DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jil.21.1.210-219

Dynamic Model for Food Security to Realize Food Sovereignty: Case Study in Bantul Regency of Yogyakarta Special Region

1Natural Resources and Environmental Management Study Program, Bogor Agricultural Institute, Jalan Pajajaran Raya No.1 Bogor, Indonesia, Indonesia

2Department of Mechanical and Biosystem Engineering, Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor, Indonesia, Indonesia

3Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Bogor Agricultural Institute, Bogor, Indonesia, Indonesia

Received: 27 Mar 2022; Revised: 14 Jan 2023; Accepted: 21 Jan 2023; Available online: 28 Jan 2023; Published: 28 Jan 2023.
Editor(s): Budi Warsito

Citation Format:
Abstract

The increased populism should be offset by increased food production; thus, the region's food security can be maintained. Food security will not be resolved if it does not solve the root of the problem, namely the farmers' deterioration and the agricultural land conversion. The primary purpose of this study is to design a dynamic model of sustainable food farming—the methods used in achieving an approach with a dynamic system. Needs analysis, problem formulation, system identification, system modeling, model validation, and implementation are the stages in problem-solving with the systems approach method. The Powersim Studio software analyzes the system and views model behavior. Based on the predicted results, in 2021, Bantul Regency experienced a deficit rice of 1,925 tons without control efforts. A pessimistic scenario with a control policy of 50% of the rice field function transfer rate caused the rice balance sheet to be a deficit of 1,001 tons. Optimistic scenario, control of paddy field conversion 50% of the transfer rate and food diversification obtained rice balance with a surplus of 5,460.24 tons by 2030.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: dynamic system, food diversification, Powersim, rice balance, Yogyakarta

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Article
Language : EN
Recent articles
Jasa Lanskap pada Pekarangan Transmigran Bali di Wilayah Lampung Timur Interaction of Organisms in Abandoned Tin Mining Pits: Perspective of Life in Acid Mine Drainage Environment Analisis Daur Hidup Produksi Beton Fly Ash sebagai Upaya Mengurangi Dampak Emisi CO2 More recent articles
Most cited articles
BACTERIAL Cr (VI) REDUCTION AND ITS IMPACT IN BIOREMEDIATION STRATEGI PENGELOLAAN AIR LIMBAH SENTRA UMKM BATIK YANG BERKELANJUTAN DI KABUPATEN SUKOHARJO PENGARUH EMISI UDARA PADA SENTRA PENGOLAHAN BATU KAPUR TERHADAP KAPASITAS VITAL PARU PEKERJA DAN MASYARAKAT DI DESA KARAS KECAMATAN SEDAN KABUPATEN REMBANG Analisis Kualitas Air Sungai Guna Menentukan Peruntukan Ditinjau Dari Aspek Lingkungan Analisis Penyebab Masyarakat Tetap Tinggal di Kawasan Rawan Bencana Gunung Merapi (Studi di Lereng Gunung Merapi Kecamatan Cangkringan, Kabupaten Sleman Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta) More cited articles
  1. Aisyahi, I. N. T., Purnomo, E, P., & Kasiwi, A. N. (2020). Analisis Kebijakan Ketahanan Pangan di Kabupaten Bantul. Demos. 2 (2) 151–162
  2. BPS, [Badan Pusat Statistik]. (2018). BPS Sebut Luas Lahan Pertanian Kian Menurun. Available at https://www.cnnindonesia.com/ekonomi/20181025153705-92 341433/bps-sebut-luas-lahan-pertanian-kian-menurun
  3. BSN, [Badan Standardisasi Nasional]. (2004). Tata Cara Perencanaan Lingkungan Perumahan Perkotaan, SNI 03-1733-2004. Jakarta (ID): Badan Standardisasi Nasional
  4. Daulay, R. A., Putri, E.I.K., Barus, B., & Noorachmat, B. P. (2016). Analisis Faktor Penyebab Alih Fungsi Lahan Sawah Menjadi Sawit di Kabupaten Tanjung Jabung Timur. Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian. 14 (1) 1–15. doi: 10.21082/akp.v14n1.2016.1–15
  5. FAO, [Food Agriculture Organization of the United Nations]. (2019). Land grab or development opportunity?. E.Book. Available at http://www.fao.org/3/a-ak241e.pdf
  6. Forrester, J. (1989). The Beginning of System Dynamics. Cambridge: MIT Press
  7. Giyarsih, R.S., & Alfana, F. M. A. (2013). The Role of Urban Area As The Determinant Factor of Population Growth. IJG. 45 (1) 38–47. DOI: 10.22146/ijg.2405
  8. Haliki E. (2019). A Dynamic Network Model For Population Growth And Urbanization. Cumhuriyet Sci. 40 (4) 896–901. DOI: 10.17776/csj.632996
  9. Ichwandi I. (2014). Membumikan Kebijakan Ketahanan Pangan. Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan. 1 (2) 97–104. doi: 10.20957/jkebijakan.v1i2.10300
  10. Khairati R, & Syahni, R. (2016). Respon Permintaan Pangan Terhadap Pertambahan Penduduk di Sumatera Barat. Pembangunan Nagari. 1 (2). doi: 10.30559/jpn.v1i2.5
  11. Oort, P. A. J. V., Saito, K., Tanaka, A., Assagba, A. E., Bussel, L. G. J. V., Wart, J. V., Groot, H. D., Ittersum, M. K. V., Cassman, K. G., & Wopereis, M. C. S., (2015). Assessment of rice self-sufficiency in 2025 in eight African countries. Elsevier. 5. 39–49
  12. Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2009). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 41 Tahun 2009 tentang Perlindungan Lahan Pertanian Pangan Berkelanjutan. Jakarta (ID): Sekretariat Negara
  13. Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2012). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 18 Tahun 2012 tentang Pangan. Jakarta (ID): Sekretariat Negara
  14. Rohman, A., & Maharani, A. D. (2017). Proyeksi Kebutuhan Konsumsi Pangan Beras di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Caraka Tani. 32(1) 29–34. Doi: :http://dx.doi.org/10.20961/carakatani.v32i1.12144
  15. Sterman J. (2002). Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World, 202
  16. Wijayati, . D., Harianto., & Suryana, A. (2019). Permintaan Pangan Sumber Karbohidrat di Indonesia. Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian. 1 (17): 13–26. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21082/akp.v17n1.2019.13-26

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-11-02 12:38:22

No citation recorded.