DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/politika.13.2.2022.253-273

Delegitimisation of Indonesian Traditional Leaders: An Analysis in Minangkabau, West Sumatra Province

Department of Political Science, Universitas Andalas, Indonesia

Open Access Copyright (c) 2022 Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.

How to cite (IEEE): A. Asrinaldi, "Delegitimisation of Indonesian Traditional Leaders: An Analysis in Minangkabau, West Sumatra Province," Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 253-273, Oct. 2022. https://doi.org/10.14710/politika.13.2.2022.253-273
Citation Format:
Abstract

It is argued that an excessive euphoria of autonomy was the primary consequence of the first five years of decentralisation in Indonesia after the New Order. The euphoria of autonomy led to the emergence of ethnic nationalism perpetuated by traditional powers that regulated the control and exploitation of natural resources. The New Order government tried to control local democratic practices by weakening traditional leaders' legitimacy. This article explains how this reality occurs in West Sumatra Province. First, based on village and regional government laws following the New Order, local democracy led to the delegitimisation of traditional power. Second, the systematic implementation of local democracy erased the traditional leadership authority that relegated the Minangkabau ethnic and traditional values. It was concluded that the government enacted the local government and village laws to regulate the traditional authority.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: decentralisation; local identity; traditional power; village; Minangkabau.

Article Metrics:

Plum Print visual indicator of research metrics
Captures
  • Readers: 24

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
Nationalist-Islamist Party in a Liberal Ecosystem: The Solidity and Campaign Strategy of the Prosperous Justice Party (PKS) during the 2014 and 2019 Elections The Hegemony of Uken-Toa Socio-Politics in the Regional Head Elections in Aceh Tengah Voter Behaviour and The Campaign Pattern of Candidates during Pandemics in Regional Head Election in Medan City, North Sumatra More recent articles
Most cited articles
Politika Jurnal Ilmu Politik Inovasi Manajemen Pelayanan Publik Tim Emergency Service Kabupaten Bantaeng BENTUK RESOLUSI KONFLIK DALAM PILKADA: Kasus Pilkada Kota Yogyakarta dan Kabupaten Jepara MANAJEMEN TATA KELOLA SUMBER DAYA ALAM BERBASIS PARADIGMA EKOLOGI POLITIK PEREMPUAN DAN KORUPSI PADA RANAH PUBLIK (Ditinjau dari Gaya Kepemimpinan, Politik, Agama, Psikologi dan Budaya Ketimuran) More cited articles
  1. Tyson, A. (2010). Decentralization and Adat Revivalism in Indonesia: The Politics of Becoming Indigenous. London: Routledge
  2. Buehler, M. (2010). Decentralisation and Local Democracy in Indonesia: The Marginalisation of the Public Sphere. In E. Aspinall, & M. Mietzner, Problems of Democratization in Indoensia: Elections, Institutions, and Society (pp. 267-285). Singapore: ISEAS
  3. Helmske, G., & Levitsky, S. (2004). Informal Instititutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda. Perspectives on Politics, 2(4), 725-740
  4. Mietzner, M. (2014). Indonesia's Decentralization: The Rise of Local Identitites and the Survival of Nation State. In H. Hill, Regional Dynamics in a Decentralized Indonesia (pp. 45-67). Singapore: ISEAS
  5. Bedner, A., & Arizona, Y. (2019). Adat in Indonesia Land Law: A Promise for the Future or a Dead End? The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 20(5), 416-434
  6. Tanasaldy, T. (2012). Regime Change and Ethnic Politics in Indonesia: Dayak Politics of West Kalimantan. Leiden: KITLV Press
  7. Bertrand, J. (2004). Nationalism and Ethnic Conflict in Indonesia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  8. Wilson, I. D. (2006). Continuity and Change: The Changing Contours of Organized Violence in Post-New Order Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 38(2), 265-297
  9. Fukuyama, F. (2004). State Building: Governance and World Order in the 21st Century. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
  10. Weber, M. (1947). The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York: The Free Press
  11. Anderson, B. O. (1991). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso
  12. Logan, C. (2009). Selected Chiefs: Elected Councillors and Hybrid Democrats: Popular Perspectives on the Co-Existence of Democracy and Traditional Authority. Journal of Modern African Studies, 47(1), 101-128
  13. Goodfellow, T., & Lindemann, S. (2013). The Clash of Instititutions: Traditional Authority, Conflict and the Failure of 'Hybridity' in Buganda. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 51(1), 3-26
  14. Zimbalist, Z. (2021). Explaining Variation in Levels of Public (Dis)trust in Traditional Leaders: Colonial Ruling Strategies and Contemporary Roles in Governance. Government and Opposition, 56(4), 661-682
  15. Tomsa, D. (2008). Party Politics and Democratization in Indonesia: Golkar in the Post-Suharto Era. London: Routledge
  16. Tran, T., & Bifuh-Ambe, E. (2021). Ethnic Identity Among Second-Generation Vietnamese American Adolescents. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 8(2), 167-186
  17. Ribot, J., Agrawal, A., & Larson, A. M. (2006). Recentralizing while Decentralizing: How National Government Re-appropriate Forest Resources. World Development, 34(11), 1864-1886
  18. Antlov, H., Wetterberg, A., & Dharmawan, L. (2016). Village Governance, Community Life, and the 2014 Village Law in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 52(2), 161-183
  19. Dusing, S. (2000). Traditional Leadership and Democratisation in Southern Africa: A Comparative Study of Bostwana, Namibia & South Africa. Munster: LIT Verlag
  20. Baldwin, K. (2016). The Paradox of Traditional Chiefs in Democratic Africa. New York: Cambridge University Press
  21. Landman, T. (2005). Protecting Human Right: A Comparative Study. Washington D.C: Georgetown University Press
  22. Sellers, J., & Lidstrom, A. (2007). Decentralization, Local Government, and the Welfare State. Governance, 20(4), 609-632
  23. Henly, D., & Davidson, J. (2007). Introduction: Radical Conservatism-the Protean Politics of Adat. In J. Davidson, & D. Henly, The Revival of Tradition in Indonesian Politics: The Deployment of Adat from Colonialism to Indigenism (pp. 1-49). London: Routledge
  24. Sulistiyanto, P., & Erb, M. (2009). Indonesia and the Quest for "Democracy". In M. Erb, & P. Sulistiyanto, Deepening Democracy in Indonesia? Direct Election for Local Leaders (Pilkada) (pp. 1-37). Singapore: ISEAS
  25. Kimura, E. (2013). Political Change and Territoriality in Indonesia: Provincial Proliferation. Oxon: Routledge
  26. Crouch, H. (2010). Political Reform in Indonesia After Soeharto. Singapore: ISEAS
  27. Devas, N. (1997). Indonesia: What Do We Mean by Decentralization? Public Administration and Development, 17, 352-367
  28. Duncan, C. R. (2007). Mixed Outcomes: The Impact of Regional Autonomy and Decentralization on Indigenous Ethnic Minorities in Indonesia. Development and Change, 38(4), 711-733
  29. Power, T., & Warburton, E. (2020). The Decline of Indonesian Democracy. In T. Power, & E. Warburton, Democracy in Indonesia (pp. 1-22). Singapore: ISEAS
  30. Vel, J. A., & Bedner, A. W. (2015). Decentralisation and Village Governance in Indonesia: The Return to Nagari and the 2014 Village Law. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 47(3), 493-507
  31. Kahin, A. (1999). Rebellion to Integration: West Sumatra and the Indonesian Polity 1926-1998. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press
  32. Dalmenda, M. A. (2018, June 5). KAN Harus Aktif di Nagari. (Asrinaldi, Interviewer)
  33. Bahar, S. (2018). Etnik, Elite dan Integrasi Nasional: Minangkabau 1945-1984, Republik Indonesia 1985-2015. Yogyakarta: GRE Publishing
  34. Graves, E. (2007). Asal-Usul Elite Minangkabau Modern: Respons terhadap Kolonial Belanda Abad XIX/XX. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia
  35. Hadler, J. (2010). Sengketa Tiada Putus: Matriarkat, Reformisme Islam dan Kolonialisme di Minangkabau. Jakarta: Freedom Institut
  36. Redaksi. (2019, February 7). Prokabar. Retrieved from prokabar.com: https://prokabar.com/horeee-anggaran-dana-desa-2019-untuk-sumbar-naik-lagi
  37. De Jong, J. (1982). Minangkabau and Negri Sembilan: Socio-Political Structure in Indonesia. The Hague: M. Nijhoff
  38. Dahl, R. A. (1971). Poliarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press
  39. Rahim, S. (2018, June 9). MTTS Tidak Berfungsi. (Asrinaldi, Interviewer)
  40. Sova, E. (2018, July 17). Ninik Mamak Kehilangan Kekuasaan di Nagari. (Asrinaldi, Interviewer)
  41. Nordholt, H. S., & Klinken, G. (2007). Pendahuluan. In H. Nordholt, & G. Klinken, Politik Lokal di Indonesia (pp. 1-41). Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia
  42. Aspinall, E., & Sukmajati, M. (2016). Electoral Dynamics in Indonesia: Money Politics, Patronage, and Clientelism at the Grassroots. Singapore: ISEAS

Last update:

  1. Problems of Implementing Village Origin Rights in Indonesia

    Asrinaldi Asrinaldi. Andalas International Journal of Socio-Humanities, 6 (1), 2024. doi: 10.25077/aijosh.v6i1.57

Last update: 2025-04-03 01:43:44

No citation recorded.