DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/parole.v14i1.1-10

Articulatory dynamics of laterals and trills in Tamil and Telugu: An Ultrasound Study

1Assistant Professor, Program of Speech Language Pathology , Saudi Arabia

2Speech Language Pathologist, India

Received: 16 Jan 2024; Published: 5 Apr 2024.
Open Access Copyright (c) 2024 PAROLE: Journal of Linguistics and Education under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Compared to other sounds, /l/ and /r/ have much more complex and more variable articulatory configurations across speakers. The present study aims to find the articulatory dynamics of lateral /l/ and trill /r/ across two Dravidian languages, i.e., Tamil and Telugu. A total of 20 subjects from two language groups were taken for the study, with 10 participants from each language, which includes an equal number of males and females. Tongue contours for each subject were taken for /l/ and /r/ sounds in the VCV context. In Tamil, the posterior tongue height was more for /r/, and there was no difference in height in the mid-region and anterior region. In the /u/ context, tongue height was more for /l/. The statistical analysis of /l/ and /r/ in Tamil revealed that in the /a/ context, there was no significant difference in tongue advancement and tongue height. The tongue height for /l/ was more in the anterior region when compared to the /r/, but there was no significant difference in tongue advancement in the /i/context. The present study findings will be provided information regarding the tongue dynamics of trills and laterals in normal individuals across two Dravidian languages.

 

Fulltext View|Download Email colleagues
Keywords: Liquids; Trills; Tamil; Telugu; articulatory dynamics; Ultrasound

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Article
Language : EN
Most cited articles
Illocution on Speech Acts of Foreign Students in Indonesian Learning The Implication of Curriculum Renewal on ELT in Indonesia A Critical Evaluation of Qualitative Reports and Their Contributions to Educational Research Frontmatter Backmatter More cited articles
  1. Charles, S., & Lulich, S. M. (2019, May).An ultrasound study of American English laterals produced by children.In Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics 177ASA (Vol. 36, No. 1, p. 060006).Acoustical Society of America
  2. Ciriza, M. D. P., & Rivera-Campos, A. (2020). Teaching the Spanish trill to L1 English speakers using ultrasound instruction: a preliminary study on pronunciation pedagogy. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching, 7(1), 20-33. Clark, C. E., Schwarz, I. E., & Blakeley, R. W. (1993). The removable r-appliance as a practice device to facilitate correct production of/r. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 2(1), 84-92. Dhananjaya, N., Yegnanarayana, B., &Bhaskararao, P. (2012). Acoustic analysis of trill sounds. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131(4), 3141-3152. Elbert, M., & McReynolds, L. V. (1975). Transfer of/r/across contexts. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 40(3), 380-387
  3. Espy-Wilson, C. Y., & Boyce, S. E. (2001). Similarities in acoustic modeling for/r/and/l/. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109(5_Supplement), pp. 2292-2292
  4. Fink, B. R. (1986). ‘Complexity.’Science 231, 319. Fodor J A (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  5. Gick, B., Kang, A. M., & Whalen, D. H. (2002).MRI evidence for commonality in the post-oral articulations of English vowels and liquids. Journal of Phonetics, 30(3), 357–371
  6. Goldman, R., & Fristoe, M. (2000). Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation, Second Edition (GFTA-2). APA PsycTests. Ladefoged, P., &Bhaskararao, P. (1983). Non-quantal aspects of consonant production: A study of retroflex consonants. Journal of phonetics, 11(3), 291-302. Lawson, E., Leplatre, G., Stuart-Smith, J., &Scobbie, J. M. (2019). The effects of syllable and utterance position on tongue shape and gestural magnitude in/l/and/r/
  7. Oh, S. (2005). Articulatory characteristics of English/l/in speech development (Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia). Raver-Lampman, G., & Wilson, C. (2017). An Acceptable Alternative Articulation to Remediate Mispronunciation of the English /l/ Sound: Can Production Precede Perception? TESOL Journal, 9(1), 203–223. doi: 10.1002/tesj.319.Recasens,D.(2011).DifferencesinbaseofarticulationforconsonantsamongCatalandialects.Phonetica,67(4),201-218
  8. Ristuccia, C.L.(2004). Survey of speech language pathologists concerning /r/.unpublished manuscript. Smith, T. (1971).A phonetic study of the functions of the extrinsic tongue muscles. UCLA Work.Pap.Phonet., 18
  9. Stone, M., Faber, A., Raphael, L. J., &Shawker, T. H. (1992). Cross-sectional tongue shape and linguopalatal contact patterns in ‘s’, ‘sh’, and ‘l’. Journal of Phonetics, 20, 253–270
  10. Tabain, M., Kochetov, A., Beare, R., & Sreedevi, N. (2016). A comparative ultrasound study of coronal consonants in Arrernte and Kannada: manner contrasts. In 16th Australasian international conference on speech science and technology. Sydney: Australia (pp. 25-28)

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-07-12 19:17:52

No citation recorded.