DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jkli.23.3.362-373

Evaluasi Sistem Informasi Kesehatan Lingkungan Menggunakan Model CIPP

Jurusan Kesehatan Lingkungan , Poltekkes Kemenkes Semarang, Indonesia

Open Access Copyright 2024 Jurnal Kesehatan Lingkungan Indonesia under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Latar belakang: Capaian sistem informasi kesehatan lingkungan di Kabupaten A meliputi kelengkapan dan ketepatan laporan masih rendah. Kondisi tersebut berdampak pada rendahnya kualitas data dan informasi yang dihasilkan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi sistem informasi kesehatan lingkungan di Kabupaten Adengan menggunakan model CIPP.

Metode: Jenis penelitian kualitatif dengan applied qualitative research methods. Evaluasi menggunakan model CIPP (Context, Input, Process dan Product). Teknik sampling yang digunakan purposive sampling. Informan sebanyak 16 orang antara lain Sanitarian (10 orang), Kepala Puskesmas (4 orang), Koordinator Kesehatan Lingkungan di Dinkes Kabupaten A (1 orang) dan Koordinator Sumber Daya Manusia Kesehatan di Dinkes Kaupaten A (1 orang). Teknik pengumpulan data melalui studi dokumentasi dan in-depth interview. Data yang telah terkumpul kemudian dianalisis melalui tahapan: reduksi data, penyajian data dan penarikan kesimpulan. Fokus analisis CIPP meliputi: Contect (latar belakang, tujuan dan analisis SWOT); Input (pemenuhan sumberdaya);  Process (pelaksanaan sistem informasi); serta Product (Capaian sistem informasi).

Hasil: Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa permasalahan sistem informasi kesehatan lingkungan di Kabupaten A antara lain: keterbatasan sanitarian, rangkap jabatan, aplikasi mengalami error/maintenance, keterbatasan alat pengolahan data, aplikasi belum terintegrasi dan belum memfasilitasi keseluruhan layanan kesehatan lingkungan serta lemahnya monitoring. Kelengkapan dan ketepatan waktu pelaporan masing-masing sebesar 47,5% dan 57,5%.

Simpulan: Sistem informasi kesehatan lingkungan di Kabupaten A ditemukan permasalahan yang berdampak pada rendahnya kualitas data dan informasi. Perlu pemenuhan kebutuhan sumbardaya, membangun aplikasi berbasis web secara terintegrasi serta memperkuat monitoring dengan melakukan validasi data/informasi dari puskesmas.

 

ABSTRACT

Title: Evaluation Of Environmental Health Information System  Using The CIPP Model

Background: The achievements of the environmental health information system in District A, including the completeness and accuacy of reports, are still low. This condition has an impact on the low quality of the data and information produced. This study aims to evaluate the environmental health information system in District A using the CIPP model 

Methods: A type of qualitative research with applied qualitative research methods. Evaluation uses the CIPP (Context, Input, Pocess and Product) model. The sampling technique used is purposive sampling. There were 16 informants, including Sanitarians (10 people), Head of Primary Health Centers (4 people), Environmental Health Coordinator at the District Health Office of A (1 person) and Health Human Resources Coordinator at the District Health Office of A (1 person). Data collection techniques through documentation studies and in-depth interviews. The data that has been collected is then analyzed through stages: data reduction, data presentation and conclusion drawn. The focus of the CIPP analysis includes: Contect (background, objectives and SWOT analysis); Input (fulfillment of resources); Process (implementation of information systems); and Product (Information system achievements).

Results: The results of the study showed that there were problems in the environmental health information system in District A ncluding: limited sanitation, dual positions, application experiencing errors/maintenance, limitations of data processing tools, applications that have not been integrated and have not facilitated all environmental health services and weak monitoring. The completeness and timeliness of reporting were 47.5% and 57.5%, respectively.

Conclusion: The environmental health information system in District A has several problems that have an impact on the low quality of data and information.. It is necessary to meet the needs of community resources, build an integrated web-based application and strengthen monitoring by validating data/information from Prmary Health Centers.

 

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download |  Turnitin
Turnitin
Subject
Type Turnitin
  Download (3MB)    Indexing metadata
 CTA
Copyrigh Transfer Agreement
Subject
Type CTA
  Download (22KB)    Indexing metadata
 ES
Etichal Statement
Subject
Type ES
  Download (62KB)    Indexing metadata
Keywords: Sistem Informasi; kesehatan lingkungan; Model CIPP

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Articles
Language : ID
Recent articles
Hubungan Perilaku Masyarakat dengan Kejadian Tuberkulosis di Kecamatan Panekan Kabupaten Magetan Analisis Penyediaan Air Minum Di Wilayah Kumuh Perkotaan Kota Padang The Analysis of the Impact of Petroleum Mining on the Environment and Community Economy in Wonocolo Village of Bojonegoro Regency Halaman Belakang Halaman Sampul More recent articles
Most cited articles
Faktor Yang Berhubungan Dengan Gejala Neurotoksik Akibat Paparan Pestisida Pada Petani Sayuran Di Kenagarian Alahan Panjang Kabupaten Solok Studi Kondisi Lingkungan Rumah dan Perilaku Masyarakat Sebagai Faktor Risiko Kejadian Filariasis di Kecamatan Buaran dan Tirto Kabupaten Pekalongan Faktor Lingkungan dan Perilaku yang Berpengaruh Terhadap Kejadian Filariasis Pada Daerah Endemis Filariasis di Kecamatan Maro Sebo Kabupaten Muaro Jambi Propinsi Jambi. Faktor-Faktor Yang Berhubungan Dengan Angka Kuman Dalam Air Produk Air Minum Isi Ulang di Pemalang Identifikasi Kualitas Air dan Beban Pencemaran Sungai Bedadung di Intake Instalasi Pengolahan Air PDAM Kabupaten Jember More cited articles
  1. Presiden RI. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 17 Tahun 2023 Tentang Kesehatan. Jakarta: Presiden Republik Indonesia; 2023
  2. Kemenkes RI. Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor 13 Tahun 2015 tentang Penyelenggaraan Kesehatan Lingkungan di Puskesmas. Jakarta: Kementerian Kesehatan RI; 2015
  3. Nuryanto, Ma’ruf F, Purnomo BC. Implementasi Target Layanan Sebagai Upaya Peningkatan Capaian Layanan Klinik Sanitasi. Buletin Keslingmas. 2024;43(1):26–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31983/keslingmas.v43i1.11300
  4. Janati A, Hosseiny M, Gouya MM. Communicable Disease Reporting Systems in the World : A Systematic Review Article. Iranian Journal of Public Health. 2015;44(11):1453–65. https://ijph.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ijph/article/view/5301
  5. Sari KP, Ardi K, Agusbybana F. Sistem Pengumpulan dan Pelaporan Penyakit Menular di Puskesmas: Literature Review. Media Publikasi Promosi Kesehatan Indonesia. 2023;6(5):860–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56338/mppki.v6i5.3307
  6. Chima T, Mkwinda E, Kumwenda S. The Need For Health Information Management Professionals In Malawi Health Facilities. Health Information Management Journal. 2024;53(1):6–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/18333583231180772
  7. Djasri H, Hardhantyo M, Nursetyo A, Rachela B, Yulianti A. Quality of National Disease Surveillance Reporting before and during COVID-19: A Mixed-Method Study in Indonesia. International Journal of Environmental and Public Health. 2023;19(5):1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18332/popmed/165754
  8. Egwar AA, Ssekibuule R, Nabukenya J. Status of Resources For Information Technology To Support Health Information Exchange In Resource-Constrained Settings. HEALTHINF 2020 - 13th International Conference Health Informatics, Proceedings; https://doi.org/10.5220/0008970004630471
  9. Part 13th International Joint Conference Biomedical Engeenering Systems and Technologies (BIOSTEC 2020). 2020;(5):463–471. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5220/0008970004630471
  10. Dinkes Kab. A. Laporan Layanan Kesehatan Lingkungan Dinkes Kab. A Tahun 2022. A: Dinas Kesehatan Kabupaten A; 2022
  11. Chioma Anthonia Okolo, Scholastica Ijeh, Jeremiah Olawumi Arowoogun, Adekunle Oyeyemi Adeniyi, Olufunke Omotayo. Reviewing the Impact of Health Information Technology on Healthcare Management Efficiency. International Medical Science Research Journal. 2024;4(4):420–440. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51594/imsrj.v4i4.1000
  12. Gunawan A. Pengantar Sistem Informasi Kesehatan. Cetakan I. Malang: PT. Literasi Nusantara Abadi Grup; 2023
  13. Winaryati E, Munsarif M, Mardiana, Suwahono. Model-Model Evaluasi Aplikasi Dan Kombinasinya. Cetakan 1. Nuhidioh S, editor. Yogyakarta: Penerbit KBM Indonesia; 2021
  14. Harahap N. Penelitiam Kualitatif. Cetakan Pe. Sazali H, editor. Medan: Wal Ashri Publising; 2020
  15. Cai C, Xiong S, Millett C, Xu J, Hone T. Health And Health System Impacts of China ’ s Comprehensive Primary Healthcare Reforms : a systematic review. Health Policy And Planning. 2023;38(9):1064–1078. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czad058
  16. Nuryanto N, Ma’aruf F, Purnomo BC. Analisis Kualitas Proses Layanan Kesehatan Lingkungan Dengan Pendekatan Quality Improvment Process (QIP). Jurnal Kesehatan Lingkungan Indonesia. 2024;23(2):215–25. DOI : https://doi.org/10.14710/jkli.23.2.215-225
  17. Lagiono L, Nuryanto N, Rudijanto H, Maulana MR, Ma’ruf F. Evaluasi Layanan Layanan Kesehatan Lingkungan Sebagai Intervensi Spesifik Untuk Mendukung Akselerasi Penurunan Stunting. Link. 2023;19(1):34–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31983/link.v19i1.9428
  18. Ritonga ZA, Mansuri I. Evaluasi Peaksanaan Program Sistem Pencatatan dan Pelaporan Terpadu Puskesmas (SP2TP) di Puskesmas Rantang. Jurnal Ilmu Perekam dan Informasi Kesehatan Imelda. 2017;2(2):292–306. https://media.neliti.com/media/ publications/299183-evaluasi-pelaksanaan-program-sistem-penc-057eb410 .pdf
  19. Haryanto B. Sistem Informasi Rekam Medis Berbasis Web (Studi Kasus : Klinik Gaga Medika). Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research. 2024;4(2):1976–1992
  20. Hasibuan R. Perencanaan dan Evaluasi Kesehatan Masyarakat. Cetakan 1. Nasrudin M, editor. Pekalongan: PT. Nasya Expanding Management; 2021
  21. Neelima S, Govindaraj M, Subramani DK, ALkhayyat A, Mohan DC. Factors Influencing Data Utilization and Performance of Health Management Information Systems: A Case Study. Indian Journal of Information Sources and Services. 2024;14(2):146–152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51983/ijiss-2024.14.2.21
  22. Chauhan H, S SU, Singh SK. Health Information and Its Crucial Role in Policy Formulation and Implementation. Journal of Health Management. 2021;23(1):54-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0972063421994957
  23. Carlof DM. Inovasi Teknologi dalam Manajemen Kesehatan: Pemanfaatan Sistem Informasi Kesehatan Elektronik di Rumah Sakit. Journal of Management and Social Sciences. 2023;2(2):50–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55606/jimas.v2i2.262
  24. Kamal S, Mardi Y, Regina R. Evaluasi Penerapan Sistem Informasi Khanza Menggunakan Metode HOT-FIT Di Rumah Sakit Tentara Reksodiwiryo Kota Padang. Jurnal Ilmu Perekam dan Informasi Kesehatan Imelda. 2024;9(1):1–11.DOI: https://doi.org/10.52943/jipiki.v9i1.1447
  25. Yamin K, Saimi S, Karjono K, Intan Gumilang Pratiwi. Analisis Implementasi Sistem Informasi Karantina Kesehatan (SINKARKES) di Kantor Kesehatan Pelabuhan Kelas II Mataram. Bima Nursing Journal. 2024;5(2):107–15
  26. Zain NS, Ulya N, Wasir R, Istanti ND. Leveraging Data to Improve Evidence-Based Decision Making in the Indonesian Health System. Afiasi: Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat. 2024;9(1):25–34. http://afiasi.unwir.ac.id.
  27. Kasambara A, Kumwenda S, Kalulu K, Lungu K, Beattie T, Masangwi S, et al. Assessment of Implementation of The Health Management Information System At The District Level In Southern Malawi. Malawi Medical Journal. 2017;29(3):240–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/mmj.v29i3.3
  28. Sugiyanto B, Matandung OM, Silvia S, Darurahmi V, Veranita M. Evaluation of HOT-FIT Method of Hospital Management Information Systems (SIMRS): Literature Review. Journal of Social and Economic Reseach. 2024;6(1):896–906. https://idm.or.id/JSER/index.php/ JSER.
  29. Iskandar C, Hartono B. Analysis of Information System Management Planning at the Riau Provincial Health Service Citra. Journal Healthcare Technology Medicine. 2024;10(1):264–274. https://jurnal.uui.ac.id/index.php/JHTM/article/view/3847/1880
  30. Rama A, Ambiyar A, Rizal F, Jalinus N, Waskito W, Wulansari RE. Konsep Model Evaluasi Context, Input, Process Dan Product (CIPP) di Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan. Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia. 2023;8(1):82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29210/30032976000
  31. Laily N, Azizah N, Setiawan MV. Pengelolaan Informasi Kesehatan Secara Terintegrasi untuk Memaksimalkan Layanan Kesehatan kepada Pasien di Rumah Sakit. Indonesian Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology. 2017;4(3):79–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15416/ijpst.v4i3
  32. Nigenda G, Serván-Mori E. Human resources for health and maternal mortality in Latin America and the Caribbean over the last three decades: a systemic-perspective reflections. International Journal Equity Health. 2024;23(1):1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-024-02154-y
  33. Hasibuan ID, Silalahi SA, Ramadhani AN. Analisis Manajemen SDM Kesehatan di Puskesmas Medan Johor. Jurnal Kesehatan Tambusai. 2024;5(1):1843–9
  34. Mwashighadi WJ, Maurice O, Veronica N, Wanjiru inyanjui M. Budget and Health Service Delivery in Country Goverments of Kenya. International Journal Social Science Managament and Enterpreneurship. 2024;8(1):517–29. https://sagepublishers.com/index.php/ijssme/ article/view/359/387
  35. Yeni G, Lita, Septien Asmarwiati. Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Program Pengendalian Hipertensi di Dinas Kesehatan Kabupaten Rokan Hulu Tahun 2022: Tantangan dan Upaya Meningkatkan Capaian. Ensklopedia of Journal. 2024;6(2):16–22
  36. Lubis I, Sihite AMH, Sianturi M. Pengaruh Standar Operasional Prosedur (SOP) Pengawasan, Dan Teknologi Informasi Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Pada Unit Outbond Di PT JNE Cabang Utama Medan. Journal Management and Social Science. 2024;2(1):134–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59031/jmsc.v2i1.360
  37. Setiawan K, Kuncoro G, Dewi R, Marliani T. Community Service Information System Training at TPMB Lilik Faiqoh. Community Engagement & Emergence Journal. 2024;5(1):107–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37385/ceej.v5i1.4298
  38. Putra ADA, Hidayatulloh A, Setyawardhana A, Kusumawati TIJ. Sistem Informasi Administrasi dan Data Rekam Medis Pasien Pada Klinik Soleh Ali Berbasis Web. Information System Development. 2020;5(2):37–41. https://ejournal-medan.uph.edu/isd/article/view/378
  39. Hendry D, Devina F, Wahyu O, Ruldeviani Y. Tantangan Data Quality pada Pelaporan Penyakit Menular : Studi Kasus Pelayanan Publik Kesehatan di Indonesia. Jurnal Teknologi Dan Sistem Informasi Bisnis. 2024;6(2):270–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47233/jteksis.v6i2.1215
  40. Pesik H, Lendo FB, Junaedy S. Pengguaan google Drive Untuk Laporan Bumdes Tunan Desa Talawaan Kec. Talawaan Ka. Minahasa Utara. Jurnal Syntax Admiration. 2024;5(1):56–64. https://doi.org/10.46799/jsa.v5i1.965
  41. Parada V, Fast L, Briody C, Wille C, Coninx R. Underestimating attacks: comparing two sources of publicly-available data about attacks on health care in 2017. Conflic Health. 2023;17(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-023-00498-w
  42. Dogan O. Process mining based on patient waitin time: an application in health processes. International Journal of Web Information Systems. 2023;18(5/6):240–254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWIS-02-2022-0027
  43. Arwani I, Akbar SR, Syauqy D, Prasetio BH, Brawijaya U, Korespondensi P. Pengembangan Sistem Informasi Puskesmas Terintegrasi Sebagai Upaya Peningatan Layanan Kesehatan Masyarakat di Kabupaten Malang. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Teknologi Informasi dan Informatika. 2022;1(1):22–8. https://dimasloka.ub.ac.id/index.php/dimasloka/article/view/12
  44. Wang J, Fu Y, Yang X. An Integrated System For Building Structural Health Monitoring And Early Warning Based On An Internet of Things Approach. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks. 2017;13(1):1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1550147716689101
  45. Bascom E, Casanova-perez R, Tobar K, Bedmutha MS, Ramaswamy H, Wood B. Designing Communication Feedback Systems To Reduce Healthcare Providers ’ Implicit Biases In Patient Encounters. In: ACM Journal. 2024. p. 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642756
  46. Lyon AR, Lewis CC. Designing Health Information Technologies for Uptake: Development and Implementation of Measurement Feedback Systems in Mental Health Service Delivery: Introduction to the Special Section. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. 2016;43(3):344–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-015-0704-3
  47. Aisyiah IK, Hasibuan RF, Husni L, Aini R. Peran Dukungan manajemen Rumah Sakit Terhadap Penerapan Pelaporan Indisen Keselamatan Pasien di Rumah Sakit. P Prepotif: Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat. 2024;8(April):690–700
  48. Syahputri RB, Haryanti R, Handayani S. Peran Manajer Dalam Implementasi Fungsi Manajemen di Unit Rekam Medis dan Informasi Kesehatan RSU PKU Muhammadiyah Prambanan. Motorik: Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan. 2024;19(1):7–14. https://doi.org/10.61902/motorik.v19i1.970
  49. Gulo TF, Hutahean M, Tobing AL. Analisis Kinerja Ombudsman Dalam Menangani Laporan Pengaduan Masyarakat ( Studi Kasus Kantor Ombudsman Perwakilan Provinsi Sumatera Utara ). Innovative: Journal Social Science Research. 2024;4(2):4805–4814. https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v4i2.9943
  50. Siregar AN, Nasution MIP. Upaya Dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Pengolahan Data. Jurnal Riset Ilmu Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan. 2024;2(1):90–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61132/maeswara.v2i1.579
  51. Chen H, Yu P, Hailey D, Cui T. Identification Of The Essential Components Of Quality In The Data Collection Process For Public Health Information Systems. Health Informatics Journal. 2020;26(1):664–82.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458219848622

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-10-31 08:57:13

No citation recorded.