skip to main content

Anesthetic Choice and Management in Cesarean Section for a Patient with Post Laminectomy and Inferior Stabilization: A Case Report

1Faculty of Medicine, Tarumanagara University, Jakarta, Indonesia

2K.M.R.T Wongsonegoro Hospital, Semarang, Indonesia

Received: 8 Mar 2024; Revised: 3 May 2024; Accepted: 28 May 2024; Available online: 9 Jul 2024.
Open Access Copyright 2021 JAI (Jurnal Anestesiologi Indonesia)

Citation Format:
Cover Image
Abstract
Background: Deciding the choice of anesthetic choice and management for a cesarean section is a relatively complex procedure. In this case report we examine a patient undergoing cesarean section who has a significant history of laminectomy with inferior stabilization, the complexities of the patient's conditions may influenced the choice of anesthetic strategy.

Case: A 29-year-old female patient undergoing a cesarean section with a complex medical history, including two previous cesarean sections and a laminectomy with inferior stabilization, presenting unique challenges in obstetric and anesthetic care. The patient was admitted to K.M.R.T Wongsonegoro Hospital, Semarang, at 40 weeks of gestation, with symptoms of intense abdominal tightening, active fetal movement, and bloody mucus. Her medical history was further complicated by a laminectomy with inferior stabilization performed in 2019.

Discussion: Laminectomy and inferior stabilization is one of the choice treatments for bone tuberculosis. Laminectomy is a surgery that creates space by removing bone spurs and tissues associated with spondylosis of the spine and adding Inferior stabilization to maintain the space. In our patient with complex post-laminectomy and lumbar inferior stabilization, it caused anatomical and neurological changes in the patient. The patient was going to have a cesarean section because the time is nearly expected to be the delivery date of her third pregnancy. Because of the complex background of her past laminectomy surgery, we decided to use the general anesthesia technique for this cesarean section.

Conclusion: In this case report we can reaffirm that this case contributes to the medical community's understanding of managing cesarean sections in patients with previous spinal surgeries and underscores the need for evolving clinical guidelines and practices in obstetric anesthesia to enhance patient care and safety. The case is a valuable addition to the literature, providing insights for healthcare professionals in similar complex scenarios.

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download |  common.other
Case Reports
Subject
Type Other
  Download (249KB)    Indexing metadata
Keywords: anesthesia; cesarean section; general anesthesia; inferior stabilization; laminectomy

Article Metrics:

  1. Ring L, Landau R, Delgado C. The Current Role of General Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery. Curr Anesthesiol Rep. 2021;11(1):18–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40140-021-00437-6
  2. Ghaffari S, Dehghanpisheh L, Tavakkoli F, Mahmoudi H. The Effect of Spinal versus General Anesthesia on Quality of Life in Women Undergoing Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request. Cureus. 2018;10(12). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.3715
  3. Emadi SA, Gholipour A, Khademloo M, Abotorabi M, Hassanzadeh F. Evaluating patient’s choice of general and spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section and associated factors : a descriptive study. 2023; DOI: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000000010
  4. Lertkovit S, Nivatpumin P. Anesthetic management of cesarean delivery of parturient with systemic lupus erythematous associated with pilmonary arterial hypertension - A case report. 2022; DOI: https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.21123
  5. Sung TY, Jee YS, You HJ, Cho CK. Comparison of the effect of general and spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section on maternal and fetal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study. 2021; DOI: 10.14744/nci.2023.25593
  6. Adhikari KM, Lakhe G, Adhikari AS. Cesarean Sections under General Anesthesia at a Tertiary Care Center in Western Nepal: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study. 2019;DOI: https://doi.org/10.31729/jnma.4724
  7. Wiskott K, Jebrin R, Loscovich D, Granovsky SG, Tevet A, Shatalin D, et al. General Versus Regional Anesthesia for Emergency Cesarean Delivery in a High-volume High-resource Referral Center: A Rettrospective Cohort Study. 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rjaic-2020-0012
  8. Al-Husban N, Elmuhtaseb MS, Al-Husban H, Nabhan M, Abuhalaweh H, Al E. Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: Retrospective Comparative Study. 2021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S292434
  9. Choi SU. General anesthesia for cesarean section: are we doing it well:2022.DOI: https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.22196
  10. Stanisic DM. Comparison of Post-cesarean Pain Perception of General Versus Regional Anesthesia, a Single Center Study. 2023; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59010044
  11. Sekerak R, Mostafa E, Morris MT, Nessim A, Vira A, Sharan A. Comparative outcome analysis of spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia in lumbar fusion surgery. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021;13:122–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2020.11.017
  12. Ahmed Jonayed S, Alam MS, Al Mamun Choudhury A, Akter S, Chakraborty S. Efficacy, safety, and reliability of surgery on the lumbar spine under general versus spinal anesthesia- an analysis of 64 cases. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021;16:176–81.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2020.12.032
  13. Marzuki MS, Hayati F. Pengaruh Tindakan Spinal Anestesi Terhadap Kadar Gula Darah Pada Pasien Operasi Sectio Caesarea Di Rumah Sakit Pertamedika Ummi Rosnati Banda Aceh. J Sains Ris. 2021;11(2):417–25. DOI: 10.47647/jsr.v10i12
  14. Tawfeeq NA, Hilal F, Alharbi NM, Alowid F, Al E. The Prevalence of Acceptance Between General Anesthesia and Spinal Anesthesia Among Pregnant Women Undergoing Elective Caesarean Sections in Saudi Arabia. 2023; DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.44972
  15. Novakovic SS, Cuk S, Malusic Z, Sandic D, A; E. Accidental Awareness Under General Anesthesia During Cesarean Section: An Observational Study. 2023;DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.37118
  16. Park JI, Park SH, Kang MS, Kang GW, Kim ST. Evaluation of changes in anesthetic methods for cesarean delivery: an analysis for 5 years using the big data of the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service. 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.20021
  17. Ren YL, Ma YS. Anesthesia management for cesarean section in a pregnant woman with odontogenic infection: A case report. 2022; DOI: https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i14.4563
  18. Endalew M, Endalew N, Agegnehu A, Mekonnen Z, Teshome D. Knowledge and attitude towards anesthesia for cesarean section and its associated factors among pregnant women attending antenatal care: A cross sectional study. 2022; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103299
  19. Liu G, Zhao J, Yuan L, Shi F, Zhang L. Spinal anesthesia for L5-S1 interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy: a retrospective study. 2023;DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06956-z
  20. Hunie M, Fenta E, Kibret S, Teshome D. The Current Practice of Spinal Anesthesia in Anesthetists at a Comprehensive Specialized Hospital: A Single Center Observational Study. 20221; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S300054
  21. Hussain T, Ghosh I, Gerber C, Basu A, Tiwari M. Post-partum paraplegia following spinal anaesthesia: a report of two rare cases. 2023; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jscr/rjad081

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-11-23 09:48:43

No citation recorded.