DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/presipitasi.v0i0.%25p

Performance Evaluation and Operational Optimization of a Fine-Bubble Porous–Venturi Aeration System

*Niesa Hanum Mistoro  -  Universitas Islam Indonesia, Indonesia
Sri Puji Saraswati  -  Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
Johan Syafri Mahathir Ahmad  -  Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
Henny Sudibyo  -  Research Centre For Energy Conversion Technology, National Research and Innovation Agency, Indonesia
Dahlia Anggita Zahra  -  National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies (GRIPS), Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract
Aeration is the most energy-intensive unit in wastewater treatment systems, particularly in shallow decentralized reactors with limited hydrostatic pressure, which, which reduces oxygen transfer efficiency. However, systematic evaluations of integrated porous–Venturi microbubble systems under shallow-water conditions are limited. This study aims to address this gap by investigating and optimizing a fine-bubble porous–Venturi microbubble generator (MBG) using laboratory-scale experiments. Clean water experiments were conducted in a 200 L batch reactor with two liquid flow rates (71.6 and 103.8 L/min) and four gas flow rates (0.15–0.60 L/min). Aeration performance was assessed using the volumetric oxygen mass transfer coefficient (KLa(20)), standard oxygen transfer rate (SOTR), and specific aeration efficiency (SAE), supported by one-way ANOVA. The results showed that the gas flow rate influenced  KLa(20) and SOT,R whereas the liquid flow rate had a dominant effect on SAE. The optimal operating conditions were identified as QL = 71.6 L/min and QG = 0.45 L/min, achieving KLa(20) of 2.23 h⁻¹ and SAE exceeding 40 kg O₂/kWh. The findings showed that optimum gas–liquid interaction leads to energy-efficient aeration performance rather than maximum flow rate supply. It also provides practical design insights for optimizing aeration systems in shallow and decentralized wastewater treatment applications
Fulltext View|Download Email colleagues
Keywords: Fine-bubble aeration; microbubble generator; oxygen transfer; specific aeration efficiency; wastewater treatment

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Original Research Article
Language : EN
Most cited articles
Simple Technology to Convert Coconut Shell Waste into Biochar; A Green Leap Towards Achieving Environmental Sustainability STUDI PEMBUATAN KOMPOS PADAT DARI SAMPAH DAUN KERING TPST UNDIP DENGAN VARIASI BAHAN MIKROORGANISME LOKAL (MOL) DAUN KAJIAN PUSTAKA POTENSI PEMANFAATAN GREYWATERSEBAGAI AIR SIRAM WC DAN AIR SIRAM TANAMAN DI RUMAH TANGGA STUDI PENGARUH PENCAMPURAN SAMPAH DOMESTIK, SEKAM PADI, DAN AMPAS TEBU DENGAN METODE MAC DONALD TERHADAP KEMATANGAN KOMPOS PERKEMBANGAN BIOFILM NITRIFIKASI DI FIXED BED REACTOR PADA SALINITAS TINGGI More cited articles
  1. Ahmadi, M. et al. (2022) “Efficient Wastewater Treatment via Aeration Through a Novel Nanobubble System in Sequence Batch Reactors,” Frontiers in Energy Research, 10. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2022.884353
  2. Al-Ahmady, K.K. (2006) Analysis of Oxygen Transfer Performance on Sub-surface Aeration Systems, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. Available at: www.ijerph.org
  3. Azis Aziz, N.F., Ramli, N.A. and Hamid, M.F.A. (2019) “Energy efficiency of wastewater treatment plant through aeration system,” Desalination and Water Treatment, 156, pp. 38–45. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2019.24134
  4. Behnisch, J., Schwarz, M. and Wagner, M. (2020) “Three decades of oxygen transfer tests in clean water in a pilot scale test tank with fine-bubble diffusers and the resulting conclusions for wwtp operation,” Water Practice and Technology, 15(4), pp. 910–920. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2020.072
  5. Drewnowski, J. et al. (2019) “Aeration process in bioreactors as the main energy consumer in a wastewater treatment plant. Review of solutions and methods of process optimization,” Processes, 7(5). Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7050311
  6. Gu, Y. et al. (2023) “Optimization and control strategies of aeration in WWTPs: A review,” Journal of Cleaner Production. Elsevier Ltd. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138008
  7. Guerrini, A., Romano, G. and Indipendenza, A. (2017) “Energy efficiency drivers in wastewater treatment plants: A double bootstrap DEA analysis,” Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(7). Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9071126
  8. International Energy Agency (IEA) (2018) The energy sector should care about wastewater, https://www.iea.org/commentaries/the-energy-sector-should-care-about-wastewater. Available at:
  9. Lee, C.H. et al. (2023) “Effect of screw structure and flared diffuser in a cylindrical venturi-type microbubble generator,” Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 37(12), pp. 6513–6521. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-023-1123-0
  10. Liew, K.C.S. et al. (2020) “Porous venturi-orifice microbubble generator for oxygen dissolution in water,” Processes, 8(10), pp. 1–15. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8101266
  11. Mahmud, R., Erguvan, M. and MacPhee, D.W. (2020) “Performance of closed loop venturi aspirated aeration system: Experimental study and numerical analysis with discrete bubble model,” Water (Switzerland), 12(6). Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/w12061637
  12. Majid, A.I. et al. (2018) “On the performance of venturi-porous pipe microbubble generator with inlet angle of 20° and outlet angle of 12°,” AIP Conference Proceedings, 2001(1), p. 050009. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5050000
  13. Mistoro, N.H. et al. (2023) “Analisis Pengaruh Variasi Debit Air (QL) dan Debit Gas (QG) terhadap Koefisien Transfer Oksigen (KLa) pada Performa Microbubble Generator,” Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknik Kimia “Kejuangan.” Yogyakarta: Jurusan Teknik Kimia, FTI, UPN “Veteran” Yogyakarta
  14. Morling, S. (2008) “Why the Oxidation Ditch disappeared in Sweden?,” VATTEN, 3(08), pp. 209–214
  15. Mukandi, M.R. et al. (2021) “Influence of diffuser design on selected operating variables for wastewater flotation systems: A review,” Water Practice and Technology, 16(4), pp. 1049–1066. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2021.061
  16. De Oro Ochoa, E. et al. (2022) “Design and experimental evaluation of a Venturi and Venturi-Vortex microbubble aeration system,” Heliyon, 8(10). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10824
  17. Puri, D., Sihag, P. and Thakur, M.S. (2023) “A review: Aeration efficiency of hydraulic structures in diffusing DO in water,” MethodsX. Elsevier B.V. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2023.102092
  18. Rosso, D., Larson, L.E. and Stenstrom, M.K. (2008) “Aeration of large-scale municipal wastewater treatment plants: State of the art,” Water Science and Technology, pp. 973–978. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2008.218
  19. Rosso, D. and Stenstrom, M.K. (2006) “Surfactant effects on α-factors in aeration systems,” Water Research, 40(7), pp. 1397–1404. Available at: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2006.01.044
  20. Skouteris, G. et al. (2020) “The use of pure oxygen for aeration in aerobic wastewater treatment: A review of its potential and limitations,” Bioresource Technology, 312. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123595
  21. Skouteris, G et al. (2020) “The use of pure oxygen for aeration in aerobic wastewater treatment: A review of its potential and limitations,” Bioresource Technology, 312, p. 123595. Available at: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123595
  22. Stenstrom, M.K., Leu, S.-Y. and Jiang, P. (2006) Theory to Practice: Oxygen Transfer and the New ASCE Standard
  23. Uby, L. (2019) “Next steps in clean water oxygen transfer testing – A critical review of current standards,” Water Research, 157, pp. 415–434. Available at: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.03.063
  24. United Nations Statistics Division (UNSD) (2024) UN SDGs Report Clean Water and Sanitation 2024. Available at: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2024/Goal-06 (Accessed: October 29, 2025)
  25. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2011) Principles of Design and Operations of Wastewater Treatment Pond Systems for Plant Operators, Engineers, and Managers. Cincinnati, Ohio: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
  26. Wagner, M.R. and Pöpel, H.J. (1998) “Oxygen transfer and aeration efficiency — Influence of diffuser submergence, diffuser density, and blower type,” Water Science and Technology, 38(3), pp. 1–6. Available at: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1223(98)00445-4
  27. Wang, X. et al. (2020) “Performance comparison of swirl-venturi bubble generator and conventional venturi bubble generator,” Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification, 154. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2020.108022
  28. Yadav, A., Kumar, A. and Sarkar, S. (2021) “Performance evaluation of venturi aeration system,” Aquacultural Engineering, 93. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2021.102156
  29. Zhang, C. et al. (2020) “Design and optimization of a new tube aeration device,” Aquaculture International, 28(3), pp. 985–999. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-020-00507-2
  30. Zhao, D. et al. (2021) “Effects of coarse and fine bubble aeration on performances of membrane filtration and denitrification in moving bed membrane bioreactors,” Science of the Total Environment, 772. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145513

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-08-01 21:07:18

No citation recorded.