skip to main content

Optimal operating scenario for Polerood hydropower station to maximize peak shaving and produced profit

Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran, Islamic Republic of

Published: 15 Dec 2018.
Editor(s): H Hadiyanto

Citation Format:

This paper deals with the optimization of the daily operation of Polerood hydropower station being constructed in the north of Iran. Dynamic Programming method (DP) is applied as the preferred optimization tool owing to the fact that it guarantees the optimal solution and is applicable to the present problem. Produced profit and peak-shaving are the two objectives considered separately in this study. The results show that the optimal water management of the case study through charging and discharging the reservoir at the appropriate times led to 4% increase in the produced profit. In another part of this study, the optimal performance strategies regarding to the two objectives (produced profit and peak-shaving) are compared. The observed similarity between the two performance strategies implies the substantial dependence of the electricity price and the network demand level. The paper ends with the profitability study of the project and the sensitivity analysis of the results to various economic parameters. 

Article History: Received December 15th 2017; Received in revised form April 18th 2018; Accepted September 16th 2018; Available online

How to Cite This Article: Feshalami, B.F. (2018) Optimal Operating Scenario for Polerood Hydropower Station to Maximize Peak Shaving and Produced Profit. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 7(3), 233-239.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Polerood Hydropower Station; Performance Optimization; Dynamic Programming Method; Profit; Peak Shaving

Article Metrics:

  1. Afshar, M. H. (2012). Large scale reservoir operation by Constrained Particle Swarm Optimization algorithms. Journal of Hydro-environment Research, 6(1), 75-87.
  2. Amjady, N., & Soleymanpour, H. R. (2010). Daily Hydrothermal Generation Scheduling by a new Modified Adaptive Particle Swarm Optimization technique. Electric Power Systems Research, 80(6), 723-732.
  3. Barten, H. (2010). International Energy Agency
  4. Bellman, R. (2013). Dynamic programming, Courier Corporation
  5. Belsnes, M. M., Wolfgang, O., Follestad, T., & Aasgård, E. K. (2016). Applying successive linear programming for stochastic short-term hydropower optimization. Electric Power Systems Research, 130, 167-180.
  6. Borghetti, A., Ambrosio, C. D., Lodi, A., & Martello, S. (2008). An MILP Approach for Short-Term Hydro Scheduling and Unit Commitment With Head-Dependent Reservoir. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 23(3), 1115-1124.
  7. Bozorg-Haddad, O., Azarnivand, A., Hosseini-Moghari, S.-M., & Loáiciga, H. A. (2017). Optimal operation of reservoir systems with the symbiotic organisms search (SOS) algorithm. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 19(4).
  8. Carter, R. G. Pipeline Optimization: Dynamic Programming After 30 Years, Pipeline Simulation Interest Group
  9. Chatterjee, B., Howitt, R. E., & Sexton, R. J. (1998). The Optimal Joint Provision of Water for Irrigation and Hydropower. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 36(3), 295-313.
  10. Chen, L., McPhee, J., & Yeh, W. W. G. (2007). A diversified multiobjective GA for optimizing reservoir rule curves. Advances in Water Resources, 30(5), 1082-1093.
  11. Chen, Q., Chen, D., Li, R., Ma, J., & Blanckaert, K. (2013). Adapting the operation of two cascaded reservoirs for ecological flow requirement of a de-watered river channel due to diversion-type hydropower stations. Ecological Modelling, 252, 266-272.
  12. Darmstader, P. D., Teitelbaum, P. D., & Polach, J. G. (1971). Energy in the world economy: a statistical review of trends in output, trade, and consumption since 1925, The Johns Hopkins Press,Baltimore; None
  13. Delucchi, M. A., & Jacobson, M. Z. (2011). Providing all global energy with wind, water, and solar power, Part II: Reliability, system and transmission costs, and policies. Energy Policy, 39(3), 1170-1190.
  14. Egré, D., & Milewski, J. C. (2002). The diversity of hydropower projects. Energy Policy, 30(14), 1225-1230.
  15. Fang, W., Huang, Q., Huang, S., Yang, J., Meng, E., & Li, Y. (2017). Optimal sizing of utility-scale photovoltaic power generation complementarily operating with hydropower: A case study of the world’s largest hydro-photovoltaic plant. Energy Conversion and Management, 136, 161-172.
  16. Feng, Z.-k., Niu, W.-j., Cheng, C.-t., & Zhou, J.-z. (2017). Peak shaving operation of hydro-thermal-nuclear plants serving multiple power grids by linear programming. Energy, 135, 210-219.
  17. Finley, M. (2013). BP statistical review of world energy
  18. Fu, X., Li, A., Wang, L., & Ji, C. (2011). Short-term scheduling of cascade reservoirs using an immune algorithm-based particle swarm optimization. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 62(6), 2463-2471.
  19. Gaudard, L., Avanzi, F., & De Michele, C. (2017). Seasonal aspects of the energy-water nexus: The case of a run-of-the-river hydropower plant. Applied Energy.
  20. Gaudard, L., & Romerio, F. (2014). The future of hydropower in Europe: Interconnecting climate, markets and policies. Environmental Science & Policy, 43, 5-14.
  21. Hakimi-Asiabar, M., Ghodsypour, S. H., & Kerachian, R. (2010). Deriving operating policies for multi-objective reservoir systems: Application of Self-Learning Genetic Algorithm. Applied Soft Computing, 10(4), 1151-1163.
  22. Hosseini, S. E., & Wahid, M. A. (2013). Feasibility study of biogas production and utilization as a source of renewable energy in Malaysia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 19, 454-462.
  23. Jahandideh-Tehrani, M., Bozorg Haddad, O., & Loáiciga, H. A. (2015). Hydropower Reservoir Management Under Climate Change: The Karoon Reservoir System. Water Resources Management, 29(3), 749-770.
  24. Jiekang, W., Zhuangzhi, G., & Fan, W. (2014). Short-term multi-objective optimization scheduling for cascaded hydroelectric plants with dynamic generation flow limit based on EMA and DEA. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 57, 189-197.
  25. Koziel, S., & Yang, X.-S. (2011). Computational optimization, methods and algorithms, Springer
  26. Labadie, J. W. (2004). Optimal operation of multireservoir systems: state-of-the-art review. Journal of water resources planning and management, 130(2), 93-111.
  27. Lu, B., Li, K., Zhang, H., Wang, W., & Gu, H. (2013). Study on the optimal hydropower generation of Zhelin reservoir. Journal of Hydro-environment Research, 7(4), 270-278.
  28. Ma, C., Lian, J., & Wang, J. (2013). Short-term optimal operation of Three-gorge and Gezhouba cascade hydropower stations in non-flood season with operation rules from data mining. Energy Conversion and Management, 65, 616-627.
  29. Mahmoudimehr, J., Sorouri, A., & Feshalami, B. F. (2016). A novel map for deciding on the type of a hydro power plant. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Energy, 169(4), 161-178.
  30. Mantawy, A. H., Soliman, S. A., & El-Hawary, M. E. (2003). The long-term hydro-scheduling problem—a new algorithm. Electric Power Systems Research, 64(1), 67-72.
  31. Marano, V., Rizzo, G., & Tiano, F. A. (2012). Application of dynamic programming to the optimal management of a hybrid power plant with wind turbines, photovoltaic panels and compressed air energy storage. Applied Energy, 97, 849-859.
  32. Mariano, S. J. P. S., Catalao, J. P. S., Mendes, V. M. F., & Ferreira, L. A. F. M. (2007). Profit-Based Short-Term Hydro Scheduling considering Head-Dependent Power Generation. Power Tech, 2007 IEEE Lausanne.
  33. Mariano, S. J. P. S., Catalão, J. P. S., Mendes, V. M. F., & Ferreira, L. A. F. M. (2008). Optimising power generation efficiency for head-sensitive cascaded reservoirs in a competitive electricity market. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 30(2), 125-133.
  34. Martinot, E. (2005). Renewables 2005: Global status report. Washington, DC: Worldwatch Institute
  35. Nautiyal, H., Singal, S., & Sharma, A. (2011). Small hydropower for sustainable energy development in India. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(4), 2021-2027.
  36. Pérez-Díaz, J. I., & Wilhelmi, J. R. (2010). Assessment of the economic impact of environmental constraints on short-term hydropower plant operation. Energy Policy, 38(12), 7960-7970.
  37. Pérez-Díaz, J. I., Wilhelmi, J. R., & Sánchez-Fernández, J. Á. (2010). Short-term operation scheduling of a hydropower plant in the day-ahead electricity market. Electric Power Systems Research, 80(12), 1535-1542.
  38. Sharma, V., Jha, R., & Naresh, R. (2007). Optimal multi-reservoir network control by augmented Lagrange programming neural network. Applied Soft Computing, 7(3), 783-790.
  39. Simopoulos, D. N., Kavatza, S. D., & Vournas, C. D. (2007). An enhanced peak shaving method for short term hydrothermal scheduling. Energy Conversion and Management, 48(11), 3018-3024.
  40. Xu, J., & Tao, Z. (2012). A class of multi-objective equilibrium chance maximization model with twofold random phenomenon and its application to hydropower station operation. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 85, 11-33.
  41. Yang, T., Gao, X., Sellars, S. L., & Sorooshian, S. (2015). Improving the multi-objective evolutionary optimization algorithm for hydropower reservoir operations in the California Oroville–Thermalito complex. Environmental Modelling & Software, 69, 262-279.
  42. Yoo, J.-H. (2009). Maximization of hydropower generation through the application of a linear programming model. Journal of Hydrology, 376(1), 182-187.
  43. Zhang, R., Zhou, J., Ouyang, S., Wang, X., & Zhang, H. (2013). Optimal operation of multi-reservoir system by multi-elite guide particle swarm optimization. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 48, 58-68.
  44. Zhao, G., & Davison, M. (2009). Optimal control of hydroelectric facility incorporating pump storage. Renewable Energy, 34(4), 1064-1077.

Last update:

  1. Nanofluids-based solar collectors as sustainable energy technology towards net-zero goal: Recent advances, environmental impact, challenges, and perspectives

    Zafar Said, Misbah Iqbal, Aamir Mehmood, Thanh Tuan Le, Hafiz Muhammad Ali, Dao Nam Cao, Phuoc Quy Phong Nguyen, Nguyen Dang Khoa Pham. Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification, 191 , 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.cep.2023.109477
  2. Simulation and experimental study of refuse-derived fuel gasification in an updraft gasifier

    Thanh Xuan Nguyen-Thi, Thi Minh Tu Bui, Van Ga Bui. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 12 (3), 2023. doi: 10.14710/ijred.2023.53994

Last update: 2024-07-14 22:55:26

No citation recorded.