DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/politika.15.1.2024.135-160

Examining the Impact of E-Government Development Index (EGDI) and Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI): A Comparative Study of Thailand and The Six Selected ASEAN Countries

1Mindanao State University - Iligan Institute of Technology, Iligan, Philippines , Philippines

2Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Bantul, DI Yogyakarta , Indonesia

Open Access Copyright (c) 2024 Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.

Citation Format:
Abstract

The purpose of this research is to analyze how the comparison between Thailand and the six selected ASEAN countries in this study, namely Singapore, Brunei Darussalam, Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, and the Philippines. This study will analyze the data further using Google Data Studio which is correlated between two indicators, namely the World Governance Indicator (WGI) and the E-Government Development Index (EGDI). Based on the six indicators of the World Governance Indicator (WGI), it can be concluded that on the Voice and Accountability indicator, Thailand scored 82.53 because the freedom of expression in Thailand is still not completely free. On the indicator of Political Stability and Absence of Violence/Terrorism Thailand itself experienced several acts of terror in its country. In the Government Effectiveness indicator, Thailand's Government has implemented good regulatory practices and is committed to improving the quality of regulations. On the Regulatory Quality indicator, Thailand has been working to accelerate reforms for three years to set a solid foundation for sustainable regulatory policy intervention.

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download |  Research Instrument
Examining the Impact of E-Government Development Index (EGDI) and Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI) : A Comparative Study of Thailand and The Six Selected ASEAN Countries
Subject
Type Research Instrument
  Download (178KB)    Indexing metadata
Keywords: Worldwide Governance Indicator (WGI); E-Government Development Index (EGDI); ASEAN.

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
The Politics of Electric Vehicle Subsidies in Indonesia: Actors, Agenda, and Issues Partisipasi Politik Sedulur Sikep Blora dalam Pemilihan Umum Inklusif melalui Ajaran Kerukunan Di Bawah Bayang-Bayang Perubahan Iklim: Transformasi Negara Pembangunan dan Agenda Transisi Energi di Indonesia More recent articles
Most cited articles
KONFLIK IDENTITAS SOSIAL MASYARAKAT TEMANGGUNG (Kajian Kekerasan Sosial di Temanggung Tahun 2011) FAKTOR DETERMINAN KEMENANGAN KANDIDAT PADA PEMILUKADA KABUPATEN BATANG 2011 FENOMENA POLITIK UANG DALAM PILKADA PEREMPUAN DAN KORUPSI PADA RANAH PUBLIK (Ditinjau dari Gaya Kepemimpinan, Politik, Agama, Psikologi dan Budaya Ketimuran) KEBIJAKAN PENDIDIKAN GRATIS DI TINGKAT REGIONAL: Konsep dan Pelaksanaan di Kabupaten Rembang More cited articles
  1. Ahmad, J., Hardianti, Nilwana, A., Muliani, & Hamid, H. (2021). Digitalization Era: Website Based E-Government. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 717(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/717/1/012047
  2. Ali, B. J., & Anwar, G. (2021). Factors Influencing the Citizens’ Acceptance of Electronic Government. International Journal of Engineering, Business and Management, 5(1), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijebm.5.1.5
  3. Anastasia Arvirianty. (2019). Sri Mulyani Akui RI Kalah Efektif dari Thailand dan Malaysia. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20190131124448-4-53284/sri-mulyani-akui-ri-kalah-efektif-dari-thailand-dan-malaysia
  4. Andrea Lidwina. (2021). Akses Internet Singapura Paling Inklusif di Asia Tenggara. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2021/08/04/akses-internet-singapura-paling-inklusif-di-asia-tenggara
  5. Annur, C. M. (2022). Sistem E-Government Indonesia Peringkat ke-5 di Asia Tenggara. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2022/10/05/sistem-e-government-indonesia-peringkat-ke-5-di-asia-tenggara
  6. AR Maulana, A. (2022). Pengaruh Gerakan Mahasiswa Terhadap Upaya Penegakan Demokrasi di Thailand pada masa Pemerintahan PM Prayuth Chan-Ocha (2014-2020). In Braz Dent J. (pp. 1–79)
  7. Cindy Mutia Annur. (2022). Sistem E-Government Indonesia Peringkat ke-5 di Asia Tenggara. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2022/10/05/sistem-e-government-indonesia-peringkat-ke-5-di-asia-tenggara
  8. databoks. (2022). Sistem E-Government Indonesia Peringkat ke-5 di Asia Tenggara. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2022/10/05/sistem-e-government-indonesia-peringkat-ke-5-di-asia-tenggara
  9. Databoks. (2019). Indeks Modal Manusia Indonesia Peringkat 6 di ASEAN. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2019/05/22/indeks-modal-manusia-indonesia-peringkat-6-di-asean
  10. Dizrisa, D. A., Sudrajat, S., & Kusumawardani, N. (2020). Pengaruh Elemen Good Governance Terhadap Tingkat Korupsi Di Asia Tenggara. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan (JAK), 25(1), 96–114. https://doi.org/10.23960/jak.v25i1.242
  11. Doramia Lumbanraja, A. (2020). Urgensi Transformasi Pelayanan Publik melalui E-Government Pada New Normal dan Reformasi Regulasi Birokrasi. Administrative Law and Governance Journal, 3(2), 220–231. https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v3i2.220-231
  12. Drajat, E. U. (2015). Pengaruh kualitas pemerintahan terhadap penanaman modal asing
  13. Eka Asbarini, N. F., Isnaini, L., & Wibowo, M. G. (2021). Pengaruh Tata Kelola Pemerintah Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Di ASEAN. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan, 12(1), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.22373/jep.v12i1.606
  14. Gioh, A. (2021). Pelayanan Publik E-Government Di Dinas Komunikasi Informatika Kabupaten Minahasa. Jurnal Politico, 10(1), 1–14
  15. Hidriyah, S. (2021). Krisis Politik Myanmar dan Intervensi ASEAN. Info Singkat, XIII(6), 7–12
  16. Husain, F. R., & Marselina. (2022). Pengaruh Kelembangaan dan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Terhadap Arus Masuk Foreign Direct Investment Negara ASEAN Tahun 2016-2022. KLASSEN, 2(1), 32–45
  17. Kelas Pintar. (2020). Memahami Konflik Berdarah di Thailand. https://www.kelaspintar.id/blog/inspirasi/memahami-konflik-berdarah-di-thailand-9058/
  18. Kraipornsak, P. (2018). Good Governance and Economic Growth: an Investigation of Thailand and Selected Asian Countries. Eurasian Journal of Economics and Finance, 6(1), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.15604/ejef.2018.06.01.009
  19. Luh, N., Ratnawati, T. T., Made, I., & Suryawan, Y. (2021). E-procurement Implementation as Reflection of Good Governance in North Lombok Regency. Social Science, Public Administration and Management (HUSOCPUMENT), 1(1), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.0121/husocpument.v1i1.3
  20. Lutfiah, R. A., Zahara, V. M., & Anwar, C. J. (2021). Analisis Pengaruh Utang Luar Negeri Dan Risiko Negara Terhadap Capital Flight Di Negara Berkembang Asean. National Conference on Applied Business, Education, & Technology (NCABET), 1(1), 334–348. https://doi.org/10.46306/ncabet.v1i1.28
  21. Lykidis, I., Drosatos, G., & Rantos, K. (2021). The Use of Blockchain Technology in e-Government Services. Computers, 10(12), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers10120168
  22. M. Ali Nur. (2018). Peringkat Pendidikan Indonesia dan Budaya Buruknya. Siedoo. https://siedoo.com/berita-4965-peringkat-pendidikan-indonesia-dan-budaya-buruknya/#:~:text=Brunei Darussalam,Brunei menanggung semua biaya pendidikan
  23. Maladevi, S. (2022). Implementation of Agile Governance Principles Through the Village/Township Monograph Digitization Program in Bantaeng Regency. Iapa Proceedings Conference, 322. https://doi.org/10.30589/proceedings.2022.704
  24. Mardiana, M. E., Adinda, R. A., & Isnaini, N. L. (2021). Analisis Faktor Keberhasilan Implementasi E-Government di Bandung, Batam, dan Surabaya. Jurnal Social and Sains (SOSAINS), 1, 598–609
  25. Mathematics, A. (2022). Agile Governance In Handling the Covid-19 Pandemic by The Kampar District Health Office in 2021. Publica: Jurnal Pemikiran Administrasi Negara, 14(2), 204–214
  26. Minin, I. M., & Leo, A. (2021). Penerimaan Sistem Informasi Pelayanan Desa Berbasis Web Di Desa Kudikan Model E-Government To-Citizens Berdasarkan Tam. Sains Terapan Dan Teknologi, 2(2), 1–15
  27. Morato, J., Iglesias, A., Campillo, A., & Sanchez-Cuadrado, S. (2021). Automated Readability Assessment for Spanish e-Government Information. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 6(2), em0137. https://doi.org/10.29333/jisem/9620
  28. Muhammad Quranul Kariem, & Ishmatuddin, N. (2021). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Penentu Tata Kelola Pemerintahan Di Pemerintah Kota Surabaya Periode Kepemimpinan Tri Risma Harini Tahun 2015-2020. KEMUDI : Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 5(02), 239–248. https://doi.org/10.31629/kemudi.v5i02.3141
  29. Muzni Hanipah, & Aryani, L. (2022). Efektivitas Inovasi Pelayanan Publik Berbasis E-Government (Simpelin) di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 (Studi Kasus di Dinas Kependudukan dan Pencatatan Sipil Kab. Sukabumi). Sawala : Jurnal Administrasi Negara, 10(1), 112–128. https://doi.org/10.30656/sawala.v10i1.4619
  30. Nasution, D. K., Fauzi, A., & Ruslan, R. (2021). Legal Certainty on The Implementation of Electronic Registration of Liability Rights Performed by The Office of The Land Act Maker (Study at the Office of the Land Act Maker Deli Serdang). Veteran Law Review, 4(2), 120. https://doi.org/10.35586/velrev.v4i2.2669
  31. OECD. (2020). Regulatory Management and Oversight Reforms in Thailand: A Diagnostic Scan. https://www.oecd.org/regreform/RIA-Thailand.pdf
  32. Praphornkul, P. (2021). Thailand ranks higher on UN E-Government Development Index. https://thainews.prd.go.th/en/news/detail/TCATG210705144423431
  33. Prateeppornnarong, D. (2021). Fighting Corruption While Having Hands Tied: A Case Study of Thailand’s Public Sector Anti-Corruption Commission. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 56(2), 320–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909620926529
  34. Priyashantha, K. G., & Dilhani, V. I. (2022). Determinants of E-government Adoption: A Systematic Literature Review. Kelaniya Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(1), 105. https://doi.org/10.4038/kjhrm.v17i1.107
  35. Pusparisa, Y. (2020). Indeks Modal Manusia Singapura Tertinggi di Dunia. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2020/09/18/indeks-modal-manusia-singapura-tertinggi-di-dunia
  36. Puspitaningrum, A. C. (2021). Literature Review: Elements and Criteria Methodology of Enterprise Architecture for E-Government. Sistemasi, 10(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.32520/stmsi.v10i1.1027
  37. Putri, A. F. J., Herdika, M., Fendita, X. A., & Fratiwi. (2022). Desentralisasi Sebagai Upaya Penanggulangan Problematika Serta Tantangan dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Daerah. BULLET : Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu, 1(03), 400–408
  38. Putri, R. H. (2022). Pengaruh Kebijakan Subsidi, Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) dan Tata Kelola Pemerintahan Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi (Studi Kasus Negara - Negara di ASEAN). 3(1), 123–136
  39. Rahman, A. (2022). Revisiting the Relationship between E-Government and Corruption: An Empirical Investigation. Athens Journal of Social Sciences, X(9), 1–16. https://www.athensjournals.gr/social/2021-4381-AJSS-POL-Rahman-05.pdf
  40. Ramadhan, P. S. (2021). Pengaruh Tata Kelola Pemerintah Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi di Negara ASEAN-6
  41. republika.co.id. (2020). Kelamnya Teror Thailand. Republika.Co.Id. https://www.republika.co.id/berita/q5il2e318/kelamnya-teror-thailand
  42. Rizkinaswara, L. (2020). Tingkatkan EGDI, Pemerintah Fokus Percepat Transformasi Digital. https://aptika.kominfo.go.id/2020/09/tingkatkan-egdi-pemerintah-fokus-percepat-transformasi-digital/
  43. Sadik-Zada, E. R., Gatto, A., & Niftiyev, I. (2022). E-government and petty corruption in public sector service delivery. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2022.2067037
  44. Saefudin. (2022). Signifikan, Hasil Survei e-Government Indonesia Naik 11 Peringkat. DitjenAptika. https://aptika.kominfo.go.id/2022/10/signifikan-hasil-survei-e-government-indonesia-naik-11-peringkat/
  45. Saleh, S., Nakshabandi, O. A., Zeebaree, M., Ismael, G. Y., & Aqel, M. (2021). Organizational barriers which are facing electronic government implementation: The electronic government implementation framework. Estudios de Economia Aplicada, 39(7). https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v39i7.5231
  46. Siahaan, S. B., Simanjuntak, A., Simanjuntak, W. A., & Pasaribu, D. (2022). Penerapan Good Governance Berbasis Birokrasi Pemerintahan Digital Untuk Mengatasi Pandemi Covid – 19 Di Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Methodist, 5(2), 154–163. https://bpptik.kominfo.go.id/2018/08/23/59
  47. Sorongan, T. P. (2021). Myanmar Ngenes, PBB Ramal Setengah Populasi Jatuh Miskin. CNBC Indonesia. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20210503124650-4-242669/myanmar-ngenes-pbb-ramal-setengah-populasi-jatuh-miskin
  48. Sukarno, M., & Nurmandi, A. (2023). E-Government Development Index Impact on World Governance Indicator Index in Southeast Asian Countries. Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy, 4(April), 97–114
  49. Takiya, H., Negreiros, I., Yamamura, C. L. K., Quintanilha, J. A., Machado, C. A. S., Abiko, A., Campos, C. I. de, Pessoa, M. S. de P., & Berssaneti, F. T. (2022). Application of Open Government Data to Sustainable City Indicators: A Megacity Case Study. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148802
  50. Tanaya, O., Kanti Wilujeng, R. S., & Putri Radjamin, I. (2022). Foreign Direct Investment dan Risiko Politik di ASEAN. Owner Riset Dan Jurnal Akuntansi, 6(2), 1610–1620. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v6i2.805
  51. Tasyah, A., Septiya, S., Jasriyani Putri, S., Agung Fernanda, R., & Chesilia Azani, P. (2021). Best practice kebijakan e-government dalam mengimplementasikan pelayanan publik di era new normal. Jurnal Studi Ilmu Sosial Dan Politik, 1(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.35912/jasispol.v1i1.163
  52. Ucanews.com. (2019). Rule by law but no rule of law in Thailand. https://www.ucanews.com/news/rule-by-law-but-no-rule-of-law-in-thailand/84851
  53. Urinovich Kobilov, A., Khashimova, D. P., Mannanova, S. G., & Ogli Abdulakhatov, M. M. (2022). Modern Content and Concept of Digital Economy. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 9(2), 375. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v9i2.3524
  54. Viona, J., & Khairiyah. (2022). TRANSFORMATION OF GOVERNMENT MANAGEMENT BASED ON E-GOVERNMENT (Case Study: Padang City Government Constraints in the Implementation of e-Government). Jurnal Suara Politik, 1(1), 22–28. www.kotapadang.gov
  55. Widianatasari, A. (2021). Pengaruh Kualitas Institusi , Government Size , Dan Foreign Direct Investment Terhadap Pertumbuhan
  56. Widjanarko, W. (2021). Analisis Hubungan Good Governance Dan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Indonesia 2013-2019. Jurnal Good Governance, 17(2), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.32834/gg.v17i2.340
  57. Wijaya, J. H., Yunanto, S. E., Setyowati, Y., & Supardal. (2022a). E-partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Pelaksanaan E-government di Indonesia Tahun 2003-2020. Jurnal Administrasi Pemerintahan Desa, 3(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.47134/villages.v3i1.27
  58. Wijaya, J. H., Yunanto, S. E., Setyowati, Y., & Supardal, S. (2022b). E-partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Pelaksanaan E-government di Indonesia Tahun 2003-2020. Jurnal Administrasi Pemerintahan Desa, 3(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.47134/villages.v3i1.27
  59. Wirawan, A., Foong, S. G. C., Win, Y. M., & ... (2009). Bridging the knowledge gap in developing societies: a field study of Indonesia, Vietnam and Myanmar. The International Journal …, 1–38. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1344956
  60. Wirawan, V. (2020). Penerapan E-Government dalam Menyongsong Era Revolusi Industri 4.0 Kontemporer di Indonesia. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan, 1(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.18196/jphk.1101
  61. Yusril Izha Mahendra, Marselina, Heru Wahyudi, & Ukhti Ciptawati. (2022). Pengaruh Populasi Penduduk, FDI dan Control of Corruption terhadap Emisi CO2 di 9 Negara ASEAN. Jurnal Multidisiplin Madani (MUDIMA), 2(10), 3741–3753. https://doi.org/10.55927/mudima.v2i10.1462

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-11-21 11:18:48

No citation recorded.