DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jis.23.1.2024.64-79

Regional Integration and The Myanmar Crisis: Navigating The Delicate Balance Between Human Rights and Non-Interference Policy In ASEAN

Aniello Iannone  -  Faculty Social of Political Science, Universitas Airlangga, Italy
Vatanya Konchanan  -  Faculty of Political Science, Chulalongkorn university, Thailand
*Bangkit A. Wiryawan  -  Faculty Social of Political Science, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

Southeast Asian countries are currently grappling with a significant rise in authoritarianism within the region. In this context, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) is expected to play a pivotal role in safeguarding peace and prosperity throughout the region. However, the Myanmar crisis has exposed a deep fracture within ASEAN. The stability and tranquillity that have characterised at some times the ASEAN region are now severely threatened. The full-scale civil war in Myanmar, which originated from the coup d'état in 2021 following a protracted period of internal strife and the marginalisation of the Rohingya population, is not an isolated incident. Instances of conflict and coup d'états persist across ASEAN. For example, the 2014 coup in Thailand, the chronic crackdown in Cambodia and Vietnam, the tensions around the South China Sea, and the growing separatist movement in Papua illustrate the volatile policy landscape within ASEAN. This work's main objective is to address whether ASEAN should consider reforming its mechanisms, with particular attention to its no-interference policy. This paper relies on desk-based research, entailing a thorough review and analysis of the literature on ASEAN's political history. The study employs a critical literature review approach with a historical perspective on regionalism within ASEAN. By utilising the advanced constructivist theory concerning the concept of norms, this article analyses the repercussions of steadfastly adhering to certain norms, explicitly focusing on the principle of non-interference.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Regional integtration; Myanmar crisis, international relations, ASEAN policy

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
Examining of E-readiness in the Local Government toward Smart City A Study from Balangan Regency Regional Integration and The Myanmar Crisis: Navigating The Delicate Balance Between Human Rights and Non-Interference Policy In ASEAN Policy Incoherence and Reactive Approaches: Barriers to Effective Management of Land Subsidence in Semarang City, Indonesia More recent articles
Most cited articles
ECONOMIC RESILIENCE PADA INDUSTRI KREATIF GUNAMENGHADAPI GLOBALISASI DALAM RANGKA KETAHANAN NASIONAL Peran Indonesia Dalam Memerangi Terorisme More cited articles
  1. Severin, Werner J. and James W. Tankard, Jr. (1988). Communication Theories: Origins, Methods, Uses (2th ed.). New York: Longman Inc
  2. Folkerts, Jean. (1981).“William Allen White: Press, Power and Party Politics”. Disertation
  3. Kansas University
  4. Hanura, Marten, 2018, Assessing Indonesia-Russia Foreign Policy during Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono Administration, Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Vol. 17, No. 1, January - June: 1- 20
  5. Acharya, A. (1997). Ideas, identity, and institution building: from the ASEAN way to the Asia-Pacific way? The Pacific Review, 10(3), 319–346
  6. Acharya, A. (2001). Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the Problem of Regional Order. London: Routledge
  7. Acharya, A. (2005). Do norms and identity matter? Community and power in Southeast Asia’s regional order. The Pacific Review, 18(1), 95–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512740500047199
  8. Acharya, A., & Stubbs, R. (2006). Theorizing Southeast Asian Relations: an introduction. The Pacific Review, 19(2), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512740500473106
  9. Badgley, J. H. (1969). Two Styles of Military Rule: Thailand and Burma. Government and Opposition, 4(1), 100–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.1969.tb00799.x
  10. Bellamy, A. J., & Drummond, C. (2011). The responsibility to protect in Southeast Asia: between non-interference and sovereignty as responsibility. The Pacific Review, 24(2), 179–200. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2011.560958
  11. Bhattacharyay, B. N. (2010). Infrastructure for ASEAN Connectivity and Integration. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 27(2), 200. https://doi.org/10.1355/ae27-2d
  12. Busse, N. (1999). Constructivism and Southeast Asian security. The Pacific Review, 12(1), 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512749908719277
  13. Chng, M. K. (1990). ASEAN’s Institutional Structure and Economic Co-operation. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 6(3), 268–282. https://doi.org/10.1355/AE6-3B
  14. Chongkittavorn, K., & Anwar, A. (n.d.). Strengthening US Relations with ASEAN: A Critical Element of the US Indo-Pacific Strategy. East-West Center
  15. Davies, M. (2013). ASEAN and human rights norms: constructivism, rational choice, and the action-identity gap. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 13(2), 207–231. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lct002
  16. Emmers, R. (2018). Unpacking ASEAN Neutrality: The Quest for Autonomy and Impartiality in Southeast Asia. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 40(3), 349–370. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs40-3a
  17. Farrelly, N., & Simpson, A. (2023). Déjà Vu All Over Again: The 2021 Coup in Historical Perspective. In Myanmar Politics, Economy and Society. Routledge
  18. Haacke, J. (2002). Seeking Influence: China’s Diplomacy Toward ASEAN After the Asian Crisis. Asian Perspective, 26(4), 13–52. https://doi.org/10.1353/apr.2002.0002
  19. Hew, D., & Soesastro, H. (2003). Realizing the ASEAN Economic Community by 2020: ISEAS and ASEAN ISIS Approaches. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 20(3), 292–296. https://doi.org/10.1355/AE20-3H
  20. Hopt, T. (1998). The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. International Security, 23(1), 171–200
  21. Ian, H. (2011). Burma Redux: Global Justice and the Quest for Political Reform in Myanmar
  22. Jones, L. (2010). ASEAN’s unchanged melody? The theory and practice of ‘non-interference’ in Southeast Asia. E-International Relations, 23(4), 479–502
  23. Katanyuu, R. (2006). Beyond Non-Interference in ASEAN: The Association’s Role in Myanmar’s National Reconciliation and Democratization. Asian Survey, 46(6), 825–845. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2006.46.6.825
  24. Khoo, N. (2015). The ASEAN Security Community: A Misplaced Consensus. Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, 2(2), 180–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347797015586126
  25. Leifer, M. (1980). Conflict and regional order in Southeast Asia. ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute Singapore
  26. Leifer, M. (1992). ‘Is ASEAN a security organization? In The ASEAN Reader, Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies
  27. Leifer, M. (2000). Regional solutions to regional problems? In Towards Recovery in Pacific Asia. Routledge
  28. Mohd, A. A. H. (n.d.). ASEAN must end Myanmar crisis. Harakah Daily. http://www.harakahdaily.net/index.php/headline-english/35100-asean-must-end-myanmar-crisis
  29. Molthof, M. (2012). ASEAN and the Principle of Non-Interference. International Relations, 7
  30. Narine, S. (2002). Explaining ASEAN: Regionalism in Southeast Asia. Boulder: Lynne Rienner
  31. Nesaduri, H. E. S. (2009). ASEAN and regional governance after the Cold War: from regional order to regional community? The Pacific Review, 22(1), 91–118
  32. Noel, M. M. (2014). Ensuring responsibility while implementing under Article 4(h) intervention. In Dan Kuwali and Frans Viljoen, Eds., Africa and the responsibility to protect: Article 4(h) of the African union constitutive act (pp. 317–318). London: Routledge
  33. Othman, M. F., & Othman, Z. (2010). The principle of non-interference in ASEAN: Can Malaysia spearhead the effort towards a more interventionist ASEAN (pp. 35-62). Institute of Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad's Thought (IPDM), Universiti Utara Malaysia
  34. Pedersen, M. (2023). Democracy and Human Rights under Military Rule: Three Iterations of Myanmar’s National Security State. In Myanmar: Politics, Economy and Society (pp. 75–90). Routledge
  35. Petcharamesree, S. (2015). ASEAN and its approach to forced migration issues. The International Journal of Human Rights, 20(2), 173–190. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2015.1079021
  36. Ramcharan, R. (2000). ASEAN and Non-interference: A Principle Maintained. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 22(1), 60–88
  37. Secretary-General United Nations. (2023). Situation of human rights of Rohingya Muslims and other minorities in Myanmar (A78278). https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N23/230/62/PDF/N2323062.pdf?OpenElement
  38. Special Advisory Council for Myanmar. (n.d.). Briefing Paper: Effective Control in Myanmar - Special Advisory Council for Myanmar. Retrieved 11 March 2024, from https://specialadvisorycouncil.org/2022/09/statement-briefing-effective-control-myanmar/
  39. Stubbs, R. (2008). The ASEAN alternative? Ideas, institutions and the challenge to ‘global’ governance. The Pacific Review, 21(4), 451–468
  40. Suzuki, S. (2019). Why is ASEAN not intrusive? Non-interference meets state strength. Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies, 8(2), 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/24761028.2019.1681652
  41. Tan, S. S. (2006). Rescuing constructivism from the constructivists: a critical reading of constructivist interventions in Southeast Asian security. The Pacific Review, 19(2), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512740500473288
  42. Thompson, D., & Chong, B. (n.d.). Built for Trust, Not for Conflict: ASEAN Faces the Future. 29
  43. Vatikiotis, M. R. J. (1999). ASEAN 10: The Political and Cultural Dimensions of Southeast Asian Unity. Asian Journal of Social Science, 27(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1163/030382499X00200
  44. Weatherbee, D. E. (2019). ASEAN's half century: a political history of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. Rowman & Littlefield
  45. Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization, 46(2), 391–425
  46. Wendt, A. (1995). Constructing International Politics. International Security, 20(1), 71–81
  47. Win Ko Ko Latt, & Maung Thin Tone. (2015). Only four ethnic armed groups sign peace commitment. Mizzima. https://reliefweb.int/report/myanmar/only-four-ethnic-armed-groups-sign-peace-commitment

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-11-19 15:48:00

No citation recorded.