BibTex Citation Data :
@article{JIS74851, author = {Tomi Setiawan and Jayum Jawan and Shifwah Nashifa}, title = {Algorithmic tyranny and artificial intelligence totalitarianism in digital society: A critical perspective}, journal = {Jurnal Ilmu Sosial}, volume = {24}, number = {2}, year = {2026}, keywords = {Algorithmic tyranny; totalitarianism 2.0; artificial intelligence; digital society}, abstract = { The dominance of algorithms in the social, economic, and political life of the 21st century has created unprecedented structural dependencies, with complex socio-political implications. This research aims to uncover the mechanisms of algorithmic tyranny in social governance, analyze the transformation of AI into a totalitarian tool, and formulate a democratic oversight framework based on cross-national empirical findings. The study uses a critical-realist paradigm with post-qualitative methods, combining reverse engineering of controversial AI systems with critical analysis of over 40 reputable journals and books, and 14 policy documents (2015–2025). A rhizomatic analysis approach is used to explore the multidimensional nature of algorithmic power beyond hierarchical structures. Validity was established through catalytic validity to ensure epistemological and social impact. The research findings reveal regulatory differences across countries: the European Union leads in transparency but hinders innovation, while the US dominates with risks of fragmentation and minimal accountability. China uses AI for social control, and Singapore adopts a pro-business hybrid model. Algorithmic tyranny emerges in recommendation systems that create filter bubbles while judicial algorithms exhibit racial bias. Additionally, there is a totalitarian threat in the use of AI for mass surveillance and political deepfakes, meeting the criteria for “totalitarianism 2.0”. This study concludes with a novelty emancipatory concept to challenge algorithmic tyranny, through the instruments of an ”Algorithm Constitutionalism” and a ”Right to Algorithmic Explanation”. The policy recommendations emphasize the need for a global alliance to balance innovation with the protection of human rights in the algorithmic realm. }, issn = {2548-4893}, pages = {409--430} doi = {10.14710/jis.24.2.2025.409-430}, url = {https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/ilmusos/article/view/74851} }
Refworks Citation Data :
The dominance of algorithms in the social, economic, and political life of the 21st century has created unprecedented structural dependencies, with complex socio-political implications. This research aims to uncover the mechanisms of algorithmic tyranny in social governance, analyze the transformation of AI into a totalitarian tool, and formulate a democratic oversight framework based on cross-national empirical findings. The study uses a critical-realist paradigm with post-qualitative methods, combining reverse engineering of controversial AI systems with critical analysis of over 40 reputable journals and books, and 14 policy documents (2015–2025). A rhizomatic analysis approach is used to explore the multidimensional nature of algorithmic power beyond hierarchical structures. Validity was established through catalytic validity to ensure epistemological and social impact. The research findings reveal regulatory differences across countries: the European Union leads in transparency but hinders innovation, while the US dominates with risks of fragmentation and minimal accountability. China uses AI for social control, and Singapore adopts a pro-business hybrid model. Algorithmic tyranny emerges in recommendation systems that create filter bubbles while judicial algorithms exhibit racial bias. Additionally, there is a totalitarian threat in the use of AI for mass surveillance and political deepfakes, meeting the criteria for “totalitarianism 2.0”. This study concludes with a novelty emancipatory concept to challenge algorithmic tyranny, through the instruments of an ”Algorithm Constitutionalism” and a ”Right to Algorithmic Explanation”. The policy recommendations emphasize the need for a global alliance to balance innovation with the protection of human rights in the algorithmic realm.
Article Metrics:
Last update:
Last update: 2026-07-12 23:32:56
All open access articles published in Jurnal Ilmu Sosial (JIS) are released under the terms of the CC BY-NC-ND (Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License). This license permits the following:
Readers may share, copy, and redistribute the article in any medium or format, provided that appropriate credit is given to the author(s). The work may not be used for commercial purposes, and no modifications, adaptations, translations, or derivative works are permitted. The article must be distributed in its original form.
Copyright of all published articles is retained by the respective author(s). The authors grant Jurnal Ilmu Sosial (JIS) a non-exclusive license to publish the article and to identify itself as the original publisher. This license also includes the right for the journal to distribute the article as part of its publication, including in printed or electronic formats, for non-commercial dissemination.
Although the restrictions of the CC BY-NC-ND license do not limit the authors’ own rights as copyright holders, by submitting an article to Jurnal Ilmu Sosial (JIS), authors acknowledge and accept that readers and third parties are granted the right to access, read, download, and share the article without alteration and for non-commercial purposes only, in accordance with the terms of the license.
