skip to main content

Co-Creation of Public Service Innovation for Marginalized Groups in The Underdeveloped Regions

*Nova Yulanda Putri Sipahutar  -  National Research and Innovation Agency of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia
Metha Claudia Agatha Silitonga  -  National Research and Innovation Agency of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia
Tyas Wahyu Fadhila  -  National Institute of Public Administration of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia
Rahayu Eka Putri  -  National Institute of Public Administration of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia
Yosefina Itu  -  Academy of Community Development St. Ursula, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

Marginalized groups in underdeveloped regions still experience difficulties accessing public services. Co-creation of public service innovation is urgent to solve limited resources for providing public services to marginalized groups. This article aims to describe and analyze the type, influential actors, and influential factors of the co-creation of public service innovation for marginalized groups. This study applied a qualitative descriptive method with the research locus in the local governments of North Lombok Regency, Tojo Una-Una Regency, and Sorong Regency. Data were collected using in-depth interviews and FGD. North Lombok Regency was considered to have the most varied actors since they involved farmers group, trainers, non-governmental organizations, and the private sector to support the local government in co-initiating, co-designing, and co-implementing their innovations. Meanwhile, the Local Government of Tojo Una-Una Regency and Sorong Regency only involved the community in designing and implementing innovations. Further, the results of this study show that influential factors from several perspectives. From the government’s perspective, the local governments did not reflect the risk-averse but have shown an open attitude to co-creation. From the citizens’ perspective, concerns about the economic and health conditions of the marginalized people around them were their main motivation to participate in providing public services. Local governments should broaden the participation of actors to accelerate the target achievement.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Co-Creation; Public Service Innovation; Underdeveloped Regions; Marginalized Groups

Article Metrics:

  1. Agudelo-Suárez, A., Gil-González, D., Ronda-Pérez, E., Porthé, V., Paramio-Pérez, G., García, A. M., & Garí, A. (2009). Discrimination, work and health in immigrant populations in Spain. Social Science and Medicine, 68(10), 1866–1874 (doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.02.046),[Online]
  2. Alves, H. (2013). Co-creation and innovation in public services. Service Industries Journal, 33(7–8), 671–682 (doi: 10.1080/02642069.2013.740468),[Online]
  3. Andrews, R., & Brewer, G. A. (2013). Social Capital, Management Capacity and Public Service Performance. Public Management Review, 15(1), 19–42 (doi: 10.1080/14719037.2012.662445),[Online]
  4. BAPPENAS. (2008). Improving Local Government Planning for Enhanced Poverty Reduction Cases from Central Java, South Sumatra and East Nusa Tenggara. Retrieved from http://p3b.bappenas.go.id [Accessed July 21, 2021]
  5. Beal, T., Tumilowicz, A., Sutrisna, A., Izwardy, D., & Neufeld, L. M. (2018). A review of child stunting determinants in Indonesia. In Maternal and Child Nutrition (Vol. 14, Issue 4). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. (doi: 10.1111/mcn.12617),[Online]
  6. Bentzen, T., Øllgaard, ;, Sørensen, E. ;, & Torfing, J. (2020). Strengthening public service production, administrative problemsolving, and political leadership through co-creation of innovative public value outcomes? The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 21(1). [Online]. Retrieved from https://www.innovation.cc/scholarly-style/2020_25_1_4_sorensen-torfing_psc-problem- [Accessed July 27, 2021]
  7. Bommert, B. (2010). COLLABORATIVE INNOVATION IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR. In International Public Management Review · electronic Journal (Vol. 11, Issue 1). [Online]. Retrieved from http://www.ipmr.net [Accessed July 27, 2021]
  8. Bonnell, K., Michalovic, E., Koch, J., Pagé, V., Ramsay, J., Gainforth, H. L., Lamontagne, M. E., & Sweet, S. N. (2021). Physical activity for individuals living with a physical disability in Quebec: Issues and opportunities of access. Disability and Health Journal, 14(3). (doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2021.101089),[Online]
  9. BPS. (2022). Statistik Indonesia 2022. [Online]. Retrieved from https://www.bps.go.id/publication/2022/02/25/0a2afea4fab72a5d052cb315/statistik-indonesia-2022.html [Accessed July 21, 2022]
  10. BPS Lombok Utara. (2020). Kabupaten Lombok Utara Dalam Angka Tahun 2020. [Online]. Retrieved from https://lombokutarakab.bps.go.id/publication.html [Accessed July 21, 2022]
  11. BPS NTB. (2021). Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat Dalam Angka Tahun 2020. [Online]. Retrieved from https://ntb.bps.go.id/publication/2020/04/27/aa55eda38b5104eafb5cf8b5/provinsi-nusa-tenggara-barat-dalam-angka-2020.html [Accessed July 21, 2022]
  12. Castro-Arce, K., & Vanclay, F. (2020). Transformative social innovation for sustainable rural development: An analytical framework to assist community-based initiatives. Journal of Rural Studies, 74, 45–54 (doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.11.010),[Online]
  13. de Vries, H., Bekkers, V. J. J. M., & Tummers, L. G. (2015). Innovation in the Public Sector: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda. SSRN Electronic Journal (doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2638618),[Online]
  14. Dinas Kesehatan Provinsi Papua Barat. (2018). Profil Kesehatan Papua Barat Tahun 2018. [Online]. Retrieved from https://dinkes.papuabaratprov.go.id/assets/files/Profil_Kesehatan_Papua_Barat_Tahun_2018.pdf [Accessed July 21, 2022]
  15. Dinas Kesehatan Provinsi Sulawesi Tengah. (2020). Profil Kesehatan Provinsi Sulawesi Tengah Tahun 2020. [Online]. Retrieved from http://dinkes.sultengprov.go.id [Accessed July 21, 2022]
  16. Gatzweiler, F. W., Baumüller, H., Ladenburger, C., & von Braun, J. (2011). Marginality: Addressing the Root Causes of Extreme Poverty Working Paper Series 77 ZEF. [Online]. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2235654https://ssrn.com/abstract=2235654 [Accessed July 23, 2022]
  17. Gouillart, F., & Hallett, T. (2015). Co-Creation in Government. [Online]. Retrieved from www.ssireview.org [Accessed July 21, 2022]
  18. Heidelberg, R. L. (2017). Political Accountability and Spaces of Contestation. Administration and Society, 49(10): 1379–1402 ( doi: 10.1177/00953997155810330),[Online]
  19. Jagtap, S. (2021). Co-design with marginalised people: designers’ perceptions of barriers and enablers. CoDesign (doi: 10.1080/15710882.2021.1883065),[Online]
  20. Janssen, M., & van der Voort, H. (2016). Adaptive governance: Towards a stable, accountable and responsive government. In Government Information Quarterly (Vol. 33, Issue 1, pp. 1–5). Elsevier Ltd. (doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2016.02.003),[Online]
  21. Jia, H., Sai, X., Su, Y., & Huang, Y. (2022). Measurement and Decomposition of the Health Poverty of Rural Residents in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19). (doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912876),[Online]
  22. Joshi, A., & Moore, M. (2004). Institutionalised co-production: Unorthodox public service delivery in challenging environments. Journal of Development Studies, 40(4), 31–49 (doi: 10.1080/00220380410001673184),[Online]
  23. Kumar, A. (2019). Citizen-centric model of governmental entrepreneurship: Transforming public service management for the empowerment of marginalized women. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 13(1): 62–75 (doi: 10.1108/TG-03-2018-0023),[Online]
  24. Laksono, A. D., & Wulandari, R. D. (2022). The barrier to maternity care in rural Indonesia. Journal of Public Health (Germany), 30(1), 135–140. (doi: 10.1007/s10389-020-01274-3),[Online]
  25. Lotz, N., Thomas, B., Fernández Cárdenas, J. M., Reynaga Peña, C., Díaz de León Lastras, A., Cortes Capetillo, A., ... & Hayhoe, S. (2020). Co-creating FabLab La Campana: Empowering a marginalised community in the North of Mexico. In Design Revolutions: IASDR 2019 Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1). Manchester Metropolitan University, [Online]
  26. Madon, S., & Krishna, S. (2022). Theorizing community health governance for strengthening primary healthcare in LMICs. Health Policy and Planning, 37(6): 706–716 (doi: 10.1093/heapol/czac002),[Online]
  27. Meričkova, B. M., Nemec, J., & Svidronova, M. (2015). Co-creation in local public services delivery innovation: Slovak experience. Lex Localis, 13(3): 521–535, (doi: 10.4335/13.3.521-535(2015),[Online]
  28. Mulgan Geoff, & Albury David. (2003). Innovation in The Public Sector. [Online]. Retrieved from http://www.sba.oakland.edu/FACULTY/MATHIESON/MIS524/RESOURCES/READINGS/INNOVATION/INNOVATION_IN_THE_PUBLIC_SECTOR.PDF [Accessed July 23, 2022]
  29. Mureddu, F., & Osimo, D. (2020). Co-creation of public services-Why and How?. Revue Européenne d’Économie et Management des Services, 2020(9), 177-200. [Online]. Retrieved from http://www.co-val.eu [Accesed July 27, 2022]
  30. OMBUDSMAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA. (2019). POTRET PENGAWASAN PELAYANAN PUBLIK DI DAERAH DAN KELOMPOK MARJINAL. OMBUDSMAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA. [Online]. Retrieved from https://www.ombudsman.go.id/produk/listview/15?c=38 [Accessed July 23, 2022)
  31. Pelc, S. (2017). Marginality and Marginalization. In Perspectives on Geographical Marginality (Vol. 2, pp. 13–28). Springer Nature. (doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-50998-3_2),[Online]
  32. Pestoff, V. (2012). Co-production and Third Sector Social Services in Europe: Some Concepts and Evidence. 23(4), 1102–1118. (doi: 10.1007/s),[Online]
  33. Rheinländer, T., Samuelsen, H., Dalsgaard, A., & Konradsen, F. (2010). Hygiene and sanitation among ethnic minorities in Northern Vietnam: Does government promotion match community priorities? Social Science and Medicine, 71(5), 994–1001. (doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.06.014),[Online]
  34. United Nations. (2008). People Matter Civic Engagement in Public Governance World Public Sector Report 2008. [Online]. Retrieved from https://desapublications.un.org/file/640/download [Accesed July 27, 2022]
  35. Vigoda, E. (2002). From Responsiveness to Collaboration: Governance, Citizens, and the Next Generation of Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 62(5), 527–540. (doi: 10.1111/1540-6210.002350),[Online]
  36. Vijeyarasa, R. (2010). The State, the family and language of “social evils”: Re-stigmatising victims of trafficking in Vietnam. Culture, Health and Sexuality, 12(SUPPL. 1), 89–102 (doi: 10.1080/13691050903359257),[Online]
  37. Hippel, E. V. (2007). Horizontal innovation networks - By and for users. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(2), 293–315. (doi: 10.1093/icc/dtm005),[Online]
  38. Voorberg, W., Bekkers, V. J. J. M., & Tummers, L. G. (2014). Co-creation in social innovation: comparative case-study on the influential factors and outcomes of co-creationcreation in social innovation: A comparative case-study on the influential factors and outcomes of co-creation Ottowa: IRSPM. [Online]. Retrieved from hdl.handle.net/1765/51069 [Accessed July 21, 2022]
  39. Wise, S., Paton, R. A., & Gegenhuber, T. (2012). Value co-creation through collective intelligence in the public sector: A review of US and European initiatives. VINE, 42(2), 251–276 (doi: 10.1108/03055721211227273),[Online]
  40. Yin, X., Coles, R., & Chen, J. (2022). “Let’s Bring Innovation into the Bottom of the Pyramid Together”: Introducing the Anti-Poverty Innovation Approach (pp. 13–36) (doi: 10.1142/9789811248870_0002),[Online]

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-12-29 00:55:08

No citation recorded.