DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jil.22.6.1486-1493

Carrying Capacity Analysis of Batu Belimbing Nature Tourism in East Singkawang District Singkawang City West Kalimantan

1Faculty of Forestry, Tanjungpura University, Pontianak, Indonesia, Indonesia

2Faculty of Forestry, Tanjungpura University, Indonesia, Indonesia

Received: 2 Feb 2024; Revised: 4 May 2024; Accepted: 8 Jul 2024; Available online: 11 Nov 2024; Published: 11 Nov 2024.
Editor(s): Budi Warsito

Citation Format:
Abstract
Batu Belimbing Natural Tourism (BBNT) is located in Nyarumkop Village, East Singkawang District, Singkawang City, and is one of the natural tourist attractions that has the potential to be developed. The number of visitors continues to increase, but the carrying capacity of the tourist area is still unknown. The carrying capacity value of BBNT needs to be analyzed to determine its ability to remain sustainable and accommodate visitors optimally so that visitor satisfaction can be achieved without environmental damage. The purpose of this research is to analyze the carrying capacity of BBNT as a natural tourist attraction based on three factors: physical (PCC), real (RCC), and effective (ECC) carrying capacity. This research used observation and interview methods. Qualitative descriptive analysis was used in this research. The calculation results show that the PCC value is 5,211 people/day, the RCC value is 1,637 people/day, and the ECC value is 1,637 people/day. The carrying capacity value of BBNT has the equation PCC > RCC = ECC; this means that the carrying capacity of BBNT is large and can still accommodate its visitors with all activities if its RCC and ECC values are lower than its PCC value (5,211 people/day).

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download |  Cover Letter
Carrying Capacity Analysis of Batu Belimbing Nature Tourism in East Singkawang District Singkawang City West Kalimantan
Subject
Type Cover Letter
  Download (3MB)    Indexing metadata
Keywords: Tourism carrying capacity; Batu Belimbing Nature Tourism; Physical Carrying Capacity; Real Carrying Capacity

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Article
Language : EN
Recent articles
Analisis Emisi Gas Rumah Kaca dengan Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) dan Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Industri Tahu Analisis Tingkat Pencemaran Air Sungai Rangkui Kota Pangkalpinang Kepulauan Bangka Belitung Berdasarkan Status Mutu Air Keanekaragaman Jenis Tumbuhan Semak di KHDTK Wanadipa Kabupaten Semarang, Jawa Tengah More recent articles
Most cited articles
KEARIFAN LOKAL DALAM MELESTARIKAN MATA AIR (Studi Kasus di Desa Purwogondo, Kecamatan Boja, Kabupaten Kendal) Variasi Genetik pada Pertumbuhan Tanaman Konservasi Sumberdaya Genetik Cendana (Santalum album Linn.) Populasi Pulau Timor Bagian Timur RANCANG BANGUN DAN UJI ALAT PROSES PENINGKATAN MINYAK CENGKEH PADA KLASTER MINYAK ATSIRI KABUPATEN BATANG KAJIAN DAMPAK KERUSAKAN LINGKUNGAN AKIBAT KEGIATAN PENAMBANGAN PASIR DI DESA KENINGAR DAERAH KAWASAN GUNUNG MERAPI Pengembangan Potensi Energi Alternatif Dengan Pemanfaatan Limbah Cair Kelapa Sawit Sebagai Sumber Energi Baru Terbarukan Di Kabupaten Kotawaringin Timur More cited articles
  1. Anye NT, Iortyom ET, Adelabu OA. 2017. Influence of Weather Condition on the Recreational Use of Wild Life Park. J Hum Ecol. 59(2–3):100–107. doi: 10.1080/09709274.2017.1368197
  2. Budiani SR, Puspitasari L, Adibah MN, Fauzia A, Basuki SN. 2019. Kajian Daya Dukung Lingkungan Fisik Wisata Berkemah Telaga Cebong Desa Sembungan untuk Mendukung Pariwisata Berkelanjutan. Maj Geogr Indones. 33(1):9. doi: 10.22146/mgi.32304
  3. Cifuentes M. 1992. Determinacion de Capacidad de Carga Truistica en Areas Protegidas. Publicacion Patrocinada Por el Fondo Mundial para la Naturaleza-WWF. Serie Tecnica Informe Tecnico No. 194. Centro Agronomico Tropical de Investigacion Y Ensenanza CATIE, Programa de Manej
  4. Fandeli C dan Muhamad. 2009. Prinsip-prinsip dasar mengkonservasi lanskap. Volume ke-1. Yogyakarta (ID): UGM Press
  5. He H, Shen L, Wong SW, Cheng G, Shu T. 2023. A “load-carrier” perspective approach for assessing tourism resource carrying capacity. Tour Manag. 94:104651. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2022.104651
  6. Herlambang MFR, Wicaksono AD, Hidayat ART. 2016. Kemampuan Daya Dukung Lingkungan Wisata Tirta Nirwana Songgoriti. J Tata Kota dan Drh. 8(2):57–62
  7. Karmelitha Y, Dewantara I, Yani A. 2021. Keanekaragaman jenis burung diurnal di Kawasan Taman Wisata Alam Bukit Kelam Kecamatan Kelam Permai Kabupaten Sintang Kalimantan Barat. J Hutan Lestari. 9(1):145–153
  8. Kennell J. 2014. Carrying capacity, tourism. Di dalam: Encyclopedia of Tourism. Cham: Springer International Publishing. hlm 1–3
  9. Lahallo W, Tanjung RHR, Suharno S, Sujarta P. 2022. Diversity, composition and important tree species for Cenderawasih bird activities in Rhepang Muaif ecotourism forest, Jayapura, Papua, Indonesia. Biodiversitas J Biol Divers. 23(2). doi: 10.13057/biodiv/d230219
  10. Lee C-C, Chen M-P, Peng Y-T. 2021. Tourism development and happiness: International evidence. Tour Econ. 27(5):1101–1136. doi: 10.1177/1354816620921574
  11. Lestari F, Tua IN, Muzanni A, Nugroho DF, Wibowo AA, Wartono T, Widanarko B, Saepullah A, Modjo R, Farida M, et al. 2023. NDVI, suitability, and carrying capacity of Dieng Plateau Forests to sustain Dieng Kulon Village tourism, Central Java, Indonesia. Biodiversitas. 24(1):282–289. doi: 10.13057/biodiv/d240134
  12. Listiani KA, Rifanjani S, Muflihati, Kusuma HA. 2023. Strategy for Developing Rafting as A Special Interest Tourism at Belaban Resort. J Sylva Indones. 6(02):138–148. doi: 10.32734/jsi.v6i02.8909
  13. Lucyanti S, Hendrarto B, Izzati M. 2013. Penilaian Daya Dukung Wisata di Obyek Wisata Bumi Perkemahan Palutungan Taman Nasional Gunung Ciremai Propinsi Jawa Barat. Pros Semin Nas Pengelolaan Sumberd Alam dan Lingkung 2013
  14. Manning RE. 2022. Studies in Outdoor Recreation. Ed ke-4. Oregon (US): Oregon State University Press
  15. Maria Y, Hardiansyah G, Natalina U. 2019. Nilai Ekonomi Ekowisata Taman Nasional Danau Sentarum Kabupaten Kapuas Hulu Provinsi Kalimantan Barat (Studi Kasus di SPTN) Semitau, Stasiun Riset Bukit Tekenang). J Chem Inf Model. 53(9):1689–1699
  16. Mendicino G. 1999. Sensitivity analysis on GIS procedures for the estimate of soil erosion risk. Nat Hazards. 20(2–3):231–253. doi: 10.1023/a:1008120231103
  17. Muta’ali L. 2012. Daya Dukung Lingkungan Untuk Perencanaan Pengembangan Wilayah. Universitas Gajah Mada. www.geo.ugm.ac.id
  18. Odum E. 1998. Dasar-Dasar Ekologi. Diterjemahkan dari Fundamental of. Ecology oleh T. Samingan. Yogyakarta (ID): Gadjah Mada University Press
  19. Pahlevi RS, Hasan H, Devy SD. 2018. Studi Tingkat Erodibilitas Tanah Pada PIT 3000 Blok 3, PT. Bharinto Ekatama Kabupaten Kutai Barat, Provinsi Kalimantan Timur. J Teknol Miner FT UNMUL. 6(1):17–20
  20. Pangestika RS, Wicaksono AD, Sari N. 2019. Daya Dukung Lingkungan Wisata Subak Jatiluwih di Desa Jatiluwih Kabupaten Tabanan. Plan Urban Reg Environ. 8(1):39–48
  21. Putri IASLP, Ansari F. 2021. Managing nature-based tourism in protected karst area based on tourism carrying capacity analysis. J Landsc Ecol Republic). 14(2):46–64. doi: 10.2478/jlecol-2021-0012
  22. Ralph, C. J., Droege, S., Sauer, J. R. 1995. Managing and monitoring birds using point counts: standards and applications. In: Ralph, C. John; Sauer, John R.; Droege, Sam, technical editors. 1995. Monitoring bird populations by point counts. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-149. Albany, CA: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station: p. 161-168, 149
  23. Rifanjani S, Altika K, Riyono JN, Munadian M. 2023a. Interpretasi Potensi Ekowisata Riam Pangar Dusun Segonde Desa Pisak Kecamatan Tujuh Belas Kabupaten Bengkayang Kalimantan Barat. J Hutan Lestari. 11(1):218. doi: 10.26418/jhl.v11i1.55660
  24. Rifanjani S, Listiani KA, Muflihati M, Perdana DM, Marwanto M. 2024. White-water Rafting Tourism Potential at Bukit Baka Bukit Raya National Park Based on The Tourism Suitability Index. Media Konserv. 28(3):284–291. doi: 10.29244/medkon.28.3.284-291
  25. Rifanjani S, Siagian ID, Dirhamsyah M. 2023b. Strategi Pengembangan Objek Wisata Mangrove Di Kawasan Hutan Mangrove Surya Perdana Mandiri Kelurahan Setapuk Besar. J Hutan Lestari. 11(3):580. doi: 10.26418/jhl.v11i3.71380
  26. Salemi M, Jozi SA, Malmasi S, Rezaian S. 2019a. Conceptual framework for evaluation of ecotourism carrying capacity for sustainable development of Karkheh protected area, Iran. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 26(4):354–366. doi: 10.1080/13504509.2019.1570379
  27. Salemi M, Jozi SA, Malmasi S, Rezaian S. 2019b. A New Model of Ecological Carrying Capacity for Developing Ecotourism in the Protected Area of the North Karkheh, Iran. J Indian Soc Remote Sens. 47(11):1937–1947. doi: 10.1007/s12524-019-01035-0
  28. Saputra OW, Siahaan S, Widiastuti T. 2021. Potensi Obyek Wisata Alam Air Terjun Entoba Di Desa Nyanggai Kecamatan Pinoh Selatan Kabupaten Melawi. J Hutan Lestari. 9(2):188. doi: 10.26418/jhl.v9i2.44846
  29. Sasmita E, Darsiharjo, Rahmafiitria F. 2014. Analisis Daya Dukung Wisata Sebagai Upaya Mendukung Fungsi Konservasi Dan Wisata Di Kebun Raya Cibodas Kabupaten Cianjur. Manajement Resort Leasure. 11 no 2:14. https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/jurel/article/download/2960/1986
  30. Siahaan RK, Rifanjani S, Siahaan S. 2018. Penilaian Potensi Obyek Daya Tarik Wisata Alam (Odtwa) Kawasan Mangrove Setapuk Di Kelurahan Setapuk Besar Kecamatan Singkawang Utara Kota Singkawang. J Hutan Lestari. 6(1):25–29
  31. Silva LB, Alves M, Elias RB, Silva L. 2017. Comparison of T-Square, Point Centered Quarter, and N-Tree Sampling Methods in Pittosporum undulatum Invaded Woodlands. Int J For Res. 2017:1–13. doi: 10.1155/2017/2818132
  32. Siswantoro H. 2012. Kajian Daya Dukung Lingkungan Wisata Alam Taman Wisata Alam Grojogan Sewu Kabupaten Karanganyar. Diponegoro University
  33. Soemarwoto O. 1983. Ekologi lingkungan hidup dan pembangunan. Jakarta (ID): Djambatan. https://lib.ui.ac.id/detail.jsp?id=20259657
  34. Suana IW, Ahyadi H, Hadiprayitno G, Amin S, Kalih LATTWS, Sudaryanto FX. 2020. Environment carrying capacity and willingness to pay for bird-watching ecotourism in Kerandangan Natural Park, Lombok, Indonesia. Biodiversitas J Biol Divers. 21(5). doi: 10.13057/biodiv/d210557
  35. Subardja D. 2012. Petunjuk teknis klasifikasi tanah nasional. Balai Besar Penelitian dan Pengembangan Sumberdaya Lahan Pertanian, Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian
  36. Toha, Rifanjani S, Nugroho J. 2021. Identifikasi Potensi Daya Tarik Ekowisata Air Terjun Bedawat Di Desa Dange Aji Kecamatan Air Besar Kabupaten Landak. J Hutan Lestari. 09(02):324
  37. USDA NRCS. 2022. Keys to Soil Taxonomy. Ed ke-13th. Volume ke-12. Washington (US): USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service
  38. Wirjohamidjojo S, Soesanto R, Mulyono T, Nureni I. 1996. Kamus Klimatologi. Jakarta (ID): Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa. http://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/id/eprint/2929
  39. Wiyono KH, Muntasib EKSH, Yulianda F. 2018. Carrying capacity of Peucang Island for ecotourism management in Ujung Kulon National Park. Di dalam: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. Volume ke-149. Institute of Physics Publishing
  40. Zeng Y, Filimonau V, Wang L, Zhong L. 2022. The role of seasonality in assessments of conflict tendency between tourism development and ecological preservation in protected areas: The case of protected areas in China. J Environ Manage. 304:114275. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114275

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-11-11 22:07:45

No citation recorded.