skip to main content

CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY CHAIN PERFORMANCE EVALUATION USING THE SUPPLY CHAIN OPERATIONS REFERENCE (SCOR 12.0) (CASE STUDY: SEMARANG-DEMAK TOLL ROAD PROJECT PACKAGE 2)

*Nugroho Wahyu Jati  -  Department of Civil Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Diponegoro University, Jl. Prof. Sudarto, SH, Tembalang, Semarang, Indonesia 50275, Indonesia
Mochamad Agung Wibowo  -  Department of Civil Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Diponegoro University, Jl. Prof. Sudarto, SH, Tembalang, Semarang, Indonesia 50275, Indonesia
Maulida Asri  -  Department of Industrial Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Diponegoro University, Jl. Prof. Sudarto, SH, Tembalang, Semarang, Indonesia 50275, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2025 TEKNIK

Citation Format:
Abstract

Inefficiencies in construction projects, aside from being caused by poor planning and control, are also attributed to delays in material delivery, especially for critical materials. One of the main causes of these delivery delays is suboptimal supply chain management. Therefore, it is essential to evaluate supply chain performance to identify and address these issues. Supply chain performance evaluation can utilize the SCOR 12.0 model, which has been widely applied in the manufacturing industry. A case study was conducted on the Semarang–Demak Toll Road Project Package 2, focusing on two key materials: precast full slabs and ready-mix concrete. The evaluation of supply chain performance employed the SCOR 12.0 model, which covers dimensions of reliability, responsiveness, agility, costs, and assets, as well as best practices implemented within the project. The research used a qualitative methodology, collecting data through questionnaires designed to assess supply chain performance indicators based on the SCOR 12.0 model, adapted for the construction context, and conducting interviews with project stakeholders and suppliers. The findings from the questionnaires and interviews were used to validate key performance indicators (KPIs), which were then scored on a Likert scale with five levels (5 = excellent, 4 = good, 3 = average, 2 = poor, 1 = very poor). The results of the supply chain performance assessment showed a score of 3.53 (good) for precast full slabs and a score of 3.8 (good) for ready-mix concrete.

Fulltext
Keywords: performance; measurement; construction supply chain; supply chain operations reference (SCOR) 12.0; toll road

Article Metrics:

  1. Agnes, A. R., Adelino, M. I., & Fitri, M. (2022). Analysis of SCM Performance Using the SCOR Model. 3(1)
  2. Fauzi, A., Nazaruddin, & Wibowo, R. P. (2023). Measurement of Supply Chain Management Performance on Toll Road Projects with Design and Build Contracts Using SCOR and AHP Methods: A Case Study on the Tebing Tinggi-Parapat Toll Road Section III Project. In W. R. Murhadi, D. Anandya, N. K. Darmasetiawan, J. Dyah Trisnawati, P. A. Mahadwartha, & E. Tandelilin (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Symposium on Management (INSYMA 2022) (Vol. 223, pp. 1152–1161). Atlantis Press International BV. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-008-4_142
  3. Fitrianto, T. (2020). Supply Chain Performance Measurement in Multi-Story Building Construction Using the SCOR Method Approach. Media Komunikasi Teknik Sipil, 26(1)
  4. Supply Chain Performance Measurement for Sustainable Construction with the SCOR 12.0 Model Approach. (2020). Jurnal Vokasi Indonesia, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.7454/jvi.v8i2.159
  5. Pranatawijaya, V. H., Widiatry, W., Priskila, R., & Putra, P. B. A. A. (2019). Application of Likert Scale and Dichotomous Scale in Online Questionnaires. Jurnal Sains dan Informatika, 5(2), 128–137. https://doi.org/10.34128/jsi.v5i2.185
  6. Rizkya, I., Syahputri, K., Sari, R. M., Siregar, I., & Utaminingrum, J. (2019). SCOR: Business Process Analysis and Supply Chain Performance in the Building Materials Industry. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 598(1), 012070. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/598/1/012070
  7. Santoso, A., Nurzaki, A., Benawan, C., Wahyudin, D., & Santoso, S. (2020). Performance of PT PLN Jakarta Raya Distribution Unit with Supply Chain Operation Reference. Distribusi - Journal of Management and Business, 8(2), 255–266. https://doi.org/10.29303/distribusi.v8i2.136Scor versi 12.pdf. (n.d.)
  8. Sholeh, M. N., Fauziyah, S., & Sari, U. C. (2021). Preliminary Study on the Standards of Construction Supply Chain Workforce Competence. Jurnal Proyek Teknik Sipil, 4(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.14710/potensi.2021.10332
  9. Sholeh, M. N., Nurdiana, A., Dharmo, B., & Suharjono. (2021). Implementation of Construction Supply Chain Flow Based on SCOR 12.0 Performance Standards. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1833(1), 012012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1833/1/012012
  10. Wibowo, M. A., Handayani, N. U., Sinaga, G., Sholeh, M. N., & Ulkhaq, M. M. (2019). The Performance of Building Construction Supply Chain: A Case Study in Building Construction Project. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 673(1), 012048. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/673/1/012048
  11. Wibowo, M. A., & Sholeh, M. N. (2015). The Analysis of Supply Chain Performance Measurement at Construction Project. Procedia Engineering, 125, 25–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.11.005

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-07-06 13:33:13

No citation recorded.