skip to main content

The Effect of Sustainable Livelihoods on the COVID-19 Disaster Recovery in Agrotourism

*Verlina Intan Wulandari  -  Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia
Qomariyatus Sholihah  -  Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia
Rita Parmawati  -  Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

Kebun Belimbing Ngringinrejo is the leading agrotourism in Bojonegoro Regency. COVID-19 pandemic has decreased a numeral of tourist visits which caused agrotourism income to decline, business actors, to lose their jobs, and the livelihoods of starfruit farmers to be threatened. After the COVID-19 vaccination, the re-opening of agrotourism began with the application of health protocols. Agrotourism must carry out a recovery process to return to normality. The study aims to determine the condition of sustainable livelihoods for star fruit farmers and business actors and the effect of livelihood assets on disaster recovery. This research was conducted so that agrotourism can recover immediately by optimizing high assets and improving low assets. This study used the descriptive statistic and analysis of SEM-PLS. The outcome indicated that the condition of sustainable livelihoods for starfruit farmers and business actors has a high natural, social, and physical assets. At the same time, low assets are human and financial assets. Four sustainable livelihood assets are human, natural, social, and physical, significantly influencing disaster recovery. In contrast, financial assets have no significant impact on disaster recovery. The most significant indicators for the disaster recovery process in agrotourism are developing digital solutions, and the lowest indicator is designing risk communication.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Agrotourism; COVID-19; disaster recovery; sustainable livelihood

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Original Research Article
Language : EN
  1. Amanah, S., and Fatchiya, A., 2018. Strengthening rural extension services to facilitate community towards sustainable development goals in three districts in Indonesia. Jurnal Penyuluhan 14(1), 134-144
  2. Apriyanti, Chusna and Widoyoko, R., 2021. Persepsi dan aksi masyarakat pedesaan di masa pandemi.Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 10(1)
  3. Baiquni, M., 2006. Pengelolaan sumberdaya pedesaan dan strategi penghidupan rumah tangga di Provinsi DIY pada masa krisis (1998 – 2003). Yogyakarta : Disertasi Fakultas Geografi Universitas
  4. Cannon, T., Twigg, J., and Rowell, J., 2003. Social vulnerability, sustainable livelihoods and disasters. London : Department for International Development
  5. Coppola, D.P., 2011. Introduction to international disaster management third edition. Oxford : Butterworth-Heinemann Elsevier
  6. DFID, 1999. Sustainable livelihoods guidance sheets. London: Departement for International Development
  7. Fakhruddin, B., Blanchard, K., Ragupathy, D., 2020. Are we there yet? The transition from response to recovery for the COVID-19 pandemic. Progress in Disaster Science 7, 100102
  8. Gitleman, L., Purnomo, E., Suhendra, E. S., Fathy, R., 2019. Data dan metode pengumpulan data penelitian. Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan 5(1), 369–380
  9. Hadi, S., 2020. Pengurangan risiko pandemi COVID-19 aecara partisipatif : Suatu tinjauan ketahanan nasional terhadap bencana. Jurnal Perencanaan Pembangunan Indonesia 4, 177–190
  10. Hair, J., Hult, G., Ringle, C., and Sarstedt, M., 2017. A primier on partial least squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). America: SAGE Publication, Inc
  11. Hasanah, E.U and Widowati, Puri., 2011. Analisis produktivitas tenaga kerja pada industri rumah tangga krecek di Kelurahan Segoroyoso. Efektif Jurnal Bisnis dan Ekonomi 2(2), 169-182
  12. Hermanto, Susilowati, E., Kustanti, S., Zahrok, S., Savitri, D.E., Hermannas, D.R., 2020. Partisipasi masyarakat dalam kegiatan kampung tangguh untuk mengantisipasi penyebaran COVID-19 di Kota Surabaya. Seminar Nasional Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, Pekanbaru, 18 November 2021
  13. Indriantoro, Nur, and Bambang Supomo, 2009. Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: Gramedia
  14. Joakim, Erin, 2013. Resilient disaster recovery: A critical assessment of the 2006 Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Earthquake using a vulnerability, resilience and sustainable livelihoods framework 1–294. Canada: University of Waterloo
  15. Jones, P.; Comfort, D., 2020. The COVID-19 crisis, tourism and sustainable development. Athens Journal Tour 7, 75–86
  16. Kementerian Pariwisata dan Ekonomi Kreatif, 2020. Panduan pelaksanaan kebersihan, kesehatan, keselamatan, dan kelestarian lingkungan di daya tarik wisata. Jakarta
  17. Mair, J., Ritchie, B.W., Walters, G., 2016. Towards a research agenda for post-disaster and post-crisis recovery strategies for tourist destinations: a narrative review. Current Issues Tour 19, 1–26
  18. Muller, T, 2020. Why the corona virus crisis is a unique and once in a lifetime opportunity for destinations and the tourism industry. VoyagesAfriq. Available online: https://voyagesafriq.com/2020/03/23/why-the-corona-virus-crisis-is-a-unique-andonce-in-a-lifetime-opportunity-for-destinations-and-the-tourism-industry/ (accessed on 12 December 2021)
  19. Orîndaru, A., Popescu, M.-F., Alexoaei, A.P., Caescu, S.C., Florescu, M.S., Orzan, A.O, 2021. Tourism in a post-COVID-19 era: sustainable strategies for industry’s recovery. Sustainability 13, 6781
  20. Pandey, K., Mahadevan, K., Joshi, S., 2021. Indian tourism industry and COVID-19: A sustainable recovery framework in a post-pandemic wra. Vision 3, 1–15
  21. Regnier, P., Bruno, N., Scuteri, S., & Miniati, S., 2008. From emergency relief to livelihood recovery: Lessons learned from post-tsunami experiences in Indonesia and India. Disaster Prevention and Management 17 (3), 410-429
  22. Sharma, G. D., and Mahendru, M., 2020. Lives or livelihood: Insights from locked-down India due to COVID-19. Social Sciences & Humanities 2(1), 100036
  23. Sholihin, Mahfud and Ratmono, D., 2013. Analisis SEM-PLS dengan WarpPLS 3.0. Yogyakarta: Penerbit ANDI
  24. Surdianto, Y., Setiawan, B.I., Prastowo, Saptomo, S.K., 2012. Peningkatan resapan air tanah dengan saluran resapan dan rorak untuk meningkatkan produktivitas belimbing manis (Studi kasus di Kota Depok). Jurnal Irigasi Volume 7 (1)
  25. Suyono, Bambang dan Hermawan, Hery, 2013. Analisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi produktivitas tenaga kerja pada industri kerajinan kulit di Kabupaten Magetan. Jurnal Ekomaks 2(2)
  26. Tino and Balkis, S. 2016. Analisis pendapatan dan efisiensi usaha tani padi sawah di Desa Kota Bangun Kecamatan Kota Bangun. ZIRAA’AH, Volume 41 Nomor 1, Pebruari 2016 Halaman 72-77 ISSN 2355-3545
  27. Parmawati, R., Putra, F., Sunaryo, Wike, Hardyansah, R., 2021. Sustainable livelihood approach: Mendorong pertanian yang ramah lingkungan dan berkelanjutan. Malang: UB Press
  28. Prista, Fadilla. 2017. Analisis sustainable livelihood petani padi di Desa Ngadilangkung, Kecamatan Kepanjen, Kabupaten Malang. Skripsi Program Studi Agribisnis Fakultas Pertanian: Universitas Brawijaya Malang
  29. UNISDR, 2009. Terminology on Disaster Risk Reduction. Geneva
  30. Wojcieszak-Zbierska, Anna J, Jeczmyk, A., Zawadka, J., Uglis, J., 2020. Agritourism in the era of the Coronavirus (COVID-19): A rapid assessment from Poland. Journal Agriculture 10, 397
  31. World Health Organization, 2020. Rolling updates on coronavirus disease (COVID-19), events as they happen. Available online: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus2019/events-as-they-happen (accessed on 16 April 2021)
  32. WTTC, 2020. Travel and tourism economic impact from COVID-19. Available online: https://wttc.org/Research/Economic-Impact (accessed on 20 September 2020)

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-04-22 08:15:57

No citation recorded.