Effect of Different Inoculum Combination on Biohydrogen Production from Melon Fruit Waste

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/ijred.7.2.101-109

Article Metrics: (Click on the Metric tab below to see the detail)

Article Info
Published: 10-07-2018
Section: Original Research Article
Fulltext PDF Tell your colleagues Email the author

The natural microbial consortium from many sources widely used for hydrogen production. Type of substrate and operating conditions applied on the biodigesters of the natural consortium used as inoculum impact the variation of species and number of microbes that induce biogas formation, so this study examined the effect of different inoculum source and its combination of biohydrogen production performance. The hydrogen producing bacteria from fruit waste digester (FW), cow dung digester (CD), and tofu waste digester (TW) enriched under strictly anaerobic conditions at 37OC. Inoculums from 3 different digesters (FW, CD, and TW) and its combination (FW-CD, CD-TW, FW-TW, and FW-CD-TW) were used to test the hydrogen production from melon waste with volatile solids (VS) concentration of 9.65 g/L, 37°C and initial pH 7.05 ± 0.05. The results showed that individual and combined inoculum produced the gas comprising hydrogen and carbon dioxide without any detectable methane. The highest cumulative hydrogen production of 743 mL (yield 207.56 mL/gVS) and 1,132 mL (yield 231.02 mL/gVS) was shown by FW and FW-CD-TW, respectively. Butyric, acetate, formic and propionic were the primary soluble metabolites produced by all the cultures, and the result proves that higher production of propionic acid can decrease hydrogen yield. Clostridium perfringens and Clostridium baratii prominently seen in all single and combination inoculum. Experimental evidence suggests that the inoculum from different biodigesters able to adapt well to the environmental conditions and the new substrate after a combination process as a result of metabolic flexibility derived from the microbial diversity in the community to produce hydrogen. Therefore, inoculum combination could be used as a strategy to improve systems for on-farm energy recovery from animal and plant waste to processing of food and municipal waste.

Article History: Received February 5th 2018; Received in revised form May 7th 2018; Accepted June 2nd 2018; Available online

How to Cite This Article: Amekan, Y., Wangi, D.S.A.P., Cahyanto, M.N., Sarto and Widada, J. (2018) Effect of Different Inoculum Combination on Biohydrogen Production from Melon Fruit Waste. Int. Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 7(2), 101-109.

https://doi.org/10.14710/ijred.7.2.101-10

Keywords

Inoculum; Biohydrogen; Melon fruit waste; Dark Fermentation; DGGE

  1. Yumechris Amekan  Orcid
    Gadjah Mada University, Indonesia
    Department of Biotechnology, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 55281
  2. Dyah Sekar A P Wangi 
    Gadjah Mada University, Indonesia
  3. Muhammad Nur Cahyanto 
    Department of Food and Agricultural Product Technology, Faculty of Agricultural Technology, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  4. Sarto Sarto 
    Department of Chemical Engineering, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  5. Jaka Widada 
    Department Agriculture Microbiology, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  1. Akutsu Y., Li Y., Tandukar M., Kubota K., et al. (2008). Effects of seed sludge on fermentative characteristics and microbial community structures in thermophilic hydrogen fermentation of starch. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 33, 6541-6548.
  2. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Environment Federation, Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 20th ed, APHA, AWWA, and WEF. Washington D.C. (USA): 1998.
  3. Cai J.L., Wang G.C., Li Y.C., et al. (2009). Enrichment and hydrogen production by marine anaerobic hydrogen-producing Microflora. Chinese Science Bulletin. 54, 2656–2661.
  4. Cahyari K., Syamsiah S., Sarto, et al. (2011). Hydrogen production from fruit waste through dark fermentation. 4th conference of Hydrogen and Fuel Cells in The Nordic Countries. Malmö. Sweden. 25–26 October 2011.
  5. Chang S., Li J.Z., Liu F. (2011). Evaluation of different pretreatments methods for preparing hydrogen-producing seed inocula from waste activated sludge. Renewable Energy. 36, 1517–1522.
  6. Choi J, Ahn Y. (2014). Characteristics of biohydrogen fermentation from various substrates. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 39, 3152–3159.
  7. Choi J., Ahn Y. (2015). Biohydrogen fermentation from Sucrose and Piggery Waste with High Levels of Bicarbonate Alkalinity. Energies, 8, 1716–1729.
  8. Das D., Veziroglu T.N. (2001). Hydrogen production by biological processes: a survey of literature. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 26, 13–28.
  9. Das D., Khanna N., Dasgupta C.N. (2014). Biohydrogen Production Fundamentals and Technology Advances. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group.
  10. Díez B., Pedrós-Alió C., Marsh T.L., et al. (2001). Application of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) to study the diversity of marine picoeukaryotic assemblages and comparison of DGGE with other molecular techniques. Application of Environmental Microbiology. 67, 2942–2951.
  11. Fang H.H.P., Liu H. (2002). Effect of pH on hydrogen production from glucose by a mixed culture. Bioresource Technology. 82, 87–93.
  12. Hallenbeck P.C., Abo-Hashesh M., Ghosh D. (2012). Review: Strategies for improving biological hydrogen production. Bioresource Technology. 110, 1–9.
  13. Hallenbeck P.C., Benemann J.R. (2012). Biological hydrogen production; fundamentals and limiting processes. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 27, 1185–1193.
  14. Han S.K., Shin H.S. (2004). Biohydrogen production by anaerobic fermentation of food waste. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 29, 569–577.
  15. Hawkes F.R., Hussy I., Kyazze G., et al. (2007). Continuous dark fermentative hydrogen production by mesophilic microflora: Principles and progress. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 32, 172–184.
  16. Insam H., Franke-Whittle I., Goberna M. (2010). Microbes at Work: from waste to resources. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
  17. Jang S., Kim D.H., Yun Y.M., et al. (2015). Hydrogen fermentation of food waste by alkali-shock pretreatment: Microbial community analysis and limitation of continuous operation. Bioresources and Technology. 186, 215–222.
  18. Kapdan I.K., Kargi F. (2006). Bio-hydrogen production from waste materials. Enzyme and Microbial Technology. 38, 569–582.
  19. Karthic P., Joseph P. (2012). Comparison and Limitations of Biohydrogen Process. Research Journal of Biotechnology, 7, 59–71
  20. Kawagoshi Y., Hino N., Fujimoto A., et al. (2005). Effect of inoculum conditioning on hydrogen fermentation and pH effect on bacterial community relevant to hydrogen production. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering. 100, 524–530.
  21. Khanal S.K., Chen W.H., Li L., et al. (2004). Biological hydrogen production: effects of pH and intermediate products. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 29, 1123–1131.
  22. Kumar G., Bakonyi P., S Periyasamy., et al. (2015). Lignocellulose biohydrogen: practical challenges and recent progress. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Rev., 44, 728–737.
  23. Kumar G., Bakonyi P., Sivagurunathan P., et al. (2015). Enhanced biohydrogen production from industrial beverage wastewater using external nitrogen sources and bioaugmentation with facultative anaerobic strains. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering. 120, 155–160.
  24. Lee H.S., Salerno M.B., Rittmann B.E (2008). Thermodynamic evaluation on H2 production in glucose fermentation. Environmental Science and Technology. 42, 2401-2407.
  25. Li Z., Wang H., Tang Z., Wang X., et al. (2008). Effects of pH value and substrate concentration on hydrogen production from the anaerobic fermentation of glucose. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 13, 1–6.
  26. Liu H., Wang G., Zhu D., et al. (2009). Enrichment of the hydrogen-producing microbial community from marine intertidal sludge by different pretreatment methods. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 34, 9696–9701.
  27. Mohan, S.V. (2009). Harnessing of biohydrogen from wastewater treatment using mixed fermentative consortia: Process evaluation towards optimization. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 34, 7460–7474.
  28. Mohan S.V., Babu M.L., Reddy M.V., et al. (2009). Harnessing of biohydrogen by acidogenic fermentation of Citrus limetta peelings: effect of extraction procedure and pretreatment of biocatalyst. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 34, 6149–6156.
  29. Mohanakrishna G., Mohan S.V., Sarma P.N. (2010). Utilizing acid-rich effluents of fermentative hydrogen production process as substrate for harnessing bioelectricity: an integrative approach. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 35, 3440–3449.
  30. Nath K., Das D. (2004). Improvement of Fermentative Hydrogen Production: Various Approaches. Appl. Microbiology and Biotechnology, 65, 520–529.
  31. Ni B. J., Rittmann B.E., Yu H.Q. (2011). Soluble microbial products and their implications in mixed culture biotechnology. Trends Biotechnology. 29, 454-463.
  32. Noike T., Takabatake H., Mizuno O., et al. (2002). Inhibition of hydrogen fermentation of organic wastes by lactic acid bacteria. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 1367–1371.
  33. Pachapur V.L., Sarma S.J., Brar S.K., et al. (2015). Co-culture strategies for increased biohydrogen production. International Journal of Energy Research, 39, 1479–1504.
  34. Pattra S., Sangyoka S., Boonmee M., et al. (2008). Bio-hydrogen production from the fermentation of sugarcane bagasse hydrolysate by Clostridium butyricum. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 33, 5256–5265.
  35. Reith J.H., Wijffels R.H., Barten H. (2003). Bio-methane and bio-hydrogen – status and perspective of biological methane and hydrogen production. Dutch Biological Hydrogen Foundation: The Hague.
  36. Ren N.Q., Guo W.Q., Wang X.J., et al. (2008). Effects of different pretreatment methods on fermentation types and dominant bacteria for hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 33, 4318–4324.
  37. Ruggeri B., Tommasi T. (2012). Efficiency, and efficacy of pre-treatment and bioreaction for bio-H2 energy production from organic waste. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 37, 6491–6502.
  38. Ruknongsaeng P., Reungsang A., Moonamart S., et al. (2005). Influent of nitrogen, acetate, and propionate on hydrogen production from pineapple waste extract by Rhodospirillum rubrum. Journal of Water Environment. Technol. 13, 93–117.
  39. Saady, N.M.C. (2013). Homoacetogenesis during hydrogen production by mixed cultures dark fermentation: Unresolved challenge. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 38, 13172–13191.
  40. Sivagurunathan P., Sen B., Lin C.Y. (2014). Batch fermentative hydrogen production by enriched mixed culture: Combination strategy and their microbial composition. Journal of Bioscience Bioengineering. 117, 222–228.
  41. Sivagurunathan P., et al. (2016). A critical review on issues and overcoming strategies for the enhancement of dark fermentative hydrogen production in continuous systems. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.12.081
  42. Sivagurunathan P., Anburajan P., Kumar G., et al. (2016). Improvement of hydrogen fermentation of galactose by combined inoculation strategy. J. Biosci. Bioeng. XX, 1–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2016.10.006
  43. Srikanth S., Mohan S.V. (2014). Regulating feedback inhibition caused by the accumulated acid intermediates during acidogenic hydrogen production through feed replacement. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 39, 10028–10040.
  44. Sun W., Liu J., Xu H., et al. (2015). l-Lactic acid fermentation by Enterococcus faecium: a new isolate from bovine rumen. Biotechnology Letter. 37, 1379–1383.
  45. Tien H.M., Le K.A., Tran A. T., et al. (2016). Effect of fermentation condition on biohydrogen production from cassava starch by anaerobic mixed cultures. The 3rd AUN/SEED-NET Regional Conference on Energy Engineering and the 7th International Conference on Thermofluids (RCEnE/THERMOFLUID 2015). doi: 10.1063/1.4949310.
  46. Van Ginkel S., Sung S.W., Lay J.J. (2001). Biohydrogen production as a function of pH and substrate concentration. Environmental Science and Technology. 35, 4726–4730.
  47. Yokoi H., Saitsu A., Uchida H., et al. (2001). Microbial Hydrogen Production from Sweet Potato Starch Residue. Journal of Bioscience Bioengineering, 91, 58–63.
  48. Zhang L., Li J., Ban Q., et al. (2012). Metabolic pathways of hydrogen production in fermentative acidogenic microflora. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 22, 668–67