DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jil.22.2.472-483

Tata Kelola Industri Gula untuk Pangan Berkelanjutan: Ulasan Perbandingan antara Brazil dan Indonesia

1Sekolah Ilmu Lingkungan Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia

2Environmental Science School, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia & Coordinating Ministry for Economic Affairs, Jakarta, Indonesia, Indonesia

3Environmental Science School, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia, Japan

4 Study Program Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta, Indonesia, Indonesia

View all affiliations
Received: 2 May 2023; Revised: 16 Oct 2023; Accepted: 9 Nov 2023; Available online: 4 Feb 2024; Published: 15 Feb 2024.
Editor(s): Budi Warsito

Citation Format:
Abstract

Indonesia memiliki potensi mengembangkan industri gula berkelanjutan. Dalam menuju industri berkelanjutan dibutuhkan tata kelola dalam industri gula sehingga dapat mendorong produktivitas dan meningkatkan daya saing tinggi serta mendukung keberlanjutan lingkungan. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah mengulas dan membandingkan tata kelola industri gula antara Brazil dan Indonesia, sehingga dapat menghasilkan rekomendasi yang tepat dalam tata kelola Industri gula. Pendekatan penelitian ini dilakukan dengan metode kualitatif dengan studi literatur penelitian di Brazil dan literatur lainnya. Industri gula di Brazil berkembang melalui penetapan kebijakan melalui undang-undang Renovabio dalam mengembangkan biofuel. Pemerintah Brazil memberikan insentif untuk mendorong pelaku industri gula di Brazil dalam menerapkan industri gula berkelanjutan. Hal tersebut bertujuan untuk mengurangi efek gas rumah kaca (GRK). Hal tersebut mendorong industri gula di Brazil memiliki produktivitas dan daya saing tinggi secara global. Produktivitas Industri gula di Indonesia dibandingkan Brazil sangat rendah. Pada periode tahun 2010 hingga 2020, hasil produksi gula di Indonesia hanya sekitar 5 ton per hektar dengan rata-rata yield 68,85-ton tebu per hektar. Sedangkan, yield perkebunan tebu di Brazil rata-rata di atas 70 ton per hektar. Dalam tata kelola, Brazil juga menggunakan teknologi pertanian pada industri hulu, dan didukung dengan kebijakan energi terbarukan tersebut.

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download |  Cover Letter
Cover Letter
Subject
Type Cover Letter
  Download (30KB)    Indexing metadata
Keywords: Penelitian perbandingan; industri gula tebu; tata kelola industri gula; pangan berkelanjutan; industri gula berkelanjutan

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Article
Language : ID
Recent articles
Vegetasi Riparian Telaga Pengilon dan Gangguan Antropogenik Struktur Vegetasi Mangrove di Pantai Utara Mojo Pemalang Jawa Tengah Portrait of Environmental Governance in Waste Management in Malang City More recent articles
Most cited articles
KAJIAN DAMPAK KERUSAKAN LINGKUNGAN AKIBAT KEGIATAN PENAMBANGAN PASIR DI DESA KENINGAR DAERAH KAWASAN GUNUNG MERAPI BIOAKUMULASI LOGAM BERAT TIMBAL (Pb) DAN SENG (Zn) PADA KERANG DARAH (Anadara granosa L.) dan KERANG BAKAU (Polymesoda bengalensis L.) DI PERAIRAN TELUK KENDARI Analisis Kualitas Air Sungai Guna Menentukan Peruntukan Ditinjau Dari Aspek Lingkungan Menakar Kapasitas Adaptasi Perubahan Iklim Petani Padi Sawah (Kasus Kabupaten Pasuruan Jawa Timur) Variasi Genetik pada Pertumbuhan Tanaman Konservasi Sumberdaya Genetik Cendana (Santalum album Linn.) Populasi Pulau Timor Bagian Timur More cited articles
  1. Bhatnagar, A., Kesari, K. K., & Shurpali, N. (2016). Multidisciplinary Approaches to Handling Wastes in Sugar Industries. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 227(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-015-2705-y
  2. Bispo, R. C., Hernandez, F. B. T., Gonçalves, I. Z., Neale, C. M. U., & Teixeira, A. H. C. (2022). Remote sensing based evapotranspiration modeling for sugarcane in Brazil using a hybrid approach. Agricultural Water Management, 271(May), 107763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107763
  3. BPS. (2020). Statistik Tebu Indonesia 2020
  4. BPS. (2021). Distribusi Perdagangan Komoditas Gula Pasir Indonesia. Badan Pusat Statistik Republik Indonesia
  5. Brinkman, M. L. J., da Cunha, M. P., Heijnen, S., Wicke, B., Guilhoto, J. J. M., Walter, A., Faaij, A. P. C., & van der Hilst, F. (2018). Interregional assessment of socio-economic effects of sugarcane ethanol production in Brazil. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 88(December 2016), 347–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.02.014
  6. Bruntland, G. H. (1987). Report of the World Commisiaon on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. In Oxford University Press (Vol. 4, Issue 1). Oxford University Press
  7. da Luz, F. B., Carvalho, M. L., Castioni, G. A. F., de Oliveira Bordonal, R., Cooper, M., Carvalho, J. L. N., & Cherubin, M. R. (2022). Soil structure changes induced by tillage and reduction of machinery traffic on sugarcane – A diversity of assessment scales. Soil and Tillage Research, 223(June). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2022.105469
  8. Faria, K. C. P., Gurgel, R. F., & Holanda, J. N. F. (2012). Recycling of sugarcane bagasse ash waste in the production of clay bricks. Journal of Environmental Management, 101, 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.01.032
  9. García-Bustamante, C. A., Aguilar-Rivera, N., Zepeda-Pirrón, M., & Armendáriz-Arnez, C. (2018). Development of indicators for the sustainability of the sugar industry. Environmental and Socio-Economic Studies, 6(4), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.2478/environ-2018-0025
  10. Gilio, L., & Azanha Ferraz Dias de Moraes, M. (2016). Sugarcane industry’s socioeconomic impact in São Paulo, Brazil: A spatial dynamic panel approach. Energy Economics, 58, 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.06.005
  11. Gonçalves, I. Z., Barbosa, E. A. A., Santos, L. N. S., Nazario, A. A., Feitosa, D. R. C., Tuta, N. F., & Matsura, E. E. (2019). Nutritional balance and production of sugarcane irrigated with treated wastewater through subsurface drip. Irrigation Science, 37(2), 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-019-00620-y
  12. Granco, G., Caldas, M., & De Marco, P. (2019). Potential effects of climate change on Brazil’s land use policy for renewable energy from sugarcane. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 144(January), 158–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.01.033
  13. He, S. S., Zeng, Y., Liang, Z. X., Jing, Y., Tang, S. Y., Zhang, B., Yan, H., Li, S., Xie, T., Tan, F., & Li, M. (2021). Economic Evaluation of Water-Saving Irrigation Practices for Sustainable Sugarcane Production in Guangxi Province, China. Sugar Tech, 23(6), 1325–1331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-021-00965-9
  14. Heryanto, M. A., & Suryatmana, E. R. (2020). Dinamika Agroindustri Gula Indonesia: Tinjauan Analisis Sistem. Agricore: Jurnal Agribisnis Dan Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Unpad, 5(2), 194–210. https://doi.org/10.24198/agricore.v5i2.32100
  15. Iwan, H., & rasbin. (2012). Analisis Penggunaan Luas Lahan Tebu dan Padi Terkait Dengan Pencapaian Swasembada Gula Di Indonesia (Analysis of Land Use of Sugar Cane and Paddy in the Framework of Achieving Sugar Self-Sufficiency in Indonesia). Jurnal Ekonomi & Kebijakan Publik, 3(1), 47–63
  16. Jilcha, K., & Kitaw, D. (2017). Industrial occupational safety and health innovation for sustainable development. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, 20(1), 372–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2016.10.011
  17. Khoodaruth, A. (2016). Contribution of the sugar cane industry to reduce carbon dioxide emissions in the energy sector: the case of Mauritius. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 18(6), 1719–1731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-015-9713-3
  18. Kusnadi, N., Limbong, W., Hutagaol, P., & Marpaung, Y. (2011). Perkembangan Industri Gula Indonesia dan Urgensi Swasembada Gula Nasional. Indonesian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2(1), 1–14
  19. Lampridi, M. G., Sørensen, C. G., & Bochtis, D. (2019). Agricultural sustainability: A review of concepts and methods. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11185120
  20. Miller, G. T., & Spoolman, S. A. (2018). Living in Environment (Nineteenth). Cengage Learning
  21. Moraes, M. A. F. D., Oliveira, F. C. R., & Diaz-Chavez, R. A. (2015). Socio-economic impacts of Brazilian sugarcane industry. Environmental Development, 16, 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2015.06.010
  22. Naseri, H., Parashkoohi, M. G., Ranjbar, I., & Zamani, D. M. (2021). Energy-economic and life cycle assessment of sugarcane production in different tillage systems. Energy, 217, 119252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119252
  23. Nunes, L. J. R., Loureiro, L. M. E. F., Sá, L. C. R., & Silva, H. F. C. (2020). Sugarcane industry waste recovery: A case study using thermochemical conversion technologies to increase sustainability. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 10(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/APP10186481
  24. Raza, Q. U. A., Bashir, M. A., Rehim, A., Sial, M. U., Raza, H. M. A., Atif, H. M., Brito, A. F., & Geng, Y. (2021). Sugarcane industrial byproducts as challenges to environmental safety and their remedies: A review. Water (Switzerland), 13(24), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13243495
  25. Riajaya, P. D., Hariyono, B., Cholid, M., Kadarwati, F. T., Santoso, B., Djumali, & Subiyakto. (2022). Growth and Yield Potential of New Sugarcane Varieties during Plant and First Ratoon Crops. Sustainability, 14(21), 14396. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114396
  26. Rossetto, R., Ramos, N. P., de Matos Pires, R. C., Xavier, M. A., Cantarella, H., & Guimarães de Andrade Landell, M. (2022). Sustainability in Sugarcane Supply Chain in Brazil: Issues and Way Forward. Sugar Tech, 24(3), 941–966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-022-01170-y
  27. Sahu, O. (2020). Deduction of Organic and Inorganic Pollutant from Sugarcane Processing Plant Effluent by Thermal-oxidation and Electro-oxidation Processes in Batch Experiment. Chemistry Africa, 3(4), 965–978. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42250-020-00167-y
  28. Sawaengsak, W., & Gheewala, S. H. (2017). Analysis of social and socio-economic impacts of sugarcane production: A case study in Nakhon Ratchasima province of Thailand. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 1169–1175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.148
  29. Singh, S. R., Yadav, P., Singh, D., Shukla, S. K., Tripathi, M. K., Bahadur, L., Mishra, A., & Kumar, S. (2021). Intercropping in Sugarcane Improves Functional Diversity, Soil Quality and Crop Productivity. Sugar Tech, 23(4), 794–810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-021-00955-x
  30. Soldi, A., Meza, M. J. A., Guareschi, M., Donati, M., & Ortiz, A. I. (2019). Sustainability assessment of agricultural systems in Paraguay: A comparative study using FAO’s SAFA framework. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133745
  31. Turetta, A. P. D., Kuyper, T., Malheiros, T. F., & Coutinho, H. L. da C. (2017). A framework proposal for sustainability assessment of sugarcane in Brazil. Land Use Policy, 68(April), 597–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.08.011
  32. Valderrama, C., Quintero, V., & Kafarov, V. (2020). Energy and water optimization of an integrated bioethanol production process from molasses and sugarcane bagasse: A Colombian case. Fuel, 260(September 2019), 116314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116314
  33. Wahyuni, S. (2009). Industri dan Perdagangan Gula di Indonesia: Pembelajaran dari Kebijakan Zaman Penjajahan - Sekarang Sugarcane Industry and Trade : Lesson Learned from the Applied Policies during the Colonial Era up until this Period. September, 133–149

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-11-02 03:29:36

No citation recorded.