skip to main content

Hubungan Evapotranspirasi, Hujan dan Elevasi Muka Air Tanah pada Lahan Gambut Tropis Sebagai Awal Penentuan Kondisi Lahan Basah

Prodi Teknik Sipil, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat Jl. A Yani Km 35,5 Banjarbaru-Kalimantan Selatan 70714, Indonesia

Received: 16 Sep 2022; Revised: 31 May 2023; Accepted: 15 Jul 2023; Available online: 14 Sep 2023; Published: 21 Sep 2023.
Editor(s): Budi Warsito

Citation Format:

The relationship between parameters in wetlands, especially peatlands, as a part of the analysis is interesting to study. The analysis is expected to show the condition of the peatland or the state of the wetlands in general. The water table elevation (WTE) is measured daily, so to compare it with evapotranspiration and rain, daily values for these two parameters are also required. The study was conducted between June-July and August 2022 on shallow peatlands in Gambut District, Banjar Regency, South Kalimantan Province. Evapotranspiration in this study was calculated using the Hargreaves and Modified Hargreaves method which presents a daily evapotranspiration calculation. The methods only depend on the maximum and minimum temperature, the number of outer space radiation whose magnitude depends on its location on the earth's surface, and the time when the research is conducted. The results showed that the highest daily evapotranspiration value generally occurred in August, which was in accordance with previous studies, but the magnitudes were different. The daily evapotranspiration value in this study ranged from 0.5 mm to 1.8 mm, while previously, the values were greater. WTE values show a strong relationship with rainfall, where rainfall increases the WTE value, and conversely, the absence causes the WTEs to decrease gradually. In general, the condition of the peatlands in the study area based on the groundwater elevation conditions still looks quite good with a fast response to rain. The relationship of evapotranspiration with rain and water table elevation cannot be clearly seen in this study because alterations in rainfall and WTE do not directly indicate changes in evapotranspiration values, so a more extended study covering other months and more in-depth covering parameters and other methods is needed to draw valid conclusions more accurate.



Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Evapotranspiration, parameters analysis, peatlands, rainfall, water table elevation
Funding: LPPM Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

Article Metrics:

  1. Alaska Department of Fish and Game (1992) ‘Wetland Classification, Inventory, and Assessment Methods: An Alaska Guide to their Fish and Wildlife Application’, p. 234
  2. Amal, N. (2021) ‘Analisis Karakteristik dan Formulasi Rawa dengan Pendekatan Variabel Hidrologi Rawa’, Info Teknik, 6(11), 951–952., 22(1), pp. 5–24
  3. Amal, N. et al. (2021) ‘Variability of Water Table Elevation and Flow Response of Tropical Peatland Case Study at Pulau Padang , Riau , Indonesia’, Lowland Technology International, 22 (4)(June), pp. 135–141
  4. Amal, N. et al. (2022) ‘Analysis of hydrology parameters in a tropical wetland as an early approach to identify a drought risk in a peatland area’, IOP Conf. Series Earth and Environmental Science. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/999/1/012011
  5. Arifin, Y. F., Hamidah, S. and Fakhrurazi (2018) ‘Kajian Teknis Analisis Daya Dukung Hutan Lindung Kota Banjarbaru’, 1, pp. 78–79
  6. Bay, R. R. (1967) ‘Evapotranspiration from two peatland watersheds’, Symp on Geochem, Precipitation, Evaporation, Soil Moisture, Hydrom, Proc Gen Assembly of Bern, (Virta), pp. 300–307
  7. Brady, M. A. (1997) Organic matter dynamics of coastal peat deposits in Sumatra, Indonesia
  8. Daniels, S. M. et al. (2008) ‘Water table variability and runoff generation in an eroded peatland, South Pennines, UK’, Journal of Hydrology, 361(1–2), pp. 214–226. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.07.042
  9. Department of Environment and Science Queensland (2019) ‘Index of wetland condition (IWC)’, WetlandInfo website. Available at:
  10. Droogers, P. and Allen, R. G. (2002) ‘Estimating reference evapotranspiration under inaccurate data conditions’, Irrigation and Drainage Systems, 16(1), pp. 33–45. doi: 10.1023/A:1015508322413
  11. Farmer, W. et al. (2011) ‘A Method for Calculating Reference Evapotranspiration on Daily Time Scales’, (195), p. 27. Available at:
  12. Glenn, E. P. et al. (2013) ‘Evapotranspiration and water balance of an anthropogenic coastal desert wetland: Responses to fire, inflows and salinities’, Ecological Engineering, 59, pp. 176–184. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.06.043
  13. Gribovszki, Z. and Kalicz, P. (2008) ‘Evapotranspiration calculation on the basis of the riparian zone water balance’, Acta Silv. Lign. …, 4(January), pp. 95–106. Available at:
  14. Hanson, a et al. (2008) Wetland Ecological Functions Assessment: An Overview of Approaches, Office. Available at:
  15. Hargreaves, B. G. H. (1994) ‘REFERENCE EVAPOTRANSPIRATION By George H. Hargreaves, 1 Fellow, ASCE’, Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 120(6), pp. 1132–1139
  16. Hirano, T., Kusin and Kitso (2015) ‘Evapotranspiration of tropical peat swamp forest’, Global Change Biology
  17. Holden, J. and Burt, T. P. (2002) ‘Infiltration, runoff and sediment prduction in blanket peat catchments: implications of field rainfall simulation experiments.’
  18. Isabelle, P. E. et al. (2018) ‘Water budget, performance of evapotranspiration formulations, and their impact on hydrological modeling of a small boreal peatland-dominated watershed’, Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 55(2), pp. 206–220. doi: 10.1139/cjes-2017-0046
  19. Katimon, A. and Wahab, A. K. A. (2003) ‘Hydrologic Characteristics of a Drained Tropical Peat Catchment: Runoff Coefficients, Water Table and Flow Duration Curves’, Jurnal Teknologi, 38, pp. 39–53
  20. Kusler, J. (2016) ‘Wetland Assessment: Overview’, The Wetland Book, pp. 1–10. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-6172-8_285-1
  21. Liu, M. and Hu, D. (2019) ‘Response of wetland evapotranspiration to land use/cover change and climate change in Liaohe River Delta, China’, Water (Switzerland), 11(5). doi: 10.3390/w11050955
  22. Manik, T., Rosadi, R. and Karyanto, A. (2012) ‘Evaluasi Metode Penman-Monteith Dalam Menduga Laju Evapotranspirasi Standar (ET0) di Dataran Rendah Propinsi Lampung, Indonesia’, Jurnal Keteknikan Pertanian, 26(2), p. 21612
  23. Mitsch, William J, Gosselink, J. G. (2015) Wetlands Fifth Edition, Wi Ley
  24. Moore, P. A., Pypker, T. G. and Waddington, J. M. (2013) ‘Effect of long-term water table manipulation on peatland evapotranspiration’, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 178–179(September), pp. 106–119. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.04.013
  25. Moorhead, J. E. et al. (2019) ‘Evaluation of evapotranspiration from eddy covariance using large weighing lysimeters’, Agronomy, 9(2), pp. 1–17. doi: 10.3390/agronomy9020099
  26. Nungesser, M. K. and Chimney, M. J. (2006) ‘A hydrologic assessment of the Everglades Nutrient Removal Project, a subtropical constructed wetland in South Florida (USA)’, Ecological Engineering, 27(4), pp. 331–344. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2006.08.007
  27. Ohkubo, S., Hirano, T. and Kusin, K. (2021) ‘Influence of fire and drainage on evapotranspiration in a degraded peat swamp forest in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia’, Journal of Hydrology, 603(PA), p. 126906. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126906
  28. PP (2016) ‘PP No.57 Tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Ekosistem Gambut’, pp. 1–23
  29. Susanti, I. et al. (2018) ‘Dinamika Evapotranspirasi Akibat Perubahan Iklim ( Evapotranspiration Dynamic in Climate Change )’, Berita Dirgantara, 19(2015), pp. 51–58
  30. Vitt, D. H. (2008) ‘Peatlands’, Encyclopedia of Ecology, Five-Volume Set, pp. 2656–2664. doi: 10.1016/B978-008045405-4.00318-9
  31. Whitfield, P. H., St-Hilaire, A. and Van Der Kamp, G. (2009) ‘Improving hydrological predictions in peatlands’, Canadian Water Resources Journal, 34(4), pp. 467–478. doi: 10.4296/cwrj3404467
  32. Wu, C. L., Shukla, S. and Shrestha, N. K. (2016) ‘Evapotranspiration from drained wetlands with different hydrologic regimes: Drivers, modeling, and storage functions’, Journal of Hydrology, 538, pp. 416–428. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.04.027
  33. Wu, J. et al. (2010) ‘Evapotranspiration dynamics in a boreal peatland and its impact on the water and energy balance’, Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 115(4). doi: 10.1029/2009JG001075

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-03-02 10:04:23

No citation recorded.