skip to main content

Indonesia’s Climate Change Policies: Under the Tug of Domestic and International Influences

*Dani Mochtar Isnaini  -  Master of Public Policy, Faculty of Arts, Monash University, Australia

Citation Format:
Abstract

Paris Agreement with its ‘bottom-up’ approach is an attempt to address climate change problem. The Parties of the Paris Agreement decide their own policies in the national scope and present it as pledges in the form of Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs). I explore the evidence to the shaping of the climate change policies in Indonesia, mainly regarding NDCs and the engagement of actors behind the shaping of that pledge. The main question is which actor or combination of actors in terms of domestic and international interests actually influenced and shaped Indonesia’s NDCs? This article aims to give practical evidence regarding the influences of different positions among competing interests through negotiation. In terms of Indonesia’s policymaking, this study is hoped to foster a viewpoint for the sake of acceptable practices to intensify policymaking preferences. In this literature review Liberal Intergovernmentalism propositions were used in examining the dynamics at the domestic level as well as transnational/regional negotiation and interdependence. I also used multiple sources from other studies and governmental documents in the analysis of this qualitative research. As a result, some evidence were found, showing the influence of domestic actors such as Local and Environmental NGOs, CSOs, public perceptions to certain extent, and insignificant influence of business groups. I also found that the transnational institutions and developed countries have impacts on Indonesia’s CC policy framework, funding provision and the balance between mitigation and adaptation.  

 

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Climate Change; Paris Agreement; NDCs; Policy; Intergovernmentalism

Article Metrics:

  1. Ardhian, D., Adiwibowo, S. and Wahyuni, E. (2016). Peran dan strategi organisasi non pemerintah dalam arena politik lingkungan hidup. Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan, 4(3): 210-216 (doi: 4.10.22500/sodality.v4i3.14429),[Online]
  2. Bruin, K. D., Dellink, R., and Agrawala, S, 2009. “Economic Aspects of Adaptation to Climate Change” [online]. Retrieved from https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/225282538105.pdf [Accessed January 30, 2021]
  3. Climate Action Tracker, 2021. “The Climate Action Tracker” [online]. Retrieved from https://climateactiontracker.org [Accessed January 30, 2021]
  4. Downie, C. and Edward Elgar Publishing. (2014). The politics of climate change negotiations: strategies and variables in prolonged international negotiations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Pub. Ltd
  5. Doyle, M. W. (1986). “Liberalism and World Politics”. The American political science review, 80(4): 1151–1169 (doi: 10.2307/1960861),[Online]
  6. Eden, C., Ackermann, F. (1998). Making strategy the journey of strategic management. London: Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications
  7. Environment Institute (Enviro), 2020. “Biden Extends Green Funding Opportunities in Indonesia” [online]. Retrieved from https://www.enviro.or.id/2020/11/biden-extends-green-funding-opportunities-in-indonesia [Accessed January 9, 2021]
  8. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman
  9. Freeman, R. E. and McVea, J. (2005). “A Stakeholder Approach to Strategic Management”. The Blackwell Handbook of Strategic Management. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 183–201
  10. Fujiwara, Noriko, Van Asselt, Harro, Böβner, Stefan, Voigt, Sebastian, Spyridaki, Niki-Artemis, Flamos, Alexandros, … and Ten Donkelaar, Michael. (2019). The practice of climate change policy evaluations in the European Union and its member states: Results from a meta-analysis. Sustainable Earth, 2(1):1-16 (doi: 10.1186/s42055-019-0015-8),[Online]
  11. Giessen, Lukas, & Sahide, Muhammad Alif K. (2017). “Blocking, attracting, imposing, and aligning: The utility of ASEAN forest and environmental regime policies for strong member states”. Land Use Policy, 67: 13-26 (doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.05.012),[Online]
  12. Hofman, E. and van der Gaast, W. (2019). Enhancing ambition levels in nationally determined contributions—Learning from Technology Needs Assessments. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Energy and environment, 8(1): 311 (doi: 10.1002/wene.311),[Online]
  13. Institute for Essential Service Reform (IESR), 2017. “Indonesia was not affected even though the US withdrew from the Paris Agreement” [online]. Retrieved from https://iesr.or.id/indonesia-tak-terpengaruh-walau-as-mundur-dari-perjanjian-paris-2 [Accessed February 6, 2021]
  14. ISEAS Yusof Ishak institute, 2020. “State of Southeast Asia: 2020 Survey Report” [online]. Retrieved from https://www.iseas.edu.sg/home-page-highlights/state-of-southeast-asia-2020-survey-report [Accessed December 29, 2020]
  15. Iyer, Gokul, Ledna, Catherine, Clarke, Leon, Edmonds, James, McJeon, Haewon, Kyle, Page, and Williams, James H. (2017). Measuring progress from nationally determined contributions to mid-century strategies. Nature Climate Change, 7(12): 871-874 (doi: 10.1038/s41558-017-0005-9),[Online]
  16. Jernnäs, Maria, Nilsson, Jens, Linnér, Björn-Ola, and Duit, Andreas. (2019). Cross-national patterns of governance mechanisms in nationally determined contributions (NDCs) under the Paris Agreement. Climate Policy, 19(10): 1239-1249 (doi: 10.1080/14693062.2019.1662760),[Online]
  17. Jotzo, F. (2018). “Can indonesia lead on climate change?” In ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute (Ed.), Indonesia Rising: The Repositioning of Asia’s Third Giant. Singapore: ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute Singapore: pp. 93–116
  18. Kane, S. and Shogren J, 2000. “Linking adaptation and mitigation in climate change policy”. [online]. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1005688900676 [Accessed January9, 2021]
  19. Kant, I. and Reiss, H. (1991). Kant: political writings 2nd, enl., Cambridge [England], New York: Cambridge University Press
  20. Keohane, R. O. and Nye, J. S. (1987). Power and Interdependence revisited. International organization, 41(4): 725–753 (doi: 10.1017/S0020818300027661),[Online]
  21. Keohane, R. O. and Nye, J. S, 1989. “Power and interdependence 2nd ed.” [online]. Retrieved from https://openlibrary.org/books/OL2041658M/Power_and_interdependence [Accessed January 15, 2021]
  22. Lecocq, Franck and Shalizi, Zmarak, 2007. “Balancing Expenditures on Mitigation of and Adaptation to Climate Change: An Exploration of Issues Relevant to Developing Countries” [online]. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=1004841 [Accessed January 15, 2021]
  23. Leinaweaver, J. and Thomson, R. (2021). The Elusive Governance of Climate Change: Nationally Determined Contributions as Commitments and Negotiating Positions. Global Environmental Politics, 21 (2): 73–98 (doi: 10.1162/glep_a_00585),[Online]
  24. Martinus, M, 2020. “ASEAN Smart Cities Network: A Catalyst for Partnerships”. ISEAS Perspective, Issue 2020 No.32 [online]. Retrieved from https://www.iseas.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/ISEAS_Perspective_2020_32.pdf [Accessed January 15, 2021]
  25. Mendelow, A. L., 1981. “Environmental Scanning: The Impact of the Stakeholder Concept”. Proceedings from the Second International Conference on Information Systems, Cambridge, MA. 407-418. Retrieved from https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis1981/20/ [Accessed January 10, 2021]
  26. Ministry of Finance Republic Indonesia (MoF) and Climate Policy Initiative, 2014. “The Landscape of Public Climate Finance in Indonesia” [online]. Retrieved from https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/The-Landscape-of-Public-Finance-in-Indonesia.pdf [Accessed January 9, 2021]
  27. Ministry of Finance Republic Indonesia (MoF) Fiscal Policy Agency, 2019. “Public Finance for Climate Change in Indonesia 2016-2018” [online]. Retrieved from https://www.id.undp.org/content/dam/indonesia/2020/DOCS/INS-ENGLISH-Full-Report-Public-Finance-for-Climate-Change-in-Indonesia-2016-2018_compressed.pdf [Accessed January 9, 2021]
  28. Moravcsik, A. (2020). “Liberal Intergovernmentalism” [online]. Retrieved from https://oxfordre.com/politics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-1065. [Accessed January 31, 2021]
  29. Moravcsik, A. (2003). Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics. International organization, 51(4), 513–553 (doi: 10.1162/002081897550447),[Online]
  30. Moravcsik, A. (1999). A New Statecraft? Supranational Entrepreneurs and International Cooperation. International Organization, 53 (2): 267–306 (doi: 10.1162/002081899550887),[Online]
  31. Moravcsik, A. (1993). Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach. Journal of common market studies, 31(4): 473–524 (doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.1993.tb00477.x),[Online]
  32. Mutiara, Z. Z. (2020). “Climate Budget Tagging: Amplifying Sub-National Government’s Role in Climate Planning and Financing in Indonesia”. In R Djalante et al. (eds.), Climate Change Research, Policy and Actions in Indonesia, New York: Springer International Publishing AG: pp. 265-280
  33. National Council on Climate Change (NCCC) and UNFCCC, 2009. “National Economic, Environment and Development Study (NEEDS) for Climate Change Indonesia Country Study Final report” [online]. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/files/adaptation/application/pdf/indonesianeeds.pdf. [Accessed January 9, 2021]
  34. OhAiseadha, Coilin, Quinn, Gerre, Connolly, Ronan, Connolly, Michael, and Soon, Willie. (2020). Energy and Climate Policy-An Evaluation of Global Climate Change Expenditure 2011-2018. Energies (Basel), 13(18): 4839 (doi: 10.3390/en13184839),[Online]
  35. Pauw, W. P, Castro, P, Pickering, J, and Bhasin, S. (2020). Conditional nationally determined contributions in the Paris Agreement: Foothold for equity or Achilles heel?. Climate Policy, 20(4): 468-484 (doi: 10.1080/14693062.2019.1635874),[Online]
  36. Rembeth, V. (2015). “Indonesian Experiences of Private Sector Involvement. Focus on Partnership”. In: T Izumi and R Shaw (Eds.), Disaster management and private sectors. Tokyo: Springer Japan: 279–299
  37. Resosudarmo, B. P. and Jotzo, F. (2009). Development, resources and environment in eastern Indonesia. In B P Resosudarmo and F Jotzo (Eds.), Working with Nature against Poverty, Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies
  38. Salahuddin, M. (2014). “Challenges for the UNFCCC in Indonesia's Decentralisation”. Indonesia Law Review, 4(1): 1-30 (doi: 10.15742/ilrev.v4n1.72),[Online]
  39. Shimizu, N. and Rocamora, A, 2016. “Analysis of Financial Components of Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs): Lessons for future NDCs, Institute for Global Environmental Strategies” [online]. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep02930. [Accessed February 4, 2021]
  40. Steans, Jill, Pettiford, Lloyd, Diez, Thomas, & El-Anis, Imad. (2010). An Introduction to International Relations Theory. London: Routledge
  41. Sulistiawati, L. Y. (2020). Indonesia’s climate change national determined contributions, a farfetch dream or possible reality? IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science, 423: 120-122 (doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/423/1/012022),[Online]
  42. The Government of Republic of Indonesia, 2016. “First Nationally Determined Contribution” [online]. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/nationally-determined-contributions-ndcs/ [Accessed January 9, 2021]
  43. The Government of Republic of Indonesia. (2007). Disaster Management Law number 24/2007
  44. The Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS), 2020. “Each Country's Share of CO2 Emissions” [online]. Retrieved from https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/each-countrys-share-co2-emissions [Accessed January 19, 2021]
  45. Torstad, V., Saelen, H. and Boyum, L. S. (2020). The domestic politics of international climate commitments: which factors explain cross-country variation in NDCs ambition?. Environmental research letters, 15(2): 24021 (doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab63e0),[Online]
  46. Uitto, J. I., Puri, J. and van den Berg, R. D. (2017). Evaluating Climate Change Action for Sustainable Development 1st ed. 2017. New York: Springer International Publishing
  47. UN, 2020. “100 Billion climate finance report” [online]. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/100_billion_climate_finance_report.pdf [Accessed January 19, 2021]
  48. UNDP, 2017. “Guidance Note UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (SES) Stakeholder Engagement” [online]. Retrieved from http://www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/library/corporate/Social-and-Environmental-Policies-and-Procedures/UNDPs-Social-and-Environmental-Standards-ENGLISH.pdf [Accessed January 9, 2021]
  49. UNDP, 2014. “Methodological guidebook: climate public expenditure and institutional review (CPEIR)” [online]. Retrieved from https://www.undp.org/content/dam/rbap/docs/Research%20and%20Publications/democratic_governance/RBAP-DG-2015-CPEIR-Methodological-Guidebook.pdf [Accessed January 11, 2021]
  50. UNEP, 2020. “Emissions Gap Report 2020” [online]. Retrieved from https://www.unep.org/emissions-gap-report-2020. [Accessed January 11, 2021]
  51. UNFCCC, 2015. “The Paris Agreement” [online]. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/the-paris-agreement [Accessed January 11, 2021]
  52. UNFCCC, 2020. “Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs)” [online]. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/nationally-determined-contributions-ndcs/ [Accessed January 11, 2021]
  53. UNFCCC, 2021. “Admitted NGOs” [online]. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/process/parties-non-party-stakeholders/non-party-stakeholders/admitted-ngos/list-of-admitted-ngos. [Accessed January 20, 2021]
  54. UNFCCC, 2014. “UNFCCC Standing Committee on Finance: 2014 Biennial Assessment and Overview of Climate Finance Flows” [online]. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/topics/climate-finance/resources/biennial-assessment-of-climate-finance. [Accessed January 11, 2021]
  55. Vener, J., Fransen, K., and Levin, J. B. (2019). “Scaling Up Ambition: Leveraging Nationally Determined Contributions and Long-Term Strategies to Achieve the Paris Agreement Goals”. Working Paper. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute
  56. Windyswara, D, 2019. “Alasan pemerintah indonesia meratifikasi paris climate agreement tahun 2016” [online]. Retrieved from ejournal.hi.fisip-unmul.ac.id [Accessed January 9, 2021]
  57. World Economic Forum, 2019. “Global Risks Report 2019” [online]. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-risks-report-2019 [Accessed January 11, 2021]
  58. Xunzhang Pan, Jie Tao and Hailin Wang (2018). Comparing and evaluating the nationally determined contributions of the top six emitters under the Paris Agreement goals. Zhongguo ren kou, zi yuan yu huan jing., 16(3): 211–219 (doi: 10.1080/10042857.2018.1510079),[Online]

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.