DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/ijred.2023.52322

Mediating role of stock market volatility to evaluate asymmetries in the growth-degradation nexus in Nigeria

1Department of Finance and Economics, Dhofar University, Salalah, Sultanate of Oman, Oman

2Department of Economics and Development Studies, Federal University Dutsin-Ma, Nigeria

3Department of Accounting, Dhofar University, Salalah, Sultanate of Oman, Oman

Received: 5 Feb 2023; Revised: 10 Apr 2023; Accepted: 18 Apr 2023; Available online: 15 Apr 2023; Published: 15 May 2023.
Editor(s): H Hadiyanto
Open Access Copyright (c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Centre of Biomass and Renewable Energy (CBIORE)
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract

This study explores the mediating role of stock market volatility in the economic growth and environmental degradation nexus in Nigeria using data covering period from 1984 until 2020. The study uses Nonlinear Autoregressive Distributed Lag (NARDL) and a nonparametric asymmetric causality model. While the Wald test in model 1 reveals evidence of weak long-run asymmetric nexus between CO2 and economic growth however, findings in model 2 indicates that stock market volatility (SMV) exerts a strong asymmetric effect in growth-CO2 relation in the long-run. The result of nonlinear model validates the inverted U-shaped growth-degradation nexus consistent with EKC hypothesis. The finding in model 1 reveals that investment exerts a strong impact on CO2 in both the short-run and long-run. On the other hand, the results in model 2 show that the positive component of economic growth has a positive and significant impact on CO2 in Nigeria. However, the negative component of economic growth has a negative impact on CO2. Moreover, the dynamic causality model reveals: (i) a feedback causality between CO2 and the negative component of GDP; and (ii) a unidirectional causality flowing from CO2 to the positive component of GDP. Similarly, result of nonlinear causality test reveals a feedback causality between CO2 and GDP. The implication of the finding suggests that while asymmetric properties of economic growth must be controlled in efforts of promoting environmental sustainability, the stock market has a dedicated role to play in widening access to funds for green investment in Nigeria and other developing economies.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: CO2; EKC hypothesis; NARDL; Stock Market Volatility; Toda and Yamamoto test

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Original Research Article
Language : EN
Recent articles
Utilization of the spent catalyst as a raw material for rechargeable battery production: The effect of leaching time, type, and concentration of organic acids A four-line active shunt filter to enhance the power quality in a microgrid Response surface optimization and social impact evaluation of Houttuynia cordata Thunb solar drying technology for community enterprise in Chiangrai, Thailand More recent articles
Most cited articles
Study of Fabricated Solar Dryer of Tomato Slices under Jordan Climate Condition Comparative Analysis of Biodiesels from Calabash and Rubber Seeds Oils The Costs of Producing Biodiesel from Microalgae in the Asia-Pacific Region Optimization and Molecular Characterization of Syngas Fermenting Anaerobic Mixed Microbial Consortium TERI SA1 Optimization of Concentration and EM4 Augmentation for Improving Bio-Gas Productivity from Jatropha curcas Linn Capsule Husk More cited articles
  1. Abid, A., Mehmood, U., Tariq, S., & Haq, Z. U. (2022). The effect of technological innovation, FDI, and financial development on CO2 emission: evidence from the G8 countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 11654–11662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15993-x
  2. Adebayo, T. S., & Samour, A. (2023). Renewable energy, fiscal policy and load capacity factor in BRICS countries: novel findings from panel nonlinear ARDL model. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02888-1
  3. Adebayo, T. S., Kirikkaleli, D., Adeshola, I., Oluwajana, D., Akinsola, G. D., & Osemeahon, O. S. (2021). Coal consumption and environmental sustainability in South Africa: the role of financial development and globalization. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 10(3). 527-536. https://doi.org/10.14710/ijred.2021.34982
  4. Aliero, H. M. & Ibrahim, S. S (2012). An analytical review of financial intermediation in the rural areas of Nigeria. In Muktar, M (ed) Studies in the State of the Nigerian Economy. Economics Department, Umaru Musa Yar’adua University Katsina. 323 – 333. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/214007099.pdf
  5. Alvarado, R & Toledo, E. (2016). Environmental degradation and economic growth: evidence for a developing country. Environ Dev Sustain, 19, 1205-1218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-016-9790-y
  6. Anwar, A., Sinha, A., Sharif, A., Siddique, M., Irshad, S., Anwar, W., & Malik, S. (2022). The nexus between urbanization, renewable energy consumption, financial development, and CO2 emissions: evidence from selected Asian countries. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(5), 6556-6576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01716-2
  7. Anwar, N., & Elfaki, K. E. (2021). Examining the Relationship Between Energy Consumption, Economic Growth and Environmental Degradation in Indonesia: Do Capital and Trade Openness Matter?. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 10(4), 769-778. https://doi.org/10.14710/ijred.2021.37822
  8. Bahmani-Oskooee, M., & Fariditavana, H. (2015). Nonlinear ARDL Approach and the J-Curve Phenomenon. Open Economies Review, 27(1), 51–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11079-015-9369-5
  9. Cavusoglu, B., Ibrahim, S. S., & Ozdeser, H. (2019). Testing the relationship between financial sector output, employment and economic growth in North Cyprus. Financial Innovation, 5(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-019-0151-3
  10. Cetin,M. & Ecevit, E. (2017). The Impact of Financial Development on Carbon Emissions under the Structural Breaks: Empirical Evidence from Turkish Economy. International Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11 (1), 64-78. https://www.proquest.com/openview/0bbf544bb5aa1e2437feaa40bc95f20c/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=51667
  11. Diks, C., & Panchenko,V. (2006). A new statistic and practical guidelines for nonparametric Granger causality testing. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 30 (9-10), 1647-1669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2005.08.008
  12. Dinder, S. (2004). Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: A Survey. Ecological Economics, 4(1), 431–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.02.011
  13. Farooq, A., Anwar, A., Ahad, M., Shabbir, G., & Imran, Z. A. (2021). A validity of environmental Kuznets curve under the role of urbanization, financial development index and foreign direct investment in Pakistan. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEAS-10-2021-0219
  14. Gani, I. M. & Ibrahim, S. S. (2015). Capital market development and economic growth: evidence from Nigeria. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research, 3(5), 22-32. https://www.ijhssi.org/papers/v2(12)/Version-1/A021201013.pdf
  15. Gessesse, A. T., & He, G. (2020). Analysis of carbon dioxide emissions, energy consumption, and economic growth in China. Agricultural Economics, 66(4), 183-192. https://doi.org/10.17221/258/2019
  16. Grossman, G. M. & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 353-378. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118443
  17. Ibrahim, S. S. & Tanimu, N. (2016). The linkages between trade openness, financial openness and economic growth in Nigeria. Sokoto Journal of the Social Sciences, 6(2), 383 – 393
  18. Ibrahim, S. S. (2022). Livelihood transition and economic well-being in remote areas under the threat of cattle rustling in Nigeria. GeoJournal, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-022-10583-x
  19. Ibrahim, S. S., & Sanusi, H. (2022). Testing the Effect of Islamic Financial Inclusion, Infrastructural Quality on Economic Growth in Nigeria: New Insight from Bootstrap and Non-Linear ARDL. MALIA: Journal of Islamic Banking and Finance, 6(2), 87-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/malia.v6i2.16594
  20. Ibrahim. M. H. (2015). Oil and food prices in Malaysia: A nonlinear ARDL analysis, Agricultural and Food Economics, ISSN 2193-7532, Springer, Heidelberg, 3,1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40100-014-0020-3
  21. Isiksal, A. Z., Samour, A., & Resatoglu, N. G. (2019). Testing the impact of real interest rate, income, and energy consumption on Turkey’s CO2 emissions. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(20), 20219-20231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04987-5
  22. Kapetanios, G., Shin, Y. & Snell, A. (2003). Testing for unit root in the nonlinear STAR framework. Journal of Econometrics, 112(2), 359-379. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(02)00202-6
  23. Kartal, M. T., Samour, A., & Depren, S. K. (2023). Do nuclear energy and renewable energy surge environmental quality in the United States? New insights from novel bootstrap Fourier Granger causality in quantiles approach. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 155, 104509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2022.104509
  24. Kuznets, S. (1954). Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review. 49, l-28
  25. Levine, R. & Zervos, S. (1996). Stock markets, banks and economic growth. Policy Research working Paper 1690. https://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/abs/10.1596/1813-9450-1690
  26. Li, Y. & Guo, J. (2022). The asymmetric impacts of oil price and shocks on inflation in BRICS: a multiple threshold nonlinear ARDL model. Applied Economics, 54(12), 1377-1395. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2021.1976386
  27. Mehmood, U., Askari, M. U., & Saleem, M. (2021). The assessment of environmental sustainability: The role of research and development in ASEAN countries. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/IEAM.4569
  28. Okonkwo, & Jude, J. (2019). Volatility of stock return and selected macroeconomic variables: Evidence from Nigeria Stock Exchange. International Journal of Academic Research In Business And Social Sciences, 9(6), 185–201. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v9-i6/5934
  29. Oladipupo, S.D., Rjoub,H., Kirikkaleli, D. & Adebayo, T.S.(2022). Impact of Globalization and Renewable Energy Consumption on Environmental Degradation: A Lesson for Developing Nations. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 11(1), 145-155. https://doi.org/10.14710/ijred.2022.40452
  30. Omri A, Daly S, Rault, C, & Chaibi, A. (2015). Financial development, environmental quality, trade and economic growth: what causes what in MENA countries. Energy Econ 48, 242–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.01.008
  31. Ozturk, I. & Acaravci, A. (2013). The long-run and causal analysis of energy, growth, openness and financial development on carbon emissions in Turkey. Energy Economics, 36, 262-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.08.025
  32. Pata, U. K., & Samour, A. (2022). Do renewable and nuclear energy enhance environmental quality in France? A new EKC approach with the load capacity factor. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 149, 104249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2022.104249
  33. Pata, U. K., & Samour, A. (2023). Assessing the role of the insurance market and renewable energy in the load capacity factor of OECD countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25747-6
  34. Pesaran, M.H.; Shin, Y. & Smith R.J. (2001). An Autoregressive Distributed Lag Modelling Approach to Cointegration Analysis: Econometrics and Economic Theory in 20th Century. The Ragnar Frisch Centennial Symposium, 354–391. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL521633230.011
  35. Saliminezhad, A., Ozdeser, H. & Birnintsaba, D.A.B. (2022). Environmental degradation and economic growth: time varying and nonlinear evidence from Nigeria. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24, 6288-6301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01702-8
  36. Samour, A., Adebayo, T. S., Agyekum, E. B., Khan, B., & Kamel, S. (2023). Insights from BRICS-T economies on the impact of human capital and renewable electricity consumption on environmental quality. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 5245. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32134-1
  37. Samour, A., Isiksal, A. Z., & Resatoglu, N. G. (2019). Testing the impact of banking sector development on Turkey’s CO2 emissions. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res, 17(3), 6497-6513. http://dx.doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1703_64976513
  38. Selden, T. M., & Song, D. (1994). Environmental quality and development: Is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27, 147-162. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1994.1031
  39. Shafik, N., & Bandyopadhyay, S. (1992). Economic Growth and Environmental Quality: Time Series and Cross-Country Evidence. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/833431468739515725/pdf/multi-page.pdf
  40. Shahbaz, M., Tiwari, A.K. & Nasir, M. (2013). The effect of financial development, economic growth, energy consumption and trade openness on CO2 emissions in South Africa. Energy Policy, 61, 1452-1459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.006
  41. Shahzad, S,J,H., Ur Rehman, M,, Hurr, M. & Zakarikya, M. (2014). Do economic growth and financial development increase carbon emission in Pakistan: Empirical analysis through ARDL Cointegration and VECM causality. MPRA paper No. 60310. https://oa.mg/work/1690579742
  42. Shin, Y., Yu, C., and Greenwood-Nimmo. (2014). Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multi-pliers in a nonlinear ARDL framework. In Festschrift in Honor of Peter Schmidt, edited by W. C. Horrace and R. C. Sickles. New York (NY): Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-8008-3_9
  43. Stern, D. I., Common, M. S., & Barbier, E. B. (1996). Economic growth and environmental degradation: The environmental Kuznets curve and sustainable development. World Development, 24, 1151-1160. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(96)00032-0
  44. TamazianA, Chousa J.P. & Vadlamannati K.C. (2009). Does higher economic and financial development lead to environmental degradation: evidence from BRIC countries. Energy Policy 37(1), 246–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.08.025
  45. Toda H.Y, & Yamamoto T. (1995). Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. J Econ 66(1), 225–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01616-8
  46. Vo, D. H. & Ho, M.C (2021). Foreign investment, economic growth, and environmental degradation since the 1986 “Economic Renovation” in Vietnam. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28,29795–29805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12838-5
  47. Zhao, W. X., Samour, A., Yi, K., & Al-Faryan, M. A. S. (2023). Do technological innovation, natural resources and stock market development promote environmental sustainability? Novel evidence based on the load capacity factor. Resources Policy, 82, 103397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103397
  48. Zivot, E. & Andrews, D. (1992). Further evidence of the great crash, the oil-price shock and the unit-root hypothesis. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 10, 251–270. https://doi.org/10.2307/1391541

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-04-24 13:36:50

No citation recorded.