skip to main content

Assessing Urban Carbon Sequestration Capacity under Land Use Changes

*Irfan Tawakkal  -  The University of Kitakyushu, Japan
Nani Anggraini  -  Universitas Bosowa, Indonesia
Ramdiana Muis  -  Universitas Muhammadiyah Parepare, Indonesia
Reza Darma Al Fariz  -  Environmental Agency of Deli Serdang Regency, Indonesia
Akrim Jusdil  -  Universitas Bosowa, Indonesia
Ira Rumiris Hutagalung  -  The University of Kitakyushu, Japan
Indriyani Rachman  -  The University of Kitakyushu, Japan
Toru Matsumoto  -  The University of Kitakyushu, Japan

Citation Format:
Abstract

A significant amount of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions comes from Indonesia, largely driven by deforestation and land degradation. As a developing nation, it is also dealing with the growing pressures of urban expansion. This study assesses the distribution of carbon stock in Parepare City, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Notably, Parepare City has not yet experienced extensive land-use transformations, retaining substantial carbon stock, which positions it as a proactive case study for preventing future carbon loss amidst ongoing urbanization. Using the InVEST Carbon Storage and Sequestration model with SPOT 7 satellite imagery (2016) and global carbon density data, the research quantifies carbon storage across various land use/land cover (LULC) types. Analysis reveals natural ecosystems, particularly mixed forests and fields, hold the highest carbon storage potential. The total estimated carbon stock in Parepare City is 1,456,909.41 Mg C. These findings emphasize the urgent need for climate-responsive land management, including forest conservation, and urban greening, to enhance local carbon sinks and support Indonesia's climate change mitigation goals. This assessment provides crucial insights for urban planners and policymakers to balance growth with ecosystem conservation for a susta00inable future.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Climate change mitigation; Indonesia; InVEST; land use change; model; urban carbon stocks

Article Metrics:

  1. Aguilar-Tello, A, Aponte, H, and Alegre, J. 2023. Co2 sequestration and o2 production in urban parks: The case of an introduced species in tropical south america. Journal of Urban and Environmental Engineering 13–21
  2. Arehart, J, H, Hart, J, Pomponi, F, and D’Amico, B. 2021. Carbon sequestration and storage in the built environment. Sustainable Production and Consumption 27, 1047–1063
  3. Baxter, G. 2020. Assessing the carbon footprint of a dedicated all-cargo airline: The case of cargolux international airlines. Journal of Urban and Environmental Engineering 14(2), 204–217
  4. Central Statistics Agency of Parepare City. 2024
  5. Chen, H, Zhang, C, and Yin, K. 2022. The impact of global value chain embedding on carbon emissions embodied in china’s exports. Frontiers in Environmental Science 10, 950869
  6. Disney, M. 2018. Urban “forests” can store almost as much carbon as tropical rainforests. Down To Earth
  7. Friedlingstein, P, O’Sullivan, M, Jones, M, W, Andrew, R, M, Bakker, D, C, E, Hauck, J, Landschützer, P, Le Quéré, C, Luijkx, I, T, Peters, G, P, Peters, W, Pongratz, J, Schwingshackl, C, Sitch, S, Canadell, J, G, Ciais, P, Jackson, R, B, Alin, S, R, Anthoni, P, and Zheng, B. 2023. Global carbon budget 2023. Earth System Science Data 15(12), 5301–5369
  8. Global Soil Organic Carbon Map v1.5 (GSOC)—"FAO catalog". No date
  9. Hansis, E, Davis, S, J, and Pongratz, J. 2015. Relevance of methodological choices for accounting of land use change carbon fluxes. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 29(8), 1230–1246
  10. Houghton, R, A, and Nassikas, A, A. 2017. Global and regional fluxes of carbon from land use and land cover change 1850–2015. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 31(3), 456–472
  11. Indriyani, L, Bana, S, Yasin, A, Sudia, L, B, Kahirun, M, Midi, L, O, and Hardin, I. 2020. The potential of blue carbon stocks and carbon dioxide absorption in mangrove forests to support low carbon emission development in southeast sulawesi province, indonesia. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology 10(6), 2526–2535
  12. Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change (Ipcc). 2023. Climate change 2021 – the physical science basis: Working group I contribution to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change 1st ed. Cambridge University Press
  13. Kazlou, T, Cherp, A, and Jewell, J. 2024. Feasible deployment of carbon capture and storage and the requirements of climate targets. Nature Climate Change 14(10), 1047–1055
  14. Kumar, A, and Kumar, A. 2019. Assessing human and carbon footprint of ranchi urban environment using remote sensing technology. Journal of Urban and Environmental Engineering
  15. Leifeld, J, and Menichetti, L. 2018. The underappreciated potential of peatlands in global climate change mitigation strategies. Nature Communications 9(1), 1–7
  16. Meteorology, Climatology, and Geophysics Agency. 2025
  17. Murdiyarso, D, Purbopuspito, J, Kauffman, J, B, Warren, M, W, Sasmito, S, D, Donato, D, C, Manuri, S, Krisnawati, H, Taberima, S, and Kurnianto, S. 2015. The potential of Indonesian mangrove forests for global climate change mitigation. Nature Climate Change 5(12), 1089–1092
  18. Raciti, S, M, Hutyra, L, R, and Newell, J, D. 2014. Mapping carbon storage in urban trees with multi-source remote sensing data: Relationships between biomass, land use, and demographics in boston neighborhoods. Science of The Total Environment 500–501, 72–83
  19. Ramadhan, R, Mon, M, T, Tangparitkul, S, Tansuchat, R, and Agustin, D, A. 2024. Carbon capture, utilization, and storage in indonesia: An update on storage capacity, current status, economic viability, and policy. Energy Geoscience 5(4), 100335
  20. Rasoolzadeh, R, Mobarghaee Dinan, N, Esmaeilzadeh, H, Rashidi, Y, Marcu, M, V, and Sadeghi, S, M, M. 2024. Carbon sequestration and storage of urban trees in a polluted semiarid city. Forests 15(9), 1488
  21. Redhead, J, W, Stratford, C, Sharps, K, Jones, L, Ziv, G, Clarke, D, Oliver, T, H, and Bullock, J, M. 2016. Empirical validation of the InVEST water yield ecosystem service model at a national scale. Science of The Total Environment 569–570, 1418–1426
  22. Regional Development Planning Agency of Parepare, No. 1. 2021. Database peraturan | jdih bpk
  23. Research Methodology | Better Forests, Better Cities. 2022
  24. Rodrigues, C, I, D, Brito, L, M, and Nunes, L, J, R. 2023. Soil carbon sequestration in the context of climate change mitigation: A review. Soil Systems 7(3), 64
  25. Rum, I, A, Tukker, A, Hoekstra, R, Koning, A, D, and Yusuf, Arief, A. 2024. Exploring carbon footprints and carbon intensities of indonesian provinces in a domestic and global context. Frontiers in Environmental Science 12, 1325089
  26. Sharma, R, Pradhan, L, Kumari, M, Bhattacharya, P, Mishra, V, N, and Kumar, D. 2024. Spatio-temporal assessment of urban carbon storage and its dynamics using InVEST model. Land 13(9), 1387
  27. Spawn, S, A, and Gibbs, H, K. 2020. Vegetation collectionglobal aboveground and belowground biomass carbon density maps for the year 2010 version 1
  28. Ugle, P, Rao, S, and Ramachandra, T, V. 2010. Carbon sequestration potential of urban trees. Biodiversity and Climate Change
  29. Warren, M, Frolking, S, Dai, Z, and Kurnianto, S. 2017. Impacts of land use, restoration, and climate change on tropical peat carbon stocks in the twenty-first century: Implications for climate mitigation. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 22(7), 1041–1061
  30. Xiaoxu, X, Qiangmin, X, and Weihao, S. 2024. Impact of urban compactness on carbon emission in chinese cities: From moderating effects of industrial diversity and job-housing imbalances. Land Use Policy 143, 107213
  31. Zhao, M, Kong, Z, Escobedo, F, J, and Gao, J. 2010. Impacts of urban forests on offsetting carbon emissions from industrial energy use in hangzhou, china. Journal of Environmental Management 91(4), 807–813

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-11-30 22:42:17

No citation recorded.