skip to main content

Pengukuran Emisi CO2 dan CH4 pada Tiga Jenis Pohon Asli Hutan Rawa Gambut Sekunder

1Program Pascasarjana Magister Ilmu Lingkungan, Universitas Tanjungpura, Pontianak, Indonesia

2Universitas Tanjungpura, Indonesia

3Yayasan Konservasi Alam Nusantara, Indonesia

Received: 25 Jul 2025; Revised: 30 Jun 2026; Accepted: 2 Jul 2026; Available online: 16 Jul 2026; Published: 18 Jul 2026.
Editor(s): Budi Warsito

Citation Format:
Abstract
Pohon di hutan rawa gambut berperan penting dalam siklus karbon sebagai penyerap sekaligus pelepas karbon. Namun, emisi gas rumah kaca dari batang pohon masih jarang diteliti. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengukur emisi CO₂ dan CH₄ dari batang tiga jenis pohon dominan di hutan rawa gambut sekunder serta menganalisis pengaruh jenis pohon, kelas diameter, posisi sungkup, dan waktu pengamatan terhadap besarnya emisi. Penelitian dilakukan di hutan rawa gambut sekunder Desa Anjungan Dalam, Kabupaten Mempawah, Kalimantan Barat. Sebanyak 27 pohon yang mewakili Gymnostoma nobile, Pentace borneensis, dan Syzygium napiforme diamati pada tiga kelas diameter (10–15 cm, 15–20 cm, dan 20–25 cm). Emisi batang diukur menggunakan LI-COR 7810 dengan metode sungkup tertutup pada ketinggian 65 cm dan 130 cm selama empat minggu. Data dianalisis menggunakan General Linear Model, ANOVA, dan uji Tukey. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa emisi CO₂ dan CH₄ dari batang pohon dipengaruhi oleh berbagai faktor. Gymnostoma nobile menghasilkan emisi CO₂ tertinggi, sedangkan S. napiforme menghasilkan emisi CH₄ tertinggi. Pohon berdiameter besar umumnya menghasilkan emisi CO₂ lebih tinggi dibandingkan pohon berdiameter kecil, sementara emisi CH₄ tertinggi ditemukan pada S. napiforme berdiameter besar. Posisi sungkup berpengaruh nyata terhadap emisi CO₂, tetapi tidak terhadap CH₄. Suhu tidak berpengaruh nyata terhadap kedua gas, sedangkan kelembapan relatif berpengaruh terhadap emisi CH₄ dan tekanan udara berpengaruh terhadap emisi CO₂ maupun CH₄. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa vegetasi hutan rawa gambut secara alami melepaskan CO₂ dan CH₄ sehingga berkontribusi terhadap dinamika karbon ekosistem.
Keywords: emisi batang; CO₂; CH₄; hutan rawa gambut; jenis; sungkup

Article Metrics:

  1. Aubrey, D. P., & Teskey, R. O. (2009). Root-derived CO2 efflux via xylem stream rivals soil CO 2 efflux. New Phytologist,184(1), 35–40. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.14698137.2009.02971.x
  2. Barba, J., Poyatos, R., & Vargas, R. (2019). Automated measurements of greenhouse gases fluxes from tree stems and soils: magnitudes, patterns and drivers. Scientific Reports, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39663-8
  3. Basuki, imam. 2017. “Carbon Dynamics in Response to Land Cover Change in Tropical Peatlands, Kalimantan, Indonesia.” Oregon: Oregon State University. https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/graduate_thesis_or_dissertations/xg94hv18k
  4. Bréchet, L. M., Daniel, W., Stahl, C., Burban, B., Goret, J. Y., Salomόn, R. L., & Janssens, I. A. (2021). Simultaneous tree stem and soil greenhouse gas (CO2, CH4, N2O) flux measurements: a novel design for continuous monitoring towards improving flux estimates and temporal resolution. New Phytologist, 230(6), 2487–2500. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17352
  5. Kauffman, J. B., V.B. Arifanti, I. Basuki, S. Kurnianto, N. Novita, D. Murdiyarso, D.C. Donato, dan M.W. Wareren. 2016 Protocols for the measurement, monitoring and reporting of structure, biomass, carbon stocks and greenhouse gas emission in tropical peat swamp forests. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR). https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/006429
  6. Kreutzer, K., & Butterbach Bahl, K. (2000). Temporal Variations of soil atmosphere trace gas exchange in forest ecosystems. In: Sculze et al., Caerbon and Nitrogen Cycling in European Forest Ecosystem (pp. 163-178). Springer
  7. Machacova, Katerina, Jaana Bäck, Anni Vanhatalo, Elisa Halmeenmäki, Pasi Kolari, Ivan Mammarella, Jukka Pumpanen, Manuel Acosta, Otmar Urban, and Mari Pihlatie. 2016. “Pinus Sylvestris as a Missing Source of Nitrous Oxide and Methane in Boreal Forest.” Scientific Reports 6 (March). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep23410
  8. Maier, M., Schack-Kirchner, H., & Hildebrandt, A. (2017). "Stem-mediated gas exchange in trees – A synthesis of current knowledge and methodological approaches." Ecological Evolution, 7, 6882–6892
  9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3256
  10. Murdiyarso. 2004. “Wildlife Habitat Canada Habitat Faunique Canada Pendugaan Cadangan Karbon Pada Lahan Gambut.” Bogor. www.wetlands.or.id
  11. Poorter, L., et al. (2010). "Wood traits and wood productivity explain the impact of wood density on tree growth." Ecology, 91(12), 3684–3692. https://doi.org/10.1890/09-1090.1
  12. Rice, A. H., Emanuel, W. R., & Shugart, H. H. (2010). Modeling carbon and methane fluxes in tropical wetland ecosystems: impacts of tree size and structure. Biogeochemistry, 103, 217–234
  13. Novita, Nisa. 2016. “Title: Carbon Stocks and Soil Greenhouse Gas Emissions Associated with Forest Conversion to Oil Palm Plantations in Tanjung Puting Tropical Peatlands, Indonesia.”
  14. Novita, Nisa., Gangga, A., Asyhari, A., Putra, C. A. S., Ritonga, R. P., Oktarita, S., & Yeo, S. (2023). Protocol for Measuring Soil Greenhouse Gas, Yayasan Konservasi Alam Nusantara, Indonesia, Hal 32-33
  15. Pangala, Sunitha R., Alex Enrich-Prast, Luana S. Basso, Roberta Bittencourt Peixoto, David Bastviken, Edward R.C. Hornibrook, Luciana V. Gatti, et al. 2017. “Large Emissions from Floodplain Trees Close the Amazon Methane Budget.” Nature 552 (7684): 230–34. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24639
  16. Pangala, Sunitha R., Sam Moore, Edward R.C. Hornibrook, and Vincent Gauci. 2013. “Trees Are Major Conduits for Methane Egress from Tropical Forested Wetlands.” New Phytologist 197 (2): 524–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12031
  17. Pangala, S. R., Enrich-Prast, A., Billett, M. F., & Gauci, V. (2015). Large emissions from floodplain trees close the Amazon methane budget. Nature, 526(7574), 595–598. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14948
  18. Pihlatie, M., Pumpanen, J., Rinne, J., Ilvesniemi, H., Simojoki, A., Hari, P., Vesala, T., & Heinonsalo, J. (2010). Stem CH₄ fluxes of boreal trees. Biogeosciences, 7(6), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-187-2010
  19. Sjögersten, S., Siegenthaler, A., Lopez, O. R., Aplin, P., Turner, B., & Gauci, V. (2020). Methane emissions from tree stems in neotropical peatlands. New Phytologist, 225(2), 769–781. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16178
  20. Teskey, Robert O., An Saveyn, Kathy Steppe, and Mary Anne McGuire. 2008. “Origin, Fate and Significance of CO2 in Tree Stems.” New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02286.x
  21. van Haren, J., Brewer, P. E., Kurtzberg, L., Wehr, R. N., Springer, V. L., Espinoza, R. T., Ruiz, J. S., & Cadillo-Quiroz, H. (2021). A versatile gas flux chamber reveals high tree stem CH4 emissions in Amazonian peatland. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108504
  22. Warner DL, Guevara M, Inamdar S, Vargas R. 2019. Upscaling soil-atmosphere CO2 and CH4 fluxes across a topographically complex forested landscape. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 264: 80–91

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-07-18 02:55:24

No citation recorded.