Determinants of CO2 Emissions in Emerging Markets: An Empirical Evidence from MINT Economies

*Tomiwa Sunday Adebayo  -  Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Science, Cyprus International University, North Cyprus, Mersin 10, Turkey
Ayobamiji Abraham Awosusi  -  Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Science, Near East University, North Cyprus,Mersin 10, Turkey
Ibrahim Adeshola  -  Department of Information Technology, School of Computing and Technology, Eastern Mediterranean University, North Cyprus, Mersin 10, Turkey
Received: 7 Jun 2020; Revised: 1 Jul 2020; Accepted: 9 Jul 2020; Published: 15 Oct 2020; Available online: 15 Jul 2020.
Open Access License URL:

Citation Format:
Article Info
Section: Original Research Article
Language: EN
Statistics: 786 291

CO2 emission is one the major contributor to climate change that the top CO2 emitting countries are always trying to mitigate.  In an attempt to fill the gap in energy and environmental literature, this study explores the interaction between economic growth, energy usage, trade and urbanization on CO2 emission for MINT economies using the time coverage from 1980 to 2018, providing new perspectives into the literature by employing panel data analysis. Aiming to create robust outcomes, this paper deployed both conventional and modern econometric techniques. The panel co-integration test revealed evidence of the co-integration between CO2 and its determinants in the MINT economies. In order to explore the linkages between CO2 and its determinants, the ARDL PMG model was utilized in MINT economies. Findings based on the ARDL PMG reveals; (i) positive interconnection between CO2 emissions and energy usage; (ii) no significant link was found between CO2 and economic growth; (iii) urbanization influence CO2 positively while a negative link was found between CO2 and trade. Furthermore, the Dumitrescu-Hurlin Causality test revealed; (i) uni-directional causality from CO2 to urbanization; (ii) GDP growth cause CO2 while CO2 causes energy usage. Based on these findings, recommendations were put forward. ©2020. CBIORE-IJRED. All rights reserved

Keywords: MINT, CO2 Emissions, Urbanization, Energy consumption, Trade, Economic growth, Granger causality

Article Metrics:

  1. Abbasi, M. A., Parveen, S., Khan, S., & Kamal, M. A. (2020). Urbanization and energy consumption effects on carbon dioxide emissions: evidence from Asian-8 countries using panel data analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-15.
  2. Adebayo, T. S. (2020). Dynamic Relationship between Oil Price and Inflation in Oil Exporting Economy: Empirical Evidence from Wavelet Coherence Technique. Energy Economics Letters, 7(1), 12-22.
  3. Ali, G., & Nitivattananon, V. (2012). Exercising a multidisciplinary approach to assess the interrelationship between energy use, carbon emission, and land-use change in Pakistan's metropolitan city. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,16(1), 775–786
  4. Akadiri, S. S., & Akadiri, A. C. (2020). Interaction between CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and economic growth in the Middle East: panel causality evidence. International Journal of Energy Technology and Policy, 16(2), 105-118.
  5. Akin, C. S. (2014). The Impact of Foreign Trade, Energy Consumption and Income on Co2 Emissions. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 4(3), 465-475.
  6. Apergis, N., & Payne, J. E. (2009). CO2 emissions, energy usage, and output in Central America. Energy Policy, 37(8), 3282-3286.
  7. Andersson, R., Quigley, J. M., & Wilhelmsson, M. (2009). Urbanization, productivity, and innovation: evidence from investment in higher education.Journal of Urban Studies,66,2–15
  8. Ayobamiji, A. A., & Kalmaz, D. B. (2020). Reinvestigating the determinants of environmental degradation in Nigeria. International Journal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies, 13(1), 52-71.
  9. Bakirtas, T., & Akpolat, A. G. (2018). The relationship between energy consumption, urbanization, and economic growth in new emerging-market countries. Energy, 147, 110-121.
  10. Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Gokmenoglu, K. K., Taspinar, N., & Cantos-Cantos, J. M. (2019). An approach to the pollution haven and pollution halo hypotheses in MINT countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(22), 23010-23026.
  11. BP, (2020). BP Statistical Review of World Energy.
  12. Breusch, T., & Pagan, A. R. (1980). Useful invariance results for generalized regression models. Journal of Econometrics,13(3), 327–340
  13. Chertow, M. R. (2001). The IPAT equation and it’s variants Journal of Industrial Ecology Vol. 4.
  14. Dinda, S., & Coondoo, D. (2006). Income and emission: a panel data-based co-integration analysis. Ecological Economics, 57(2), 167-181.
  15. Dietz, T., & Rosa, E. A. (1997). Effects of population and affluence on CO2 emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 94(1), 175-179.
  16. Ehrlich, P. R., & Holdren, J. P. (1971). Impact of population growth. Science, 171(3977), 1212-1217.
  17. Eberhardt, M., & Teal, F. (2011). Econometrics for grumblers: a new look at the literature on cross‐country growth empirics. Journal of Economic Surveys, 25(1), 109-155.
  18. Ertugrul, H. M., Cetin, M., Seker, F., & Dogan, E. (2016). The impact of trade openness on global carbon dioxide emissions: evidence from the top ten emitters among developing countries. Ecological Indicators, 67, 543-555.
  19. Farhani, S., Chaibi, A., & Rault, C. (2014). CO2 emissions, output, energy consumption, and trade in Tunisia. Economic Modelling, 38, 426-434.
  20. Ghosh, S. (2010). Examining carbon emissions economic growth nexus for India: A multivariate cointegration approach. Energy Policy, 38(6), 3008–3014.
  21. Gorus, M. S., & Aydin, M. (2018). The Relationship between Energy Consumption, Economic Growth, and CO2 Emission in MENA Countries: Causality Analysis in the Frequency Domain. Energy. doi: 10.1016/
  22. Govindaraju, V. C., & Tang, C. F. (2013). The dynamic links between CO2 emissions, economic growth and coal consumption in China and India. Applied Energy, 104, 310-318.
  23. Heidari, H., Katircioğlu, S. T., & Saeidpour, L. (2015). Economic growth, CO2 emissions, and energy consumption in the five ASEAN countries. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 64, 785-791.
  24. Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing unit roots in heterogeneous panels.J. Econometrics,115(1), 53–74
  25. Jedwab, R., & Vollrath, D. (2015). Urbanization without growth in historical perspective. Explorations in Economic History, 58, 1-21.
  26. Kasman A, Duman YS (2015) CO2 emissions, economic growth, energy consumption, trade and urbanization in new EU member and candidate countries: a panel data analysis. Econ Model 44:97–103.
  27. Khoshnevis Yazdi, S., & Dariani, A. G. (2019). CO2 emissions, urbanisation and economic growth: evidence from Asian countries. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 32(1), 510-530.
  28. Lee, C. C., & Lee, J. D. (2009). Income and CO2 emissions: evidence from panel unit root and co-integration tests. Energy policy, 37(2), 413-423.
  29. Levin, A., Lin, C.-F., & Chu, C. S. (2002). Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic andFinite Sample Properties.Journal of Econometrics,108(1), 1–24.
  30. Martínez-Zarzoso, I., Bengochea-Morancho, A., & Morales-Lage, R. (2007). The impact of population on CO 2 emissions: evidence from European countries. Environmental and Resource Economics, 38(4), 497-512.
  31. Maddala, G. S., & Wu, S. (1999). A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and anew simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and statistics, 61(S1), 631–652.
  32. Nasrollahi, Z., Hashemi, M. S., Bameri, S., & Taghvaee, V. M. (2020). Environmental pollution, economic growth, population, industrialization, and technology in weak and strong sustainability: using STIRPAT model. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 22(2), 1105-1122.
  33. Odugbesan, J. A., & Rjoub, H. (2019). Relationship among HIV/AIDS Prevalence, Human Capital, Good Governance, and Sustainable Development: Empirical Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. Sustainability, 11(5), 1348.
  34. Odugbesan, J. A., & Rjoub, H. (2020). Relationship Among Economic Growth, Energy Consumption, CO2 Emission, and Urbanization: Evidence From MINT Countries. SAGE Open, 10(2), 2158244020914648.
  35. Ozturk, I., & Acaravci, A. (2010). CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(9), 3220-3225.
  36. Pao, H. T., & Tsai, C. M. (2010). CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in BRIC Countries. Energy Policy 38, 7850–7860.
  37. Pedroni, P. (2004). Panel co-integration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Economic Theory,20, 597–625.
  38. Pesaran, M. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics,22(2), 265–312.
  39. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. P. (1999). Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of the American statistical Association, 94(446), 621-634.
  40. Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels.
  41. Poumanyvong, P., & Kaneko, S. (2010). Does urbanization lead to less energy use and lower CO2 emissions? A cross-country analysis. Ecological Economics, 70(2), 434-444.
  42. Raggad, B. (2020). Economic development, energy consumption, financial development, and carbon dioxide emissions in Saudi Arabia: new evidence from a nonlinear and asymmetric analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-20.
  43. Saidi, K., & Hammami, S. (2016). Economic growth, energy consumption and carbone dioxide emissions: Recent evidence from panel data analysis for 58 countries. Quality & Quantity, 50(1), 361-383.
  44. Salahuddin, M., & Gow, J. (2014). Economic growth, energy consumption and CO2 emissions in Gulf Cooperation Council countries. Energy, 73, 44-58.
  45. Sebri, M., & Ben-Salha, O. (2014). On the causal dynamics between economic growth, renewable energy consumption, CO2 emissions and trade openness: Fresh evidence from BRICS countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 39, 14-23.
  46. Shahbaz, M., Naeem, M., Ahad, M., & Tahir, I. (2018). Is natural resource abundance a stimulus for financial development in the USA?. Resources Policy, 55, 223-232.
  47. Soytas, U., & Sari, R. (2009). Energy consumption, economic growth, and carbon emissions: challenges faced by an EU candidate member. Ecological economics, 68(6), 1667-1675.
  48. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (2014). World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision, Highlights (ST/ESA/SER. A/352).
  49. Usman, O., Akadiri, S. S., & Adeshola, I. (2020). Role of renewable energy and globalization on ecological footprint in the USA: implications for environmental sustainability. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-13.
  50. Wang, S., Li, G., & Fang, C. (2018). Urbanization, economic growth, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions: Empirical evidence from countries with different income levels. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81, 2144-2159.
  51. Wang, S. S., Zhou, D. Q., Zhou, P., & Wang, Q. W. (2011). CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in China: A panel data analysis. Energy Policy, 39(9), 4870-4875.
  52. Westerlund, J. (2008). Panel cointegration tests of the Fisher effect. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 23(2), 193-233.
  53. World Bank. (2019). World development indicators.
  54. World Bank. (2020). World development indicators.
  55. Zaidi, I., Ahmed, R. M. A., & Siok, K. S. (2017). Examining the relationship between economic growth, energy consumption and Co2 emission using inverse function regression. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 15(1), 473-484.

  1. Investigating the Causal Linkage Among Economic Growth, Energy Consumption and CO2 Emissions in Thailand: An Application of the Wavelet Coherence Approach
    Tomiwa Sunday Adebayo, Gbenga Daniel Akinsola, International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 17, 2021. doi: 10.14710/ijred.2021.32233