DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jati.19.3.142-154

MODEL REGRESI LOGISTIK PENCIPTAAN PROTOTIPE SEBAGAI LUARAN AKTIVITAS LITBANG INDUSTRI

*Shiddiq Sugiono  -  Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional, Indonesia
Dimas Hardy Purnomo  -  Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional, Indonesia
Dindha Fadhilah Dinati  -  Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

Persaingan ketat di sektor Industri telah memaksa setiap perusahaan untuk berinovasi pada produknya. Sebagai salah satu hasil penelitian dan pengembangan di sektor industri, prototipe memainkan peran untuk mendukung terciptanya inovasi produk. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk memodelkan dampak belanja, jumlah personil, skema jenis kerjasama litbang dan skala industri terhadap status penciptaan prototipe dalam lingkup industri. Analisis dilakukan pada data hasil Survei Litbang Industri Indonesia tahun 2021 melalui regresi logistik. Adapun regresi yang dilakukan menggunakan stepwise untuk menghasilkan model dengan variabel yang memiliki tingkat signifikansi terbaik. Hasil penelitian menyebutkan bahwa jumlah personil litbang, skala industri, kerjasama SDM dengan institusi asing dan kerjasama pendanaan dengan pemerintah pusat menjadi faktor yang signifikan dalam menghasilkan luaran prototipe. Industri skala menengah cenderung lebih banyak menghasilkan prototipe jika dibandingkan skala besar. Adapun kerjasama pendanaan dari Pemerintah Pusat merupakan aspek yang memiliki signifikansi paling tinggi dalam mempengaruhi luaran prototipe. Investasi SDM litbang yang kompeten bisa menjadi solusi untuk mengantisipasi kecilnya nilai odds ratio pada variabel jumlah SDM litbang. Selain itu, otoritas yang berwenang perlu terus meningkatkan ekosistem pendanaan riset industri yang lebih baik.

 

[Logistic Regression Model of Prototype Creation as an Output of Industrial R&D Activities] Intense competition has forced every company to innovate its products. As one of the research and development outputs in the industrial sector, prototypes play a role to support the creation of product innovation. The purpose of this study is to model the impact of expenditure, number of personnel, type of R&D cooperation scheme and industry scale on the status of prototype creation in the industrial scope. The analysis was carried out on the data from the Indonesian Industrial R&D Survey 2021 through logistic regression. The regression was carried out using stepwise to produce the best model. The results stated that the number of R&D personnel, industry scale, HR cooperation with foreign institutions and funding cooperation with the central government were significant factors in producing prototype output. Medium-scale industries tend to produce more prototypes than large-scale ones. Funding cooperation from the central government is the aspect that has the highest significance in influencing prototype output. Investment in competent R&D human resources can be a solution to anticipate the small value of the odds ratio on the variable number of R&D human resources. In addition, the competent authority needs to continue to improve a better industrial research funding ecosystem.

Keywords: industrial R&D; prototypes; R&D expenditure; R&D personnel; R&D cooperation; R&D resources

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: belanja litbang; kerjasama litbang; litbang industri; prototipe; personil litbang; sumber daya litbang

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Articles
Language : ID
Recent articles
MODEL REGRESI LOGISTIK PENCIPTAAN PROTOTIPE SEBAGAI LUARAN AKTIVITAS LITBANG INDUSTRI ILO-PATRIS AS AN ALTERNATIVE INSTRUMENT TO OBSERVE THE WORKING CONDITIONS OF A SMALL FOOD-PRODUCING BUSINESS THE INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF TASKS AND USER EXPERIENCE LEVELS ON HUMAN-COMPUTER TRUST IN THE CHATGPT APPLICATION MINIMIZING PATIENT LENGTH OF STAY IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT AT ANNA MEDIKA GENERAL HOSPITAL, MADURA More recent articles
Most cited articles
PERANCANGAN PEMENUHAN PERMINTAAN PASOKAN GULA RAFINASI DENGAN METODE WAGNER WHITIN ANALISIS TINGKAT KEPENTINGAN ATRIBUT PERPUSTAKAAN BERBASIS RISET MELALUI METODE CONJOINT ANALYSIS STUDI KASUS DI UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO IDENTIFIKASI KEPENTINGAN RELATIF KONSUMEN TERHADAP ROBOT REHABILITASI PASIEN PASCA STROKE DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN CONJOINT ANALYSIS INDUSTRI 4.0: TELAAH KLASIFIKASI ASPEK DAN ARAH PERKEMBANGAN RISET MODEL PEMILIHAN BAHAN PEWARNA ALAM COKLAT BATIK TULIS SOLO DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP) More cited articles
  1. Antonio García-Sánchez, David Siles, & María de Mar Vázquez-Méndez. (2018). Innovation, Competitiveness and Prosperity: A Factor Analysis of Innovation Indicators in Spain. Management Studies, 6(5). https://doi.org/10.17265/2328-2185/2018.05.006
  2. Baker, M. R., Steins, N. A., Pastoors, M. A., Neuenfeldt, S., de Boer, A., Haasnoot, D., Madsen, S., Muller, J., Post, K., Sparrevohn, C. R., & van der Meij, M. (2023). A new era for science-industry research collaboration – a view towards the future. In Frontiers in Marine Science (Vol. 10). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.1144181
  3. Baleeiro Passos, J., Valle Enrique, D., Costa Dutra, C., & Schwengber ten Caten, C. (2023). University industry collaboration process: a systematic review of literature. In International Journal of Innovation Science (Vol. 15, Issue 3, pp. 479–506). Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-11-2021-0216
  4. Berawi, M. A., Suwartha, N., Asvial, M., Harwahyu, R., Suryanegara, M., Setiawan, E. A., Surjandari, I., Zagloel, T. Y. M., & Maknun, I. J. (2020). Digital Innovation: Creating Competitive Advantages. International Journal of Technology, 11(6), 1076–1080. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v11i6.4581
  5. Chang, Y. W. (2014). Exploring scientific articles contributed by industries in Taiwan. Scientometrics, 99(2), 599–613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1222-2
  6. Dai, D., Fan, Y., Wang, G., & Xie, J. (2022). Digital Economy, R&D Investment, and Regional Green Innovation—Analysis Based on Provincial Panel Data in China. Sustainability, 14(11), 6508. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116508
  7. Das, R. C. (2020). Interplays among R&D spending, patent and income growth: new empirical evidence from the panel of countries and groups. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-020-00130-8
  8. Dimov, D., & Taneva, N. (2019). The R&D personnel – a key competitive factor for the innovative enterprises in Bulgaria. July. https://doi.org/10.3846/cibmee.2019.088
  9. Draper, N. R., & Smith, H. (1998). Applied regression analysis (Third ed.). Wiley
  10. Fajrin, J. (2018). Kerjasama Pengembangan Teknologi Bangunan Tradisional: Peluang dan Tantangan Penerapan Teknologi Kayu Laminasi untuk Revitalisasi Bangunan Tradisional; Studi kasus pada bangunan tradisional di NTB
  11. Hendayana, Y., Suryana, Ahman, E., & Mulyadi, H. (2019). The Effect of Innovation on Business Competitiveness of Small and Medium Enterprise in Indonesia. 100(Icoi), 116–120. https://doi.org/10.2991/icoi-19.2019.21
  12. Hosmer, D. W., & Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied Logistic Regression - Hosmer. John Wiley & Sons, Inc
  13. Jacob, B. A., & Lefgren, L. (2011). The impact of research grant funding on scientific productivity. Journal of Public Economics, 95(9–10), 1168–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.05.005
  14. Jin, S., & Lee, K. (2020). The government R&D funding and management performance: The mediating effect of technology innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040094
  15. Khuan, H., Andriani, E., & Rukmana, A. Y. (2023). The Role of Technology in Fostering Innovation and Growth in Start-up Businesses. West Science Journal Economic and Entrepreneurship, 1(08), 348–357
  16. Lauff, C. A., Kotys-Schwartz, D., & Rentschler, M. E. (2018). What is a prototype? what are the roles of prototypes in companies? Journal of Mechanical Design, Transactions of the ASME, 140(6). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4039340
  17. Li, H., & Hu, B. (2014). Study on Efficiency Optimization of R&D Resources Allocation in Shanghai. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 04(05), 217–222. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2014.45029
  18. Loukil, K. (2018). The Impact of R&D Collaboration on Technological Innovation in European Countries. Academic Journal of Economic Studies, 4(4), 34–41
  19. Magistretti, S., Dell’Era, C., Verganti, R., & Bianchi, M. (2022). The contribution of Design Thinking to the R of R&D in technological innovation. R and D Management, 52(1), 108–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12478
  20. Martias, L. D. (2021). Statistika Deskriptif Sebagai Kumpulan Informasi. Fihris: Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan Dan Informasi, 16(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.14421/fhrs.2021.161.40-59
  21. Mulugeta, T. (2021). Impacts of R&D Expenditures On Firms’ Innovation and Financial Performance: A Panel Data Evidence from Ethiopian Firms
  22. Namusonge, M., Muathe, S., & Kiveu, M. N. (2019). Effect of innovation on firm competitiveness: the case of manufacturing SMEs in Nairobi County, Kenya. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 18(3), 307. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijbir.2019.10019560
  23. Nelson, J., Berlin, A., Menold, J., & Parkinson, M. (2020). The role of digital prototyping tools in learning factories. Procedia Manufacturing, 45(2019), 528–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.073
  24. OECD. (2015). Frascati Manual 2015 The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities
  25. OECD. (2022). OECD Business Innovation Indicators: Highlights (Issue April). https://www.oecd.org/innovation/inno/innovation-indicators-2021-highlights.pdf
  26. Patwary, A. K., & Fauzan, F. (2020). The Impact of Human, Structural, and Relational Capital on Product Development Performance in Manufacturing Organizations in Indonesia: Mediating Role of Organizational Learning Capabilities and R&D Resources. IRASD Journal of Management, 2(2), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.52131/jom.2020.0202.0017
  27. Pegkas, P., Staikouras, C., & Tsamadias, C. (2019). Does research and development expenditure impact innovation? Evidence from the European Union countries. Journal of Policy Modeling, 41(5), 1005–1025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2019.07.001
  28. Prokop, V., Stejskal, J., Klimova, V., & Zitek, V. (2021). The role of foreign technologies and R&D in innovation processes within catching-up CEE countries. PLoS ONE, 16(4 April 2021), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250307
  29. Pusat Data dan Informasi BRIN. (2022). Hasil Survei Litbang Sektor Industri Tahun 2021. RIN Dataverse
  30. Roberts, D. L., Palmer, R., & Hughes, M. (2022). Innovating the product innovation process to enable co-creation. R and D Management, 52(3), 484–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12492
  31. Sharma, C. (2019). Effects of R&D and foreign technology transfer on productivity and innovation: an enterprises-level evidence from Bangladesh. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 27(1), 46–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2019.1597634
  32. Shi, J., & Xiao, Z. (2024). Research on the Impact of Inter-Industry Innovation Networks on Collaborative Innovation Performance: A Case Study of Strategic Emerging Industries. Systems, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12060211
  33. Stawasz, E. (2019). Factors that Shape the Competitiveness of Small Innovative Companies Operating in Internatioonal Markets with a Particular Focus on Business Advice. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 15(1), 61–82. https://doi.org/10.7341/20191513
  34. Su, Y. S., Zheng, Z. X., & Chen, J. (2018). A multi-platform collaboration innovation ecosystem: the case of China. Management Decision, 56(1), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-04-2017-0386
  35. Tajaddini, R., & Gholipour, H. F. (2021). Economic policy uncertainty, R&D expenditures and innovation outputs. Journal of Economic Studies, 48(2), 413–427. https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-12-2019-0573
  36. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia. (2019). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2019 tentang Sistem Nasional Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2019 Nomor 148
  37. WIPO. (2021). Global Innovation Index. https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/analysis-indicator/
  38. World Bank. (2022). Gross expenditure on R&D (GERD). https://tcdata360.worldbank.org/indicators/5b985527?country=IDN&indicator=40353&viz=line_chart&years=2013,2020
  39. Wu, J., Harrigan, K. R., Ang, S. H., & Wu, Z. (2019). The impact of imitation strategy and R&D resources on incremental and radical innovation: evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms. Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(1), 210–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9621-9
  40. Wulandari, A., Faruk, F. M., Doven, F. S., & Budyanra, B. (2020). Penerapan Metode Regresi Logistik Biner Untuk Mengetahui Determinan Kesiapsiagaan Rumah Tangga Dalam Menghadapi Bencana Alam. Seminar Nasional Official Statistics, 2019(1), 379–389. https://doi.org/10.34123/semnasoffstat.v2019i1.146
  41. Yi, S., Rabnawaz, M., Jalal, W., & Zeb, A. (2023). The Nexus between Foreign Competition and Buying Innovation: Evidence from China’s High-Technology Industry. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511756
  42. Zhou, X. B., Wei, W., Jang, C. L., & Chang, C. P. (2019). The impacts of government R&D expenditure on innovation in chinese provinces: what’s the role of corruption. Buletin Ekonomi Moneter Dan Perbankan, 21(3), 409–430. https://doi.org/10.21098/BEMP.V21I3.977

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-12-23 09:55:57

No citation recorded.