Green Brand Products in Small and Medium Batik Industries with Pls-Sem Approach

*Naili Farida  -  Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Apriatni Endang Prihartini  -  Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Ngatno Ngatno  -  Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Published: 23 Dec 2019.
Open Access
Citation Format:
This study examines Regiocentric Image Capabilities and Market Penetration on Green
Products and the effect of Green Products on Marketing Performance. The sample in this study
were 58 entrepreneurs of Small and Medium Batik Industries, who used natural colouring. The
sampling technique used was purposive sampling, and the analysis technique used was PLS-
SEM. The study found that Regiocentric Image Capabilities and Market Penetration significantly
influence the Green Products, and it has a significant effect on Marketing Performance.
Moreover, Green Brand Image does not influence a significant increase in Marketing
Performance. These results indicated that Regiocentric Image Capabilities can enhance the
capability of green product innovation with environmentally friendly natural colouring. The
product is also supported by a broad market penetration capability. Furthermore, Green Brand
Image on batik colouring products has no significant effect on marketing performance. The focus
on green products appears so that the SMIs can increase marketing of environmentally friendly
batik products.
Keywords: Marketing Performance; Green Brand Products; Market Capabilities; Green Brand Image; Innovation

Article Metrics:

  1. Aaker, D. (1992). The Value Brand Equity. Journal of Bussiness Strategy, 13(4): 27-32 (doi: 10.1108/eb039503),[Online]
  2. Chen, J.-K., & Chen, I. S. (2008). Grey Relation Analysis for Leisure Service Industry Reputation Measurement. Business Renaissance Quarterly, 3(1): 77-96, [Online]. Retrieved from cluster=11223129114236731246&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&as_vis=1
  3. Cooper, R. G. (1994). Perspective third-generation new product processes. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11 (1): 3-14 (doi: 10.1016/0737-6782(94)90115-5),[Online]
  4. Cretu, A. E., & Brodie, R. J. (2007). The influence of brand image and company reputation where manufacturers market to small firms: A customer value perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 36 (2): 230-240 (doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.08.013),[Online]
  5. Henard, D. H., & Szymanski, D. M. (2001). Why Some New Products Are More Successful Than Others. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(3):362-375 (doi: 10.1509/jmkr.38.3.362.18861),[Online]
  6. Padgett, D., & Allen, D. (1997). Communicating experiences: A narrative approach to creating service brand image. Journal of Advertising, 26 (4): 49-62 (doi: 10.1080/00913367.1997.10673535),[Online]
  7. Schriber, S., & Löwstedt, J. (2015). Tangible resources and the development of organizational capabilities. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 13(1):54-68 (doi: 10.1016/j.scaman.2014.05.003),[Online]
  8. Siddiqi, M. N. (1984). Issues in Islamic Banking (Islamic Economics Series 4), Middle East Studies Association Bulletin, 18 (2): 223-225, [Online]. Retrieved from [Accessed December 25, 2018]
  9. Tseng, S. M. (2014). The impact of knowledge management capabilities and supplier relationship management on corporate performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 54 (August 2014): 39-48 (doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.04.009),[Online]

Last update: 2021-03-02 10:40:11

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2021-03-02 10:39:58

No citation recorded.