skip to main content

Planning and Risk Analysis in Projects of Procurement of Agricultural Raw Materials for the Production of Environmentally Friendly Fuel

1Department of Information Systems and Technologies, Lviv National Agrarian University, Ukraine

2Faculty of Engineering and Technology, State Agrarian and Engineering University in Podilya, Ukraine

3Department of Mechanics and Agroecosystems Engineering, Polissia National University, Ukraine

4 Educational and Scientific Laboratory “DAK GPS”, State Agrarian and Engineering University in Podilya, Ukraine

5 Economic Faculty, Department of Statistics and Economic Analysis, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine

6 LLC “360-EkoTech Company”, Poland

View all affiliations
Received: 30 Nov 2021; Revised: 25 Jan 2022; Accepted: 20 Mar 2022; Available online: 15 Apr 2022; Published: 5 May 2022.
Editor(s): H. Hadiyanto
Open Access Copyright (c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Centre of Biomass and Renewable Energy (CBIORE)
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract

The purpose of the research is to substantiate the method of planning the need for technical equipment of corn waste collection projects for the production of environmentally friendly fuel, which is based on simulation of work taking into account the changing design environment.  During the research, the methods of simulation modeling of corn waste collection projects for the production of environmentally friendly fuel were used. The methods of probability theory and mathematical statistics were used, which provided the substantiation of models of natural-climatic and production conditions of corn waste collection projects for the production of environmentally friendly fuel.  As a result of the conducted research the method and statistical simulation model of planning  the need for  technical equipment of projects on collecting the waste of corn for production of environmentally friendly fuel has been  developed. They provided an assessment of the timely implementation of work in selected fields, taking into account the changing design environment, which leads to the risk of the specific cost of corn waste disposal.  A simulated model for the collection of maize waste available for disposal, provided that the balance of organic carbon in the fields is maintained, and tested for adequacy according to the Mann-Whitney test. Based on the use of the developed simulation model, the indicators of the use of technical equipment and the trend of changing the risk of the specific cost of disposal of corn waste are substantiated. Rational scenarios for the implementation of projects for which there are no risks for a given project environment are identified.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: project; harvesting; corn waste; environmentally friendly fuel; risk

Article Metrics:

  1. Alberti, V., Caperna, G., Colagrossi, M., Geraci, A., Mazzarella, G., Panella, F. & Saisana M. (2021). Tracking EU Citizens’ Interest in EC Priorities Using Online Search Data. The European Green Deal, EUR 30580 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. https://doi.org/10.2760/18216 , JRC123917
  2. Ang, B.W., Choon, W.L., Ng, T.S. (2015). Energy security: Definitions, dimensions and indexes. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 42, 1077–1093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.064
  3. A European Green Deal. https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities/2019-2024/european-green-deal
  4. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) / Forth edition, 2008, Project Management Institute, Four Campus Boulevard, Newtown Square, PA 19073-3299 USA
  5. Bashynsky, O., Garasymchuk, I., Gorbovy, O., Vilchinska, D. and Dubik, V. (2020). Research of the variable natural potential of the wind and energy energy in the northern strip of the ukrainian carpathians. 6th International Conference: Renewable Energy Sources (ICoRES 2019). E3S Web of Conferences, 154, 06002. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202015406002
  6. Batyuk, B. & Dyndyn, M. (2020). Coordination of Configurations of Complex Organizational and Technical Systems for Development of Agricultural Sector Branches, in: Journal of Automation and Information Sciences 52(2), 63-76. https://doi.org/10.1615/JAutomatInfScien.v52.i2.60
  7. Bielski, S., Marks-Bielska, R., Zieli´nska-Chmielewska, A., Romaneckas, K., Šarauskis, E. (2021). Importance of Agriculture in Creating Energy Security - A Case Study of Poland. Energies, 14, 2465. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14092465
  8. Bildirici, M., Özaksoy, F. (2018). An analysis of biomass consumption and economic growth in transition countries. Econ. Res. Ekon. Istraz., 31, 386–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2018.1427610
  9. Bioenergy Technologies Office. https://www.energy.gov/eere/bioenergy/articles/largest-cellulosic-ethanol-plant-world-opens-october-30
  10. Tryhuba, A., Hutsol, T., Kuboń, M., Tryhuba, I., Komarnitskyi, S., Tabor, S., Kwaśniewski, D., Mudryk, K., Faichuk, O., Hohol, T., Tomaszewska-Górecka, W. (2022). Taxonomy and Stakeholder Risk Management in Integrated Projects of the European Green Deal. Energies, 15(6), 2015. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15062015
  11. Boyarchuk, V., Ftoma, O., Padyuka, R., Rudynets, M. (2020). Forecasting the risk of the resource demand for dairy farms basing on machine learning (MoMLeT&DS-2020) In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2631
  12. DuPont Nevada Site Cellulosic Ethanol Facility Feedstock Collection Program. http://www.dupont.com/content/dam/dupont/products-and-services/industrial-biotechnology/documents/IB-PDF-04-Feedstock_Collection_Program_2015.pdf
  13. EBA. European Biogas Association. https://www.europeanbiogas.eu/2020-gas-decarbonisation-pathways-study
  14. Gachie, W. (2017). Project risk management: A review of an institutional project life cycle. Risk Governance and Control: Financial Markets & Institutions, 7(4-1), 163-173. http://doi.org/10.22495/rgc7i4c1art8
  15. Gas Decarbonisation Pathways 2020-2050-Gas for Climate. https://www.gasforclimate2050.eu
  16. Gródek-Szostak, Z., Malik, G., Kajrunajtys, D., Szeląg-Sikora, A., Sikora, J., Kuboń, M., Niemiec, M., Kapusta-Duch, J. (2019). Modeling the Dependency between Extreme Prices of Selected Agricultural Products on the Derivatives Market Using the Linkage Function, Sustainability, 11, 4144. doi: 10.3390/su11154144
  17. Hutsol, T., Glowacki, S., Tryhuba, A., Kovalenko, N., Pustova, Z., Rozkosz, A., Sukmaniuk, O. (2021). Current Trends of Biohydrogen Production from Biomass – Green Hydrogen. Monograph. Warsaw: 2021, 102. https://doi.org/10.22630/SGGW.IIM.9788382370218
  18. Ibrahim, M.N., Thorpe, D. and Mahmood, M.N. (2019). Risk factors affecting the ability for earned value management to accurately assess the performance of infrastructure projects in Australia, in: Construction Innovation, 19(4), 550-569. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-07-2018-0058
  19. ISO 21500. (2012). Guidance on Project Management. http://www.projectprofy.ru
  20. Jeschke, M. and Heggenstaller, A. (2011). Sustainable Corn Stover Harvest for Biofuel Production /. https://hoards.com/sites/default/files/IB/corn_stover_harvest.pdf
  21. Jewiarz, M., Wróbel, M., Mudryk, K., Szufa, S. (2020). Impact of the Drying Temperature and Grinding Technique on Biomass Grindability. Energies, 13, 3392. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13133392
  22. Koch, S. (2007). Value-at-risk for e-business project and portfolio appraisal and risk management, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronic Business (ICEB), 765-768. http://iceb.johogo.com/proceedings/2005/763-768.pdf
  23. Komleva, N., Liubchenko, V., Zinovatna, S., Kobets, V. (2020). Risk management with lean methodology CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2020, 2805, 266-281. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2805/paper20.pdf
  24. Korchak, M., Yermakov, S., Hutsol, T., Burko, L., Tulej, W. (2021). Features of Weediness of the Field by Root Residues of Corn Environment. Technologies. Resources. 122-126. https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2021vol1.6541
  25. Korchak, M., Yermakov, S., Maisus, V. (2020). Problems of field contamination when growing energy corn as monoculture. Proceedings of 6 th International Conference – Renewable Energy Sources, E3S Web of Conferences, 154, 01009 https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202015401009
  26. Kovalenko, N., Kovalenko, V., Hutsol, T., Ievstafiieva, Y. and Polishchuk, A. (2021). Economic Efficiency and Internal Competitive Advantages of Grain Production in the Central Region of Ukraine. Agricultural Engineering, 25 (1), 51-62. https://doi.org/10.2478/agriceng-2021-0004
  27. Kovalenko, N., Hutsol, T., Kovalenko, V., Glowacki, S., Kokovikhin, S., Dubik, V., Mudragel, O., Kuboń, M. and Tomaszewska-Górecka, W. (2021). Hydrogen Production Analysis: Prospects for Ukraine. Agricultural Engineering, 25(1), 99-114. https://doi.org/10.2478/agriceng-2021-0008
  28. Kowalczyk, Z., Kwasniewski, D. Environmental impact of the cultivation of energy willow in Poland. Sci. Rep. 11, 4571 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84120-0
  29. Lutsiak, V., Hutsol, T., Kovalenko, N., Kwaśniewski, D., Kowalczyk, Z., Belei, S., Marusei, T. (2021). Enterprise Activity Modeling in Walnut Sector in Ukraine. Sustainability, 13, 13027. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313027
  30. Martinov, M., Djatkov, D., Golub, M., Viskovic, M. Harvestable biomass of corn, wheat, soybean and sunflower, experiences in Vojvodina (agricultural region of Serbia) http://iet.jrc.ec.europa.eu/bf-ca/sites/bf-ca/files/files/documents/events/martinov.pdf
  31. Marks-Bielska, R., Bielski, S., Novikova, A., Romaneckas, K. (2019). Straw stocks as a source of renewable energy. A case study of a district in Poland. Sustainability, 11, 4714. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174714
  32. P2M (Project & Program Management for Enterprise Innovation) Guidebook. – Project Management Association of Japan, 2008
  33. Ratushny, R., Bashynsky, O. & Shcherbachenko, O. (2018). Identification of firefighting system configuration of rural settlements, in: Fire and Enviromnental Safety Engineering. MATEC Web Conf., 247. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201824700035
  34. Ratushnyi, R., Bashynsky, O., Ptashnyk, V. (2019). Development and Usage of a Computer Model of Evaluating the Scenarios of Projects for the Creation of Fire Fighting Systems of Rural Communities, Xl-th International Scientific and Practical Conference on Electronics and Information Technologies (ELIT), 34-39. https://doi.org/10.1109/ELIT.2019.8892320
  35. Ratushny, R., Bashynsky, O., Ptashnyk, V. (2020). Planning of Territorial Location of Fire-Rescue Formations in Administrative Territory Development Projects, in: CEUR Workshop Proceedings. Published in ITPM. http://sci.ldubgd.edu.ua:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/8181
  36. Ratushny, R., Horodetskyy, I., Molchak, Y., Grabovets, V. (2021). The configurations coordination of the projects products of development of the community fire extinguishing systems with the project environment (ITPM-2021) In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2851
  37. Ratushny, R., Koval, N. and Androshchuk, I. (2020). The Model of Projects Creation of the Fire Extinguishing Systems in Community Territories, in: Acta universitatis agriculturae et silviculturae mendelianae brunensis. 68, 2, 419-431
  38. Shigenobu Ohara. (2003). Booklet on P2M / Project & Program Management for Enterprise Innovation. – Project Management Association of Japan, 2003
  39. Szufa, S., Piersa, P., Adrian, Ł., Czerwińska, J. (2021). Sustainable Drying and Torrefaction Processes of Miscanthus for Use as a Pelletized Solid Biofuel and Biocarbon-Carrier for Fertilizers. Molecules, 26, 1014. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26041014
  40. Sikora, J., Niemiec, M., Szeląg-Sikora, A., Gródek-Szostak, Z., Kuboń, M., Komorowska, M. (2020). The Impact of a Controlled-Release Fertilizer on Greenhouse Gas Emissions and the Efficiency of the Production of Chinese Cabbage. Energies, 13, 2063. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13082063
  41. Sikora, J., Niemiec, M., Tabak, M., Gródek-Szostak, Z., Szeląg-Sikora, A., Kuboń, M., Komorowska, M. 2020. Assessment of the Efficiency of Nitrogen Slow-Release Fertilizers in Integrated Production of Carrot Depending on Fertilization Strategy. Sustainability, 12, 1982. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051982
  42. Smith, N. and Male, S. (2007). Risk, value, uncertainty and requirements management in projects, in: CME 2007 Conference - Construction Management and Economics: Past, Present and Future, 2007, 385-394
  43. Tryhuba, A., Bashynsky, O., Hutsol, T., Rozkosz, A., Prokopova, O. (2020). Justification of Parameters of the Energy Supply System of Agricultural Enterprises with Using Wind Power Installations. 6th International Conference: Renewable Energy Sources (ICoRES 2019), 154, 06015. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202015406001
  44. Tryhuba, A., Boyarchuk, V., Tryhuba, I., Boyarchuk, O., Ftoma, O. (2019). Evaluation of Risk Value of Investors of Projects for the Creation of Crop Protection of Family Daily Farms. Acta universitatis agriculturae et silviculturae mendelianae brunensis, 67(5), 1357-1367. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201967051357
  45. Tryhuba, A., Boyarchuk, V., Tryhuba, I. (2020). Method and Software of Planning of the Substantial Risks in the Projects of Production of raw Material for Biofuel, in: CEUR Workshop Proceedings. Published in ITPM
  46. Tryhuba, A., Boyarchuk, V., Tryhuba, I. (2019). Forecasting of a Lifecycle of the Projects of Production of Biofuel Raw Materials with Consideration of Risks, in: International Conference on Advanced Trends in Information Theory (ATIT), 420-425. https://doi.org/10.1109/ATIT49449.2019.9030492
  47. Tryhuba, A., Boyarchuk, V., Tryhuba, I. (2020). Model of assessment of the risk of investing in the projects of production of biofuel raw materials, in: 15th International Scientific and Technical Conference on Computer Sciences and Information Technologies (CSIT), 2, 151-154, September 2020
  48. Tryhuba, A., Hutsol, T., Glowacki, S., Tryhuba, I., Tabor, S., Kwasniewski, D., Sorokin, D., Yermakov, S. (2021). Forecasting Quantitative Risk Indicators of Investors in Projects of Biohydrogen Production from Agricultural Raw Materials, Processes, 9(1), 258. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9020258
  49. Tryhuba, A., Hutsol, T., Tryhuba, I., Pokotylska, N., Kovalenko, N., Tabor, S., Kwasniewski, D. (2021). Risk Assessment of Investments in Projects of Production of Raw Materials for Bioethanol. Processes, 9, 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9010012
  50. Faichuk, O., Voliak, L., Glowacki, S., Pantsyr, Y., Slobodian, S., Szeląg-Sikora, A., Gródek-Szostak, Z. (2022). European Green Deal: Threats Assessment for Agri-Food Exporting Countries to the EU. Sustainability, 14, 3712. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073712
  51. Тryhuba, A., Tryhuba, I., Mykhalchyshyna, L., Mushenyk, I., Koval, N., & Haybura, Yu. (2021). Forecasting the Time Stock for Chemical Plant Protection based on Computer Simulations. Independent Journal of Management & Production, 12(6), 402-416. https://doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v12i6.1782
  52. Von der Leyen, U. (2019). My agenda for Europe. Political Guidelines for the Next European Commission 2019-2024. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/political-guidelines-next-commission_en.pdf
  53. Winzer, C. (2012). Conceptualizing energy security. Energy Policy, 46, 36–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.067
  54. Wójcik, A., Krupa, K., Łapczyńska-Kondon, B., Francik, S., Kwaśniewski, D. (2018). The Dynamic Model of Willow Biomass Production. In: Mudryk K., Werle S. (eds) Renewable Energy Sources: Engineering, Technology, Innovation. Springer Proceedings in Energy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72371-6_62
  55. Yermakov, S., Hutsol, T., Glowacki, S., Hulevskyi, V., Pylypenko, V. (2021). Primary Assessment of the Degree of Torrefaction of Biomass Agricultural Crops. Environment. Technologies. Resources. 264-267. https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2021vol1.6597
  56. Yermakov, S., Hutsol, T., Rozkosz, A., Glowacki, S., Slobodian, S. (2021). Evaluation of Effective Parameters Of Biomass Heat Treatment in Processing for Solid Fuel. Engineering for Rural Development. https://doi.org/10.22616/ERDev.2021.20.TF241

Last update:

  1. Cyber Security Risk Modeling in Distributed Information Systems

    Dmytro Palko, Tetiana Babenko, Andrii Bigdan, Nikolay Kiktev, Taras Hutsol, Maciej Kuboń, Hryhorii Hnatiienko, Sylwester Tabor, Oleg Gorbovy, Andrzej Borusiewicz. Applied Sciences, 13 (4), 2023. doi: 10.3390/app13042393
  2. An Approach to Assessing the State of Organic Waste Generation in Community Households Based on Associative Learning

    Inna Tryhuba, Taras Hutsol, Anatoliy Tryhuba, Agata Cieszewska, Nataliia Kovalenko, Krzysztof Mudryk, Szymon Glowacki, Andrzej Bryś, Weronika Tulej, Mariusz Sojak. Sustainability, 15 (22), 2023. doi: 10.3390/su152215922
  3. Coordination of Configurations of Technologically Integrated “European Green Deal” Projects

    Anatoliy Tryhuba, Krzysztof Mudryk, Inna Tryhuba, Taras Hutsol, Szymon Glowacki, Oleksandr Faichuk, Nataliia Kovalenko, Alona Shevtsova, Arkadiusz Ratajski, Monika Janaszek-Mankowska, Weronika Tulej. Processes, 10 (9), 2022. doi: 10.3390/pr10091768
  4. Assessment of the Condition of the Project Environment for the Implementation of Technologically Integrated Projects of the “European Green Deal” Using Maize Waste

    Anatoliy Tryhuba, Taras Hutsol, Inna Tryhuba, Krzysztof Mudryk, Valentyna Kukharets, Szymon Głowacki, Larysa Dibrova, Oleksandr Kozak, Krystyna Pavlenko-Didur. Energies, 15 (21), 2022. doi: 10.3390/en15218220
  5. European Green Deal: Substantiation of the Rational Configuration of the Bioenergy Production System from Organic Waste

    Inna Tryhuba, Anatoliy Tryhuba, Taras Hutsol, Szymon Szufa, Szymon Glowacki, Oleh Andrushkiv, Roman Padyuka, Oleksandr Faichuk, Nataliia Slavina. Energies, 17 (17), 2024. doi: 10.3390/en17174513
  6. European Green Deal: Justification of the Relationships between the Functional Indicators of Bioenergy Production Systems Using Organic Residential Waste Based on the Analysis of the State of Theory and Practice

    Inna Tryhuba, Anatoliy Tryhuba, Taras Hutsol, Vasyl Lopushniak, Agata Cieszewska, Oleh Andrushkiv, Wiesław Barabasz, Anna Pikulicka, Zbigniew Kowalczyk, Vyacheslav Vasyuk. Energies, 17 (6), 2024. doi: 10.3390/en17061461
  7. Recent advances in hydrogen production from biomass waste with a focus on pyrolysis and gasification

    Van Giao Nguyen, Thanh Xuan Nguyen-Thi, Phuoc Quy Phong Nguyen, Viet Dung Tran, Ümit Ağbulut, Lan Huong Nguyen, Dhinesh Balasubramanian, Wieslaw Tarelko, Suhaib A. Bandh, Nguyen Dang Khoa Pham. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 54 , 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.05.049
  8. Track to reach net-zero: Progress and pitfalls

    Suhaib A Bandh, Fayaz A Malla, Tuan-Dung Hoang, Irteza Qayoom, Haika Mohi-Ud-Din, Shahnaz Bashir, Richard Betts, Thanh Tuan Le, Duc Trong Nguyen Le, Nguyen Viet Linh Le, Huu Cuong Le, Dao Nam Cao. Energy & Environment, 2024. doi: 10.1177/0958305X241260793

Last update: 2024-11-17 19:02:23

No citation recorded.