DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/presipitasi.v21i1.1-11

The Effectiveness of Using Eco-Friendly Bag to Support Sustainable Development Goals: A Review

*Annisa Indah Pratiwi scopus  -  National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Indonesia
Nadia Rizki Ariyani  -  National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Indonesia
Chintya Komala Sari  -  National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Indonesia
Abdul Rahman  -  National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

Nowadays, most people use eco-friendly bags as alternatives to plastic grocery bags. This comes from the government's strategy of prohibiting plastic bag use and requiring the use of eco-friendly supermarket bags instead. Eco-friendly bags are the most recent developments in supermarket bags made from environmentally friendly raw materials. However, using eco-friendly bags is not the ideal option because it generates new trash clusters as a result of their use and contributes to the impact of climate change. This article examines the effectiveness of using eco-friendly bags in reducing plastic waste and how it relates to SDG 13. This research uses qualitative methods related to analysing the environmental impact of environmentally friendly bags. It was found that bio-based plastics had the lowest GWP values. Several solutions to the problem of plastic bag pollution have been offered, including the development of new biodegradable bag technology, making policies or other incentives encouraging people to reuse shopping bags, and researching eco-friendly bag innovation in Indonesia using LCA.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Eco-friendly bags; environment; sustainable development goals; climate change

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Review Article
Language : EN
Recent articles
Incorporating Inhibition Effects and Hydrolysis Biokinetics into the Mathematical Model of Anaerobic Fermentation The Review Study of Environmental Education Curriculum in Climate Change Mitigation The Effectiveness of Using Eco-Friendly Bag to Support Sustainable Development Goals: A Review Utilization of Sludge from Cow Dung Biogas as Additional Feed for Sangkuriang Catfish (Claries gariepinus) Risk Factors of Unsafe Behavior among Construction Workers Biogas Purification using Modified Red Mud Adsorbent with a Study of the Length of the Adsorbent Column Phytoplankton Diversity as Bioindicator of Water Quality in Mangrove Area of Surabaya East Coast Spatial Planning for Agricultural Development Based on Carrying Capacity of Ecosystem Services in The Melolo Transmigration Area, East Sumba Socio-Spatial Analysis of Deforestation in Soeharto Forest Using Remote Sensing Method More recent articles
Most cited articles
EVALUASI DESAIN INSTALASI PENGOLAHAN AIR PDAM IBU KOTA KECAMATAN PRAMBANAN KABUPATEN KLATEN EVALUASI KINERJA INSTALASI PENGOLAHAN AIR MINUM (IPAM) KARANGPILANG I PDAM SURYA SEMBADA KOTA SURABAYA SECARA KUANTITATIF KAJIAN PUSTAKA POTENSI PEMANFAATAN GREYWATERSEBAGAI AIR SIRAM WC DAN AIR SIRAM TANAMAN DI RUMAH TANGGA EVALUATION ON COMMUNITY BASED FOREST MANAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION IN RANDUBLATUNG, BLORA UNJUK KERJA MODIFIKASI SBR AEROB TERHADAP PENYISIHAN COD More cited articles
  1. Abidin, A.Z., Nathania, M., Trirahayu, D.A., 2018. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Kantong Belanja Berbahan Plastik Daur Ulang, Goodie Bag dan Bioplastik. Majalah Polimer Indonesia 21
  2. Ahamed, A., Vallam, P., Iyer, N.S., Veksha, A., Bobacka, J., Lisak, G., 2021. Life cycle assessment of plastic grocery bags and their alternatives in cities with confined waste management structure: A Singapore case study. Journal of Cleaner Production 278, 123956
  3. Anwar, T., Schmidt, M., Palekhov, D., 2020. Comparative Study of Environmental Performance between Low Density Polyethylene (LDPE) Grocery Bags and Unbleached Paper Grocery Bags via Life Cycle Assessment using openLCA. (Doctoral dissertation, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus)
  4. Balwada, J., Samaiya, S., Mishra, R.P., 2021. Packaging Plastic Waste Management for a Circular Economy and Identifying a better Waste Collection System using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Procedia CIRP 98, 270–275
  5. Civancik-Uslu, D., Puig, R., Hauschild, M., Fullana-i-Palmer, P., 2019. Life cycle assessment of carrier bags and development of a littering indicator. Science of The Total Environment 685, 621–630
  6. Durak, S.G., 2016. Investigation and Evaluation of the Effect to Environmental Pollution of Plastic Shopping Bags. Turkish Journal of Scientific Reviews 9, 20–24
  7. GAIA, 2019. LCA for Biodolomer® within EU LIFE15 ENV/SE/000315
  8. Governor of DKI Jakarta Province, 2019. Regulation of the Governor of DKI Jakarta Province Number 142 of 2019 concerning the Obligation to Use Environmentally Friendly Shopping Bags in Shopping Centers, Supermarkets and Traditional Markets
  9. Jambeck, J.R., Geyer, R., Wilcox, C., Siegler, T.R., Perryman, M., Andrady, A., Narayan, R., Law, K.L., 2015. Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science (1979) 347, 768–771
  10. Kaewphan, N., Gheewala, S.H., 2013. Greenhouse Gas Evaluation and Market Opportunity of Bioplastic Bags from Cassava in Thailand. Journal of Sustainable Energy & Environment 4, 15–19
  11. Kimmel, R.M., Cooksey, K.D., Littman, A., 2014. Life Cycle Assessment of Grocery Bags in Common Use in the United States. Clemson University Digital Press
  12. Li, B., Liu, J., Yu, B., Zheng, X., 2022. The Environmental Impact of Plastic Grocery Bags and Their Alternatives. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 1011, 012050
  13. Ministry of Environment, 2021. Komposisi Sampah Berdasarkan Jenis Sampah
  14. Ministry of National Development Planning/Bappenas, 2017. Ringkasan Metadata Indikator Tujuan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan (TPB) / Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Indonesia
  15. Mori, M., Drobnič, B., Gantar, G., Sekavčnik, M., 2013. LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF SUPERMARKET CARRIER BAGS AND OPPORTUNITY OF BIOPLASTICS. Proceedings of SEEP2013, 20-23 August 2013, Maribor, Slovenia 20–23
  16. Muthu, S.S., Li, Y., 2014. Assessment of Environmental Impact by Grocery Shopping Bags. Springer Singapore, Singapore
  17. Muthu, S.S., Li, Y., Hu, J.Y., Mok, P.Y., Liao, X., 2012. Carbon Footprint of Production Processes of Polypropylene Nonwoven Shopping Bags. FIBRES & TEXTILES in Eastern Europe 20, 12–15
  18. Pitawala, P., Danthurebandara, M., Rajapaksha, L., 2022. Life cycle assessment of paper and plastic grocery bags used in Sri Lankan supermarkets. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 19, 11183–11198
  19. Rattana, S., Gheewala, S.H., 2019. Environment impacts assessment of petroleum plastic and bioplastic carrier bags in Thailand. Journal of Sustainable Energy & Environment 10, 9–17
  20. Stafford, W., Russo, V., Nahman, A., 2022. A comparative cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment of single-use plastic shopping bags and various alternatives available in South Africa. Int J Life Cycle Assess 27, 1213–1227
  21. The Danish Environmental Protection Agency, 2018. Life Cycle Assessment of Grocery Carrier Bags. Copenhagen
  22. Wahyuningtiyas, N.E., Suryanto, H., 2018. Properties of Cassava Starch based Bioplastic Reinforced by Nanoclay. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science and Technology 2, 20–26
  23. Wahyuningtyas, N., Suryanto, H., 2017. Analysis of Biodegradation of Bioplastics Made of Cassava Starch. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science and Technology 1, 24–31
  24. Wijayanti, K.P., Dermawan, N., Faisah, S.N., Prayogi, V., Judiawan, W., Nugraha, T., Listyorini, N.T., 2016. BIO-DEGRADEABLE BIOPLASTICS SEBAGAI PLASTIK RAMAH LINGKUNGAN. Surya Octagon Interdisciplinary Journal of Technology 1, 2460–8777
  25. World Economic Forum, 2020. Mengurangi Polusi Plastik Secara Radikal di Indonesia Rencana Aksi Multipemangku Kepentingan
  26. Yananto, I.D., 2021. Paparan Upaya Menuju Target Pembangunan Nasional di 2045 Bidang Lingkungan Hidup
  27. Zhang, T., Zhai, Y., Ma, X., Shen, X., Bai, Y., Zhang, R., Ji, C., Hong, J., 2021. Towards environmental sustainability: Life cycle assessment-based water footprint analysis on China’s cotton production. Journal of Cleaner Production 313, 127925

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-11-02 21:00:48

No citation recorded.