skip to main content

Effect of Salinities and Dietary Patterns toward Fullness of Gut and Gut Evacuation Time of the Newly Introduced Penaeus merguiensis Larvae

1Faculty of Marine Resources, Asmarya Islamic University, Libya

2Department of Marine Science, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Science, Diponegoro University, Indonesia

3Marine Center for Brackishwater Aquaculture Development, Indonesia

4 Department of Marine Sciences, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Sciences, Diponegoro University, Indonesia

View all affiliations
Received: 3 Mar 2021; Revised: 20 May 2021; Accepted: 27 May 2021; Published: 27 May 2021; Available online: 28 May 2021.

Citation Format:

The gut capacity of shrimp larvae is minimal, and their digestion is often challenged by the inevitable fact that they tend to develop slowly during the zoea stage. Many studies approved that the digestive capacity of shrimp larvae could be improved by increasing the retention time of food in the intestine. Gut evacuation time and fullness of the gut are crucial parameters in assessing the growth of shrimp larvae, and the diet as well as  environmental conditions indeed influence the activity of these parameters. Although many species of shrimps have a wide salinity tolerance, more specific research on salinity and its relation to the type of diet is necessary to find the optimum condition supporting the growth of shrimp larvae. By employing Penaeus merguiensis larvae, this study evaluates the effect of three nominal salinities (28, 32, and 36 ppt) and types of diets (Diet A: 100% live feed; Diet B: 100% FRIPPAK; Diet C: a combination of Diet A and Diet C, 50 % each) toward the fullness of gut and gut evacuation time of the newly introduced Penaeus merguiensis larvae culture. The result showed that the longest gut evacuation time and the highest percentage of gut's fullness were found in all Zoea reared with Diet A at salinity 28 and 32 ppt; Zoea-1 at 28 ppt with Diet A; Zoea-2 at 32 ppt with Diet A; Zoea-3 at 32 ppt with Diet A. Longer gut evacuation time would have an impact on the higher percentage of the fullness of gut. The higher fullness of the gut also indicates that the larvae have the best capacity to produce energy and achieve optimum growth.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Optimum; development; gut; growth; diet

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Articles
Language : EN
Statistics: 254 101
  1. Abrunhosa, F., Melo, M., Lima, J.D.F. & Abrunhosa, J. 2006. Developmental Morphology of Mouthparts and Foregut of the Larvae and Postlarvae of Lepidophthalmus siriboia Felder & Rodrigues, 1993 (Decapoda: Callianassidae). Acta Amaz. 36: 335-342. doi: 10.1590/S0044-59672006000300008
  2. Abrunhosa, F., Melo, M & Abrunhosa, J.P. 2003. Development and Functional Morphology of the Foregut of Larvae and Postlarva of Ucides cordatus (Decapoda, Ocypodidae). Nauplius, 11(1): 37-43
  3. Abubakr D. 2001 Studies on the Functional Morphology of the Decapod Larval Gut in Relation to Diet. University College of North Wales Press. 514 pp
  4. Beseres, J.J., Lawrence, A.L. & Feller, R.J. 2005. Variation in Fiber, Protein, and Lipid Content of Shrimp Feed-Effects on Gut Passage Times Measured in the Field. J. Shellfish Res. 24: 301-308. doi: 10.2983/0730-8000(2005)24[301:VIFPAL]2.0.CO;2
  5. Brestoff, J.R. & D. Artis. 2013. Commensal Bacteria at the Interface of Host Metabolism and the Immune System. Nat. Immunol. 14: 676-684. doi: 10.1038/ni.2640
  6. Carvalho, D.A., Collins, P.A. & De Bonis, C.J. 2011. Gut Evacuation Time of Macrobrachium borellii (Caridea: Palaemonidae) Feeding on Three Types of Prey from the Littoral-Benthic Community. J. Crust. Biol. 31: 630-634. doi: 10.1651/10-3446.1
  7. Cornejo-Granados, F., Gallardo-Becerra, L., Leonardo-Reza, M., Ochoa-Romo, J.P. & Ochoa-Leyva, A. 2018. A Meta-analysis Reveals the Environmental and Host Factors Shaping the Structure and Function of the Shrimp Microbiota. PeerJ, 6: 2-25. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5382
  8. Gallardo, P., Martínez, G., Palomino, G., Paredes, A., Gaxiola, G., Cuzon, G. & Pedroza‐Islas, R. 2013. Replacement of Artemia franciscana nauplii by Microencapsulated Diets: Effect on Development, Digestive Enzymes, and Body Composition of White Shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei larvae. J. World Aquac. Soc., 44: 187-197. doi: 10.1111/jwas.12031
  9. Hernandez-Cortes, P., Rivera-Pérez, C., Garcia-Carreno, F. & Martínez-Alarcón, D. 2017. Proteinases During Early Development of the Pacific Whiteleg Shrimp Penaeus vannamei. Biol. Bull. 232: 2-11. doi: 10.1086/691381
  10. Lima, J.D.F. Garcia, J.D.S., & Tavares, M. 2016. Foregut Morphology of Macrobrachium carcinus (Crustacea, Decapoda, Palaemonidae). Acta Amaz, 46: 209-218. doi: 10.1590/1809-4392201501214
  11. Lovett, D.L & Felder, D.L. 1989. Application of Regression Techniques to Studies of Relative Growth in Crustaceans. J. Crust. Biol. 9: 529-539. DOI: 10.1163/193724089X00557
  12. Murtaugh, P.A. 2004. Variable Gut Residence Time: Problems in Inferring Feeding Rate from Stomach Fullness of a Mysid Crustacean. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 41:1287-1293. doi: 10.1139/f84-157
  13. Piyakarnchana, T. 1987. Exploitation and Threats to the Mangrove Ecosystem in Thailand. In: Mangrove Ecosystems in Asia and the Pacific: Status, Exploitation, and Management'. (Eds C. D. Field and A. J. Dartnall). The Australian Institute of Marine Science Press. 193-198 pp
  14. Poulin, E., Boletzky, S.V. & Feral, J.P. 2001. Combined Ecological Factors Permit Classification of Developmental Patterns in Benthic Marine Invertebrates: A Discussion Note. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 257:109-115. doi: 10.1016/S0022-0981(00)00332-4
  15. Relyea, R.A. & Auld, J.R. 2004. Having the Guts to Compete: How Intestinal Plasticity Explains Costs of Inducible Defenses. Ecol. Lett. 7: 869-875. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00645.x
  16. Rocha, C.P., Quadros, M.L.A., Maciel, M., Maciel, C.R., & Abrunhosa, F.A. 2018. Morphological Changes in the Structure and Function of the Feeding Appendages and Foregut of the Larvae and First Juvenile of the Freshwater Prawn Macrobrachium acanthurus. J. Mar. Biolog. Assoc. U.K. 98: 713-720. doi: 10.1017/S0025315416001855
  17. Sekirov, I., Russell, S.L., Antunes, L.C.M. & Finlay, B.B. 2010. Gut Microbiota in Health and Disease. Physiol. Rev., 90: 859-904. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00045.2009
  18. Silva, B.C., Nolasco‐Soria, H., Magallón‐Barajas, F., Civera‐Cerecedo, R., Casillas‐Hernández, R. & Seiffert, W. 2016. Improved Digestion and Initial Performance of Whiteleg Shrimp using Organic Salt Supplements. Aquac. Nutr. 22:997-1005. doi: 10.1111/anu.12315
  19. Zacharia, S. & Kakati, V.S. 2002. Growth and Survival of Penaeus merguiensis Postlarvae at Different Salinities. Isr. J. Aquac. 54: 157-162
  20. Zhang, M., Sun, Y., Chen, K., Yu, N., Zhou, Z., Chen, L., Du, Z. & Li, E. 2014. Characterization of the Intestinal Microbiota in Pacific White Shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei, Fed Diets with Different Lipid Sources. Aquacult., 434:449-455. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.09.008

Last update: 2021-08-02 17:26:03

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2021-08-02 17:26:03

No citation recorded.