in Canada. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.), The international handbook of curriculum research (pp. 221–252). Lawrence Erlbaum
  10. Cohen, A., & Henry, A. (2020). An introduction to applied lingustics (N. Schmitt & M. P. H. Rodgers (Eds.); 5th ed., pp. 165–189). Routledge
  11. Cornbleth, C. (1984). Beyond Hidden curriculum? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 16(1), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027840160105
  12. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications
  13. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design (4th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc
  14. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. In Sage Publications (Issue 5). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1319-x
  15. Dewey, J. (1915). The school and society. University of Chicago Press
  16. Eisner, E. W. (1979). The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs. Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc
  17. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum International Publishing Group
  18. Ghonoodi, A., & Salimi, L. (2011). The study of elements of curriculum in smart schools. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 68–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.014
  19. Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. Edward Arnold
  20. Hlebowitsh, P. S. (1992). Amid behavioural and behaviouristic objectives: Reappraising appraisals of the Tyler Rationale. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 24(6), 533–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027920240602
  21. Hlebowitsh, P. S. (1995). Interpretations of the Tyler Rationale: A reply to Kliebard. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 27(1), 89–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027950270108
  22. Hoover, J. (2010). Response to intervention models: Curricular implications and interventions. Pearson
  23. International Baccalaureate Organization. (2002). A continuum of international education: The Primary Years Programme, the Middle Years Programme, the Diploma Programme. IBO
  24. IB world schools yearbook. (2020). John Catt Educational Ltd. https://www.ibyb.org/ib-world-schools-in-indonesia
  25. Jewitt, C. (2008). Multimodality and literacy in school classrooms. Review of Research in Education, 32(241–267). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07310586
  26. Kress, G., & Leeuwen, T. V. (2001). Multimodal discourse. Arnold
  27. Krull, E. (2003). Hilda Taba (1902–1967). Prospects, 33(4), 481–491. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PROS.0000004617.52394.b6
  28. Lalwani, S., & Fox, J. (2020). Teacher education and the International Baccalaureate: Where is the evidence? In J. Fox & C. Alexander (Eds.), Teacher education in gobalised times (pp. 179–197). Springer
  29. Läänemets, U., & Kalamees-Ruubel, K. (2013). The Taba-Tyler Rationales. Journal of the American Association for the Advancement of Curriculum Studies, 9, 1–12
  30. Lee, M., Kim, H., & Wright, E. (2021). The influx of International Baccalaureate (IB) programmes into local education systems in Hong Kong, Singapore, and South Korea. Educational Review, 00(00), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2021.1891023
  31. Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 1(20)
  32. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey Bass
  33. Nation, I. S. P., & Macalister, J. (2010). Language curriculum design. Routledge
  34. Nel, C. (2008). Learning styles and good language learners. In C. Griffiths (Ed.), Lessons from Good Language Learners (pp. 49–60). Cambridge University Press
  35. Nguyen, L. T. C., & Gu, Y. (2013). Strategy-based instruction: A learner-focused approach to developing learner autonomy. Language Teaching Research, 17(1), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168812457528
  36. Olsen, R. E. W.-B., & Kagan, S. (1992). About cooperative learning. In Cooperative language learning: A teacher’s resource book (pp. 1–30). Prentice Hall
  37. Permendikbud No. 37 tahun 2018 Tentang Kompetensi Inti dan Kompetensi Dasar dalam Kurikulum 2013, (2018)
  38. Pinar, W. F. (2004). What is curriculum theory? Lawrence Erlbaum
  39. Pinar, W. F., Reynolds, W. M., Slattery, P., & Taubman, P. M. (1995). Understanding curriculum. Peter Lang
  40. Posner, G. J. (2004). Analyzing the curriculum (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill
  41. Qu, W., & Zhang, C. (2013). The Analysis of Summative Assessment and Formative Assessment and Their Roles in College English Assessment System. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(2), 335–339. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.4.2.335-339
  42. Resnick, L. B. (1983). Mathematics and science learning: A new conception. Science, 220(4596), 477–478. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.220.4596.477
  43. Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge University Press
  44. Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge University Press
  45. Rose, D., & Martin, J. R. (2012). Learning to write, reading to learn: Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney school. Equinox Publishing Ltd
  46. Savignon, S. J. (2002). Interpreting communicative language teaching. Yale University Press
  47. Schiro, M. (2008). Curriculum theory: Conflicting visions and enduring concerns. Sage Publications
  48. Sholihah, K. (2017). Analysis of English curriculum in 11 grade of Udomsasn Wittya School Thailand. Journal of English Teaching, Literature, and Applied Lingustics, 1(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.1n.1p.1
  49. Siegel, M. (2012). New times for multimodality? Confronting the accountability culture. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 55(8), 671–681. https://doi.org/doi: 10.1002/JAAL.00082
  50. Silva, E. (2009). Measuring skills for 21st-century learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(9), 630–634
  51. Smith, E. R., Tyler, R. W., & the Evaluation Staff. (1942). Appraising and recording student progress. Harper and Brothers
  52. Taba, H. (1962). Curriculum development: Theory and practice. Harcourt, Brace & World
  53. Taba, H., & Wilson, H. E. (1946). Intergroup education through the school curriculum. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 244(1), 19–25. https://doi.org/doi: 10.1177/000271624624400104
  54. Thornton, P. (1999). Reading together. In D. Kluge & S. McGuire (Eds.), JALT Applied Materials: Cooperative Learning (pp. 22–36). Japan Association for Language Teaching
  55. Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. The University of Chicago Press
  56. Tyler, R. W. (2013). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. In D. J. Flinders & S. J. Thornton (Eds.), Curriculum studies reader (4th ed., pp. 59–68). Routledge Falmer
  57. Tyler, R. W. (1953). Leadership role of the school administrator in curriculum and instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 54(4), 200–209
  58. Tyler, Ralph W. (1957). The curriculum-then and now. The Elementary School Journal, 57(7), 364–374. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/459567
  59. Tyler, R. W. (1975). Educational benchmarks in retrospect: Educational change since 1915. Viewpoints, 51(2), 11–31
  60. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No. 20 Tahun 2003, (2003)
  61. Weir, C., & Roberts, J. (1994). Evaluation in ELT. Blackwell
  62. Wells, J. (2011). International education, values and attitudes: A critical analysis of the International Baccalaureate (IB) Learner Profile. Journal of Research in International Education, 10(2), 174–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475240911407808
  63. Wilson, L. O. (1990). Types of curriculum. https://thesecondprinciple.com/instructional-design/types-of-curriculum/
  64. Wraga, W. G. (2017). Understanding the Tyler rationale: Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction in historical context. Espacio, Tiempo y Educación, 4(2), 227–252. https://doi.org/10.14516/ete.156
  65. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE
  66. Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1177/109634809702100108

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-11-12 12:19:20

No citation recorded.