DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/teknik.v47i1.69211

Construction Supply Chain Performance Evaluation using The Supply Chain Operations Reference (Scor 12.0) (Case Study: Semarang-Demak Toll Road Project Package 2)

*Nugroho Wahyu Jati  -  Department of Civil Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Diponegoro University, Jl. Prof. Sudarto, SH, Tembalang, Semarang, Indonesia 50275, Indonesia
Mochamad Agung Wibowo  -  Department of Civil Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Diponegoro University, Jl. Prof. Sudarto, SH, Tembalang, Semarang, Indonesia 50275, Indonesia
Maulida Asri  -  Department of Industrial Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Diponegoro University, Jl. Prof. Sudarto, SH, Tembalang, Semarang, Indonesia 50275, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2026 TEKNIK

Citation Format:
Abstract

Inefficiencies in construction projects, aside from being caused by poor planning and control, are also attributed to delays in material delivery, especially for critical materials. One of the main causes of these delivery delays is suboptimal supply chain management. Therefore, it is essential to evaluate supply chain performance to identify and address these issues. Supply chain performance evaluation can utilize the SCOR 12.0 model, which has been widely applied in the manufacturing industry. A case study was conducted on the Semarang–Demak Toll Road Project Package 2, focusing on two key materials: precast full slabs and ready-mix concrete. The evaluation of supply chain performance employed the SCOR 12.0 model, which covers dimensions of reliability, responsiveness, agility, costs, and assets, as well as best practices implemented within the project. The research used a qualitative methodology, collecting data through questionnaires designed to assess supply chain performance indicators based on the SCOR 12.0 model, adapted for the construction context, and conducting interviews with project stakeholders and suppliers. The findings from the questionnaires and interviews were used to validate key performance indicators (KPIs), which were then scored on a Likert scale with five levels (5 = excellent, 4 = good, 3 = average, 2 = poor, 1 = very poor). The results of the supply chain performance assessment showed a score of 3.53 (good) for precast full slabs and a score of 3.8 (good) for ready-mix concrete.

Fulltext View|Download Email colleagues
Keywords: Performance; Measurement; Construction Supply Chain; Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR) 12.0; Toll Road

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Most cited articles
PROSPEK INDUSTRI GALANGAN KAPAL DALAM NEGERI GUNA MENGHADAPI PERSAINGAN GLOBAL PENURUNAN MODEL PERMUKAAN DIJITAL (DSM) MENJADI MODEL ELEVASI DIJITAL (DEM) DARI CITRA SATELIT ALOS PALSAR (Studi kasus: NAD Bagian Tenggara, Indonesia) PENGOLAHAN DATA GEOLISTRIK DENGAN METODE SCHLUMBERGER KARAKTERISTIK AKTIVITAS PEDAGANG KAKI LIMA PADA KAWASAN KOMERSIAL DI PUSAT KOTA Studi Kasus: Simpang Lima, Semarang KONVERSI ELEKTROKIMIA AMONIA MENJADI HIDROGEN More cited articles

  1. Abduh, M., Soemardi, B. W., & Wirahadikusumah, R. D. (2012). Indonesian Construction Supply Chains Cost Structure and Factors: A Case Study of Two Projects / Sąnaudų Struktūra Ir Veiksniai Indonezijos Statybų Tiekimo Grandinėse: Dviejų Projektų Atvejo Tyrimas. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 18(2), 209–216. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2012.671259">[Crossref]

  2. Alwi, S., Mohamed, S., & Hampson, K. (2002). Waste in the Indonesian Construction Projects. Proceedings of the 1st CIB-W107 International Conference: Creating a Sustainable Construction Industry in Developing Countries, 305–315.

  3. APICS. (2017). Supply Chain Operations Reference Model: SCOR Version 12.0. APICS.

  4. Boone Jr, H. N., & Boone, D. A. (2012). Analyzing likert data. The Journal of Extension, 50(2), 48.

  5. Hardina, N. (2022). The Manajemen Rantai Pasok Material Terhadap Keterlambatan Pelaksanaan Proyek Konstruksi Jalan: Kata Kunci: manajemen, rantai pasok, material, keterlambatan, proyek. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Unida, 3(1), 49–59.

  6. Kerzner, H. (2009). Project Management: A Systems Approach to.

  7. Lovrenčić Butković, L., Grilec Kaurić, A., & Mikulić, J. (2016). Supply Chain Management in the Construction Industry: A Literature Review. Proceedings of the 4th International OFEL Conference on Governance, Management and Entrepreneurship (OFEL 2016), 798–809. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301566366_Supply_Chain_Management_in_the_Construction_Industry_-_A_Literature_Review

  8. Purnatha, I. (2013). Studi Mengenai Construction Waste pada Proyek Konstruksi di Daerah Kabupaten Badung. UAJY.

  9. Sholeh, M. N., Nurdiana, A., Dharmo, B., & Suharjono. (2021). Implementation of construction supply chain flow based on SCOR 12.0 performance standards. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1833(1), 012012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1833/1/012012">[Crossref]

  10. Sugiyono, S. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. In Alfabeta. Alfabeta.

  11. Syahri, R. F., Heryanto, Wibowo, M. A., & Hatmoko, J. U. D. (2017). Analisis Waste dengan Value Stream Mapping pada Pekerjaan Kolom Gedung Bertingkat. Jurnal Karya Teknik Sipil, 6(4), 192–200. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/jkts/article/view/18345

  12. Wibowo, M. A., & Sholeh, M. N. (2015). The Analysis of Supply Chain Performance Measurement at Construction Project. Procedia Engineering, 125, 25–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.11.005">[Crossref]

  13. Wirahadikusumah, R. D., & Susilawati. (2006). Pola Supply Chain pada Proyek Konstruksi Bangunan Gedung. Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 13(3), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.5614/jts.2006.13.3.1">[Crossref]


Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-08-12 04:24:11

No citation recorded.