skip to main content

Analisis Faktor Paparan dan Faktor Lingkungan Tempat Tinggal dengan Kejadian Infeksi Tuberkulosis Laten (Studi pada Keluarga Pasien Tuberkulosis Aktif di Kota Semarang - Jawa Tengah)

Poltekkes Kemenkes Tanjungkarang, Jl. Soekarno-Hatta No.6 Bandar Lampung 35142, Indonesia

Open Access Copyright 2024 Jurnal Kesehatan Lingkungan Indonesia under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Latar belakang : Tuberkolusis merupakan salah satu penyakit infeksi menular yang masih menjadi permasalahan serius di negara-negara berkembang dan terbelakang, termasuk Indonesia. Diperkirakan 25% populasi penduduk dunia telah terinfeksi Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb), sebanyak 10% diantaranya berkembang menjadi penyakit aktif, dan sisanya (90%) akan mempertahankan diri dalam bentuk tuberkulosis laten. Antara 5-10% infeksi tuberkolusis laten akan berkembang menjadi tuberkolusis aktif. Hal ini berarti infeksi tuberkolusis laten menjadi kantung dan sumber utama kejadian dan penularan tuberkulosis aktif dimasa mendatang. Anggota keluarga serumah dengan penderita tuberkulosis aktif berisiko mengalami kejadian infeksi tuberkulosis laten. Studi ini bertujuan menganalisis hubungan faktor paparan dan faktor lingkungan tempat tinggal dengan kejadian infeksi tuberkulosis laten pada anggota keluarga serumah dengan penderita tuberkulosis aktif.

Metode : Studi ini merupakan studi analitik kuantitatif menggunakan rancangan cross sectional. Sejumlah 138 subjek studi dari 241 anggota keluarga 112 indeks kasus tuberkulosis aktif berpartisipasi dalam studi ini. Subjek studi dilakukan Tuberculin Skin Test (TST). Subjek studi dinyatakan positif mengalami infeksi tuberkulosis laten jika hasil TST didapatkan indurasi ≥10 mm. Variabel faktor paparan dan faktor lingkungan tempat tinggal dikumpulkan dengan teknik wawancara, pengamatan dan pengukuran menggunakan alat ukur kuesioner, checklist dan alat ukur lainnya. Analisis data penelitian dilakukan secara bivariat menggunakan uji chi-square dan secara multivariat dengan uji regresi logistik ganda. Hasil analisis variabel dinyatakan mempunyai hubungan bermakna jika memperoleh nilai-p<0,05.

Hasil : Sebanyak 63,8% anggota keluarga serumah penderita tuberkulosis aktif mengalami kejadian infeksi tuberkulosis laten. Berdasarkan analisis bivariat (uji chi square) ditemukan ada 3 (tiga) variabel yang mempunyai hubungan bermakna dengan kejadian infeksi tuberkulosis laten yaitu variabel jenis paparan (nilai-p=0,027), variabel lama waktu paparan (nilai-p=0,041) dan varianel kepadatan ruang tidur (nilai-p=0,001). Hasil analisis multivariat dengan uji regresi logistik ganda diketahui bahwa variabel yang berhubungan bermakna dengan kejadian TB laten adalah lama waktu paparan (nilai-p=0,023; aOR=3,72; 95%CI=1,19–11,58) dan kepadatan ruang tidur (nilai-p<0,001; aOR=3,89; 95%CI=1,82–8,33).

Simpulan : Kejadian infeksi tuberkulosis laten pada anggota keluarga serumah dengan penderita tuberkulosis aktif menunjukkan angka yang relatif tinggi. Secara simultan variabel yang mempunyai hubungan bermakna dengan kejadian infeksi tuberkulosis laten pada anggota keluarga serumah dengan penderita tuberkulosis aktif adalah variabel lama waktu paparan dan variabel kepadatan ruang tidur. Variabel kepadatan ruang tidur merupakan variabel yang paling dominan berhubungan dengan kejadian infeksi tuberkulosis laten setelah disesuaikan oleh variabel lama waktu paparan. 

 

ABSTRACT

Title: Analysis of Exposure Factors and Residential Environmental Factors with The Incidence of Latent Tuberculosis Infection (Study on families of active tuberculosis patients in Semarang City - Central Java)

Background: Tuberculosis is a contagious infectious disease that is still a serious problem in developing and underdeveloped countries, including Indonesia. It is estimated that 25% of the world's population has been infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb), 10% of which develop active disease, and the remainder (90%) will persist in the form of latent tuberculosis. Between 5-10% of latent tuberculosis infections will develop into active tuberculosis. This means that latent tuberculosis infection will become the main source of occurrence and transmission of active tuberculosis in the future. Family members living in a household with active tuberculosis sufferers are at risk of experiencing latent tuberculosis infection. This study aims to analyze the relationship between exposure factors and environmental factors of residence with the incidence of latent tuberculosis infection in family members living in the same house as active tuberculosis sufferers.

Methods: This study is a quantitative analytical study using a cross-sectional design. 138 study subjects from 241 family members and 112 index cases of active tuberculosis participated in this study. Study subjects underwent a Tuberculin Skin Test (TST). Study subjects were declared positive for latent tuberculosis infection if the TST results showed an induration of ≥10 mm. Exposure factor variables and residential environmental factors were collected using interview techniques, observation, and measurement using questionnaires, checklists, and other measuring tools. Research data analysis was carried out bivariate using the chi-square test and multivariate using the multiple logistic regression test. The results of the variable analysis are declared to have a significant relationship if they obtain a p-value <0.05.

Results: As many as 63.8% of family members living in a household with active tuberculosis experienced latent tuberculosis infection. Based on bivariate analysis (chi-square test), it was found that 3 (three) variables had a significant relationship with the incidence of latent tuberculosis infection, namely the type of exposure variable (p-value = 0.027), the length of exposure variable (p-value = 0.041) and the density variant. bedroom (p-value=0.001). The results of multivariate analysis with multiple logistic regression tests showed that the variables significantly associated with the incidence of latent TB were the length of exposure (p-value=0.023; aOR=3.72; 95%CI=1.19–11.58) and room density. sleep (p-value<0.001; aOR=3.89; 95%CI=1.82–8.33).

Conclusion: The incidence of latent tuberculosis infection in family members sharing a household with active tuberculosis sufferers shows a relatively high rate. Simultaneously, the variables that have a significant relationship with the incidence of latent tuberculosis infection in family members living in the same house as active tuberculosis sufferers are the length of exposure variable and the bedroom density variable. The bedroom density variable is the most dominant variable associated with the incidence of latent tuberculosis infection after adjusting for the length of exposure variable.

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download |  common.other
EC
Subject
Type Other
  Download (165KB)    Indexing metadata
 Turnitin
Turnitin
Subject
Type Turnitin
  Download (2MB)    Indexing metadata
 CTA
Copyrigh Transfer Agreement
Subject
Type CTA
  Download (391KB)    Indexing metadata
 ES
Etichal Statement
Subject
Type ES
  Download (460KB)    Indexing metadata
Keywords: Infeksi Tuberkulosis Laten; Faktor Paparan; Faktor Lingkungan Tempat Tinggal
Funding: Penelitian Kementerian Kesehatan RI melalui Badan PPSDM Kesehatan RI Jakarta

Article Metrics:

  1. WHO. Global tuberculosis report 2019. Geneva : WHO, 2019, 3 p. Genewa: WHO; 2019
  2. WHO. Global tuberculosis report 2020. Geneva : WHO, 2020, xiii p. Geneva: WHO; 2020
  3. Maceda EB, Goncalves CM, Andrews JR, et al. Serum vitamin D levels and risk of prevalent tuberculosis , incident tuberculosis and tuberculin skin test conversion among prisoners. Sci Rep. 2018;8(997):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19589-3
  4. Rode AK, Kongsbak M, Hansen MM, et al. Vitamin D counteracts mycobacterium tuberculosis-induced cathelicidin downregulation in dendritic cells and allows Th1 differentiation and IFNγ secretion. Front Immunol. 2017;8(656):1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.00656
  5. Hur YG, Stolinska PG, Smith AB, et al. Combination of cytokine responses indicative of latent TB and active TB in Malawian adults. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079742
  6. Shea KM, Kammerer JS, Winston CA, Navin TR, Horsburgh CR. Estimated Rate of Reactivation of Latent Tuberculosis Infection in the United States , Overall and by Population Subgroup. Am J Epidemiol. 2014;179(2):216–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwt246
  7. Osman SA, Saeed WSE, Musa AM, et al. Prevalence of Latent Tuberculosis Infection ( LTBI ) among House Hold Contacts of Sudanese Patients with Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Eastern Sudan : Revisiting the Tuberculin Skin Test. J Tuberc Res. 2017;5:69–76. https://doi.org/10.4236/jtr.2017.51007
  8. Sargentini V, Mariotti S, Carrara S, et al. Cytometric detection of antigen-specific IFN-γ and IL-2 secreting cells in the diagnosis of tuberculosis. BMC Infect Dis. 2009;9(99):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-9-99
  9. Ahmad S. Pathogenesis, immunology, and diagnosis of latent mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Clin Dev Immunol. 2011;2011(814943):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/814943
  10. Kiazyk S, Ball TB. Latent tuberculosis infection: an overview. Canada Commun Dis Rep. 2017;43(3/4):62–6. https://doi.org/10.14745/ccdr.v43i34a01
  11. World Health Organisation. End TB Strategy. In: WHO. Genewa; 2014. p. 1689–99
  12. Kementerian Kesehatan RI. Profil kesehatan Indonesia Tahun 2019. Jakarta : Kementerian Kesehatan RI, 2020, 153 p. Jakarta: Kementerian Kesehatan RI;
  13. Dinas Kesehatan Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Profil Kesehatan Provinsi Jawa Tengah Tahun 2019. Semarang : Dinas Kesehatan Provinsi Jawa Tengah, 2020, 85 p
  14. Dinas Kesehatan Kota Semarang. Analisis situasi program P2TBC Kota Semarang Tahun 2018. Semarang : Dinas Kesehatan Kota Semarang, 2019, 3-12 p
  15. Dinas Kesehatan Kota Semarang. Analisis situasi program P2TBC Kota Semarang Tahun 2019. Semarang : Dinas Kesehatan Kota Semarang, 2020, 12-27 p
  16. Indreswari SA, Suharyo. Diagnosis dini tuberkulosis pada kontak serumah dengan penderita tuberkulosis paru melalui deteksi kadar IFN-γ. J Kesehat Masy Nas. 2014;9(1):32–8. https://doi.org/10.21109/kesmas.v9i1.453
  17. Reichler MR, Khan A, Sterling TR, et al. Risk and timing of tuberculosis among close contacts of persons with infectious tuberculosis. J Infect Dis. 2018;218(6):1000–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiy265
  18. Fox GJ, Barry SE, Britton WJ MG. Contact investigation for tuberculosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir J. 2013;41(1):140–56. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00070812
  19. Eom JS, Kim I, Kim WY, et al. Household tuberculosis contact investigation in a tuberculosis-prevalent country. Medicine (Baltimore) [Internet]. 2018;97(3):1–6. Available from: www.md-journal.com. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000009681
  20. Wijaya VN. Infeksi tuberkulosis laten-diagnosis dan tatalaksana. Cermin Dunia Kedokt [Internet]. 2017;44(10):706–9. Available from: http://103.13.36.125/index.php/CDK/article/view/716
  21. Sharma SK, Vashishtha R, Chauhan LS, et al. Comparison of TST and IGRA in diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection in a high TB-burden setting. PLoS Med. 2017;January(6):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169539
  22. Indreswari SA, Suharyo, . Kadar interferon gamma pada kontak serumah dengan penderita tuberkulosis. J Kesehat Masy Nas. 2012;6(5):212–8. https://doi.org/10.21109/kesmas.v6i5.86
  23. Yap P, Tan KX, Lim WY, et al. Prevalence of and risk factors associated with latent tuberculosis in Singapore : a cross-sectional survey. Int J Infect Dis [Internet]. 2018;72:55–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2018.05.004
  24. Reichler MR, Khan A, Yuan Y, et al. Duration of exposure among close contacts of patients with infectious tuberculosis and risk of latent tuberculosis infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71(7):1627–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciz1044
  25. Jones-lópez EC, Acuña-villaorduña C, Fregona G, et al. Incident mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in household contacts of infectious tuberculosis patients in Brazil. BMC Infect Dis. 2017;17(576):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2675-3
  26. Odera S, Mureithi M, Aballa A, et al. Latent tuberculosis among household contacts of pulmonary tuberculosis cases in Nairobi , Kenya. Pan Afr Med J. 2020;37(87):1–14. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2020.37.87.21102
  27. Nardell EA. Transmission and institutional infection control of tuberculosis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2016;6(a018192):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a018192
  28. Wang PD LR. Tuberculosis transmission in the family. J Infect. 2000;41:249–51. https://doi.org/10.1053/jinf.2000.0736
  29. Chen C, Zhu T, Wang Z, et al. High latent TB infection rate and associated risk factors in the Eastern China of low TB incidence. PLoS One. 2015;1–9. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141511
  30. Faksri K, Reechaipichitkul W, Pimrin W, et al. Transmission and risk factors for latent tuberculosis infections among index case-matches household contacts. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2015;46(3):486–95
  31. Aman AM, Zeidan ZA. Latent tuberculosis infection among household contacts of pulmonary tuberculosis cases in Central State, Sudan: prevalence and associated factors. J Tuberc Res. 2017;05(04):265–75. https://doi.org/10.4236/jtr.2017.54028
  32. Tipayamongkholgul M, Podhipak A, Chearskul S, Sunakorn P. Factors associated with the development of tuberculosis in BCG immunized children. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2005;36(1):145–50
  33. Martinez L, Shen Y, Mupere E, et al. Transmission of mycobacterium tuberculosis in households and the community: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 2017;185(12):1327–39. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwx025
  34. Delogu G, Sali M, Fadda G, et al. The biology of mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2013;5:1–8. https://doi.org/10.4084/mjhid.2013.070

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-10-30 11:06:54

No citation recorded.