1Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara/Adam Malik Hospital, Medan, Indonesia
2Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara/Adam Malik Hospital, Medan, Indonesia
BibTex Citation Data :
@article{JAI83599, author = {Sherwin Sherwin and Rr Sinta Irina and Andriamuri Lubis}, title = {Comparison of the Effects of Continuous Infusion of Fentanyl 0.7 mcg/kgBW/hour versus Lidocaine 1.5 mg/kgBW/hour on Post-Anesthesia Recovery Quality Using QoR-40 Scoring in Laparotomy Surgery}, journal = {JAI (Jurnal Anestesiologi Indonesia)}, volume = {0}, number = {0}, year = {2021}, keywords = {: fentanyl; general anesthesia; laparotomy; lidocaine; postoperative recovery; QoR-40}, abstract = { Background: Postoperative recovery quality is a critical measure of anesthetic effectiveness, particularly in major surgeries such as laparotomy. Both fentanyl and lidocaine are used in multimodal analgesia, but their comparative efficacy on recovery quality remains underexplored. Objectives: To evaluate and compare the impact of continuous intravenous infusions of fentanyl as well as lidocaine on the quality of postoperative recovery in laparotomy patients undergoing general anesthesia, utilizing the quality of recovery-40 (QoR-40) score as the evaluation instrument. Methods: This double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) included 40 patients undergoing laparotomy at Adam Malik Hospital, Medan. Subjects were randomly allocated to receive either fentanyl (0.7 mcg/kg/h) or lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg/h) infusion postoperatively. QoR-40 scores were assessed 24 hours post-surgery. Pain scores and rescue analgesia requirements were also evaluated. Results: Subjects in the fentanyl group had substantially higher QoR-40 scores (173.35 ± 41.764) than those in the lidocaine group (148.95 ± 25.362; p = 0.0001). Fentanyl was superior in comfort and pain control. Rescue analgesia was needed less frequently and later in the fentanyl group (p = 0.0001). Conclusion: Fentanyl infusion substantially improved postoperative recovery quality more effectively than lidocaine in patients undergoing laparotomy, particularly in pain management and comfort. }, issn = {2089-970X}, doi = {10.14710/jai.v0i0.83599}, url = {https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/janesti/article/view/83599} }
Refworks Citation Data :
Background: Postoperative recovery quality is a critical measure of anesthetic effectiveness, particularly in major surgeries such as laparotomy. Both fentanyl and lidocaine are used in multimodal analgesia, but their comparative efficacy on recovery quality remains underexplored.
Objectives: To evaluate and compare the impact of continuous intravenous infusions of fentanyl as well as lidocaine on the quality of postoperative recovery in laparotomy patients undergoing general anesthesia, utilizing the quality of recovery-40 (QoR-40) score as the evaluation instrument.
Methods: This double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) included 40 patients undergoing laparotomy at Adam Malik Hospital, Medan. Subjects were randomly allocated to receive either fentanyl (0.7 mcg/kg/h) or lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg/h) infusion postoperatively. QoR-40 scores were assessed 24 hours post-surgery. Pain scores and rescue analgesia requirements were also evaluated.
Results: Subjects in the fentanyl group had substantially higher QoR-40 scores (173.35 ± 41.764) than those in the lidocaine group (148.95 ± 25.362; p = 0.0001). Fentanyl was superior in comfort and pain control. Rescue analgesia was needed less frequently and later in the fentanyl group (p = 0.0001).
Conclusion: Fentanyl infusion substantially improved postoperative recovery quality more effectively than lidocaine in patients undergoing laparotomy, particularly in pain management and comfort.
Note: This article has supplementary file(s).
Article Metrics:
Last update:
Last update: 2026-06-09 03:32:18
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to JAI (Jurnal Anestesiologi Indonesia) and Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University as publisher of the journal. Copyright encompasses exclusive rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.
JAI (Jurnal Anestesiologi Indonesia) and Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University and the Editors make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in JAI (Jurnal Anestesiologi Indonesia) are the sole and exclusive responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.
The Copyright Transfer Form can be downloaded here:[Copyright Transfer Form JAI]. The copyright form should be signed originally and send to the Editorial Office in the form of original mail, scanned document:
Mochamat (Editor-in-Chief)
Editorial Office of JAI (Jurnal Anestesiologi Indonesia)
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University/ Dr. Kariadi General Hospital Medical Center (RSUP Dr. Kariadi)
Jl. Dr. Soetomo No. 16 Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, 50231
Telp. : (024) 8444346
Email : janestesiologi@gmail.com
View My Stats
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License