DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jpki.19.1.24-41

Effectiveness of Audio-visual Education through Digital Media Platforms Regarding Quality of Life Amongst Breast Cancer Person

Astika Cahyarani  -  Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Indonesia
*Solikhah Solikhah orcid scopus publons  -  Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Indonesia
Sitti Nur Djannah  -  Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Promosi Kesehatan Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

Background: Improving the education system of patient-centered health information is particularly important for vulnerable populations. The magnitude of the attributable breast cancer burden is very essential to be a concern to developing a good management strategy. Improving the patient’s understanding of their conditions may enhance the quality of life following breast cancer. The study aimed to review the effectiveness of audio-visual education through digital media platforms to improve the quality of life among people with breast cancer.

Method: These 1643 articles from eight databases i.e., Scopus, PubMed, MEDLINE via EBSCO, the Cochran Library, Springer Link, Wiley Online Library, BioMed Central, and Sage Journals were searched by a combination of medical subject heading (MESH) term, and unique references were examined. All studies evaluating audio-visual education of women with breast cancer delivered by digital media platforms were included.

Results: The search yielded 14 articles with various digital media platforms, such as web-based, applications, e-mail, videoconference, YouTube, and WhatsApp. All studies reported improving quality of life, except one study using WhatsApp as the platform. Audio-visual interventions were variably effective in enhancing the quality of life of patients depending on their characteristics. Audio-visual interventions appear to be effective in improving quality of life amongst breast cancer person. Nevertheless, its effectiveness depends on the frequency and intensity of audio-visual delivery. Meanwhile, the contents of education materials must be adjusted to the administration method. Audio-visual modeling via digital platforms may facilitate improving quality of life and can be an important consideration in future health-education interventions.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: education; digital platform; audio-visual intervention; breast cancer

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Article
Language : EN
Recent articles
Knowledge and Access to Adolescent Reproductive Health Information in Indonesia Effectiveness of Audio-visual Education through Digital Media Platforms Regarding Quality of Life Amongst Breast Cancer Person Parental Interpersonal Communication Skills on Adolescent Reproductive Health More recent articles
Most cited articles
Perilaku Kepatuhan Perawat Melaksanakan SOP Terhadap Kejadian Keselamatan Pasien di Rumah Sakit X Kendari Socio-Cultural And Socio-Sexual Factors Influence The Premarital Sexual Behaviour of Javanese Youth In The Era of HIV/AIDS Praktik Perawatan Organ Genitalia Eksternal pada Anak Usia 10-11 Tahun yang Mengalami Menarche Dini di Sekolah Dasar Kota Semarang Pengetahuan Pendidik Sebaya Mempengaruhi Pemberian Informasi KRR di Kabupaten Kulon Progo Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Berpengaruh Terhadap Kemauan Masyarakat Menjadi Peserta JPKM Mandiri di Wilayah Kota Salatiga More cited articles
  1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2021;71(3):209–49
  2. Cronin KA, Scott S, Firth AU, Sung H, Henley SJ, Sherman RL, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, part 1: National cancer statistics. Cancer. 2022;(June):4251–84
  3. Beg S, Handa M, Shukla R, Rahman M, Almalki WH, Afzal O, et al. Wearable smart devices in cancer diagnosis and remote clinical trial monitoring: Transforming the healthcare applications. Drug Discovery Today. 2022;27(10)
  4. Moldavan AM, Edwards-Leis C, Murray J. Design and pedagogical implications of a digital learning platform to promote well-being in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2022;115
  5. Surantha N, Atmaja P, David, Wicaksono M. A Review of Wearable Internet-of-Things Device for Healthcare. Procedia Computer Science. 2021;179(2020):939–43
  6. Liu JK, Kaji AH, Roth KG, Hari DM, Yeh JJ, Dauphine C, et al. Determinants of Psychosocial Distress in Breast Cancer Patients at a Safety Net Hospital. Clinical Breast Cancer. 2022;22(1):43–8
  7. Lan B, Lv D, Yang M, Sun X, Zhang L, Ma F. Psychological distress and quality of life in Chinese early-stage breast cancer patients throughout chemotherapy. Journal of the National Cancer Center. 2022;2(3):155–61
  8. Luutonen S, Vahlberg T, Eloranta S, Hyväri H, Salminen E. Breast cancer patients receiving postoperative radiotherapy: Distress, depressive symptoms and unmet needs of psychosocial support. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2011;100(2):299–303
  9. Chan NC, Chow KM. A critical review: Effects of exercise and psychosocial interventions on the body image of breast cancer survivors. Nursing Open. 2022;(March):1–12
  10. Peng Y, Zhang K, Wang L, Peng Y, Liu Z, Liu L, et al. Effect of a telehealth-based exercise intervention on the physical activity of patients with breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing. 2022;9(12)
  11. Karimian Z, Zare R, Zarifsanaiey N, Salehi N. The effect of video-based multimedia training on knowledge, attitude, and performance in breast self-examination. BMC Women’s Health. 2022;22(1):1–14
  12. Mansour D, Nashwan A, Abu Rasheed H, Hararah M, Nassar H, Abu Abbas R, et al. Use of Social Media in Breast Cancer Awareness: GCC Countries’ Experience. Journal of Global Oncology. 2018;4(Supplement 2):30s–30s
  13. Plackett R, Kaushal A, Kassianos AP, Cross A, Lewins D, Sheringham J, et al. Use of Social Media to Promote Cancer Screening and Early Diagnosis: Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2020;22(11):1–13
  14. Tokosi TO, Fortuin J, Douglas TS. The Impact of mHealth interventions on breast cancer awareness and screening: Systematic review protocol. JMIR Research Protocols. 2017;6(12):1–8
  15. Agide FD, Sadeghi R, Garmaroudi G, Tigabu BM. A systematic review of health promotion interventions to increase breast cancer screening uptake: From the last 12 years. European Journal of Public Health. 2018;28(6):1149–55
  16. Wakefield MA, Loken B, Hornik RC. Use of mass media campaigns to change health behaviour. The Lancet. 2010;376(9748):1261–71
  17. Kim HJ, Kim SM, Shin H, Jang JS, Kim YI, Han DH. A Mobile Game for Patients With Breast Cancer for Chemotherapy Self-Management and Quality-of-Life Improvement: Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of medical Internet research. 2018;20(10):e273
  18. Ariza-Garcia A, Arroyo-Morales M, Lozano-Lozano M, Galiano-Castillo N, Postigo-Martin P, Cantarero-Villanueva I. A web-based exercise system (e-cuidatechemo) to counter the side effects of chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer: Randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2019;21(7):1–17
  19. Golzafarifard A, AllahBakhshi P, Loripoor M, Sayadi AR. Self-efficacy in Breast Self-examination and Satisfaction with Training in Face-toFace and Smartphone-Based Training Methods: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Iranian Quarterly Journal. 2022;15(3):4–17
  20. Haas JS, Giess CS, Harris KA, Ansolabehere J, Kaplan CP. Randomized Trial of Personalized Breast Density and Breast Cancer Risk Notification. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2019;34(4):591–7
  21. Nissen ER, O’Connor M, Kaldo V, Højris I, Borre M, Zachariae R, et al. Internet-delivered mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for anxiety and depression in cancer survivors: A randomized controlled trial. Psycho-Oncology. 2020;29(1):68–75
  22. Lleras de Frutos M, Medina JC, Vives J, Casellas-Grau A, Marzo JL, Borràs JM, et al. Video conference vs face-to-face group psychotherapy for distressed cancer survivors: A randomized controlled trial. Psycho-Oncology. 2020;29(12):1995–2003
  23. Dong X, Yi X, Gao D, Gao Z, Huang S, Chao M, et al. The effects of the combined exercise intervention based on internet and social media software (CEIBISMS) on quality of life, muscle strength and cardiorespiratory capacity in Chinese postoperative breast cancer patients:a randomized controlled trial. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2019;17(1):1–9
  24. Korkmaz S, Iyigun E, Tastan S. An Evaluation of the Influence of Web-Based Patient Education on the Anxiety and Life Quality of Patients Who Have Undergone Mammaplasty: a Randomized Controlled Study. Journal of Cancer Education. 2020;35(5):912–22
  25. Kasting ML, Conley CC, Hoogland AI, Scherr CL, Kim J, Thapa R, et al. A randomized controlled intervention to promote readiness to genetic counseling for breast cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncology. 2019;28(5):980–8
  26. Santoyo-Olsson J, Stewart AL, Samayoa C, Palomino H, Urias A, Gonzalez N, et al. Translating a stress management intervention for rural Latina breast cancer survivors: The Nuevo Amanecer-II. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(10):1–18
  27. Kim HJ, Kim SM, Shin H, Jang JS, Kim YI, Han DH. A Mobile Game for Patients With Breast Cancer for Chemotherapy Self-Management and Quality-of-Life Improvement: Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of medical Internet research. 2018;20(10):e273
  28. Rosen KD, Paniagua SM, Kazanis W, Jones S, Potter JS. Quality of life among women diagnosed with breast Cancer: A randomized waitlist controlled trial of commercially available mobile app-delivered mindfulness training. Psycho-Oncology. 2018;27(8):2023–30
  29. Gell NM, Dittus K, Caefer J, Martin A, Bae M, Patel K V. Remotely delivered exercise to older rural cancer survivors: a randomized controlled pilot trial. Journal of Cancer Survivorship. 2022;(0123456789)
  30. Peipert JD, Lad T, Khosla PG, Garcia SF, Hahn EA. A Low Literacy, Multimedia Health Information Technology Intervention to Enhance Patient-Centered Cancer Care in Safety Net Settings Increased Cancer Knowledge in a Randomized Controlled Trial. Cancer Control. 2021;28:1–12
  31. Cacioppo CN, Egleston BL, Fetzer D, Burke Sands C, Raza SA, Reddy Malleda N, et al. Randomized study of remote telehealth genetic services versus usual care in oncology practices without genetic counselors. Cancer Medicine. 2021;10(13):4532–41
  32. Tagliaferri L, Dinapoli L, Casà C, Colloca GF, Marazzi F, Cornacchione P, et al. Art and digital technologies to support resilience during the oncological journey: The Art4ART project. Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology. 2022;24(August):101–6
  33. Jalambadani Z, Borji A. Effectiveness of Mindfulness-Based Art Therapy on Healthy Quality of Life in Women with Breast Cancer. Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing. 2019;6(2):193–7
  34. O’Malley DM, Davis SN, Amare R, Sanabria B, Sullivan B, Devine KA, et al. User-Centered Development and Patient Acceptability Testing of a Health-Coaching Intervention to Enhance Cancer Survivorship Follow-up in Primary Care. Journal of Cancer Education. 2022;37(3):788–97
  35. Baniasadi H, kashani FL, Jamshidifar Z. Effectiveness of Mindfulness Training on Reduction of Distress of Patients Infected by Breast Cancer. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014;114:944–8
  36. Ormel HL, Schröder CP, van der Schoot GGF, Westerink NDL, van der Velden AWG, Poppema B, et al. Effects of supervised exercise during adjuvant endocrine therapy in overweight or obese patients with breast cancer: The I-MOVE study. Breast. 2021;58:138–46
  37. Bu S, Smith A ‘Ben,’ Janssen A, Donnelly C, Dadich A, Mackenzie LJ, et al. Optimising implementation of telehealth in oncology: A systematic review examining barriers and enablers using the RE-AIM planning and evaluation framework. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology. 2022;180(November):103869
  38. Arthur EK, Pisegna J, Oliveri JM, Aker H, Krok-Schoen JL. Older cancer survivors’ perspectives and use of telehealth in their cancer survivorship care in the United States: A ResearchMatch® sample. Journal of Geriatric Oncology. 2022;13(8):1223–9
  39. Siu AL. Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive services task force recommendation statement. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2016;164(4):279–96
  40. Peintinger F. National breast screening programs across Europe. Breast Care. 2019;14(6):354–8
  41. Marmot MG, Altman DG, Cameron DA, Dewar JA, Thompson SG, Wilcox M. The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: An independent review. British Journal of Cancer. 2013;108(11):2205–40
  42. Ponti A, Anttila A, Ronco G, Senore C. Cancer screening in the European Union (2017). European Commission. 2017
  43. Abdulkerim S, Nasır A, Parkinson T, Marais D, Altaha R, Shaban F. Enhancing higher education teaching and learning in northern Syria: Academic development needs of teaching staff at free Aleppo and Sham universities. International Journal of Educational Research Open. 2022;3(November 2021)
  44. Jauhiainen JS, Eyvazlu D, Junnila J, Virnes A. Digital divides,the Internet and social media uses among Afghans in Iran. Technology in Society. 2022;70(June):102057
  45. Willekens M, Siongers J, Lievens J. Social stratification and social media disengagement. The effect of economic, cultural and social capital on reasons for non-use of social media platforms. Poetics. 2022;95(December)

Last update:

  1. Allies not enemies—creating a more empathetic and uplifting patient experience through technology and art

    Luca Tagliaferri, Bruno Fionda, Calogero Casà, Patrizia Cornacchione, Sara Scalise, Silvia Chiesa, Elisa Marconi, Loredana Dinapoli, Beatrice Di Capua, Daniela Pia Rosaria Chieffo, Fabio Marazzi, Vincenzo Frascino, Giuseppe Ferdinando Colloca, Vincenzo Valentini, Francesco Miccichè, Maria Antonietta Gambacorta. Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, 2024. doi: 10.1007/s00066-024-02279-7

Last update: 2024-11-22 01:47:37

No citation recorded.