skip to main content

Evaluation and Implementation of Green Building in Office Building (Case Study: Munara 99 Sabilulungan Building)

Civil Engineering Study Program, Faculty of Technical Vocational Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia, Indonesia

Received: 11 Jan 2024; Revised: 29 May 2024; Accepted: 9 Jul 2024; Available online: 11 Nov 2024; Published: 11 Nov 2024.
Editor(s): Budi Warsito

Citation Format:
Abstract

Green Building concept is the concept of building planning to fulfill a better life for the next generation. A building can be classified as a green building if it meets the requirements and has green building certification. The purpose of this research is to analyze and evaluate the existing building criteria, namely the Munara 99 Sabilulungan building through the calculation of Greenship GBCI v1.2 assessment points because there is no green building assessment and rating from GBCI so that an evaluation of green building assessment is needed. A descriptive method with an evaluative approach was chosen to describe and compare the existing condition of the building with the greenship assessment tool for new buildings v1.2. The GBCI greenship assessment for new buildings v1.2 consists of 6 categories, namely land use suitability, energy efficiency and conservation, water conservation, material sources and cycles, space health and comfort, and building environmental management. To support the GBCI greenship assessment, the data used are building shop drawings, Bill of Quantity (Boq), interview results and field observations. Based on the results of the green building assessment, the Munara 99 Sabilulungan building received a GBCI bronze rating with a score of 44 points. To improve the green building rating to a gold rating, the Munara 99 Sabilulungan building is recommended to improve several categories so that it can get a gold rating with a value of 67 points and for improvements to increase the rating requires a cost of Rp 1,790,085,000, -.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Evaluation; GBCI; Green Building; Greenship for New Building v1.2; Implementation

Article Metrics:

  1. Adeswastoto, H., Setiawan, B., Desrimon, A., Febryanto, F., Putra, A. A., & Islah, M. (2023). nalisis Penerapan Green Building Pada Bangunan Gedung Klinik Universitas Pahlawan. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Management (JES-TM),, 3(1), 37-43
  2. Aisyah, A., Rizky, F. K., Lksamana, B., & Fajar, M. D. (2022). Diseminasi Hukum Penanganan Perubahan Iklim dan Pemanasan Global Ditinjau Berdasarkan Perspektif Hukum Lingkungan Internasional di Kelurahan Padang Bulan Selayang I Kecamatan Medan Selayang. Community Development Journal: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 3(3), 1401-1411
  3. Aldrian, E., Karmini, M., & Budiman. (2011). Adaptasi dan Mitigasi Perubahan Iklim di Indonesia. Jakarta: Pusat Perubahan Iklim dan Kualitas Udara, Kedeputian Bidang Klimatologi Badan Meteorologi, Klimatologi, dan Geofisika (BMKG)
  4. Ardiansyah, A. (2018). Monitoring Daya Listrik Berbasis IoT (Internet of Things). Journal of Electrical Electronic Control and Automotive Engineering, 3(2), 205-208
  5. Atmanto, A. E., Koesdaryanto, A. D., Gupita, G., Sindyartha, M., Iswati, T. Y., & Setyaningsih, W. (2020). Penilaian Kategori Green Building Pada Desain Bangunan Co-Working Space dan Serviced Office di Jakarta Selatan. SENTHONG, 3(2), 519-528
  6. GBCI. (2016). Greenship for New Building v1.2. Jakarta: Green Building Council Indonesia: Divisi Rating dan Teknologi
  7. Massie, F. Y., Dundu, A. K., & Tjakra, J. (2018). Penerapan Konsep Green Building Pada Industri Jasa Konstruksi di Manado. Jurnal Sipil Statik, 6(8), 553-558
  8. Putra, A. A. (2022). OPTIMALISASI GREENSHIP: PENDINGINAN PASIF MENGGUNAKAN BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING (BIM). Jurnal Ilmiah Desain Sains Arsitektur (DeSciArs), 1, 1-11
  9. Reztrie, N. D., Lubis, i. H., Kusuma, H. E., Koerniawan, M. D., & Budiarto, R. (2018). Wijayaningtyas, M., & Lukiyanto, K. (2021). Home occupants awareness toward Green building : Greenship rating index application. AIP Conference Proceedings 2447, 030010(October), 1–6. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0072595Wijay. In 2018 2nd International Conference on Green Energy and Applications (ICGEA) (pp. 166-170). IEEE
  10. Rohmat, A. (2020). Analisis Kerusakan Struktur Dan Arsitektur Pada Bangunan Gedung (Studi Kasus: Gedung F Universitas Muhammadiyah Sukabumi). Jurnal Student Teknik Sipil, 2(2), 134-140
  11. Sulistiawan, A. P., Maryanto, D. A., Aprizal, M. I., & Rachman, F. F. (2022). Penilaian Sumber Dan Siklus Material Arsitektural Dalam GBCI Pada Gedung Kuliah Bersama Institut Pertanian Bogor (IPB). Jurnal Arsitektur TERRACOTTA,, 3(2)
  12. Warlina, L. (2017). Manajemen Pembangunan dan Lingkungan. Tangerang Selatan: Universitas Terbuka
  13. Wijayanigtyas, M., & Lukiyanto, K. (2021). Home occupants awareness toward Green building : Greenship rating index application. AIP Conference Proceedings , (pp. 1-6)
  14. Wijayaningtyas, Redjo, R. E., Handoko, F., Lukiyanto, K., & Jiram, W. R. (2021). The Millennials’ Energy Efficiency Behaviour towards Eco-friendly Home. Civil Engineering and Architecture, 9(2), 394-403

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-11-11 22:10:55

No citation recorded.