Effects of turbulence models and grid densities on computational accuracy of flows over a vertical axis wind turbine

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/ijred.7.3.213-222

Article Metrics: (Click on the Metric tab below to see the detail)

Article Info
Published: 15-12-2018
Section: Original Research Article
Fulltext PDF Tell your colleagues Email the author

Flows through a vertical axis wind turbine (VAWT) are very complex due to their inherent unsteadiness caused by large variations of the angle of attacks as the turbine is rotating and changing its azimuth angles simultaneously. In addition, a turbine must go through a wide range of operating conditions especially the change in blade speed ratio (BSR). Accurate prediction of flows over VAWT using Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) model needs a well-tested turbulence model as well as a careful grid control around the airfoil. This paper aimed to compare various turbulence models and seek the most accurate one. Furthermore, grid convergence was studied using the Roache method to determine the sufficient number of grid elements around the blade section. The three-dimensional grid was generated by extrution from the two-dimensional grid along with the appropriate y+ controlling. Comparisons were made among the three turbulence models that are widely used namely: the RNG model, the shear stress transport k-ω model (SST) and the Menter’s shear stress transport k-ω model (transition SST). Results obtained clearly showed that turbulence models significantly affected computational accuracy. The SST turbulence model showed best agreement with reported experimental data at BSR lower than 2.35, while the transition SST model showed better results when BSR is higher than 2.35. In addition, grid extruding technique with y+ control could reduce total grid requirement while maintaining acceptable prediction accuracy.

Article History: Received April 15th 2018; Received in revised form June 16th 2018; Accepted September 17th 2018; Available online

How to Cite This Article: Chaiyanupong,J and Chitsomboon, T. (2018) Effects of Turbulence Models and Grid Densities on Computational Accuracy of Flows Over a Vertical Axis Wind Turbine. Int. Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 7(3), 213-222.

http://dx.doi.org/10.14710/ijred.7.3.213-222


Keywords

VAWT; CFD; Aerodynamic; Turbulence model; Wind turbine; Vertical axis

  1. Jaruwan Chaiyanupong 
    School of Mechanical Engineering, Suranaree University of Technology. 111 University Avenue, Suranaree Sub-District, Muang Nakhon Ratchasima District, Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand
  2. Tawit Chitsomboon  Scopus
    School of Mechanical Engineering, Suranaree University of Technology. 111 University Avenue, Suranaree Sub-District, Muang Nakhon Ratchasima District, Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand
  1. Almohammadi, K. M., Ingham, D. B., Ma, L., & Pourkashanian, M. (2015). Modeling dynamic stall of a straight blade vertical axis wind turbine. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 57, 144-158.
  2. Chowdhury, A. M., Akimoto, H., & Hara, Y. (2016). Comparative CFD analysis of vertical axis wind turbine in upright and tilted configuration. Renewable Energy, 85, 327-337.
  3. Fujisawa, N., & Shibuya, S. (2001). Observations of dynamic stall on Darrieus wind turbine blades. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 89(2), 201-214.
  4. Graham, G. M. (1982). Measurement of instantaneous pressure distributions and blade forces on an airfoil undergoing cycloidal motion (Doctoral dissertation, Texas Tech University).
  5. Howell, R., Qin, N., Edwards, J., & Durrani, N. (2010). Wind tunnel and numerical study of a small vertical axis wind turbine. Renewable energy, 35(2), 412-422.
  6. Jones, W. P., & Launder, B. (1972). The prediction of laminarization with a two-equation model of turbulence. International journal of heat and mass transfer, 15(2), 301-314.
  7. Mccullough, G. B., & Gault, D. E. (1951). Examples of three representative types of airfoil-section stall at low speed.
  8. Menter, F. L. O. R. I. A. N. R. (1993, July). Zonal two equation kw turbulence models for aerodynamic flows. In 23rd fluid dynamics, plasmadynamics, and lasers conference (p. 2906).
  9. Menter, F. R. (1994). Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA journal, 32(8), 1598-1605.
  10. Menter, F. R., Kuntz, M., & Langtry, R. (2003). Ten years of industrial experience with the SST turbulence model. Turbulence, heat and mass transfer, 4(1), 625-632.
  11. Menter, F. R., Langtry, R. B., Likki, S. R., Suzen, Y. B., Huang, P. G., & Völker, S. (2006). A correlation-based transition model using local variables—Part I: model formulation. Journal of turbomachinery, 128(3), 413-422.
  12. Nobile, R., Vahdati, M., Barlow, J. F., & Mewburn-Crook, A. (2013, July). Unsteady flow simulation of a vertical axis wind turbine: a two-dimensional study. In EngD Conference, 2nd July.
  13. Nobile, R., Vahdati, M., Barlow, J. F., & Mewburn-Crook, A. (2014). Unsteady flow simulation of a vertical axis augmented wind turbine: A two-dimensional study. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 125, 168-179.
  14. Oler, J. W., Strickland, J. H., Im, B. J., & Graham, G. H. (1983). Dynamic-stall regulation of the Darrieus turbine.
  15. Graham, Gary M. Measurement of instantaneous pressure distributions and blade forces on an airfoil undergoing cycloidal motion. Diss. Texas Tech University, 1982.
  16. Paraschivoiu, I. (2002). Wind turbine design: with emphasis on Darrieus concept.
  17. Paraschivoiu, M., Komeili, M., & Zadeh, S. N. (2014). Mesh convergence study for 2-d straight-blade vertical axis wind turbine simulations and estimation for 3-d simulations. Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering,, 38(4).
  18. Roache, P. J. (1998). Verification and validation in computational science and engineering (Vol. 895). Albuquerque, NM: Hermosa.
  19. Spalart, P., & Allmaras, S. (1992, January). A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. In 30th aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit (p. 439).
  20. Wilcox, D. C. (1993). Comparison of two-equation turbulence models for boundary layers with pressure gradient. AIAA journal, 31(8), 1414-1421.
  21. Orszag, Steven A., et al. "Renormalization group modeling and turbulence simulations." Near-wall turbulent flows (1993): 1031-1046.
  22. Wilcox, D. C. (1993). Turbulence modeling for CFD.