DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jis.1.2.2021.185-208

Innovation Capability Models to Improve the Competitiveness of Creative Industrial Products

*Naili Farida  -  Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Ari Pradhanawati  -  Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Mochamad Taufiq  -  Doctoral Program in Social Science, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

This study aims to build a model of innovation capability to increase the competitiveness of embroidery products in Jepara. The respondents in this study were 132 owners of embroidery SMEs. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling and the analysis technique employed Partial Least Square (PLS). Research results show a variety of knowledge, i.e., customer orientation has significant positive effect on innovation capability. Customer orientation and innovation capability significantly affect marketing performance, but competitive finance has no significant effect on marketing performance. In addition, the competitiveness of embroidery products is still low, so there is no impact on marketing performance. The competitive advantage of the product must be unique to the competitors’ embroidery products that have not been able to improve the competitiveness of their embroidery products.

 

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Knowledge Sharing; Competitive Advantage; Marketing Performance; Embroidery SMEs

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
Locality and Implementation of Human Rights City Innovation Capability Models to Improve the Competitiveness of Creative Industrial Products Accessibility of Voters with Disabilities in General Elections More recent articles
Most cited articles
Peran Indonesia Dalam Memerangi Terorisme ECONOMIC RESILIENCE PADA INDUSTRI KREATIF GUNAMENGHADAPI GLOBALISASI DALAM RANGKA KETAHANAN NASIONAL More cited articles
  1. Aarikka-Stenroos, L., & Jaakkola, E. (2010). Value co-creation within buyer-seller relationships in knowledge-intensive business services. In the 26th IMP-conference: Budapest, Hungary [Online]. Retrieved from https://www.impgroup.org/paper_view.php?viewPaper=7487 [Accessed April 4, 2021]
  2. Agrawal, D. K. (2012). Demand Chain Management: Factors Enhancing Market Responsiveness Capabilities. Journal of Marketing Channels. 19(2): 101-119 (doi: 10.1080/1046669X.2012.667760),[Online]
  3. Al-Khaffaf, M. M., & Abdellatif, H. J. (2011). The Effect of Information and Communication Technology on Customer Relationship Management. International Journal of Customer Relationship Marketing and Management. 12(4) (doi.org: 10.4018/jcrmm.2011100105), [Online]
  4. Ardichvili, A., Maurer, M., Li, W., Wentling, T., & Stuedemann, R. (2006). Cultural influences on knowledge sharing through online communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management. 10(1):94-107. (doi: 10.1108/13673270610650139),[Online]
  5. Ardyan, E. (2016). Market Sensing Capability and SMEs Performance: The Mediating Role of Product Innovativeness Success. Dlsu Business & Economics Review, 25(2): 79-97 [Online]. Retrieved from https://www.dlsu.edu.ph/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/6ardyan-021116.pdf. [Accessed April 14, 2021]
  6. Bajada, C., & Schneider, F. (2005). The shadow economies of the Asia-Pacific. Pacific Economic Review. 10(3):379-401. (doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0106.2005.00280.x),[Online]
  7. Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS) Provinsi Jawa Tengah. (2016). "Provinsi Jawa Tengah Dalam Angka 2016". [Online]. Retrieved from https://jateng.bps.go.id/publication/2016/07/15/e8273586eae1993d1adac969/provinsi-jawa-tengah-dalam-angka-2016.html. [Accessed April 15, 2021]
  8. Cabral, J. de O. (2010). Firms’dynamic capabilities, innovative types and sustainability: A theoretical framework. In XVI International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management: Challenges and Maturity of Production Engineering: competitiveness of enterprises, working conditions, environment. São Carlos
  9. Carmeli, A., & Cohen, A. (2001). Organizational reputation as a source of sustainable competitive advantage and above-normal performance: An empirical test among local authorities in Israel. Public Administration and Management.6(4): 122-165
  10. Chang, Y. C., Chang, H. T., Chi, H. R., Chen, M. H., & Deng, L. L. (2012). How do established firms improve radical innovation performance? the organizational capabilities view. Technovation. 32(s 7–8):441–451 (doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2012.03.001),[Online]
  11. Cummings, J. N. (2004). Work Groups, Structural Diversity, and Knowledge Sharing in a Global Organization. In Management Science. Management Science, 50(3): 352–364 (doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1030.0134),[Online]
  12. Ebrahimi Mehrabani, S., & Shajari, M. (2012). Knowledge Management and Innovation Capacity. Journal of Management Research. 4(2) (doi.org/10.5296/jmr.v4i2.1390), [Online]
  13. Ferreras-Méndez, J. L., Olmos-Peñuela, J., Salas-Vallina, A., & Alegre, J. (2021). Entrepreneurial orientation and new product development performance in SMEs: The mediating role of business model innovation. Technovation. 8(12). (doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102325),[Online]
  14. Fuller, T., & Warren, L. (2006). Entrepreneurship as foresight: A complex social network perspective on organisational foresight. Futures. 38(8): 956-971 (doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2005.12.016),[Online]
  15. Gray, C., & Gonsalves, E. (2002). Organizational Learning and Entrepreneurial Strategy. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation. 3(1) (doi: 10.5367/000000002101299015),[Online]
  16. Grizzle, J. W., Zablah, A. R., Brown, T. J., Mowen, J. C., & Lee, J. M. (2009). Employee Customer Orientation in Context: How the Environment Moderates the Influence of Customer Orientation on Performance Outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology. 94(5):1227-42 (doi: 10.1037/a0016404),[Online]
  17. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis Seventh Edition. Upper Saddle River: Pearson
  18. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis 6th Edition. Upper Saddle River: Pearson
  19. Halawi, L., Aronson, J., & McCarthy, R. (2005). Resource-based view of knowledge management for competitive advantage [Online]. Knowledge Management. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/217179364.pdf [Accessed April 15, 2021]
  20. Kim, S., & Shafi’i, M. (2009). Factor determinants of total factor productivity growth in Malaysian manufacturing industries: A decomposition analysis. Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, 23(1) (doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8411.2009.01222.x),[Online]
  21. Kohli, A., & Jaworski, B. (1999). Market orientation: the construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. In R. Deshpandé (Ed.), Developing a market orientation (pp. 7-44). SAGE Publications (doi: 10.4135/9781452231426.n2),[Online]
  22. Laforet, S. (2011). Brand names on packaging and their impact on purchase preference. Journal of Consumer, 10(1): 18-30 (doi: 10.1002/cb.343),[Online]
  23. Lawler, E. E. III. (2003). Reward Practices and Performance Management System Effectiveness. Organizational Dynamics, 32(4): 396–404. (doi: 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2003.08.007),[Online]
  24. Leonard-Barton, D. (2011). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. In Managing Knowledge Assets, Creativity and Innovation, 13: 111–125 (doi: 10.1142/9789814295505_0002),[Online]
  25. Leonidou, C. N., Leonidou, L. C., Coudounaris, D. N., & Hultman, M. (2013). Value differences as determinants of importers’ perceptions of exporters’ unethical behavior: The impact on relationship quality and performance. International Business Review, 20(1) (doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2012.03.005),[Online]
  26. Lin, H. F. (2007). Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: An empirical study. International Journal of Manpower. 28(3-4): 315-332 (doi: 10.1108/01437720710755272),[Online]
  27. Liu, Y. (2013). Sustainable competitive advantage in turbulent business environments. International Journal of Production Research, 51(10) (doi: 10.1080/00207543.2012.720392),[Online]
  28. Matanda, M. J., & Ndubisi, N. O. (2009). Market orientation, supplier perceived value and business performance of SMEs in a Sub‐Saharan African nation. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 22(4) (doi: 10.1108/17410390910975013),[Online]
  29. Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (1999). The New Challenge to America ’ s Prosperity : Findings from the Innovation Index. In Council on Comptetiveness [Online]. Retrivied from https://www.hbs.edu/ris/Publication%20Files/Downloads_Porter_index1_el_be68d54c-4990-45da-88c0-ee754c99ffdb.pdf [Accessed May 15, 2021]
  30. Rahab, Sulistyandari, & Sudjono. (2011). The development of innovation capability of small medium enterprises through knowledge sharing process: An empirical study of Indonesian creative industry. International Journal of Business and Social Science. 2(21), 112–123 [Online]. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309201461_The_development_of_innovation_capability_of_small_medium_enterprises_through_knowledge_sharing_process_An_empirical_study_of_Indonesian_creative_industry [Accessed May 15, 2021]
  31. Raju, P. S., Lonial, S. C., Gupta, Y. P., & Ziegler, C. (2000). The relationship between market orientation and performance in the hospital industry: a structural equations modeling approach. Health Care Management Science, 3: 237–247 (doi: 10.1023/A:1019061912075),[Online]
  32. Reichert, F. M., & Zawislak, P. A. (2014). Technological capability and firm performance. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 9(4): 20-35 (doi: 0.4067/S0718-27242014000400002),[Online]
  33. Saunila, M., & Ukko, J. (2013). Facilitating innovation capability through performance measurement: A study of Finnish SMEs. Management Research Review, 36(10). (doi: 10.1108/MRR-11-2011-0252),[Online]
  34. Soliman, H. S. (2011). Customer Relationship Management and Its Relationship to the Marketing Performance. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2: 166-182
  35. Schauer, A., Vasconcelos, A. C., & Sen, B. (2015). The Sharink framework: A holistic perspective on key categories of influences shaping individual perceptions of knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 19(4):770-790 (doi: 10.1108/JKM-12-2014-0519,[Online]
  36. Solcansky, M., & Simberova, I. (2010). Measurement of marketing effectiveness. Economics and management, 15: 755-759 [Online]. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/31609744/Measurement_of_Marketing_Effectiveness [Accessed June 7, 2021]
  37. Van Wijk, R., Jansen, J. J. P., & Lyles, M. A. (2008). Inter- and intra-organizational knowledge transfer: A meta-analytic review and assessment of its antecedents and consequences. Journal of Management Studies, 45(4): 830-853. (doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00771.x),[Online]
  38. Wang, Z., & Wang, N. (2012). Knowledge sharing, innovation and firm performance. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(10): 8899-8908 (doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.02.017),[Online]
  39. Westjohn, S. A., Singh, N., & Magnusson, P. (2012). Responsiveness to global and local consumer culture positioning: A personality and collective identity perspective. In Journal of International Marketing, 20(1): 58-73 (doi: 0.1509/jim.10.0154),[Online]
  40. Wheelen, T. L., & David Hunger, J. (2012). Strategic Management and Business Policy Toward Global Sustainability Thirteenth Edition. Boston: Pearson
  41. Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2003). Knowledge-based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium-sized businesses. Strategic Management Journal, 24(13): 1307-1314 (doi: 10.1002/smj.360),[Online]
  42. Wonglimpiyarat, J. (2010). Innovation index and the innovative capacity of nations. Futures, 42(3): 247-253 (doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2009.11.010),[Online]

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-04-24 23:54:25

No citation recorded.