DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/pwk.v19i2.28215

Urgensi dan Strategi Penyediaan Hunian Terjangkau di Kawasan Transit di Indonesia

*Forina lestari  -  Institut Teknologi Indonesia, Indonesia
Joko Adianto  -  Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract
Keterkaitan antara guna lahan dan transportasi saat ini menjadi kunci dalam penyediaan hunian terjangkau di kawasan transit khususnya di perkotaan. Dalam pelaksanaannya hingga saat ini masih ditemukan banyak kendala yang perlu segera ditangani seperti terbatasnya aturan teknis terkait pelaksanaan dan lemahnya aspek kelembagaan khususnya terkait badan pengelola kawasan transit. Kajian ini merumuskan alternatif strategi berdasarkan hasil pembahasan dan diskusi melalui serangkaian kegiatan focus group discussion (FGD), interview dan seminar dengan berbagai stakeholder  baik dari kalangan pemerintah maupun non pemerintah dan para ahli yang terkait. Dalam FGD dikumpulkan data berupa tantangan, isu dan strategi yang dihadapi oleh pemerintah daerah dalam mengembangkan kawasan transit. Dalam kajian ini dilakukan sebanyak empat kali FGD dengan melibatkan pemda di Jabodetabek dan dua kali seminar yang melibatkan akademisi sebagai narasumber. Hasil kajian ini merumuskan strategi ke dalam empat kelompok antara lain integrasi arahan rencana tata ruang, pembentukan badan pengelola kawasan transit, penguatan regulasi dan kelembagaan terkait kawasan transit, dan alternatif penyedian lahan bagi hunian terjangkau di kawasan transit.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Hunian Terjangkau, Kawasan Transit, Pengembangan Perkotaan

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : ID
Recent articles
Transformasi Pancuran “Kampung Kumuh” Menjadi Tangguh Penentuan Tipologi Halte BRT Trans Jateng Koridor I di Kabupaten Semarang Berdasarkan Konsep Transit Oriented Development Penilaian Tingkat Perkembangan Wilayah Kawasan Strategis Kecamatan Sungai Kunyit Kalimantan Barat Indonesia More recent articles
Most cited articles
Pengaruh Konsolidasi Lahan Perkotaan Terhadap Harga Tanah di Ringintelu, Kelurahan Kalipancur - Kota Semarang Bentuk Keterlibatan Masyarakat Dalam Upaya Penghijauan Pada Kawasan Hunian Padat di Kelurahan Serengan - Kota Surakarta Perubahan Penggunaan Lahan dan Kesesuaiannya Terhadap RDTR di Wilayah Peri-Urban (Studi Kasus: Kecamatan Mlati) MODEL PEMETAAN RISIKO KEKERINGAN DI KABUPATEN BIMA, NUSA TENGGARA BARAT Evaluasi Perubahan Penggunaan Lahan Kecamatan di Daerah Aliran Sungai Cisadane Kabupaten Bogor More cited articles
  1. Ardiwijaya, V. S. 2014. Bandung Urban sprawl and Idle Land: Spatial Environmental Perspectives. Jurnal Precedia 10: 208–213
  2. Beimborn, E., Rabinowitz, H., Gugliotta, P., Mrotek, C., Yan, S. 1991. Guidelines for Transit Sensitive Land Use Design. Washington, D. C.: Urban Mass Transportation Administration
  3. Belzer, D., Bernstein, S., Gorewitz, C., Makarewicz, C., McGraw, J., Poticha, S., Thorne-Lyman, A., Zimmerman, M. 2006. Preserving and Promoting Diverse Transit-Oriented Neighborhoods. Washington D. C.: Center for Transit-Oriented Development
  4. Belzer, D., Srivastava, S., Wood, J., Greenberg, E. 2011. Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) and Employment. Washington D. C.: Center for Transit-Oriented Development
  5. Bird, R. M. 2010. Subnational taxation in developing countries: A review of the literature. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank
  6. Bogdon, A., Can, A. 1997. Indicators of local housing affordability: Comparative and spatial approaches, Real Estate Economics 25(1): 43-80
  7. Calthorpe, P. 1993. The Next American metropolis: Ecology, community, and the American Dream. New York: Princeton Architectural Press
  8. Cao, X. J., Xu, Z., Fan, Y. 2010. Exploring the connections among residential location, selfselection, and driving: Propensity score matching with multiple treatments
  9. Cervero, R., Kang, C. D. 2011. Bus rapid transit impacts on land uses and land values in Seoul, Korea. Transport Policy 18(1): 102–116. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.06.005
  10. Cervero, R., Kockelman, K. 1997. Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 2(3): 199-219
  11. Curtis, C., Renne, J. L., Bertlini, L. 2009. Transit Oriented Development: Making It Happen. New York: Routledge
  12. Ditmar, H., Ohland, G. 2003. The New Transit Town: Best Practices in Transit-Oriented Development. Washington, D. C.: Island Press
  13. Downs, A. 1994. New Visions for Metropolitan America. Washington, D. C.: Brookings Institution & Lincoln Institute of Land Policy
  14. Farda, M., & Lubis, H. (2018). Transportation System Development and Challenge in Jakarta Metropolitan Area, Indonesia. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. Technol, 1(2), 42-50
  15. Feudo, F. 2014. How to Build an Alternative to Sprawl and Auto-centric Development Model through a TOD Scenario for the North-Pas-de-Calais Region? Transportation Research
  16. Greene, D.L., Wegener, M. 1997.Sustainable transport. Journal of Transport Geography 5(3): 177-190
  17. Hasibuan, H. S., Moersidik, S., Koestoer, R., & Soemardi, T. P. (2014). Using GIS to integrate the analysis of land-use, transportation, and the environment for managing urban growth based on transit oriented development in the metropolitan of Jabodetabek, Indonesia. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 18, No. 1, p. 012177). IOP Publishing
  18. Hasibuan, H. S., Soemardi, T. P., Koestoer, R., & Moersidik, S. (2014). The role of transit oriented development in constructing urban environment sustainability, the case of Jabodetabek, Indonesia. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 20, 622-631
  19. James, P. M. 2013. Managing Metropolises by Negotiating Mega-Urban Growth. In H. Mieg & Klaus Töpfer (eds.). Institutional and Social Innovation for Sustainable Urban Development. London: Routledge
  20. Jenks, M. Kozak, D., Takkanon, P. (eds.). 2008. World Cities and Urban Form. London: Routledge
  21. Leung, K. H. (2016). Indonesia's Summary Transport Assessment
  22. Lund, H. (2006). Reasons for living in a transit-oriented development, and associated transit use. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(3), 357-366
  23. Newman, P.W.G., Kenworthy, J.R. 1999. Sustainability and Cities: Overcoming Automobile Dependence. Washington, D.C.: Island Press
  24. Newman, P.W.G., Thorpe, A., Greive, S., Armstrong, R. 2003. Locational Advantage and Disadvantage in Public Housing, Rent Assistance and Housing Loan Assistance. Melbourne: AHURI
  25. Pereira, P., Monkevičius, A., Siarova, H. 2014. Public Perception of Environmental, Social and Economic Impacts ff Urban sprawl In Vilnius. Societal Studies Journal 6 (2): 259–290
  26. Reardon, K. M. 2003. Riding the rails. Shelterforce, (128)
  27. Rosalin, A., Kombaitan, B., Zulkaidi, D., Dirgahayani, P., & Syabri, I. (2019, October). Towards Sustainable Transportation: Identification of Development Challenges of TOD area in Jakarta Metropolitan Area Urban Railway Projects. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 328, No. 1, p. 012006). IOP Publishing
  28. Susilo, Y. O., Joewono, T. B., Santosa, W., & Parikesit, D. (2007). A reflection of motorization and Sasono, M. E. N., Purwitaningsih, S., Yusuf, L., & Navastara, A. M. (2016). Surabaya smart subway development as an alternative mode in Ahmad Yani Corridor Surabaya by TOD concept application. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 227, 132-138
  29. Suzuki, H., Murakami, J., Yu-Hong, H., Tamayose, B. 2015. Financing Transit-Orientated Development with Land Values: Adapting Land Value Capture in Developing Countries, Washington D.C.: World Bank Group
  30. UN-Habitat. 2012. Sustainable Urbanization in Asia: A Sourcebook for Local Governments, Nairobi: UN-HABITAT
  31. United Nations. 2014. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision, New York: United Nations
  32. United Nations. 2016. New Urban Agenda, Quito: UN-Habitat
  33. Vos, J. De., Acker, V. Van., Witlox, F. 2014. The influence of attitudes on Transit-Oriented Development: An explorative analysis. Transport Policy
  34. Taki, H. M., & Maatouk, M. M. H. (2018). Spatial Statistical Analysis for Potential Transit Oriented Development (TOD) in Jakarta Metropolitan Region. Journal of Geoscience, Engineering, Environment, and Technology, 3(1), 47-56
  35. Taki, H. M., Maatouk, M. M. H., Qurnfulah, E. M., & Antoni, S. (2017, November). Land Suitability Assessment for the Potential Location of Transit Oriented Development (TOD). In International Conference on Smart Cities, Infrastructure, Technologies and Applications (pp. 357-359). Springer, Cham
  36. Wismadi, A., Soemardjito, J., & Sutomo, H. (2012). Transport Situation in Jakarta. Study on Energy Efficiency Improvement in the Transport Sector through Transport Improvement and Smart Community Development in the Urban Area, 29-58
  37. Welch, T. F. (2013). Equity in transport: The distribution of transit access and connectivity among affordable housing units. Transport policy, 30, 283-293
  38. Waller, M. (2005). High Cost Or High Opportunity Cost?: Transportation and Family Economic Success (No. Center on Children & Families# 35). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, Center on Children and Families
  39. Walters, L., du Plessis, J., Haile, S., Paterson, L. 2016. Leveraging land: Land based-finance for local governments: A reader. Nairobi: United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat)
  40. Wardrip, K. 2011. Public Transit’s Impact on Housing Costs: A Review of the Literature. Insights from Housing Policy Research. Washington, DC: Center for Housing Policy
  41. Woetzel, J., Mischke, J., Peloquin, S., Weisfield, D. 2016. A Tool Kit to Close California’s Housing Gap: 3.5 Million Homes by 2025. Washington D. C.: McKinsey & Company
  42. Xie, F., Levinson, D. 2009. Modeling the Growth of Transportation Networks: A Comprehensive Review. Networks and Spatial Economics 93: 291-307
  43. Zhang, R., 2008. Transit-Oriented Development Strategies and Traffic Organization. In Transportation and Development Innovative Best Practices 2008. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, pp. 277-283
  44. Zhao, Z. J., Larson, K. 2011. Special Assessments as a Value Capture Strategy for Public Transit Finance. Public Works Management & Policy 16: 320–340. doi: 10.1177/1087724X11408923
  45. Zhou, B., Kockelman, K. M. 2008. Self-Selection in Home Choice: Use of Treatment Effects in Evaluating the Relationship between the Built Environment and Travel Behavior. Transportation Research Record 2077: 54–61

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-11-24 06:48:09

No citation recorded.