DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jil.19.3.612-619

Conflict Resolution in Mining Area: An Alternative Strategy of Community Empowerment

1Program Studi Magister Manajemen, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Muhammadiyah Palopo, Indonesia

2Program Studi Penyuluh Pertanian, Fakultas Kesehatan, Pertanian dan Kelautan, Universitas Muhammadiyah Palopo, Indonesia

Received: 30 Jun 2021; Revised: 11 Aug 2021; Accepted: 10 Sep 2021; Available online: 22 Sep 2021; Published: 1 Nov 2021.
Editor(s): H Hadiyanto

Citation Format:
Abstract

Penelitian ini menganalisis konflik di sekitar pertambangan dan merumuskan resolusi konflik sebagai strategi pemberdayaan masyarakat di Kabupaten Bombana, Sulawesi Tenggara. Penelitian ini dirancang dengan metode survei deskriptif. Populasi penelitian adalah rumah tangga yang tinggal di desa-desa sekitar wilayah pertambangan, baik di darat maupun di pulau-pulau. Teknik proportional cluster sampling digunakan untuk menentukan sampel. Analisis statistik dilakukan dengan menggunakan statistik deskriptif dan statistik inferensial. Uji statistik inferensial yang digunakan adalah analisis regresi berganda dan uji t untuk menganalisis perbedaan antara responden di daratan dan pulau-pulau. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa konflik antara perusahaan dengan masyarakat sekitar pertambangan di Kabupaten Bombana tergolong tinggi. Konflik tersebut meliputi proses pendudukan Sumber Daya Alam (SDA), dominasi perusahaan atas sumber daya alam, dan penanganan dampak negatif. Strategi pemberdayaan masyarakat sekitar pertambangan melalui pengelolaan konflik adalah: (1) Mempercepat penyelesaian konflik yang ada dengan pola musyawarah dan melibatkan semua pihak, termasuk masyarakat setempat, pemerintah, dan penegak hukum setempat. (2) Mendorong perusahaan pertambangan untuk meningkatkan pengelolaan lingkungan yang terkena dampak untuk mencegah kerusakan lingkungan. (3) Meningkatkan pola kerjasama antara perusahaan, pemerintah, dan masyarakat dalam pengelolaan sumber daya alam. (4) Mencegah konflik sosial. Upaya peningkatan pemberdayaan masyarakat sekitar pertambangan dapat dilakukan melalui kerjasama antara pemerintah, perusahaan, dan masyarakat. Pemerintah dan perusahaan memiliki sumber daya yang cukup untuk menginisiasi program pemberdayaan masyarakat sekitar pertambangan di Kabupaten Bombana.

 

ABSTRACT

This study analyzes conflicts around mining and formulates conflict resolution as a strategy for community empowerment in Bombana Regency, Southeast Sulawesi. The study was designed with a descriptive survey method. The research population is the householder living in villages around the mining area, both on land and in the islands. The proportional cluster sampling technique does the determination of the sample. Statistical analysis was performed using descriptive statistics and inferential statistics. The inferential statistical test used is multiple regression analysis and t-test to analyze the differences between respondents on the mainland and the islands. The study results indicate that conflicts between companies and communities around mining in Bombana Regency are high. These conflicts include the process of occupation of Natural Resources (SDA), the domination of companies over natural resources, and the handling of negative impacts. Strategies for empowering communities around mining through conflict management are: (1) Accelerating the resolution of existing conflicts with a deliberation pattern and involving all parties, including the local community, government, and local law enforcement. (2) Encouraging mining companies to improve management of the affected environment to prevent environmental damage. (3) Improving the pattern of cooperation between companies, the government, and the community in the management of natural resources. (4) Preventing social conflicts. Efforts to increase the empowerment of communities around mining can be carried out through collaboration between the government, companies, and the community. The government and companies have sufficient resources to initiate community empowerment programs around mining in Bombana Regency.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: conflict resolution, community empowerment

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Article
Language : EN
Recent articles
Model Partisipasi Pelaku Usaha dan Masyarakat Dalam Pengelolaan Sampah Plastik Teluk Penyu Cilacap Analisis Perubahan Penggunaan Lahan dan Cadangan Karbon sebagai Indikator Degradasi Lingkungan di Kecamatan Sandai Kabupaten Ketapang Penggunaan Makrozoobentos Dalam Penilaian Kualitas Perairan Sungai Inlet Danau Maninjau, Sumatera Barat More recent articles
Most cited articles
ANALISIS PEMANFAATAN RUANG YANG BERWAWASAN LINGKUNGAN DI KAWASAN PESISIR KOTA TEGAL KEBIJAKAN PENGELOLAAN LINGKUNGAN DI KAWASAN KENDENG UTARA PROVINSI JAWA TENGAH Forest Change Monitoring and Environmental Impact in Gunung Palung National Park, West Kalimantan, Indonesia KAJIAN KERENTANAN MASYARAKAT TERHADAP PERUBAHAN IKLIM BERBASIS DAERAH ALIRAN SUNGAI (STUDI KASUS SUB DAS GARANG HULU) PENGELOLAAN SAMPAH RUMAH TANGGA DI KECAMATAN DAHA SELATAN More cited articles
  1. Budhyono HT. 2008. Pengelolaan Strategi Pengembangan Masyarakat pada Industri Tambang untuk Keberlanjutan Bisnis Jangka Panjang dan Mendukung Pembangunan Berkelanjutan (Studi Kasus: Program Pengembangan Masyarakat PT Freeport Indonesia). National Conference on Management Research. Makasar: Prosiding
  2. Bugri JT, Kumi S. 2018. Dynamics of Community Perceptions, Common Resources and Compensation Practices in Mining the Case of Newmont Ghana Gold Ltd at Ahafo. International Journal of the Commons, Vol. 12, No. 1 (2018), pp. 1-25. Tersedia pada: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26522945
  3. Collado PA. 2015. Social Conflict in Argentina Land, Water, Work. Latin American Perspectives, Issue 201, Vol. 42 No. 2, March 2015, 125–141 DOI: 10.1177/0094582X14550284.Downloadedfromlap.sagepub.comatMidlandsStateUniversityonOctober30,2015
  4. Coser LA. 1956. The Functions of Social Conflict. Glence, I 11: Free Press
  5. Graulau J. 2008. ‘Is mining good for development?’: the intellectual history of an unsettled question. Journal of Progress in Development Studies 8, 2 (2008) pp. 129–62. Downloaded from pdj.sagepub.com at Midlands State University on November 4, 2015
  6. Hafid A. 2015. Konflik Sara di Wilayah Pertambangan (Kasus Sulawesi Tenggara). Artikel [Internet]. [diunduh 2015 November 3). Tersedia pada: http://kebudayaan.kemdikbud.go.id
  7. Hamelink CJ. 2008. Urban Conflict And Communication. Journal of The International Communication Gazette [Internet]. [diunduh 2015 Oktober 31); 70(3-4). Tersedia pada: www.sagepublications.com
  8. Hegre H, Nygard HM. 2015. Governance and Conflict Relapse. Journal of Conflict Resolution [Internet]. [diunduh 2015 September 18]; 59(6). Tersedia pada: www.sagepublications.com
  9. Humphreys M. 2005. Natural Resources, Conflict, and Conflict Resolution. Uncovering The Mechanisms. Journal Of Conflict Resolution [Internet]. [diunduh 2015 November 5); 49(4). Tersedia pada: www.sagepublications.com
  10. Lawson L, Kearns A. 2010. ‘Community Empowerment’ in the Context of the Glasgow Housing Stock Transfer. Urban Studies Journal [Internet]. [diunduh 2015 September 21]; 47(7). Tersedia pada: http://web.a.ebscohost.com
  11. McDonald P, Mayes R, and Pini B. 2012. Mining Work, Family and Community: A Spatially-Oriented Approach to the Impact of the Ravensthorpe Nickel Mine Closure in Remote Australia. Journal of Industrial Relations 54(1) 22–40 [DOI: 10.1177/0022185611432382].Downloadedfromjir.sagepub.comatMidlandsStateUniversityonNovember5,2015
  12. Ratner BD, Dick RM, Hellin J, Mapedza E, Unruh J. 2017. Addressing conflict through collective action in natural resource management. International Journal of the Commons, Vol. 11, No. 2 (2017), pp. 877-906. Downloaded from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26522939 on August 8, 2019
  13. Sanginga PC, Kamugisha RN, and Martin AM. 2007. The Dynamics of Social Capital and Conflict Management in Multiple Resource Regimes ACase of the Southwestern Highlands of Uganda. Ecology and Society, Vol. 12, No. 1. Downloaded from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26267833 on August 8, 2019
  14. Suharto E. 2005. Konflik Sosial, Masyarakat Multikultural dan Modal Kedamaian Sosial dalam Isu-Isu Tematik Pembangunan Sosial: Konsepsi dan Strategi. Jakarta; Badan Pelatihan dan Pengembangan Sosial Departemen Sosial Republik Indonesia
  15. Sukirman A. 2014. Penanganan Konflik Tambang di Bima Berdasarkan Teori Sosial dan Konflik. Artikel [Internet]. [diunduh 2014 Oktober 27]. Tersedia pada http://www.stisipmbojobima.ac.id
  16. Sumardjo. 2015. Analisis Pengelolaan Potensi Konflik di Masyarakat Sekitar Tambang Berbasis Ketahanan Pangan dan Energi (Kasus Tambang Emas di Jawa Barat dan Tambang Batubara di Kalimantan Selatan). Artikel [Internet]. [diunduh 2015 November 3]. Tersedia pada: http://www.care.ipb.ac.id
  17. Tetreault D. 2015. Social Environmental Mining Conflicts in Mexico. Latin American Perspectives [Internet]. [diunduh 2015 Oktober 31]; 42(5). Tersedia pada: www.sagepublications.com
  18. Upreti BR. 2004. Resource Conflicts and Conflict Resolution in Nepal. Mountain Research and Development, Vol. 24, No. 1 (Feb., 2004), pp. 60-66. Downloaded from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3674466 on August 8, 2019
  19. Wieviorka M. 2013. Social conflict. Current Sociology Review [Internet]. [diunduh 2015 Oktober 30]; 61(5-6). Tersedia pada: www.sagepublications.com

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-12-26 14:43:17

No citation recorded.