skip to main content

Peran Organisasi Berbasis Masyarakat dalam Inovasi Keberlanjutan Komunitas UMKM Menuju Kota Cerdas

Winny Astuti  -  Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
Chrisna Tri Hadi Permana  -  Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
*Hakimatul Mukaromah  -  Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract
Perwujudan Kota Cerdas di Indonesia sangat bergantung pada partisipasi aktif dari masyarakat. Kota Cerdas merupakan sebuah konsep yang mendorong pada penerapan berbagai teknologi dalam memudahkan dan mendukung aktivitas pembangunan yang dilakukan oleh stakeholder terutama yang berkaitan dengan pengembangan ekonomi, sosial, lingkungan dan tata kelola. Organisasi Berbasis Masyarakat (OBM) memiliki peran penting dalam memfasilitasi program dan kegiatan Kota Cerdas yang melibatkan partisipasi, tindakan kolektif, dan pemberdayaan masyarakat. OBM berfungsi membangun komunitas yang meningkatkan kekuatan negosiasi dalam pengambilan keputusan dan memperluas akses informasi dan jaringan. OBM dalam konteks ini termasuk organisasi profesi, pedagang, kelompok usaha, kelompok budayawan, dan lain-lain. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memberikan kajian empiris tentang peran OBM dalam mendorong perwujudan Kota Cerdas berbasis masyarakat, dengan fokus pada pengembangan Komunitas UMKM di 4 Kampung Kreatif di Kota Surakarta: Laweyan, Sondakan, Potrojayan, dan Kauman. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif melalui wawancara dan focus group discussion (FGD) melibatkan perwakilan OBM, perwakilan pemerintah daerah, dan pelaku usaha mikro kecil dan menengah (UMKM) di keempat lokasi studi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa peran OBM dominan dalam menginisiasi inovasi dan teknologi sekaligus sebagai wadah pertukaran pengetahuan, mediator transfer teknologi dan inovasi ramah lingkungan. Namun, tingkat dominasi OBM berbeda-beda di setiap lokasi, dipengaruhi oleh dukungan dan kepercayaan dari lembaga formal di atasnya.
Fulltext
Keywords: Organisasi Berbasis Masyarakat, Kampung Kreatif, Kota Cerdas, UMKM

Article Metrics:

  1. Amin, A., & Roberts, J. (2008). The Resurgence of Community in Economic Thought and Practice. In Community, Economic Creativity, and Organisation (pp. 11–36). Oxford University Press
  2. Astuti, W., Astuti, D. W., & Syarifudin, D. (2015). Contribution of Community-based Housing Development toward Environment Improvement as an Effort of Poverty Alleviation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 179, 250–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.428
  3. Boonstra, B. (2015). Planning Strategies in an Age of Active Citizenship (Issue november)
  4. Chaskin, R. J. (2000). Building community capacity: A definitional framework and case studies from a comprehensive community initiative. Urban Affairs Review, 36(3), 291–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780870122184876
  5. Das, A. (2015). Autonomous but constrained: CBOs and urban upgrading in Indonesia. Cities, 48, 8–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.05.009
  6. Douglass, M. (2016). Creative communities and the cultural economy — Insadong, chaebol urbanism and the local state in Seoul. Cities, 56, 148–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.09.007
  7. Florida, R. (2012). The Rise of the Creative Class: Revisited. New York: Basic Books
  8. Ghazala, M., & Rao, V. (2004). Community-Based and-Driven Development: A Critical Review (7131). https://doi.org/http://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/book/10.1596/1813-9450-7131
  9. Harsanto, B., & Permana, C. T. (2020). Sustainability-oriented innovation ( SOI ) in the cultural village : an actor-network perspective in the case of Laweyan Batik Village. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 2044(1266). https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-08-2019-0102
  10. Kong, L., & O’Connor, J. (2009). Creative Economies, Creative Cities: Asian-European Perspectives. Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9949-6
  11. Keating, W. D. (2015). Neighborhood Revitalization and Community Development. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition, 16, 450–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.74018-9
  12. Landry, C. (2008). The Creative City: A Toolkit for Urban Regeneration. In Earthscan
  13. López-Guzmán, T., Sánchez-Cañizares, S., & Pavón, V. (2011). COMMUNITY-BASED TOURISM IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES: A CASE STUDY. In TOURISMOS: AN INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF TOURISM (Vol. 6, Issue 1)
  14. Maryam, S. (2015). Gotong Royong Marketing Formulation to Improve Batik in Kampoeng Batik Laweyan. Journal of Business and Economic Policy, 2(3), 69–74
  15. Mayangsari, L., Novani, S., & Hermawan, P. (2015). Batik Solo Industrial Cluster Analysis as Entrepreneurial System: A Viable Co-creation Model Perspective. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 169(August 2014), 281–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.311
  16. Mendiwelso-bendek, Z. (2015). Community-based Research: Enabling Civil Society’s Self-Organisation. Kybernetes, 44(6/7), 903–912
  17. Milbourne, L. (2009). Remodelling the third sector: Advancing collaboration or competition in community-based initiatives? Journal of Social Policy, 38(2), 277–297. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279408002845
  18. Musyawaroh, M., Pitana, T. S., Masykuri, M., & Nandariyah. (2018). Sustainable Revitalization in Cultural Heritage Kampong Kauman Surakarta Supported by Spatial Analysis. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 123(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/123/1/012043
  19. Nugroho, P. (2014). The Role of Local Institutions in Industrial Cluster Development in Indonesia: The Cases of Javanese Batik Clusters in Kampung Laweyan, Kampung Kauman and Lasem Area. Technische Universität Dortmund
  20. Permana, C. (2019). Community Initiatives and The Reshaping of Collaborative Planning Practice in Indonesia: The Case of Creative Kampong (PhD Thesis). University of Liverpool
  21. Permana, C. T., Mukaromah, H., & Astuti, W. (2023). Creative Kampong and the Promotion of Sustainable Development Knowledge in Urban Grassroots : The Case of Surakarta. Local Wisdom, 15(2), 137–155
  22. Permana, Chrisna T., & Winarso, H. (2024). Opportunity for informal business networking to reshape the institutional capacity of community in housing revitalization projects: learning from Bandung and Surakarta, Indonesia. International Planning Studies, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2024.2357998
  23. Reed, M. G. (1997). POWER RELATIONS AND COMMUNITY-BASED TOURISM PLANNING. Annals of Tourism Research, 24(3), 566–591
  24. Snow, C. C., Håkonsson, D. D., & Obel, B. (2016). A smart city is a collaborative community: Lessons from smart Aarhus. California Management Review, 59(1), 92–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125616683954
  25. Zubizarreta, I., Seravalli, A., & Arrizabalaga, S. (2015). Smart City Concept: What It Is and What It Should Be. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP
  26. Pemerintah kota Surakarta. 2022. Keliling Solo Naik Bus Werkudara. https://surakarta.go.id/?p=27336
  27. Pemerintah Kota Surakarta. RPJMD Kota Surakarta 2021- 2016
  28. Potter, W. J., & Levine-Donnerstein, D. (1999). Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 27(3), 258–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909889909365539
  29. UNESCO, & The World Bank. (2021). Cities, Culture, Creativity Leveraging Culture and Creativity for Sustainable Urban Development and Inclusive Growth

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-01-07 06:30:49

No citation recorded.